DCMC PARTNERS. Alternative Procedures for Permanent Work (428) In Puerto Rico March 29, 2018

Similar documents
Averting a Second Disaster: Leading Financial Oversight Practices in Mitigation and Disaster Grant Programs ASFPM 2016 June 14, 2016

HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM. Federal Emergency Management Agency

North Carolina Department of Public Safety Division of Emergency Management

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Comprehensive Disaster Recovery, Financial and Grant Management Support, and Pre-Disaster Cost Recovery Planning Services

FINANCING THE FLOOD. FEMA Public Assistance (PA) and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs (HMGP) Facilitator: Corey Thomas Thompson Consulting Services

Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Clayton French FEMA-4350-DR-MS. Public Assistance Applicant Briefing. December 7, 2017

Hazard Mitigation & Grant Workshop. San Mateo County Hazard Mitigation Plan April 25, 2018

Insurance & Federal Claims Services (IFCS)

FEMA Public Assistance (PA) Grant Program

FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Presentation. I. HMGP Overview II. III. IV. Application Review Process Post Obligation Information Common Errors

Hurricane Matthew October 10, 2016 Categories A & B

Implementing the Pilot Program for Debris Removal

FEMA Grant Program Comparison

Lessons Learned from Prior Reports on Disaster-related Procurement and Contracting

Maximizing Hazard Mitigation Grant Funds for Post Irma Recovery. Florida Hospital Association. Thursday, February 22, 2018 WELCOME!

2017 Chester County. Municipal Stormwater Summit. Hazard Mitigation Planning, Actions and Funding. - State Perspective -

Company Profile Phillips & Jordan, Inc. Key Markets

FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Rebuilding Texas after Hurricane Harvey Operational Plan

CHAPTER 1. Chapter 1 Introduction Mobile County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. 1.1 Background. 1.2 Authority

Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Program. Marcie Stone Recovery Division Deputy Director FEMA Region IX August 23, 2016

Hazard Mitigation Assistance

Infrastructure Projects: Case Studies and Strategies for Funding. 1 NYC Office of Management and Budget

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

CDR Overview. The Texas General Land Office Community Development and Revitalization Division (GLO-CDR)

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS DISASTER RECOVERY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL #2018-ODS001 Project Management for Comprehensive Disaster Recovery

STAFFORD ACT BUILDING STRONG

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

Recovery, Mitigation and Standards (RMS) May 2017

Recovery, Mitigation and Standards (RMS) May 2017

The LSU Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan and Disaster Science 101 at Baton Rouge Community College

What is MITIGATION? An action that reduces or eliminates long-term risk to people and property from natural hazards and their effects.

STATE OF LOUISIANA ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN FOR PUBLIC ASSISTANCE Governor s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness

Emergency Support Function 14. Community Recovery and Mitigation

Office of Inspector General Audit Tips for FEMA Public Assistance Grant Recipients and Subrecipients

MITIGATION Break-Out

Tribal Declarations Pilot

FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM State Project/Program: N.C. MITIGATION

Applying for Hazard Mitigation Grants

EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION (ESF) 3 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CITY OF PORT LAVACA

Hurricane Harvey s Fiscal Impact on State Agencies PRESENTED TO HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF

Managing Your Grant Projects Online - TDEM's Grant Management System

Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Program

#NLCU. Lessons Learned from Crisis Leadership

Mississippi Development Authority. Katrina Supplemental CDBG Funds. For. Hancock County Long Term Recovery CDBG Disaster Recovery Program

Performance and Financial Monitoring and Reporting

Proposal for Comprehensive Disaster Recovery, Financial and Grant Management Support, and Pre- Disaster Cost Recovery Planning Services

CDBG-DR Basics: Key Steps for Management and Implementation

Chapter 14 Emergency Projects

This appendix provides the following Federal and State Regulations related to the Hazard Mitigation Planning process.

[ CDBG-DR & FEMA Key Personnel ] Nearly 400 combined years of experience in disaster recovery

APPENDIX J: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Administrative Plan

Overview of Disaster Response and Recovery Operations. April 24, 2012 Earl Sharp Operations Division

Hazard Mitigation Assistance Programs

Florida Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG DR) Hurricane Irma Unmet Needs Assessment

Bureaucratic Challenges to Hurricane Recovery in Puerto Rico. Scott Aaronson Vice President, Security and Preparedness Edison Electric Institute

Federal Resources for Disaster Response & Recovery

Averting a second disaster: avoiding grant deobligation

METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE- DAVIDSON COUNTY. ACTION PLAN FOR DISASTER RECOVERY Amendment Two

RETAIL FUEL STATION ENERGY RESILIENCY PROGRAM PROGRAM GUIDELINES. (revised) December 2014

HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE (HMA) GRANTS DR-4214-HMGP FY-2015-PDM / FY-2015-FMA

Community Recovery. Pat Forbes Louisiana Office of Community Development

Subrecipient Monitoring Under 2 CFR 200. Kris Rhodes, MS Director, Higher Education Practice

West Virginia CDBG DR Action Plan COMMUNITY BRIEFING APRIL 4, 2017 & APRIL 5, 2017

Uniform Guidance Subpart D Administrative Requirements. Why This Session Is Needed. Lesson Overview & Module Objectives

Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Funding. During the 2004 hurricane season, four major hurricanes devastated many areas of

HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE (HMA) GRANTS

Mississippi Development Authority. Katrina Supplemental CDBG Funds. For. Hancock County Long Term Recovery CDBG Disaster Recovery Program

Updated Hurricane Harvey s Fiscal Impact on State Agencies PRESENTED TO SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF

MAXIMUS Higher Education Practice

EMAC Overview. June 20, 2007

Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Developing Hazard Resilient Communities February 29, 2012

Emergency Support Function #3 Public Works and Engineering Annex. ESF Coordinator: Support Agencies:

All Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Agencies, Counties and Municipalities. By Direction of:

CHAPTER 20: DISASTER RECOVERY (CDBG-DR)

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE FUNDING

FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Application for Seismic Retrofit of Live Oak Community Center

CDBG National Disaster Resilience. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Grants Management

Florida Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG DR) Hurricane Irma

FRANKLIN AYETIN ATTORNEY ADVISOR FEMA PROCUREMENT DISASTER ASSISTANCE TEAM (PDAT)

FEMA Public & Individual Assistance Programs

Mississippi Development Authority. Katrina Supplemental CDBG Funds. For. Hancock County Long Term Recovery CDBG Disaster Recovery Program

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT- DISASTER RECOVERY ORIENTATION WEBINAR PRESENTED BY: HEATHER MARTIN

UNDERSTANDING PHA OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE NEW UNIFORM RULE ON ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES AND AUDITS: WHAT S NEW AND WHAT S NOT

Mississippi Emergency Support Function #14 Long Term Recovery Annex

RECOVERY FUNCTION. Division of Emergency Management

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 19 Public Transportation. (a) Purpose. Title 49 U.S.C. 5329, authorizes the

Public Works Officers Institute League of California Cities Disaster Recovery Procurement Challenges


Florida Housing Coalition Hurricane Irma Member Update Webinar March 23, 2018 Sponsored by Fannie Mae

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Emergency Relief Funding and Emergency Docket

Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery. Charles Craig. Voluntary Agency Liaison DHS FEMA

HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP) State Project/Program: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM

HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP) State Project/Program: DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

TEXAS MITIGATION PROJECTS

Daily Operations Briefing. Tuesday, December 12, :30 a.m. EST

Transcription:

Alternative Procedures for Permanent Work (428) In Puerto Rico March 29, 2018 DCMC Partners

Overview The President signed Alternative Procedures (Section 428 of the Stafford Act) into law in January of 2013, three months after Hurricane Sandy. Alternative Procedures are available for Debris Removal (Category A) and Permanent Work (Categories C-G). For DR 4339, Alternative Procedures for Debris Removal were not implemented. Alternative Procedures do not change the basic eligibility rules for Permanent Work (with a few exceptions) under Section 406 (Categories C-G). 2

Congressional Purpose of Alternative Procedures for Permanent Work 1. Reduce costs to the federal government in providing assistance. 2. Increase the flexibility in the administration of assistance. 3. Expedite the provision of assistance. 4. Provide financial incentives for timely and costeffective completion of projects. Stafford Act section 428(c) 3

What is 428 Normally? For permanent work, the Alternate Procedures involves the Subgrecipient agreeing to a fixed estimate for a specific subgrant. The Subrecipient is responsible for developing estimates and submitting them to FEMA for review and acceptance. Once FEMA accepts the estimates, an expert panel is convened (determined by FEMA, but most commonly the USACE) to review cost estimates and approve a final amount. It allows funding recipients to utilize the money for FEMAeligible work without any penalty if an alternate or improved project is constructed 4

What is 428 Normally? (Cont.) Multiple projects may be consolidated into a single fixed-cost subgrant, allowing greater flexibility on what is to eventually be built back. Any excess funds may be utilized for hazard mitigation or for activities that will enhance the ability to implement the PA program in the future. The Subrecipient is responsible for any and all costs above the agreed-upon fixed estimate. Work must still comply with environmental and historic preservation. In addition, the funding will be reduced based on actual or anticipated insurance proceeds, as appropriate. Section 406 Hazard Mitigation funds may be included in the fixed estimated grant amount. 5

Regular 428: Benefits and Risk of Alternative Procedures for Permanent Work Benefits Risk Subrecipients have an established budget for their recovery. Elimination of the 10% or 25% reduction for alternate projects (when facility function is not restored). Consolidation of projects. Use of excess funds for mitigation or planning. Flexibility in the use of funds. Greater opportunities for 406 mitigation funding (potentially). FEMA validates subrecipient engineering estimates, which become the basis of fixed cost subawards Subrecipient is responsible for overruns. 6

Differences Between National and Puerto Rico 428 Implementation National (Version 3) Puerto Rico (DR 4339) Participation Voluntary Mandatory per the FRN Cost Estimating Project Formulation Timeline Subrecipient s engineer develops, FEMA validates. The Subrecipient, Recipient, and FEMA collaborate. Will use methodologies developed by the Center of Excellence. Ultimately FEMA will determine the cost estimate. 12 months from declaration 18 months from the publication of the guide Expert Panel USACE To be determined, but panel will be agreedupon between FEMA and Puerto Rico, and will including local engineering expertise If No Agreement at End of Project Formulation Approach to 406 Mitigation for Improved/Alternate Projects Critical Services and Pre- Disaster Damage Revert to standard practices of closing out based on actual eligible project costs. Hazard mitigation funding under 406 can be retained on a case-by-case basis with flexibility in quantifying benefits. N/A Subrecipient must accept FEMA s cost estimate or decision of the Expert Panel. Subrecipient proposed Hazard Mitigation Proposals (HMPs) will be evaluated for technical feasibility and cost effectiveness. HMPs must be developed within project formulation timeline. Only one change to the HMP SOW allowed by FEMA. Without regard to pre-disaster damage for critical services provision, details of implementation are pending. 7

Damage Descriptions and Dimensions (DDD) Scope of Work (SOW) Resolving Disagreements Facilitated Discussion (Internal JFO Dispute Resolution Process) All other determinations besides cost estimates Appeals Cost Estimates Only Expert Panel 8

Mitigation 406 Mitigation Fully explore 406 Mitigation for every permanent work project. For in-kind restoration with same basic size/capacity, standard approach to 406 mitigation. For improved, alternate, or other projects in which there is a departure from restoring the pre-disaster design and/or capacity of the facility, HMPs will be developed based on the solution proposed by the Subrecipient, and BCA calculated per the forward-looking HMP. All HMPs must be developed and approved within the 18-month project formulation period. FEMA is allowing only one change to the HMP SOW, which has to occur within the 18-month project formulation period. Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (404) No changes to the program, which remains a separate program from PA. The FRN requires HMGP to be prioritized toward the protecting federal investments in Puerto Rico s public infrastructure. 9

Sector-Based Solutions Decision Point: Unified Solutions prioritized to receive PA funding by key partners based on eligibility, Governor s recovery priorities, desired speed of execution, and availability of other funding Unified Solutions Identified Decision Point Prioritized Solution Solutions and Funding Sources Finalized Total Fixed Cost Estimate FCE $ No change in SOW Subaward + PR $ + 404 $ + Other Federal $ + Private Sector $ Solutions Realized Solution Prioritized Solution FCE $ Change to Improved / Alternate Project Revise SOW and FCE* Subaward + PR $ + 404 $ + Other Federal $ + Private Sector $ Solution Prioritized Solution FCE $ FCE $ FCE $ FCE $ Can include FCEs from other SRs per agreement Combine into Improved / Alternate Project Revise SOW and FCE* Subaward + PR $ + 404 $ + Other Federal $ + Private Sector $ Solution *FCE revisions only for changes to 406 mitigation and insurance as described in PAAP Guide for Permanent Work in Puerto Rico FCE = Fixed Cost Estimate; 404 = Hazard Mitigation; SR = Subrecipient; PR = Puerto Rico (Recipient)

A/E Services Architectural and Engineering (A/E) Services FEMA will provide eligible funding for A/E services for permanent work projects, when design services are necessary for the eligible reconstruction. A/E fees will be considered direct project costs and may be calculated as a CEF factor. Subrecipients should consider requesting advanced FEMA funding if design work is needed prior to or during project formulation. 11

Direct Administrative Costs Direct Administrative Costs (DAC) DAC funding is for site inspections, project formulation, reviewing subawards, requesting project funding, and similar. On March 26, 2018, FEMA notified the Recipient that a 5% allowance for DAC will be provided to Subrecipients. This will be administered as a 4% + 1% (retained incentive for closeout), though FEMA s written guidance is pending for DR 4339. 12

Grants Management Alternative Procedures projects (PA C-G) will be subject to the standard grants management processes and requirements. Title 2 CFR requirements remain applicable (procurement, records retention, cost documentation, etc.) Subrecipients will obtain funding and be responsible for reports per standard processes. FEMA has developed a Public Assistance Alternative Procedures (Section 428) Internal Controls Considerations and Assessment Plan which outlines FEMA s pre-award and postaward requirements, reviews, and controls. 13