SACT REMARKS to the HIGHER CENTRE FOR NATIONAL DEFENCE STUDIES Madrid, 24 June 2014

Similar documents
Berlin, 18 March (24 min)

SACT s remarks to UN ambassadors and military advisors from NATO countries. New York City, 18 Apr 2018

SACT s KEYNOTE at. C2 COE Seminar. Norfolk, 05 July Sheraton Waterside Hotel. As delivered

Wales Summit Declaration

SACT s REMARKS to JFTC ALL HANDS

9. Guidance to the NATO Military Authorities from the Defence Planning Committee 1967

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

Smart Defence International Seminar - INCIPE Conference

SACT s remarks at the ACT 15 th Anniversary Flag Raising Ceremony Norfolk, 13 June 2018

The State Defence Concept Executive Summary

Strategic Landpower in NATO

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA. The State Defence Concept

THE MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF THE MARITIME (AS DELIVERED) 22 OCTOBER 2015 I. INTRO A. THANK YOU ALL FOR HAVING ME HERE TODAY, IT S A PRIVILEGE TO SPEAK

SA ARMY SEMINAR 21. The Revision of the South African Defence Review and International Trends in Force Design: Implications for the SA Army

The 8 th International Scientific Conference DEFENSE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE 21st CENTURY Braşov, November 14 th 2013

NATO s Special Meeting in Brussels Addressing Current Priorities and Restating Core Values

Wales Summit Declaration

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

Executing our Maritime Strategy

DEFENSE CAPABILITIES AND THE DEFENSE CAPABILITIES INITIATIVE

[Monsieur le Secrétaire Général, Mesdames et Messieurs les Ambassadeurs, Mesdames et Messieurs,

On 21 November, Ukraine

Strengthening partnerships: Nordic defence collaboration amid regional security concerns

ABOUT THE MILITARY COMMITTEE (MC)

PART V COMBATING NEW THREATS AND DEVELOPING NEW CAPABILITIES

Capability Solutions for Joint, Multinational, and Coalition Operations

To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.

ISPSW Strategy Series: Focus on Defense and International Security

Headline Goal approved by General Affairs and External Relations Council on 17 May 2004 endorsed by the European Council of 17 and 18 June 2004

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

NATO's Nuclear Forces in the New Security Environment

***** 5 July 2016 ***** 12:00- Opening of the Accreditation Office / Delivery of media passes at PGE National 18:00 Stadium, Warsaw

NOTE BY THE SECRETARY. to the NORTH ATLANTIC DEFENSE COMMITTEE THE STRATEGIC CONCEPT FOR THE DEFENCE OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC AREA

Reconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development

THE DEFENSE PLANNING SYSTEMS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS

China U.S. Strategic Stability

NATO MEASURES ON ISSUES RELATING TO THE LINKAGE BETWEEN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

Statement by. Brigadier General Otis G. Mannon (USAF) Deputy Director, Special Operations, J-3. Joint Staff. Before the 109 th Congress

European Parliament Nov 30, 2010

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

Spain-US Shared Interests: from Friendship to Partnership

PART III NATO S CIVILIAN AND MILITARY STRUCTURES CHAPTER 12

Supreme Allied Command Transformation

Section 3 Counter-piracy Operations

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond

Restructuring and Modernization of the Romanian Armed Forces for Euro-Atlantic Integration Capt.assist. Aurelian RAŢIU

Introduction. General Bernard W. Rogers, Follow-On Forces Attack: Myths lnd Realities, NATO Review, No. 6, December 1984, pp. 1-9.

5 June 2018 DOCUMENT C-M(2018)0025 (DNK-OVERVIEW) NATO DEFENCE PLANNING CAPABILITY REVIEW 2017/2018 DENMARK OVERVIEW

Strong. Secure. Engaged: Canada s New Defence Policy

Student Guide: Introduction to Army Foreign Disclosure and Contact Officers

The 16th Sustainment Brigade Sustains a Strong Europe

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

Italy s Nuclear Anniversary: Fake Reassurance For a King s Ransom

International Conference Smart Defence (Tiranë, 27 April 2012) The concept of Smart Defense (Intelligence) in the context of Kosovo

Americ a s Strategic Posture

Active Endeavour ATO. NATO naval operations

Moldova. NATO s essential purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of. Cooperation with the Republic of

NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES, FY 2005-

Why Japan Should Support No First Use

Expeditionary Force 21 Attributes

CRS Report for Congress

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

A European Net Assessment of the People s Liberation Army (Navy)

Interpreter Training in the Western Armed Forces. Dr Eleni Markou Imperial College London & University of Westminster

Planning and conducting modern military

National Defense University. Institute for National Strategic Studies

Standard Note: SN/IA/5788 Last updated: 2 December 2010 Author: Claire Taylor Section International Affairs and Defence Section

Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) first collaborative PESCO projects - Overview

11 July 2018 PR/CP(2018)074

NATO UNCLASSIFIED. 6 January 2016 MC 0472/1 (Final)

Russia News. Focus on a more operational partnership. issue 3. NATO-Russia Council (NRC) defence ministers meet informally in Berlin

***** 2 October 2018 (pre-ministerial day) *****

STATEMENT BY GENERAL RICHARD A. CODY VICE CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

IMPLEMENTATION POSSIBILITIES OF THE MILITARY OBSERVER TRAINING TO THE TRAINING SYSTEM FOR PEACETIME MILITARY ENGAGEMENT AND PEACE SUPPORT OPERATIONS

Enhancing Multinational Force Capability through Standardization and Interoperability

British Contingency Operations since 1945: Back to the Future. Dr Paul Latawski Department of War Studies

SEEKING A RESPONSIVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND STOCKPILE TRANSFORMATION. John R. Harvey National Nuclear Security Administration

ADMIRAL LAGHMARI ROYAL MOROCCAN NAVY INSPECTOR FIRST SESSION CHAIRMAN CLOSING SPEECH

Russia s New Conventional Capability

Evaluation of the European Reassurance Initiative (ERI)

America s Coast Guard. Commandant s Guiding Principles. U.S. Coast Guard

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Evolution of UN-NATO Post-Cold War Relations. Evolution of AU-NATO Relations Since 2005

It is now commonplace to hear or read about the urgent need for fresh thinking

Issue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (

Prepared Remarks for the Honorable Richard V. Spencer Secretary of the Navy Defense Science Board Arlington, VA 01 November 2017

I. Description of Operations Financed:

ROBUST NATO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Defence Policy Guidelines. Safeguarding National Interests Assuming International Responsibility Shaping Security Together

Dr Nata Menabde. Candidate for WHO Regional Director for Europe. Excellence for Health and Equity

SUSTAIN THE MISSION. SECURE THE FUTURE. STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

GAO. OVERSEAS PRESENCE More Data and Analysis Needed to Determine Whether Cost-Effective Alternatives Exist. Report to Congressional Committees

Concept. of the. NATO Security Force Assistance Centre of Excellence

A Call to the Future

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

Transcription:

25/06/2014 09:06 1 SACT REMARKS to the HIGHER CENTRE FOR NATIONAL DEFENCE STUDIES Madrid, 24 June 2014 Ladies and gentlemen, admirals, generals, officers I am pleased to be able to contribute today to one of the most important investments Spain can make in the training of its new generation of military and civilian leaders and those of others countries represented in this audience. As a matter of fact, with a long standing tradition, Spain set an example within the Alliance in many others ways. In pursuing the NATO mission in Afghanistan and in participating in NATO's maritime operations - Active Endeavour and Ocean Shield. Very much in line with its motto plus ultra further beyond Spain is fully committed to the development of expeditionary forces capable of conducting the full range of NATO missions. And Spain contributes actively to the new NATO Command Structure, through the new Combined Air Operations Centre Torrejón, and supports the Alliance collective defence mission, particularly with the ROTA Naval Base hosting a sea based component of the alliance s ant-missile shield. It is truly invigorating to see that, Spain continues to invest in its people, in tne Alliance to prepare its future. This investment is of crucial importance not only for Spain, but also for the NATO, for its cohesion, for its efficiency and its credibility. Today, as Catalonia is celebrating Saint John the Baptist, I certainly need to keep in mind one of his famous quotes; Take even more care of the education of the young people entrusted to you than if they were the children of a king. of a new king in such a case, if I may say. For the short period of time that I have with you, I do not mean to educate you but rather more modestly to advocate a simple yet important message that the Atlantic Alliance which has just celebrated its 65th anniversary, can be proud of its past, and that, more than ever, it is as relevant to the whole of its members nations as far as defending their sovereignty and ensuring the effectiveness of the whole of their forces, as it was when it was founded and that it will remain an essential part of all our Allies defence policies *** 1-[A successful past] Born in the wake of 2 world wars, the Alliance has become one of the most successful military stories of the modern age. It has contributed to deterring a major conflict in Europe for almost 7 decades, and has brought peace, security, freedom and prosperity to nearly 900 million people within its now 28 nations. 25/06/2014 09:06 1

25/06/2014 09:06 2 After the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, some were prompted to question its relevance, since the existential threat seemed to have disappeared. In fact, NATO has constantly and successfully answered to the call of post-cold War crises when it was asked by the international community in Bosnia, in Kosovo, in Afghanistan or Libya, and thus demonstrated its military relevance. During the last two decades, the Alliance s forces have been stretched from one crisis to the other; they have learned to cope with asymmetry, with counter-insurgency, and with short notice, long range, enduring deployments. If the Atlantic Alliance has been so successful, it is not by chance, it is mainly because NATO is not a coalition of circumstantial choices. It is also because it succeeded in adapting and transforming, when some were predicting that it would become militarily irrelevant. From its inception, the strength of NATO has been to bring together diverse national and regional security concerns and strategic interests, bound by our shared and common values for freedom, democracy, rules of law, the very glue of our Alliance. NATO has been able to cope with the diversity of national interests and of threat perceptions, from the East to the West, from the North to the South, with different regional perspectives, and with the many political and social culture changes. Recently, NATO s foreign ministers stressed their support to what we call the open door policy, while setting demanding criteria for future new members. Obviously, the Alliance presents a great power of attraction that exemplifies its successes. One important milestone that marked the successful transformation of the Alliance was the Lisbon summit in 2010, where the 28 Heads of states and Government committed to a broadly encompassing and demanding Strategic Concept which assigns three main missions to NATO: Collective Defence, the corner stone of the Alliance; Crisis Management and Cooperative Security, which stresses partnership as the best way to promote defence and security cooperation with non NATO nations. 2-[NATO is taking on its responsibilities ] With such a broad spectrum of possible tasks ensuing from these three missions, NATO s potential perimeter of action is higher than ever. One of our major challenges is obviously to find the right balance of effort to answer to this demanding Strategic Concept, which reflects the reality of today, and importantly, ensures that addressing effectively the challenges of our future geostrategic environment is anticipated. The reality is that NATO forces are still committed in Kosovo, in the Mediterranean Sea, off the coast of Africa, and in Afghanistan. The transition in Afghanistan from offensive operations to training, assisting and advising Afghan security Forces is planned for the end of this year. It is very well advanced, thanks to the commitment of the Afghans themselves and to the leadership of NATOs military commanders. Despite the pessimistic forecast of some, Afghan elections are already considered by many as a success. And we are working 25/06/2014 09:06 2

25/06/2014 09:06 3 hard to prepare the future Resolute Support Mission, while encouraging obviously a quick solution to current political impasse by a new elected Afghan government. That leads me to another reality; the crisis situation at the eastern borders of our Alliance. First and foremost, I would like to stress that Ukraine, while not a member of NATO, has been a very close and reliable partner Nation for many years, despite internal political changes. Ukrainian forces have been deployed with us in Afghanistan, involved in many NATO exercises and even in the NATO Response Force and our best wish today is to be able to carry forward this fruitful partnership. As it is known by most of you, the NATO military commanders have been working since the beginning of this crisis to propose sensible and responsible reassurance measures to our Eastern Allies, to improve NATO prevention and deterrence posture, while avoiding any kind of military escalation, or any potential exploitation through a thoroughly crafted communication campaign, as we have seen for weeks in Russian speaking media. Among those reassurance measures, I can mention the reinforcement of Air policing in the Baltic States, the increase of NATO situational awareness with NATO AWACS flights, the deployment of NATO maritime elements in the Baltic sea, as well as the pre-positioning in the Mediterranean, close to the Black sea and, I must stress, in full respect with existing international treaty as the Montreux Convention on the Black Sea. You must be well aware for instance that Spain contributes to achieve these reassurance measures in supporting four US ships within the European Phased adaptive Approach of the BMD. Some bi-lateral measures have also been decided, such as the training of US Army companies with Eastern Allies Land forces. As a concrete demonstration of solidarity, many NATO countries have decided to commit forces in the scope of collective contribution to deterrence and reassurance measures. As far as ACT is concerned and in accordance with ACT s responsibility to ensure that Allied Command Operations has the right capabilities fit for purpose and available to conduct its tasks, ACT is working on reinforcing the NATO s program of exercises, in order to enhance NATO forces preparation and responsiveness to address any potential threat to an Ally. Obviously the most powerful reassurance measures for Allies are rooted in the Alliance s collective defence and also in NATO's deterrence that relies first and foremost on its nuclear status, reaffirmed two years ago in Chicago. Therefore the renovation of the NATO s airborne nuclear weapons remains for us a key project. But we mustn't forget that our collective defence still relies on credible conventional forces, well equipped and well prepared and the ability to meet new threats, such as Ballistic Missiles, and Cyber. 25/06/2014 09:06 3

25/06/2014 09:06 4 In summary, NATO is doing its job in deterring and preventing a further extension of the crisis within the borders of NATO, and it s doing it very sensibly in both a responsible and resolute manner. 3[ while preparing the future] You certainly know Miguel de Cervantes famous saying; Forewarned, forearmed; to be prepared is half the victory, But, Forewarned, forearmed for what? As we look into the 21st century geostrategic environment, we see clearly the interconnection and interdependency of Nations, international organizations, private sector, and individuals. On the one hand, the traditional borders are still essential to define defence and security strategies, but on the other hand we have as well to develop a coherent and prospective approach to the freedom of access and the security of our global commons, our shared spaces of life for international communication, exchanges, trade, on the seas, in the airspace, in space, and more and more in cyber space. In sum, our ability to address those key challenges will be a key factor for NATO s future, which will rely first and foremost on credible, relevant, military capabilities. Preparing for the victory means maintaining NATO s military relevance in this afore context. This will require two strands of efforts: First that Allies keep investing in their defence; And second that the Alliance is able to capitalize on its invaluable operational experience, on the vast amount of lessons learned, and is able to reinvest for its people, in their education, training and exercises. Regarding the first point,-defence investment- it is obvious that, when the economy underperforms, defence budgets are primary targets for cuts, despite the fact that we all also know that defence is a long-term investment and that major budget reductions produce their effects in the long run. This is why, in planning for the decade to come, we have to make realistic financial assumptions and take a permanent cost-to-value assessment approach. In contrast, there is an impressive defence effort in many 21st century power nations outside of NATO, in Asia, in the Middle East, in Russia, which cannot be ignored when assessing the global future geostrategic balance. It emphasizes, the need for what I would call a better responsibility, a better task sharing between European and non-european Allies in NATO as well as between European Allies. As far as European countries are concerned, fewer and fewer nations are able to achieve the 2 percent of GDP ratio devoted to their defence budgets. The last European Council on defence stressed the need for a more coordinated and ambitious approach within the EU. The success of this endeavour will also be absolutely crucial for NATO. 25/06/2014 09:06 4

25/06/2014 09:06 5 Defining the capabilities we will need in the future up to 10 or 20 years from now requires a real effort to anticipate and to agree on a shared vision of this future. In ACT, as part of our prospective studies, we have already identified some military trends that must be taken into account when re-structuring and re-equipping the Allied Armed Forces. Among them, I could mention the need to reinforce our strategic awareness capabilities, as shown by the Ukraine crisis for instance, with drones and improve information sharing the Joint Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance (JISR). We must as well foster a greater adaptability in our weapon systems and we must retain sufficiently robust, resilient and highly interoperable forces. We need as well to leverage technology and innovation considering the exponential pace of technological progress which has created a Law of Accelerating Returns, as described by Raymond Kurzweil, American director of engineering at Google. Indeed, in our modern environment we must be able to rapidly and smartly exploit and adapt to existing and emerging technologies such as autonomous systems, nanotechnologies, distributed IT solutions - cloud computing -, new energy production and storage (and many others), for our potential opponents will likely not miss the opportunity. I must also mention standardization; which is from my perspective, one of the most powerful enabling factors of a smarter capability development. I think then, that we must learn to work much closer, more effectively with industry, with University, and with Think Tanks to anticipate the impact of new models, of new sociology and of new technologies on military capabilities. As a summary of these considerations on equipment perspectives, I would say that we need to better master the trinity of cost, time, and effectiveness. We must do this, through a balanced and innovative approach and with interoperability in mind. Upstream optimization is a must to develop smarter requirements but I do think also that effective, pragmatic, efficient innovation offers us solutions to tackle the cost, time and effectiveness challenges I have just depicted. This is why I put so much emphasis on developing innovation in Allied Command Transformation. Turning now to my second mentioned strand of effort - the education, training and exercises, it is of vital importance that, the Alliance preserves its high level of operational expertise and availability of forces. This requirement will be addressed by the Connected Forces Initiative-CFI. With CFI, we have developed an exercise programme which will allow us to test the operational level of the new NATO Command Structure as well as the NATO Force Structure which has now an essential role to play to support our streamlined new NCS, but also the headquarters and forces supplied by nations. Particular emphasis will be put on the NATO Response Force (NRF) which remains the focus of the Alliance s efforts on ensuring the swift availability and the interoperability of our forces. Our Connected Forces project is both ambitious and realistic; among many planned training activities counting 150 exercises in 2014 and including 50 national exercises offered by nations to NATO, we will, in particular, organize a high-intensity crisis management exercise in November 2015, here in Spain and in Italy and Portugal. It will be a three level-strategic, operational, tactical Command Post 25/06/2014 09:06 5

25/06/2014 09:06 6 Exercise in a form of Computer Assisted exercise and Livex. This provides me the opportunity to stress my deep appreciation for Spain, as well as Portugal and Italy, full commitment to the preparation of this major NATO Exercise, Trident Juncture 2015. As far as scenarios for NATO exercises are concerned, we also intend to develop very realistic scenarios that take account new threats, but also the diversity of the Alliance s geostrategic environment in areas like Cyber Defence and Ballistic Missile Defence. These scenarios must also address the challenge of ensuring that the full spectrum of the functional as well as the joint training requirements is met. This is one of the tasks of the Joint Warfare Center in Stavanger, Norway, one of my subordinate commands, besides the Joint Force Training Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland which focuses on the tactical preparation of NATO forces deploying to Afghanistan and the Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Center in Monsanto, Portugal. Spain is deeply involved in CFI through the organisation, implementation and participation to this programme of exercises in 2014 and has planned to continue to make a significant contribution over the next three years. This kind of deliberate commitment to NATO main initiatives is essential for their success and is acknowledged by those who have to implement them throughout ACT and ACO as extremely valuable. I have just mentioned the realism as a key feature for CFI. Certainly, if the Alliance wants to be realistic, it must also take into account the role of its partners in the future. After twenty years, Partners have gained a very special place for NATO. Now, it is our responsibility to take forward this joint enterprise, in building upon the lessons we learned in operations. We must engage in new cooperation, for our mutual benefit, to be able to take on new challenges together. And Interoperability is certainly the domain where this cooperation can be, must be, enhanced, as it is in fact the essence of any cooperation. One positive effect of ISAF is that our forces today are more capable, experienced and interoperable than ever. Our challenge is now to be able to maintain this very high level of interoperability, in the context of possible lower operational tempo post-2014 lets see. For this purpose, we need to maximize the existing tools that are offered to to foster interoperability in the fields of capability development, training and assistance. The cost for developing and procuring capabilities is increasing and might even become a deterrent to the transformation of forces. Smart Defense, Multinational projects can help to mitigate this risk and better prepare the future. But, interest of multinational projects is wider that the issue of costs. They offer as well a large room for improving doctrine, training, logistics and the overall readiness. 25/06/2014 09:06 6

25/06/2014 09:06 7 This context, within agreed decisions and procedures, calls for an expanded participation of Partners in the CFI implementation Plan. Although, this powerful initiative has been provided to Allies in priority, is meant also to bring opportunities to Partners in all its components. Within the broad context of execution of CFI, it is therefore important that Partners seize the opportunity to connect with Allies. The most strategic partnership for NATO is certainly the one it shares with the European Union. Today 22 European nations are members of the two organizations and many Non- NATO EU countries enjoy a very close partnership with NATO (Sweden, Finland, Austria). There is a clear interdependency between NATO and EU that we strive to capitalize on in developing coherent capabilities and multinational projects, you have heard maybe about Smart Defence or Pooling and Sharing. EU and NATO are part of the same peace and security equation and they must complement, reinforce each other, and which strengthens our Transatlantic relationship. [Closing] My command in Norfolk is the architect of NATO military transformation, a process through which prospective analysis, innovation, research and technology, experimentation, training and education are developed in a proactive manner. If I had to assess, in my position, all immediate to long-term efforts that are implemented by the Alliance to train and exercise its forces, to develop its capabilities, to strengthen its military links with partners, in short to transform itself for facing the security challenges on the 21 st century, I would say that we are well on track. I am confident that the NATO s summit will provide a similar appraisal. It will also likely stress that underpinning our common endeavours and ambitions are our common values. These values are essential to the Alliance s cohesion and the preservation of consensus. These values justify the price to be paid to ensure peace and collective security. These values guide the transformation process and are necessary to the definition of a proper balance of responsibilities and duties. These values will allow the Alliance to further the development of capabilities in vital areas such as Cyber Defence, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. And finally these values will guide the current debate on how to best reinforce our defence capabilities in areas which might threaten our collective security, and our stability. This is why, within transformation, I believe it is essential we discuss the best way to encourage the values which unite us. My very last words will be words of encouragement for the challenging times ahead of you. In a couple of days, you will be ready to fully contribute in building and inspiring the innovative and versatile forces that will be essential to the future security of all our nations, Allies and partners. It will be your responsibility particularly because you have been sent to this course to pursue the Alliance s effort in maintaining an efficient strategy. A lot will rest on your shoulders, but the greater the challenges, the greater the success. You must have faith in yourself and in your Allies and partners good luck. 25/06/2014 09:06 7