Performance Report 2015-2016 June (published 22/06/2015)
OFFICIAL Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 2 of 11 June Ref Description of target / measure Durham Tees Valley Performance Full Summary 2014-2015 Data Source Baseline Nov14- Jan15 % Performance in Month DTV CRC Month v 15/16Target % Performance Year to Date v 15/16 Target Target 17/18 Year to Date v Target 17/18 Success Number 39400 Total Number Direction of travel SERVICE LEVEL MEASURES Positive Completions - CO/SSO ndelius 75% 82.10 Above 81.86 Above 75% Above 591 722 84 Positive Completion - RAR requirement ndelius 8 100 Above 100 Above 9 Above 2 2 0 Positive Completions - Licence ndelius 65% 82.69 Above 84.09 Above 65% Above 111 132 16 Positive Completion - UPW requirement ndelius 9 95.65 Above 92.72 Above 9 Above 191 206 27 Positive Completion - Programme requirement ndelius 69% 87.50 Above 0 Above 9 Above 27 30 ISP within 10 days - CO/SSO ISP within 10 days - Licence ndelius via OASys ndelius via OASys 4 62.08% 87.17 Above 88.99 Above 97% Below 695 781 99 53.33% 94.81 Above 91.63 Above 97% Below 186 203 27 Priority Arrangement of UPW within 7 days ndelius 75% 90.57 Above 80.94 Above 75% Above 242 299 35 Completion of Resettlement Plans within 5 days OASys 85% 99.15 Above 87.75 Above 95% Below 652 743 93 Quality of Breach referral ndelius 89.47% 88.51 Near Miss 87.93 Near Miss 9 Near Miss 255 290 36 Quality of Recall referral PPUD 9 92.59 Above 94.29 Above 9 Above 66 70 9 Initial Contact within 5 days - CO/SSO ndelius 85.28% 99.63 Above 97.08 Above 97% Above 799 823 Pre-release planning within last 12 weeks of sentence OASys 8 9 0 0 No Data HDC/ ROTL Reports Completion ndelius 35.92% 82.00 Above 60.48 Above 97% Below 75 124 11 Initial Contact within 1 day - Licence ndelius 96.8 100 Above 98.59 Above 97% Above 210 213 30 Arrangement of UPW withion 28 days ndelius 92.15% 94.57 Above 95.94 Above 97% Near Miss 260 271 37 Completion of the Sentence ndelius 99% 88.93 Below 86.91 Below 99% Below 777 894 94 111 114 0
OFFICIAL Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 3 of 11 Ref Description of target / measure Data Source Baseline Nov14- Jan15 % Performance in Month Month v 15/16Target % Performance Year to Date v 15/16 Target Target 17/18 Year to Date v Target 17/18 Success Number Total Number Direction of travel AMA AMB AMC ASSURANCE METRICS Quality of Engagement (participant) SFO Plans completed within 3 months Released from custody with settled accommodation Bi_-Annual Return Monthly Return Improvement Trigger 6 Above 91.23 Above 75% Above 333 365 = 9 10 0 0 ndelius 8 9 0 0 AMD Accredited Programme Quality IAPS 8 9 0 0 AME Breach Referral Timeliness (8 days) ndelius 85% 87.01 Above 91.63 Below 95% Near Miss 230 251 AMF Recall Referral Timeliness (24 hours) ndelius 85% 42.86 Below 42.86 Below 95% Below 9 21 AMG Risk Escalation Quality ndelius 8 100 Above 100 Above 9 Above 6 6 Above 16 84% 16 8 11 55% Near Miss 1 5% 1 5% 3 15% Below 2 11% 3 15% 6 3 Total 19 20 20 Note: - Baseline are the official figures for SLMs. If baseline matched or was higher than Target then Target figure is shown.
Official Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 4 of 11 Durham Tees Valley LDU Breakdown 2015-2016 Year to Date Figures - June GRAPHS LDU Summary - DTV 11 10 5 2 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 DTV CRC
Official Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 5 of 11 LDU Summary - Hartlepool 11 10 5 2 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Hartlepool LDU Summary - Middlesbrough 11 10 5 2 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 M'brough
Official Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 6 of 11 LDU Summary - North Durham 11 10 5 2 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 N Durham LDU Summary - Redcar Cleveland 11 10 5 2 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Redcar Cleveland
Official Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 7 of 11 LDU Summary - South Durham 11 10 5 2 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 S Durham LDU Summary - Stockton 11 10 5 2 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Stockton
OFFICIAL Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 8 of 11 Durham Tees Valley LDU Breakdown 2015-2016 Year to Date Figures - June Ref Description of target / measure Target 17/18 Baseline Nov14-Jan15 Hartlepool M'brough N Durham Redcar Cleveland S Durham Stockton DTV CRC SERVICE LEVEL MEASURES Positive Completions - CO/SSO 75% 75% 75.8 78.2 86.7 85.1 84.1 81.9 Positive Completion - RAR requirement 9 8 10 10 10 Positive Completions - Licence 65% 65% 78.3 90.9 64.7 10 95.5 84.1 Positive Completion - UPW requirement 9 9 94.1 94.6 90.7 95.8 89.5 94.4 92.7 Positive Completion - Programme requirement 9 69% 10 10 10 83.3 10 ISP within 10 days - CO/SSO 97% 62.08% 70.3 95.8 95.7 88.9 90.2 81.0 89.0 ISP within 10 days - Licence 97% 53.33% 96.9 93.9 96.9 10 88.1 81.1 91.6 Priority Arrangement of UPW within 7 days 75% 75% 66.7 89.1 97.9 86.4 73.1 80.9 Completion of Resettlement Plans within 5 days 95% 85% 87.8 Quality of Breach referral 9 89.47% 87.7 94.4 83.9 77.8 86.0 97.0 87.9 Quality of Recall referral 9 9 94.3 Initial Contact within 5 days - CO/SSO 97% 85.28% 94.3 99.4 97.1 94.8 99.5 93.6 97.1 Pre-release planning within last 12 weeks of sentence 9 8 HDC/ ROTL Reports Completion 97% 35.92% 55.6 56.8 55.2 75.0 60.5 Initial Contact within 1 day - Licence 97% 96.8 97.4 10 10 10 97.9 97.2 98.6 Arrangement of UPW within 28 days 97% 92.15% 92.3 98.1 10 10 92.3 93.6 95.9 Completion of the Sentence 99% 99% 82.5 90.6 88.3 82.8 86.1 86.7 86.9 ASSURANCE MEASURE AMA Quality of Engagement (participant) 75% 6 92.3 88.7 95.3 91.7 85.3 94.4 91.2 AMB SFO Plans completed within 3 months 10 9 88.7 AMC Released from custody with settled accommodation 9 8 AMD Accredited Programme Quality 9 8 AME Breach Referral Timeliness (8 days) 95% 85% 10 10 92.6 93.5 94.6 71.9 91.6 AMF Recall Referral Timeliness (24 hours) 95% 85% 72.2 42.9 AMG Risk Escalation Quality 9 8 10 10 10 10 10 10
OFFICIAL Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 9 of 11 Performance Trend Analysis 2015-2016 DTV CRC June Ref Description of target / measure Target Baseline Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar SERVICE LEVEL MEASURES Positive Completions - CO/SSO 75% 75% 81.3 81.7 81.9 Positive Completion - RAR requirement 9 8 10 10 Positive Completions - Licence 65% 65% 76.6 85.0 84.1 Positive Completion - UPW requirement 9 9 89.2 91.2 92.7 Positive Completion - Programme requirement 9 69% 89.5 90.9 ISP within 10 days - CO/SSO 97% 62.08% 88.6 89.9 89.0 ISP within 10 days - Licence 97% 53.33% 83.9 89.7 91.6 Priority Arrangement of UPW within 7 days 75% 75% 77.0 75.6 80.9 Completion of Resettlement Plans within 5 days 95% 85% 77.6 87.8 Quality of Breach referral 9 89.47% 87.5 87.7 87.9 Quality of Recall referral 9 9 94.7 95.3 94.3 Initial Contact within 5 days - CO/SSO 97% 85.28% 95.2 95.8 97.1 Pre-release planning within last 12 weeks of sentence 9 8 HDC/ ROTL Reports Completion 97% 35.92% 38.9 45.9 60.5 Initial Contact within 1 day - Licence 97% 96.8 95.6 97.9 98.6 Arrangement of UPW withion 28 days 97% 92.15% 10 96.6 95.9 Completion of the Sentence 99% 99% 86.2 85.9 86.9 ASSURANCE MEASURES Improvement Trigger AMA Quality of Engagement (participant) 75% 6 91.2 AMB SFO Plans completed within 3 months 10 9 AMC Released from custody with settled accommodation 9 8 AMD Accredited Programme Quality 9 8 AME Breach Referral Timeliness (8 days) 95% 85% 97.8 93.7 91.6 AMF Recall Referral Timeliness (24 hours) 95% 85% 42.9 42.9 AMG Risk Escalation Quality 9 8 10 10
OFFICIAL Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 10 of 11 SLM Summary Targ Baseline Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 75% 75% 81.3 81.7 81.9 9 8 10 10 65% 65% 76.6 85.0 84.1 9 9 89.2 91.2 92.7 9 69% 89.5 90.9 97% 62.8 88.6 89.9 89.0 97% 53.33% 83.9 89.7 91.6 75% 75% 77.0 75.6 80.9 95% 85% 77.6 87.8 9 89.47% 87.5 87.7 87.9 9 9 94.7 95.3 94.3 97% 85.28% 95.2 95.8 97.1 9 8 97% 35.92% 38.9 45.9 60.5 97% 96.8 95.6 97.9 98.6 97% 92.15% 10 96.6 95.9 99% 99% 86.2 85.9 86.9 Key: Percentage of Allocated persons that have initial appointment with 5 days - CO/SSO Percentage of Allocated persons that have initial appointment with 1 day - Licence Percentage of Allocated persons that have ISP completed within 10 days of attending 1st appointment - CO/SSO Percentage of Allocated persons that have ISP completed within 10 days of attending 1st appointment - Licence Percentage of Allocated persons that are allocated to UPW arranged within 28 days of allocation or assignment Percentage of Allocated persons that are allocated to UPW arranged within 7 days of allocation or assignment Percentage of Allocated persons that have a completed sentence whether positive, negative or neutral Percentage of Allocated persons that have a positive sentence completion - CO/SSO Percentage of Allocated persons that have a positive sentence completion - Licence Percentage of Allocated persons that have a positive requirement completion - UPW Percentage of Allocated persons that have a positive requirement completion - Programme Percentage of Allocated persons that have a positive requirement completion - RAR (DRR, ATR, MHTR) Percentage of Resettlement plans completed within 5 days of Basic Custody Screening Tool completion Percentage of Allocated persons that have Pre-Release planning completed no more than 12 weeks prior to release Percentage of Allocated persons who are released on HDC/ROTL following completion of HDC/ROTL reports Percentage of Breach referrals that are of an acceptable quality and do not require additional information Percentage of Recall referrals that are of an acceptable quality and do not require additional information NB1: Blank boxes above indicate that there have been no cases. % means there have been cases but they have not been met. NB2: Figures shown are the cumulative total for the year at the end of the relevant month.
OFFICIAL Produced by the TIM Unit - Durham Tees Valley CRC Page 11 of 11 Targ Improvement Trigger Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar AMA 75% 6 91.23 AMB 10 9 AMC 9 8 AMD 9 8 AME 95% 85% 97.8 93.7 91.6 AMF 95% 85% 42.9 42.9 AMG 9 8 10 10 Key: AMA AMB AMC AMD AME AMF AMG AM Summary Percentage of positive participant questionaires completed in a 6 month period Percentage of SFO Plans completed within 3 months of offence occuring Percentage of Allocated Persons who are released from custody with settled accommodation Percentage of Accredited programme completions meeting the required quality assurance standards Percentage of Referrals for breach within 8 days of the alleged breach taking place Percentage of recommendations of recall made within 24 hours of becoming aware of alleged breach occuring Percentage of risk escalation referrals that are accepted by the authority