HIT and Medicaid: Opportunities for States Part I of a three part series on the State Alliance for E-Health E

Similar documents
Trends in Health Information Exchange (HIE) and Links to Medicaid Led Quality Improvement

ONC Cooperative Agreement HIE Program Update. Arizona Rural & Public Health Policy Forum January 19, 2012

Medicaid and HIT: EHR s s for Medicaid Providers

Pennsylvania Patient and Provider Network (P3N)

Overview of CMS HIT Initiatives. Kelly Cronin Senior Advisor to the Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services September 2005

What Do Legislators Want to Know About IT?

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Overview

Health Information Exchange and Telehealth: Opportunities for Integration!

Health Information Exchange 101. Your Introduction to HIE and It s Relevance to Senior Living

Overview of Health Information Exchange (HIE) Prepared by the HIMSS Health Information Exchange Steering Committee August 2009

Community Health Centers. May 6, 2010

National Health IT Week

Texas Approach to Supporting Statewide Health Information Exchange. January 2013

Medicaid Health Information Technology Plan (MHP)

Statewide HIE in Texas. Tony Gilman, CEO Texas Health Services Authority October 21, 2010 Rural Hospital IT Conference

Patricia MacTaggart Office telephone: Fax number: address:

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions June 1, 2010

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

HITECH Act, EHR Adoption, Meaningful Use Criteria, ARRA Grants, and Adoption Alternatives. The MARYLAND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION

Medicaid and Human Services Transparency and Fraud Prevention Act Progress Report

CMS Meaningful Use Incentives NPRM

NEW YORK STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM INFORMATION FOR ALL PROVIDERS

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

The Accountable Care Organization & Compliance

The Accountable Care Organization & Compliance

Medicaid EHR Provider Incentive Payment Program. September 26, 2011

Pay for Performance and Health Information Technology: Overview of HIT Pay for Performance Initiatives

Transitioning to ICD-10. Presented by: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

UPDATE ON MEANINGFUL USE. HITECH Stimulus Act of 2009: CSC Point of View

Section 2703: State Option to Provide Health Homes for Enrollees with Chronic Conditions

Examining the Differences Between Commercial and Medicare ACO Models

Electronic Health Records and Meaningful Use

Comparison of the Health Provisions in HR 1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

Health Current: Roadmap Practice Transformation using Information & Data

Michigan s Vision for Health Information Technology and Exchange

HIE & Interoperability: Roadmap to Continuum of Care Michael McPherson MU Coordinator KDHE

QUALITY AND COMPLIANCE

2012 National Patient Safety Goals and National Priorities Partnership Goals addressed in this case study

Provider Perspectives on Patient Information: Results of 2017 Survey. October 19, 2017

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

HITECH Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Stimulus Package. HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU)

SUBMIT/RECEIVE STATEWIDE ADMISSION, DISCHARGE, TRANSFER (ADT) NOTIFICATIONS

Health Information Exchange. Anne Dobbins, RN Operations Director Minnesota Health Information Exchange (MN HIE)

ARRA HITECH Act and Nevada

Diane Meyer, CHC (650) Agenda

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

New Opportunities in Long Term Services and Supports

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Pharmacy Health Information Exchange The promise. The reality. The future.

A Lawyer s Take on Meaningful Use. By Steven J. Fox & Vadim Schick

A Day in the Life of a Compliance Officer

Spring User Conference May Sandestin, FL Detailed Agenda

HIT Glossary and Acronym List

The Role of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) in the US Drug Safety System

Leveraging Health Care IT Investment

ARRA HEALTH IT INCENTIVES - UNCERTAINTIES ABOUT "MEANINGFUL USE"

The Massachusetts ehealth Institute

Policies Approved by the 2017 ASHP House of Delegates

University of California Health Science Compliance Program Executive Summary*

Building a healthy legacy together. Presentation by Shelley Lipon, Executive Regional Director, Canada Health Infoway to ICTAM October 28, 2009

Building a Better Home: Transformation to a Patient Centered Health Home. Anna M. Gard, FNP-BC Association of Clinicians for the Underserved

2011 Electronic Prescribing Incentive Program

Medicaid EHR Provider Incentive Payment Program. January 2011

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Minnesota e-health Summit. Successful Collaborations for Regional Health Information Exchange

Small Rural Hospital Transitions (SRHT) Project. Rural Relevant Measures: Next Steps for the Future

IMPROVING MEDICATION RECONCILIATION WITH STANDARDS

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Incentivizing Investments in Healthcare

Copyright Scottsdale Institute All Rights Reserved.

NEW TOOLS FOR COORDINATING HEALTH CARE AND LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS. National HCBS Conference September 1, 2016

How can oncology practices deliver better care? It starts with staying connected.

Policies Targeting Payer Harmonization: The Provider Perspective

EVV Requirements in the 21 st Century Cures Act Pre-Conference Intensive

Blueprint for E-Prescribing: A Detailed Plan of Action for Implementing E-Prescribing

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

HCAHPS and Readmissions: Making the Connection Wednesday, September 18, :00 a.m. 10:00 a.m.

Breaking HIE Barriers

Chuck Campbell, SES, Military Health System Chief Information Officer. Using Service Oriented Architecture to Support Meaningful Use

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Behavioral Health Clients

Component Description Unit Topics 1. Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the U.S. 2. The Culture of Healthcare

Accountable Care and Governance Challenges Under the Affordable Care Act

Member Services Director

Enhancing E Prescribing and Medication Adherence in the CT Medicaid Population

Combating Medicaid Fraud & Abuse NCSL New England Fiscal Leaders Meeting February 22, 2013

CAQH CORE and ehealth Initiative Joint Webinar

STATE OF TEXAS TEXAS STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY

Office of the Chief Privacy Officer. Privacy & Security in an App Enabled World HIMSS, Tuesday March 1, 2016, Las Vegas, NV

March Data Jam: Using Data to Prepare for the MACRA Quality Payment Program

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Definition of Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology for Hospitals Approved by the HIMSS Board of Directors April 24, 2009

Health Information Technology and Coordinating Care in Ohio

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

HIPAA Summit Afternoon Plenary Welcome! HIPAA, HITECH and Health Reform

EHR for the PCMH A Doctor s Perspective. Medical Home Summit

Collaborative Ventures Network 2017 Annual Meeting

Is the source of health coverage for: Almost one in five of Californians under age 65; One in three of the state s children; and

Proposed Regulations NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Return to Public Health Forum

2016 Activities and Accomplishments

What s Next: People-Powered Knowledge Generation from Digital Data

Transcription:

Reports from the State Alliance for e-healthe HIT and Medicaid: Opportunities for States Part I of a three part series on the State Alliance for E-Health E Friday, June 1, 2007 2:00 pm EDT This event is produced by the National Conference of State Legislatures under contract with the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. This web-assisted audioconference is financed in part by funds provided by the United States Department of Health and Human Services E-Health Alliance Initiative. Addition funding was provided by HRSA/Bureau of Primary Health Care grant number U30CS07490. The program contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and participants and do not necessarily represent the official views of NGA, NCSL, or HRSA/BPHC.

Speakers Shaun Alfreds, Health Policy Analyst University of Southern Maine Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy Phone: 207-829 829-83688368 salfreds@usm.maine.edu Anthony D. Rodgers, Co-Chair Chair of the Task Force on Health Information Communication and Data Exchange Director, Arizona AHCCCS (Medicaid and SCHIP programs) Kala Ladenheim Forum for State Health Policy Leadership National Conference of State Legislatures Phone: 202-624 624-3557 kala.ladenheim@ncsl.org

Medicaid s Role in Health IT and Electronic Health Information Exchange Activities Shaun T. Alfreds, MBA, CPHIT

Medicaid s Role in Supporting HIT and HIE: AHRQ UMass Project Scope Goal: To define the challenges and opportunities that Medicaid programs face in relation to the adoption of clinical HIT and HIE National Advisory Committee established Explored key issues relating to Medicaid, HIT, and HIE through literature review and interviews Facilitated expert panel meeting including state and federal policy makers (Held May 26, 2006) Establishing a Foundation for Medicaid s Role in the Adoption of Health Information Technology: Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations for the Future. AHRQ Publication No. 07-0046. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2007. Clinical Health Information Technologies and the Role of Medicaid. Health Care Financing Review. Winter 2006-2007. Vol. 28 n.2.

Key Findings: Quality of Care at the Practice Level The health needs and the settings of care for Medicaid populations often differ from commercial populations Widespread adoption of HIT may contribute to improvements in health care quality and health outcomes for Medicaid populations More efficient patient tracking Improved chronic care management and preventative care Improved coordination of care Preventing adverse drug events Medicaid programs have an interest in supporting the adoption of HIT in safety net and long-term care settings

Key Findings: Efficiency and Cost Savings Medicaid agencies have demonstrated financial efficiencies through administrative HIE Potential additional efficiencies for HIE of clinical health data include: Enhanced automation of prior approval processes Reduction in medication costs through electronic formulary access and generic substitution Reduction in medical errors and related costs Quality monitoring and management of delivery systems Detection of fraud and abuse Enhanced provider participation

Key Findings: Legal Issues Laws and regulations common to all payers and providers Federal and state specific laws and regulations Medicaid specific concerns Medicaid Privacy Statute (MPS) disclosure standards appear to be consistent with HIPAA, but clarification is needed Interactions with legal requirements of other publiclyfunded programs Medicaid s fiduciary duty to act in best interest of recipients

Key Issues and Challenges for Medicaid In Relation to HIT and HIE Legal and Regulatory Fiduciary responsibility to support higher quality, effective care for beneficiaries through HIT/HIE Medicaid Privacy Statute and relation to HIPAA MITA: guidance or regulation? Purchasing transparency Fiscal Resources FMAP availability to support HIE, Demonstration Waivers, grants (DRA), payment policies, etc. Provider Adoption Gap Specific providers serving Medicaid (LTC, RHC, CHC, etc.) Consumer Role Consumer involvement (personal health records) Privacy and security of personal data Education and outreach (opt-in vs. opt-out)

NGA State Alliance: HICDE Task Force Support the State Alliance on issues regarding the appropriate roles for publicly funded health programs in interoperable, electronic health information exchange (HIE). Develop and advance actionable policy statements, resolutions, and recommendations for referral to the State Alliance Principles of analysis: Leadership / Governance Consumer Role Fiduciary Responsibility of Publicly Funded Health Programs Interoperability Structure of the Current Approaches Taken

Thank You! For Further Information: Shaun Alfreds, MBA, CPHIT Phone: 207-829-8368 E-mail: salfreds@usm.maine.edu University of Southern Maine Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy See Also: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices State Alliance for ehealth: www.nga.org/center/ehealth University of Massachusetts Medical School Center for Health Policy and Research www.umassmed.edu/healthpolicy/hit/policydevelopment.aspx

The Strategic Role and Opportunities for Electronic Health Information and Exchange in Medicaid Anthony Rodgers, Director Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System June 1, 2007

Definition of Terms Health Information Technology (HIT) Technology and software applications that support electronic records for patient care management and clinical services Examples: computer technology, data storage, care management systems, E-prescribing, computerized order entry systems Health Information Exchange (HIE) Web based infrastructure to enable clinical record data sharing between health care organizations and providers Examples: electronic continuity of care records, Patient Health Summary, electronic health records, claims/encounter data Electronic Health Information (EHI) Health record information that is accessed, retrieve, stored and transmitted via the internet Example: Electronic Medical Records (providers), Electronic Health Records (payers), Personal Health Records (consumers)

HHS Strategic Framework Goals for Information Technology Infrastructure and Exchange of Electronic Health Information Goal 1: Informed Clinical Practice Bring EHR directly into clinical practice to reduce medical errors and duplicative work, and enable clinicians to focus efforts more directly on improved patient care. Goal 2: Interconnect Clinicians Allow portability of information to move with consumers from one point of care to another. Will require interoperable infrastructure to help clinicians get access to critical health care information when their clinical and/or treatment decisions are being made. Goal 3: Personalized Care Consumer-centric information helps individuals manage their own wellness and assists with their personal health care decisions. Goal 4: Improve Population Health Population health improvement requires the collection of timely, accurate, and detailed clinical information to allow for the evaluation of health care delivery and the reporting of critical findings to public health officials, clinical trials and other research, and feedback to clinicians.

Public Policy Rational for Investment in Electronic Health Records and Health Information Exchange in Medicaid Ensures health information is available at point-of-care Reduces medical errors Avoids duplicate medical procedures Improves coordination of care and quality Supports value driven health care and transparency Enhances medical practice Improves healthcare system efficiency and reduces cost of care Supports public health surveillance and emergency preparedness

Medicaid Transformation Grants for EHR/HIE HHS awarded $103 million in system transformation grants to State Medicaid agencies The 14 state Medicaid agencies are planning to use their system transformation grants for planning and development of electronic health information and health information exchange capability This represents combined investment of $61.1 million in transformation grant funds for EHR/HIE development in Medicaid Second round of grants announced April 27, 2007.

State Medicaid Programs Collaboration 13 state Medicaid Transformation Grant recipients agreed to collaborate on: Project coordination Explore joint planning and development opportunities Maximize the chances of EHR/HIE Project success Establish common vision for HIE among state Medicaid programs Create a learning community to share lessons learned with other state Medicaid programs Leverage each state s investment in EHR/HIE

How State Medicaid Programs Can Move Forward with EHR/HIE State Medicaid programs should consider including a payer based electronic health record system as part of any acquisition of a new MMIS system State Medicaid EHR systems should meet MITA standards to maximize federal participation States should pursue a combination of funding sources for EHR/HIE development including federal Medicaid, public health, grants and user fees.

How State Medicaid Programs Can Move Forward with EHR/HIE (cont d) States should consider leveraging state employee health benefit programs along with Medicaid for development and deployment of EHR/HIE States should consider including EHR/HIE requirements in Medicaid managed care contracts and provider contracts State Medicaid Programs should agree to a common set of health information exchange standards consistent with Federal standards to assure health information can be exchanged between states

Our first care is your healthcare

Any Questions Among the Panelists? From the audience? You can either Unmute and ask as part of the call or Use Q and A option in your web-assisted audioconference. After the call, email questions and suggestions for future web-conferences to: Health.hitch@ncsl.org

To follow up Feel free to contact us for more information at Health.chaps@ncsl.org For more program information and related links, and to see past programs: http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/ webcast2.htm This program was recorded and will be made available on line.

Arizona Speakers resources AHCCCS HIE Utility Project Update http://www.ahcccs.state.az.us/ehealth/ AHCCCS ehealth Initiative Kickoff http://www.ahcccs.state.az.us/ehealth/kickoff.asp Arizona E-Health E Roadmap http://www.azgita.gov/tech_news/2006/arizona%20health- e%20connection%20roadmap.pdf National Governors Association Center for Best Practices State Alliance for ehealth: www.nga.org/center/ehealth University of Massachusetts Medical School Center for Health Policy and Research www.umassmed.edu/healthpolicy/hit/policydevelopment.aspx University of Southern Maine Muskie School of Public Service Institute for Health Policy http://www.muskie.usm.maine.edu/research/research_institutes_i hp.jsp

Other Resources CMS Medicaid Transformation Grants (applications for the second round of grants are now available) http://www.cms.hhs.gov/medicaidtransgrants www.cms.hhs.gov/medicaidtransgrants/ Establishing a Foundation for Medicaid's Role in the Adoption of Health Information Technology: Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations for the Future http://healthit.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/ptargs_0_124 8_227105_0_0_18/UMASS%20Final%20Report.pdf Healthcare Financing Review Winter 2006-2007, 2007, Volume 28, Number 2 http://www.cms.hhs.gov/healthcarefinancingreview/09_2006%2 0Edition.asp

Resources from NCSL Related NCSL Projects Health Information Technology Champions (HITCh) The HITCh partnership serves state legislators interested in health information technology (HIT) and health information exchange (HIE). http://www.hitchampions.org www.hitchampions.org/ Other NCSL Resources State Health Notes articles on Health Information Technology http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/shn/hit.htm Medicaid main page http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/h-medicaid.htm medicaid.htm Subscribe to our bi-weekly newsletter State Health Notes http://www.ncsl.org/shn www.ncsl.org/shn/ Kala Ladenheim, Ph.D. Forum for State Health Policy Leadership National Conference of State Legislatures Tel: 202-624 624-3557 kala.ladenheim@ncsl.org http://www.ncsl.org www.ncsl.org/programs/health/forum/