CITY OF ANN ARBOR ECONOMIC COLLABORATIVE TASK FORCE REPORT

Similar documents
CREATING 21ST CENTURY COMMUNITIES MAKING THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR PLACE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

City of Ypsilanti Economic Development Action Plan Presented to City Council: June 2014

Economic Development Subsidy Report Pursuant to Government Code Section 53083

METHODOLOGY - Scope of Work

BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS

City of Portsmouth Economic Development Commission 2011 Action Plan

Economic Development and Employment Element

DEALING WITH BLIGHTED AND FORECLOSED PROPERTIES

City of Edina, Minnesota GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner

MassWorks Infrastructure Program (MassWorks)


2011 Community Revitalization Programs

E-J Industrial Spine BOA Nomination Study

City of Tacoma Community & Economic Development Department Business Plan: Prosperity on Purpose for the City of Destiny*

Community Benefits Plan

Building our future, together. Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update November 12, 2013

Neighborhood Revitalization State Revitalization Programs FY2017

MEDC Strategic Plan Overview. October 26, 2011

7/23/2013. Downtown Greenville s Success. Downtown Greenville s Success

Dane County Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Goals & Objectives HED Work Group July 7, 2006

League Task Force on the Next Generation of Economic Development Tools Background Report: Community Development Corporations April 12, 2012

Re: Use of San Jose Business Modernization Tax (Measure G) Revenues

Neighborhood Revitalization. Fiscal Year 2017 State Revitalization Programs Application. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: Friday, July 15, 2016 at 3:00 p.m.

City of Albany Industrial Development Agency (CAIDA)

Shockoe Economic Revitalization Strategy

Job Creation Bonus (JCB) Program Guidelines & Application. City of Titusville Downtown Community Redevelopment Agency

PRIME OSU CAMPUS RETAIL SPACE FOR LEASE

GEORGETOWN DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

City of Palo Alto (ID # 4425) Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report

City Plan Commission Work Session

May 22, Pamela Bailey-Campbell. Vice President - North America Infrastructure Consultancy Jacobs Engineering, Inc.

BUTTE COUNTY REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY UPDATE

ARLINGTON programs and incentives

APA/PAW 2013 Joint Awards Program Submittal

Chapter 4: Local Economy and Market Strategies

Nassau Hub Innovation District: Transforming the Nassau Hub Biotech Park into a Competitive, 21 st Century Innovation District.

Anticipate future needs. Get the big stuff right (avoid paying 3x s-install, undo, re-install)

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

New York University Campus Plan for Designation of Tax- Free NY Area

IT S NICE TO MEET YOU.

HEMPSTEAD LIVABLE CENTERS STUDY VALUES WORKSHOP

Case: Building on Economic Assets in Akron, Ohio after the Decline of the Tire Industry 1

Union County Community Improvement Corporation Investment Portfolio

First & Main A Blueprint for Prosperity in America s Local Communities

REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FORUMS

Objective 1. Research current housing issues in Avon to gain a deeper understanding of the housing market Type: Program Priority: 1 Cost: Medium

Financing Strategies to Encourage Transit Oriented Development Rail~Volution 2009

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

Draft CRA Plan Amendment. Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board September 23, CRA Plan Amendment

Executive Summary for McCordsville: Mount Comfort Corridor Development Study. January Prepared by Thomas P. Miller & Associates

Ontario s Entrepreneurship Network Strategy Review and Renewal AMO meeting Tuesday, February 19, 2013

County Commissioners Association of Ohio

Incentives in Michigan An Introduction to the Community Revitalization and Business Development Programs

Local Economy Directions Paper

Wayne State University s Office of Economic Development

2015 Project Success Current Project Pipeline Willow Run Redevelopment Business Development Services

+! % / 0/ 1 2, 2 2, 3 1 ",, 4 +! % # ! 2, $

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

Request for Developer Qualifications-John Deere Commons Development Opportunity

SILVERTHORNE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX A - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION

Façade Improvement Program

Westside TAD Neighborhoods Strategic Implementation Plan for the neighborhoods of Vine City and English Avenue. Summary

USF Board of Trustees Finance & Audit Workgroup October 10, 2005

634 NORTH PARK AVENUE

NEIGHBORHOOD BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Business Plan Diversity & Inclusion Forum

Dupont Diebold Economic Development Area Plan

BUILDING MARKHAM S FUTURE TOGETHER. Summary of Public Engagement & Research

New York Main Street Program & New York Main Street Technical Assistance RESOURCE GUIDE

Future Trends & Themes Summary. Presented to Executive Steering Committee: April 12, 2017

Summary of Workshop #2 Downtown South Neighborhood Improvement District Plan City of Orlando

The Vaughan Advantage

Appendix Tactics and Metrics from State Agencies and Organizations

223 W Wisconsin Ave. P.O. Box 131 Tomahawk, WI Operating Plan For the Tomahawk Downtown Business Improvement District 2019

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY

FY BUDGET BY PROGRAM

City of Bartow Community Redevelopment Agency

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN JAPAN JETRO TOKYO SEMINAR MARCH 2018

A GROWTH PLAN FOR JENA, LOuISIANA Adopted JAnuAry 26, MAKING IT HAPPEN Making it Happen

By April 2017, Board adopts desired vision as an early outcome of the small area plan process.

MEDC Impacts in Plainwell

City of Terrace Economic Development Strategy

Proposed Policy Agenda January 20, 2015

Tampa, Florida 10/9/11 10/14/11

Crowdfunding as a Placemaking and Community Revitalization Tool

Chapter 9: Economic Development

Requests for Proposals CITY OF ANN ARBOR. Development of City-Owned Property RFP - No. 743

City of Stockton. Legislation Text APPROVE NEW STOREFRONT BEAUTIFICATION MICRO GRANT PROGRAM FOR EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES

EMERGING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

Table 1. Summary of Recommended Implementation Strategies

SHASTA EDC BUSINESS PLAN

Everett Wallace, James Cavallo, Norman Peterson, and Mary Nelson. March, 1997

Requests for Proposals CITY OF ANN ARBOR. Development of City-Owned Property RFP - No. 743

DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAMS

DRAFT METRO TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES POLICY I. POLICY STATEMENT

Crown Corporation. Business Plan. for the fiscal year Waterfront Development Corporation

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

Request for Qualifications

Transcription:

CITY OF ANN ARBOR ECONOMIC COLLABORATIVE TASK FORCE REPORT Background Ann Arbor City Council has determined that economic health is one of its key priority areas. Economic sustainability and growth create a virtuous cycle which benefits everyone. Encouraging a diverse and healthy business sector supports job growth which helps stabilize and build the local tax base. A strong tax base enables the City to provide its citizens with police, fire, parks, safe drinking water and a number of other important public services. These services are essential to a high quality of life, which is important to attracting and retaining talent needed by area businesses. The Economic Development Collaborative Task Force On May 20, 2013 City Council created the Economic Development Collaborative Task Force and invited the Ann Arbor Downtown Development Authority and Ann Arbor SPARK to be its partners. The Task Force was given a six-month period within which it would examine its member entities' respective core values, priorities and activities regarding economic development and identify operations that may be duplicative, resources including funding and opportunities for collaboration. The Task Force was slated to expire on December 31, 2013 at which time it would present issues and recommendation(s) to City Council. This report summarizes key findings from the Task Force. Earlier in 2013, SPARK had approved a 5-year strategic plan, and this became a valuable tool with which the Task Force members could focus its discussions. Over the past months Task Force members worked to find areas of convergence with the shared goal of encouraging a prosperous, diverse, resilient local economy that creates jobs, retains and attracts talent, and supports business expansion and (re)location. Economic Health Considerations Ann Arbor is becoming well-known as an emerging tech center, but its economy also includes a diverse mix of other business types, including retail, restaurant, and services, as well as a very strong nonprofit sector including education, health care, and the arts. It was noted that key factors in the City s future growth and sustainability must include attracting qualified talent and retaining 4-year college graduates, creating an even more robust transportation system, and encouraging a larger number and variety of housing options attractive at all income levels. Other important topic areas included: Redeveloping existing commercial, retail, and office properties in a way that balances the need for density while respecting the character of adjacent neighborhoods. Using tools such as economic incentives and the sale of City property to accomplish community goals. Encouraging a predictable development process. Developing targeted and coordinated strategies to encourage a sustainable local economy, affordable housing, and transportation. 1 P a g e

Core Responsibilities The City, DDA and SPARK share the goal of community prosperity, and each entity has its own responsibilities that overlap somewhat in geography. The Task Force finds that economic development programs are best actualized through a commitment to coordination and regular communication. Ann Arbor Downtown Development Authority Since its creation in 1982, the DDA has been a catalyst behind the revitalization and renewal of downtown Ann Arbor. The DDA work includes taking on large transformative construction projects, maintenance and repair projects, managing the public parking system, and grants for downtown transportation, affordable housing, and energy saving. The DDA has two sources of funds: TIF revenues generated from some of the new taxes from new downtown buildings, and public parking revenues. The DDA District encompasses all or part of 67 city blocks, or approximately 271 acres in the heart of the city, of which approximately 39% has the potential to be redeveloped. Ann Arbor SPARK SPARK works to advance economic prosperity by promoting the region as a desired place for business expansion and location, including identifying and meeting the needs of businesses at every stage, from those that are wellestablished to those working to successfully commercialize innovations. SPARK s budget includes operating funds provided by a number of public, university, and private sources, as well as Michigan Pre-Seed Capital and Microloan funds. City of Ann Arbor The City contributes to economic prosperity and health through several mechanisms. It has policy leadership related to its regulatory responsibilities, investment capacity within the restrictions of its various revenue sources, and coordination influence related to its varied component units and its role as the primary publicly elected body of the community. The City is responsible for the regulatory framework for planning and development, investing in infrastructure improvements, supporting affordable/workforce housing, leveraging economic incentives to promote growth, optimizing the use of city owned land, and through its LDFA/Smartzone support entrepreneurial education, networking, and provide business acceleration and incubation services. Project Opportunities In the near-term, the Task Force recommends that the City, DDA, and SPARK continue existing programs and take on new strategic projects with the goal to continue the 2 P a g e

shared focus highlighted by the Economic Collaborative Taskforce. Examples of recommended projects could include: Recommended City Projects: The City is underway with a MEDC Redevelopment Readiness Program review, and upon certification, Ann Arbor sites will be marketed by the MEDC and Ann Arbor will become a priority for MEDC and MSHDA funding. The City should be encouraged to explore and potentially pursue other similar programs with the goal of conveying its vision for the future and its interest in working with the private sector to achieve that vision. Technology infrastructure is essential for companies to compete globally and for communities to attract the necessary talent. The City and SPARK should continue their work to develop a proposal for high-speed fiber that would accelerate both commercial and residential internet speeds. The City should continue its focus on strengthening the attractiveness of its signature corridors and gateways into the City. This could include: State Street: City Council s adoption of the State Street Corridor Plan provides policy direction with which this business corridor and its research park could be redeveloped. Washtenaw: The City should continue to participate in the multi-jurisdictional Reimagine Washtenaw program, with the goal of increasing the economic vibrancy of this corridor. North Main Street: City Council recently approved the North Main Street Task Force report, and the City should now pursue recommendations, including exploring revising the zoning on North Main Street with the goal to spur development and improve property values. The City should develop a plan to market and sell surplus city-owned properties, including S. Ashley/W. William (Kline) lot, S. Main/E. William (Palio) lot, Library Lane, and 415 W. Washington using as direction the recommendations in the Downtown Plan, Non-Motorized Plan, Connecting William Street Plan, PROS Plan, and 2013 Downtown Park and Open Space Plan. Recommended DDA Projects The DDA will implement streetscape projects to enhance the downtown s sense of place, improve walkability, encourage commercial and residential vibrancy, and encourage private investment. Improvements to the right of way along South University, William Street, and North Fifth Avenue will be considered upon completion of the Street Framework Plan in late 2014/early 2015. The DDA anticipates replacing the primary stair tower and elevator at the 4th and William Parking Structure. This infrastructure improvement would be done in support of Main Street area vitality. Additionally, the first floor of the parking garage along 4 th Avenue could potentially be built out to provide business incubator space and activate the sidewalk. 3 P a g e

The DDA will continue with its annual sidewalk maintenance program. The DDA will work to improve transportation choices by exploring programs such as the restoration of a downtown circulator bus, adding more electric vehicle charging units, and repairing crosswalks to enhance walkability. The DDA will continue with market analysis activities including exploring the potential to collect pedestrian count data to encourage business development, commercial leasing, and marketing the needs of downtown businesses. The DDA will explore the establishment of an ambassador program as part of an overall downtown marketing effort and to promote a positive and safe perception of downtown. Recommended SPARK Projects SPARK may explore partnering with the Ann Arbor/Ypsilanti Smartzone LDFA to create additional space in Ann Arbor for incubating early stage companies. SPARK is encouraged to assist LDFA in its exploration of a potential boundary expansion as a means to support increased resources for startup formation and support for the expansion of existing businesses SPARK is encouraged to continue its work to develop evaluation criteria by which to measure the impact of economic development in our community and region It is recommended that SPARK work with the City to find ways to encourage the development of appropriate office, research and development space, especially Class A space, in downtown and along signature Ann Arbor corridors. This is essential to attracting headquarters and IT companies. SPARK will help market the city-owned downtown sites. Conclusions and Recommendations The Task Force believes it has accomplished the purpose established by City Council. The DDA, SPARK, and City are collaborating on economic development opportunities. Rather than duplication of effort and resources, the Task Force found each entity providing specific and appropriate focus. Recommendations As City Council continues to articulate and develop its Economic Health priority area, consideration should be given to allocating additional resources for economic development in Ann Arbor. The City has no resources dedicated specifically for economic development in Ann Arbor. The City contracts for services from SPARK, but SPARK is a regional organization that cannot dedicate itself to development opportunities solely in Ann Arbor. DDA by statute must limit its development support to specific area within the city. While the DDA, SPARK, and the City have clarity and alignment on economic development projects and the objectives of those projects, the lack of an overall 4 P a g e

economic development strategy for the City is a gap. The strategy would be Ann Arborcentric, with participation from those whose priorities also include the region and county. City Council should consider allocating resources to developing the strategic plan. Although the Task Force has completed its tasks and City Council s charge, the members believe an ongoing forum for collaboration and alignment may be needed. Given Ann Arbor SPARK's regional focus and membership, it is recommended that SPARK convene and provide staff support for an A2 Economic Health Committee. This advisory group would work to foster collaboration, share information and seek new strategic partnerships with a goal of enhanced community prosperity within the City of Ann Arbor. A key element in the work of this new group would be the creation of additional metrics of success. 5 P a g e