Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Similar documents
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure

Measure: Patient name. Referring or transitioning healthcare provider's name and office contact information (MIPS eligible clinician only) Procedures

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Advancing Care Information Performance Category Fact Sheet

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

HIE Success - Physician Education Series

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance

Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, , Telligen, Inc.

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.

March 28, Dear Dr. Yong:

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

MACRA Frequently Asked Questions

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Quality Payment Program Year 2: 2018 MIPS Participation. An Introductory Guide for CRNAs in 2018

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

MIPS Scoring: Explanation and Estimation 2/7/2017 and 2/10/2017

Table 1: MIPS Exemptions. Exemption Individual Determination Group Determination Treatment under MIPS Already Finalized EXEMPTIONS Low-Volume

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Copyright. Last updated: September 28, 2017 MicroMD EMR Objective Measure Calculations Manual: Performance Year 2017

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

EHR/Meaningful Use

2017 Transition Into Value Based Care

Advancing Care Information Measures

Agenda. Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS 9/9/2016. Steps to take to prepare for MIPS

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

Promoting Interoperability Measures

The MIPS Survival Guide

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: 2018 Performance Year

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

AAWC ALERT Call for Action from Physicians

Preparing for the 2018 EHR Medicaid Incentive Payment Program

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

Quality Data Model (QDM) Style Guide. QDM (version MAT) for Meaningful Use Stage 2

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM

during the EHR reporting period.

MACRA and the Quality Payment Program. Frequently Asked Questions Edition

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

Final Meaningful Use Stage 3 Requirements Released August 2018

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

MIPS eligibility lookup tool (available in Spring 2018):

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Quality Payment Program MIPS. Advanced APMs. Quality Payment Program

Virtual Group Participation Overview Fact Sheet

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

June 27, CMS 5517 P Merit-Based Incentive System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule

MACRA Quality Payment Program

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Quality Payment Program: The future of reimbursement

MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

December 19, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

The Healthcare Roundtable

May 7, Submitted electronically via:

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Fact Sheet

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

March Data Jam: Using Data to Prepare for the MACRA Quality Payment Program

Connecticut Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Flexibility Checklist for Eligible Professionals for Meaningful Use Last Revision: May 27, 2015

MACRA Quality Payment Program

Using Updox to Succeed with MIPS

Kate Goodrich, MD MHS. Director, Center for Clinical Standards & Quality. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) May 6, 2016

2017 Edition. MIPS Guide. The rule is in and Medicare physician payments are changing. What does that mean for you?

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

June 27, Dear Secretary Burwell and Acting Administrator Slavitt,

Steps toward Sustainability with the second year of the Quality Payment Program

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

MACRA Fall into Place. By Stephanie Cecchini, CPC, CEMC, CHISP, AAPC Fellow, AAPC MACRA Prof

The Quality Payment Program: Your Questions Answered

The Quality Payment Program: Overview & Roles and Responsibilities

Moving MACRA-MIPS Forward: Role by Role

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Transcription:

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period Objective: Measure: Measure ID: Health Information Exchange Clinical Information Reconciliation For at least one transition of care or referral received or patient encounter in which the MIPS eligible clinician has never before encountered the patient, the MIPS eligible clinician performs clinical information reconciliation. The MIPS eligible clinician must implement clinical information reconciliation for the following three clinical information sets: (1) Medication. Review of the patient s medication, including the name, dosage, frequency, and route of each medication. (2) Medication allergy. Review of the patient s known medication allergies. (3) Current Problem list. Review of the patient s current and active diagnoses. PI_HIE_3 Definition of Terms Transition of Care The movement of a patient from one setting of care (hospital, ambulatory primary care practice, ambulatory, specialty care practice, long-term care, home health, rehabilitation facility) to another. At a minimum this includes all transitions of care and referrals that are ordered by the MIPS eligible clinician. Referral Cases where one provider refers a patient to another, but the referring provider maintains his or her care of the patient as well. Current problem lists At a minimum a list of current and active diagnoses. Active/current medication list A list of medications to which a given patient has known allergies. 1

Allergy An exaggerated immune response or reaction to substances that are generally not harmful. Reporting Requirements NUMERATOR/DENOMINATOR NUMERATOR: The number of transitions of care or referrals in the denominator where the following three clinical information reconciliations were performed: medication list, medication allergy list, and current problem list. DENOMINATOR: The number of transitions of care or referrals during the performance period for which the MIPS eligible clinician was the recipient of the transition or referral or has never before encountered the patient. Scoring Information BASE SCORE/PERFORMANCE SCORE/BONUS SCORE Required for Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: Up to 10% Eligible for Bonus Score: One-time bonus of 10% for MIPS eligible clinicians and groups who report using 2015 Edition CEHRT exclusively for the 2018 performance period and submit only Promoting Interoperability measures Note: MIPS eligible clinicians must fulfill the requirements of base score measures to earn a base score in order to earn any score in the Promoting Interoperability performance category. In addition to the base score, MIPS eligible clinicians have the opportunity to earn additional credit through the submission of performance measures and a bonus measure and/or activity. Additional Information MIPS eligible clinicians can report the Promoting Interoperability objectives and measures if they have technology certified to the 2015 Edition, or a combination of technologies from the 2014 and 2015 Editions that support these measures. In CY 2018, a one-time bonus will be earned by MIPS eligible clinicians and groups who report using 2015 Edition certified electronic health record technology (CEHRT) exclusively and only submit Promoting Interoperability measures. Actions included in the numerator must occur within the performance period. 2

This measure is worth up to 10 percentage points towards the Promoting Interoperability performance category score. More information about Promoting Interoperability scoring is available on the QPP website. For the measure, only patients whose records are maintained using CEHRT must be included in the denominator for transitions of care. Apart from the three fields noted as required for the summary of care record (i.e., current problem list, current medication list, and current medication allergy list), in circumstances where there is no information available to populate one or more of the fields listed (because the MIPS eligible clinician does not record such information or because there is no information to record), the MIPS eligible clinician may leave the field(s) blank and still meet the measure. For the measure, the process may include both automated and manual reconciliation to allow the receiving MIPS eligible clinician to work with both the electronic data provided with any necessary review and to work directly with the patient to reconcile their health information. For the measure, if no update is necessary, the process of reconciliation may consist of simply verifying that fact or reviewing a record received on referral and determining that such information is merely duplicative of existing information in the patient record. Non-medical staff may conduct reconciliation under the direction of the MIPS eligible clinician so long as the clinician or other credentialed medical staff is responsible and accountable for review of the information and for the assessment of and action on any relevant CDS. When MIPS eligible clinicians choose to report as a group, data should be aggregated for all MIPS eligible clinicians under one Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). This includes those MIPS eligible clinicians who may qualify for reweighting such as a significant hardship exception, hospital or ASC-based status, or in a specialty which is not required to report data to the Promoting Interoperability performance category. If these MIPS eligible clinicians choose to report as a part of a group practice, they will be scored on the Promoting Interoperability performance category like all other MIPS eligible clinicians. Regulatory References For further discussion, please see the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) final rule: 81 FR 77229. In order to meet this objective and measure, MIPS eligible clinicians must use the capabilities and standards of CEHRT at 45 CFR 170.315 (b)(2) through (b)(3) and (a)(6) through (a)(8). Certification and Standards Criteria Below is the corresponding certification and standards criteria for electronic health record technology that supports achieving the meaningful use of this measure. 3

Below is the corresponding certification and standards criteria for electronic health record Certification Criteria* technology that supports achieving the meaningful use of this measure. 170.315(b)(2) Care Coordination (2) Clinical information reconciliation and incorporation (i) General requirements. Paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (iii) of this section must be completed based on the receipt of a transition of care/referral summary formatted in accordance with the standards adopted in 170.205(a)(3) and 170.205(a)(4) using the Continuity of Care Document, Referral Note, and (inpatient setting only) Discharge Summary document templates. (ii) Correct patient. Upon receipt of a transition of care/referral summary formatted according to the standards adopted 170.205(a)(3) and 170.205(a)(4), technology must be able to demonstrate that the transition of care/referral summary received can be properly matched to the correct patient. (iii) Reconciliation. Enable a user to reconcile the data that represent a patient's active medication list, medication allergy list, and problem list as follows. For each list type: (A) Simultaneously display (i.e., in a single view) the data from at least two sources in a manner that allows a user to view the data and their attributes, which must include, at a minimum, the source and last modification date. (B) Enable a user to create a single reconciled list of each of the following: Medications; medication allergies; and problems. (C) Enable a user to review and validate the accuracy of a final set of data. (D) Upon a user's confirmation, automatically update the list, and incorporate the following data expressed according to the specified standard(s): (1) Medications. At a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(d)(3); 4

(2) Medication allergies. At a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(d)(3); and 170.315(b)(3) Care Coordination 170.315(a)(6) Problem list 170.315(a)(7) Medication list 170.315(a)(8) Medication Allergy List (3) Problems. At a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(a)(4). (iv) System verification. Based on the data reconciled and incorporated, the technology must be able to create a file formatted according to the standard specified in 170.205(a)(4) using the Continuity of Care Document template. Enable a user to record, change, and access a patient's active problem list: (i) Ambulatory setting only. Over multiple encounters in accordance with, at a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(a)(4). (ii) Inpatient setting only. For the duration of an entire hospitalization in accordance with, at a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(a)(4) Enable a user to record, change, and access a patient's active medication list as well as medication history: (i) Ambulatory setting only. Over multiple encounters. (ii) Inpatient setting only. For the duration of an entire hospitalization. Enable a user to record, change, and access a patient's active medication allergy list as well as medication allergy history: (i) Ambulatory setting only. Over multiple encounters. (ii) Inpatient setting only. For the duration of an entire hospitalization. *Depending on the type of certification issued to the EHR technology, it will also have been certified to the certification criterion adopted at 45 CFR 170.314 (g)(1), (g)(2), or both, in order to assist in the calculation of this meaningful use measure. 5

Standards Criteria 170.202(a) Transport standards 170.202 (2)(b) Transport standards 170.202 (2)(c) Transport standards 170.205(a)(1) Patient Summary Record ONC Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport, Version 1.0 (incorporated by reference in 170.299). ONC Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport, Version 1.2 (incorporated by reference in 170.299). (b) Standard. ONC XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging Specification (incorporated by reference in 170.299). ONC Transport and Security Specification (incorporated by reference in 170.299). Health Level Seven Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) Release 2, Continuity of Care Document (CCD) (incorporated by reference in 170.299). Implementation specifications. The Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) Summary Documents Using HL7 CCD Component HITSP/C32 (incorporated by reference in 170.299). Additional certification and standards criteria may apply. Review the ONC 2015 Edition Final Rule for more information. 6