Subj: NAVY ACCELERATED ACQUISITION FOR THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT, DEMONSTRATION, AND FIELDING OF CAPABILITIES

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC


Subj: TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND SECURITY ASSISTANCE REVIEW BOARD

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

SECNAVINST E CH-1 DUSN (M) 15 Sep 17

OPNAVINST E N97 7 Nov 2017

OPNAVINST A N Jan 2015

Subj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEFENSE STANDARDIZATION PROGRAM IN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Subj: SCOPE, LIMITATIONS, CERTIFICATION, UTILIZATION, AND PHYSICIAN OVERSIGHT OF CERTIFIED ATHLETIC TRAINERS

OPNAVINST B N98 4 Jun 2018

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

a. Reference (a) and the provisions of this instruction will be implemented by OPNAV and all activities under the command of CNO.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

Subj: ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO MEDICAL DEPARTMENT SPECIALTY LEADERS

OPNAVINST C N43 18 Jun Subj: NAVY EXPEDITIONARY TABLE OF ALLOWANCE AND ADVANCED BASE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT POLICY

OPNAVINST N2/N6 19 Aug 2014

Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways

Subj: NAVY HEADQUARTERS CRISIS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND ORGANIZATION. a. The clarification of Navy service watch cell and conditions I and II watch.

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Subj: MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF LEATHER FLIGHT JACKETS

Subj: ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF VOLUNTARY SERVICES IN THE NAVY

Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways

OPNAVINST B N Jun Ref: (a) DoD Directive of 29 January 2004 (b) SECNAVINST A

OPNAVINST D N96 23 Jan Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE READINESS AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURING PROGRAM

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Subj: RELEASE OF COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MATERIAL TO U.S. INDUSTRIAL FIRMS UNDER CONTRACT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell

Subj: CERTIFICATION OF THE AVIATION CAPABILITY OF SHIPS OPERATING AIRCRAFT

Subj: NAVY NUCLEAR COMMAND, CONTROL, AND COMMUNICATIONS EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE

OPNAVINST H N12 3 Sep 2015

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FOREIGN AREA OFFICER PROGRAMS

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

OPNAVINST E DNS-H 18 June 2012

3. Scope and Applicability. This instruction is applicable to BUPERS commands and subordinate activities.

1. Purpose. To define and implement a comprehensive approach to the conduct of force structure assessments.

Subj: SECRETARY OF THE NAVY SAFETY EXCELLENCE AWARDS

OPNAVINST G N09P 17 Jul Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE BOARD OF INSPECTION AND SURVEY

OPNAVINST E N98 29 May 2018

PROCEDURES FOR NAVY PARTICIPATION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPACE TEST PROGRAM

Subj: UNIFORM MATERIEL MOVEMENT AND ISSUE PRIORITY SYSTEM

Subj: OVERSIGHT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM

Subj: APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS IN THE CHAPLAIN CORPS OF THE NAVY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

Ref: (a) DoD Instruction of 22 November 2011 (b) NTTP 1-15M (c) OPNAVINST H (d) CNO memo 1000 Ser N1/ of 24 Feb 09

OPNAVINST N46 21 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

PARTICIPATION IN THE GOVERNMENT-INDUSTRY DATA EXCHANGE PROGRAM (GIDEP)

Encl: (1) Definitions (2) Example of Fiscal Year Bed Capacity Report (3) Example of Fiscal Year Staffed and Unstaffed Beds by Category Report

OPNAVINST F N09D 2 JUL 2010

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

Subj: CREDIT FOR PRIOR NON-FEDERAL WORK EXPERIENCE AND CERTAIN MILITARY SERVICE FOR DETERMINING LEAVE ACCRUAL RATE

SECNAVINST F DNS Dec 2005

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE NAVAL SAFETY CENTER

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

Subj: CIVILIAN TIME AND ATTENDANCE FOR THE BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL READINESS

OPNAVINST C N4 31 May 2012

Subj: MORALE, WELFARE, AND RECREATION AND NAVY EXCHANGE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

(c) DoD Instruction of 11 March 2014 (d) SECNAVINST D (e) CNO WASHINGTON DC Z Apr 11 (NAVADMIN 124/11)

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014

POLICIES CONCERNING THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

OPNAVINST A N13 6 Dec Subj: LATERAL TRANSFER AND REDESIGNATION OF OFFICERS IN THE NAVY

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NUCLEAR WEAPON INCIDENT RESPONSE MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL 1322 PATTERSON AVENUE SE, SUITE 3000 WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC

OPNAVINST N Dec Subj: NAVY SPECIAL WARFARE OFFICER CONTINUATION PAY (SPECWAROCP) PROGRAM

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

OPNAVINST D N4 24 May (a) OPNAV M , Naval Ordnance Management Policy Manual

SECNAVINST E OUSN 17 May 12 SECNAV INSTRUCTION E. From: Secretary of the Navy

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY UNITED STATES NAVY BAND 617 WARRINGTON AVE., SE WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC

1. Purpose. To implement the guidance set forth in references (a) through (e) by:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE

Subj: NAVY RESPONSIBILITIES REGARDING UNDOCUMENTED HUMAN REMAINS

1. Purpose. To prescribe policy and publish guidance governing Department of the Navy (DON) support to the Defense Attache System ( DAS).

CHANGES TO THE NAVY DIRECTIVES PROGRAM FOR ECHELON 2 DIRECTIVES CONTROL POINTS AND MANAGERS

OPNAVINST C N2/N6 31 Mar Subj: UNITED STATES NAVAL COOPERATION AND GUIDANCE FOR SHIPPING

Subj: ACCOUNTABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY PROPERTY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Subj: DEFENSE CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE PERSONNEL SYSTEM (DCIPS)

Subj: PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING PUBLIC AFFAIRS SUPPORT

OPNAVINST D N09F May 20, Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF NAVAL SAFETY CENTER (NSC)

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MONITORING OF NAVY TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS

Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SENIOR GOVERNANCE COUNCILS

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

NAVAL AVIATION SURVIVAL TRAINING PROGRAM DEVICES QUALITY ASSURANCE AND REVALIDATION POLICY

D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y

NAVAL SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS POLICY AND COORDINATION

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5000.53 N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5000.53 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY ACCELERATED ACQUISITION FOR THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT, DEMONSTRATION, AND FIELDING OF CAPABILITIES Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 5000.42 (b) CJCSI 3170.01I (c) JCIDS Manual, Manual for the Operation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), 12 February 2015 (d) DoD Directive 5000.71 of 24 August 2012 (e) DoD Instruction 5000.02 of 7 January 2015 (f) SECNAVINST 5000.2E Encl: (1) Accelerated Acquisition (AA) Process 1. Purpose. To implement the accelerated acquisition (AA) policies contained in reference (a) in order to deliver mission critical warfighting capabilities more rapidly than traditional acquisition processes. 2. Discussion a. The provisions of this instruction are consistent with existing directives that address rapid requirements, resourcing, and acquisition policies, as outlined in references (b) through (f). AA processes, as outlined in enclosure (1), provide the Navy the agility to more rapidly respond to validated urgent operational needs (UON), joint urgent operational needs (JUON), or joint emergent operational needs (JEON). In addition, these processes will be used for other needs assessed by the Navy that require immediate initiation and accelerated fielding to mitigate current threats, to offset future threats, or to leverage advances in technology. b. AA processes leverage two different paths: Rapid Prototyping Experimentation and Demonstration (RPED) projects and Maritime Accelerated Capability Office (MACO) programs to address high priority needs. RPED projects are preferred when a suitable material solution cannot be readily identified, and where experimentation, prototyping and demonstration efforts can inform the development of potential solutions and any subsequent acquisition strategy. MACO is the preferred path when a known solution or program of record is available to deliver an appropriate material solution to the validated need, and that program can be accelerated by receiving funding priority and incentivizing schedule as part of the acquisition strategy.

3. Scope and Applicability. This instruction applies to all U.S. Navy organizations performing or engaging in any activity related to the AA paths. This instruction does not supersede or modify the assignment of responsibilities in SECNAVINST 5430.7R. 4. Responsibilities a. Per reference (a), the executive oversight body for making AA decisions is the AA Board of Directors (AA BoD), which is comprised of the Chief of Naval Operations, the Commandant of the Marine Corps (as required), the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition, and, as applicable, the Defense Acquisition Executive. The AA BoD will review and oversee AA policies, processes, programs, and projects. b. Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems (CNO N9) will: (1) in consultation with Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (DASN) for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), recommend the appropriate AA path to the AA BoD; (2) track implementation of reference (a) and this instruction; (3) maintain a record of all approved AA decisions and track execution through final disposition; (4) record and disseminate the minutes and decisions of AA BoD meetings; (5) coordinate updates to the process and any other items or issues requiring AA BoD approval; and (6) serve as the RPED execution lead and manage the RPED process. 5. Records Management. Records created as a result of this instruction, regardless of media and format, must be managed per Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) Manual 5210.1 of January 2012. 6. Review and Effective Date. Per OPNAVINST 5215.17A, CNO N9 will review this instruction annually on the anniversary of its effective date to ensure applicability, currency, and consistency with Federal, Department of Defense (DoD), SECNAV, and Navy policy and 2

statutory authority using OPNAV 5215/40 Review of Instruction. This instruction will automatically expire 5 years after its effective date unless reissued or canceled prior to the 5-year anniversary date, or an extension has been granted. J. M. RICHARDSON Releasability and distribution: This instruction is cleared for public release and is available electronically only via the Department of the Navy Issuances Web site, http://doni.documentservices.dla.mil/ 3

ACCELERATED ACQUISITION (AA) PROCESS OPNAVINST 5000.53 1. General. The AA process enables rapid development, demonstration, and fielding of capability to the fleet. At all times, requirements officers, acquisition community members, and other key stakeholders should pursue opportunities that provide capability to the warfighter in the most effective and efficient manner possible. 2. AA Process. The process consists of four phases: (1) need request, validation, and candidate options; (2) assessment and funding decisions; (3) execution and evaluation; and (4) disposition. a. The AA process begins with the arrival of an operational need to the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) staff (e.g., UONs, JUONs, JEONs, other operational needs statements). In all cases, the requirement or capability is forwarded to CNO N9 for consideration. b. In coordination with DASN (RDT&E), CNO N9 will rapidly assemble an assessment team that will report, within 30 calendar days, whether there are known candidate options to meet the need. Assessment team members may include fleet representatives, resource sponsors, acquisition community representatives, member(s) of the Naval Research and Development Establishment, Office of the Secretary of Defense representatives, federally funded research and development centers, and academic institutions. c. This team s assessment will be presented by CNO N9 to the AA BoD and include an acquisition strategy recommendation, which could be designated as an RPED project or MACO program, a tailored program of record, or an alternative path. d. For those urgent needs for which a suitable materiel solution cannot be readily identified, or to seize a technological opportunity, designation as an RPED is the preferred path. In this case, CNO N9, in conjunction with DASN (RDT&E), will engage with the Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy and DoD laboratories, and industry, to inform research and form an evaluation team to assess potential solutions. CNO N9 and DASN (RDT&E) will report their recommendations within 90 days to the AA BoD. e. For those urgent needs for which there are existing materiel solutions, designation as a MACO program is the preferred path. MACO program leadership will pursue options to accelerate acquisition timelines. CNO N9 and DASN (RDT&E) will report their recommendations within 60 days to the AA BoD. f. The AA BoD will meet every quarter for a review of new AA proposals and to review the status of existing RPED and MACO programs. Enclosure (1)

g. When a new RPED project or MACO program is approved, a designation memorandum will be signed and forwarded to the resource sponsors and Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Integration of Capabilities and Resources (CNO N8) to identify funding to support development, demonstration, fielding and sustainment. h. Program or project execution and reporting will be completed per reference (a), enclosure (2), paragraph 4. A requirements or user representative will be co-located with industry when and where appropriate. Approved programs and projects are expected to demonstrate agreed upon capability in the agreed upon time period determined by the AA BoD. The team will be empowered to make appropriate decisions to maintain acceleration of the program. i. An RPED project or MACO program will operate under RPED or MACO designation until the need has been adequately met or an AA BoD disposition dictates otherwise. Disposition decisions will be documented by CNO N9 via decision memorandum. 2 Enclosure (1)