Creating Capability Surprise for Irregular Warfare

Similar documents
REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

Power Projection: - Where We Were - Where We Are - Where We Need To Be

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2008 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E, Dw BA 07

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

US Special Operations Command

Student Guide: Introduction to Army Foreign Disclosure and Contact Officers

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

This block in the Interactive DA Framework is all about joint concepts. The primary reference document for joint operations concepts (or JOpsC) in

Supporting the Army Warfighters Science and Technology Needs

Marine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL)

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Challenges & Opportunities

APPENDIX: FUNCTIONAL COMMUNITIES Last Updated: 21 December 2015

James T. Conway General, U.S. Marine Corps, Commandant of the Marine Corps

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell

Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates

A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

THE JOINT STAFF Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide

USTRANSCOM. USTRANSCOM Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise. 15 April Mr.

21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace. Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability

United States Special Operations Command. Science and Technology

JCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition

AUSA Army Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy Symposium and Exposition November 2018 Cobo Center, Detroit, MI. Panel Topic Descriptions

Joint Capabilities to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Army Vision - Force 2025 White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

Subj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT

INSTRUCTION. Department of Defense. NUMBER May 22, 2008 USD(P) SUBJECT: Joint Deployment Process Owner

National Lab Roles and Responsibilities in the Precision Strike Enterprise

A Call to the Future

Overview of the Chemical and Biological Defense Program Requirements Process

Air-Sea Battle: Concept and Implementation

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Joint Test and Evaluation Program

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD SPACE ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE AND PRINCIPAL DOD SPACE ADVISOR (PDSA)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #73

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Welcome to the Introduction to Special Operations Forces lesson on Joint command and control and Special Operations Command relationships.

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

AIR FORCE CYBER COMMAND STRATEGIC VISION

United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Challenges & Opportunities

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Capability Solutions for Joint, Multinational, and Coalition Operations

Executing our Maritime Strategy

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Force 2025 and Beyond

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY DR. MIKE GRIFFIN UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING BEFORE THE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Air Force Cyber Operations Command

DOD DIRECTIVE DEFENSE INSTITUTION BUILDING (DIB)

FY19 Warfighting Lab Incentive Fund Project Proposal Background and Instructions

Air-Sea Battle & Technology Development

DOD STRATEGY CWMD AND THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF EOD

The Joint Staff Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates February 2010 Procurement, Defense-Wide

The Joint Force Air Component Commander and the Integration of Offensive Cyberspace Effects

US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration

DOD INSTRUCTION DoD SUPPORT TO INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR (CBRN) INCIDENTS

Joint Command and Control Capability Portfolio Management (JC2 CPM)

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

The Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System (JCIDS)

America s Airmen are amazing. Even after more than two decades of nonstop. A Call to the Future. The New Air Force Strategic Framework

Expeditionary Force 21 Attributes

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

New Directions for Defense Programs Pacific Overview

Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

This is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways

THE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates

Science and Technology Conference for Chem-Bio Information Systems

DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN VERSION 1 A COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCY

STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA

The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Transcription:

UNCLASSIFIED Creating Capability Surprise for Irregular Warfare 7 TH ANNUAL DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE Joint Capability Area Track II: Force Application Force Support Logistics Protection UNCLASSIFIED Mike Knollmann Director, Joint Operations Support Defense Research & Engineering michael.knollmann@osd.mil

UNCLASSIFIED Creating Capability Surprise for Irregular Warfare 7 TH ANNUAL DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE Joint Capability Area Track II: Force Application Force Support Logistics Protection Mike Olmstead Associate Director Joint Needs Integration Defense Research & Engineering UNCLASSIFIED michael.olmstead@osd.mil

Director, Defense Research & Engineering Imperatives Accelerate delivery of technical capabilities to win the current fight. Solve the most difficult near term problems and transition compelling concepts to the warfighter. Prepare for an uncertain future. Shape the Department s science and technology investments to open options that counter (and create) strategic surprise. Reduce the cost, acquisition time and risk of our major defense acquisition programs. Provide systems engineering leadership, deep system analysis and technical assessments across the Department. Develop world class science, technology, engineering, and mathematics capabilities for the DoD and the Nation. 3

Defense Capabilities Enterprise: Diversified Force Generation Roles, Diversified Force Employment Needs Organize, Train & Equip Operationally Employ and increasingly, complex operational partners: NGB, inter-agency, coalition, NGO 4

Combatant Commander Science &Technology Staff: Diversified Roles, Diversified Needs Variety of roles/titles Science &Techology (S&T) Advisor Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) Programs Liaison Concept Development Lead Capability Development Lead Variety of organizational structures Reporting to Deputy Commander, Chief of Staff, J8/Resources, J9/Experimentation Single/multiple science advisors on HQ staff Variety of resource support Executive agency Service / parent service support Experimentation support Working capital fund support Rapid reaction acquisition programs support Operational needs processes 5

Senior S&T Advisors at COCOMs Donald Jones Reports to Deputy J8 Dr. Susan Wirwille Reports to Commander Marty Drake, Reports to J8 Ken Bruner Reports to J8 Juan Hurtado, Reports to Director, Stability Mike Owens, Reports to Director, Resources Functional Commands USSTRATCOM None additional duty Dave Tyner, Reports to J8 USTRANSCOM Lou Bernstein, Reports to J5/4 USSOCOM William Shepherd, Reports to Commander USJFCOM Dan Judy, Reports to Chief of Staff

Aligning the Domains: Defense Engine for Capabilities All three domains must be aligned & engaged to deliver capabilities Military Needs Validation & Operations Acquisition: Technology, Procurement, Logistics Resources: Plans, Programs, Budgeting The challenge for Combatant Commanders: They exist in the authority domain of Military Needs & Operations Joint force needs are predominantly expressed through CJCS Only US Special Operations Command has force development acquisition authorities They rely on Services for preponderance of force capabilities Force Integration / Force Provider services performed by USJFCOM USJFCOM translates joint force needs into force fill requirements for Services They rely on Services for HQ resources through legacy Executive Agency provisions They have limited manpower to participate in needs, acquisition & funding processes 7

Needs to Solutions: Processes & Roles PPBES:Program Budget Process Needs Process 1. Develop & specify needs 2. Review & comment on budget-based programming and acquisition solutions 3. Allocate resources to joint/combatant commanders Needs Roles CJCS/JCS CoComs Including USJFCOM Joint Staff Military Staffs CoCom/Component Cdr Staffs National, Security, and Military Policies Framework Acquisition Solutions Process 1. Consult with needs authorities in development of acqusition solutions 2. Acquire material solutions based on validated needs and budgetbased programming 3. Deliver resources (acquisition products) for allocation to joint/combatant commanders Solution Roles USD (AT&L)/DAE Service Secretaries/SAEs OSD (AT&L) Staff Service Secretariat Staffs Systems/Materiel Commands Military Agencies USSOCOM [special authorities] 8

Joint Capability Development Strategy: Framing Remedies Identifying Military Requirements Analyze capability gaps Lessons Learned / Warfighting Analyses Characterize improvements: What is really required? Experiment what DOTMLPF elements are needed? Define in actionable terms Specify DOTMLPF elements or options Understand DoD roles Framing the Solution Set Headquarters enhancement Engage Executive Agency (military Service)? Specific Component Force Development Specify Service partnership / component roles Joint Force Capability Gap Pursue Functional CoCom partnerships Respect & leverage authorities Needs Requirements Solutions Use diversity of tools Employ gapfillers Remain flexible Developing Specific Strategies Address key gap-closing capability segments Forge partnerships with strategy development Key element of resourcing & transition Stipulate timeline and phasing of deliverables Cite operational imperative for timelines 9

Joint Capability Areas Joint Capability Areas Comprised of functional portfolios to focus management and resource attention upon a desired capabilitybased vice threat-based envisioned and synchronized military force development and planning enterprise; Encompass capability needs definition, gap and excess analysis, major trade analyses, and capabilities planning, i.e. the DoD military capability divided into manageable functional entities; and Provide a framework to enable a capabilities-based US military enterprise to focus on emerging technological opportunities that certain capabilities such as long-range precision strike, transformed maneuver and expeditionary forces; and systems to overcome anti-access and area-denial threats. 10

UNCLASSIFIED Office of the Secretary of Defense Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Defense Research & Engineering Technology in Demand by Joint Warfighters UNCLASSIFIED

US Central Command Environment & Technologies Countermeasures for Improvised Explosives, Wide-Area Network Solutions, Information Collaboration with Coalition/Partner Nations & Agencies, Surveillance, Improved Energy Efficiencies, Partner Nation Security/Stability, Language Translation 12

US Special Operations Command Environment & Technologies USSOCOM Priorities Deter, Disrupt & Defeat Terrorist Threats Develop & Support our People & Families Sustain & Modernize the Force Forward Areas Technology Support, Networked Capabilities, Partner Nation Security Training Tools, Surveillance, Special Operations Enhancement of Conventional Force Capabilities 13

US Northern Command Environment & Technologies Missile/Air Defense, Information Collaboration with Partner Nations & Agencies, Network Capacity, Border/Seaward Approaches/Air Space Monitoring, CBRNE Response 14

US Southern Command Environment & Technologies Information Collaboration with Partner Nations & Agencies, Surveillance, Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Response, Intra-Theater Airlift, Regional Airspace Integration 15

US Pacific Command Environment & Technologies USPACOM IMPERATIVES Military Superiority Multilateral Approach to Security Freedom of Movement and Secure Access Whole-of-Government Approach Wide-Area Network Solutions, Sensors, Naval Forces, Long-Range & Heavy Lift Transportation, Missile/Air Defense, Security Collaboration with Partner Nations 16

US European Command Environment & Technologies USEUCOM Vision An agile security organization with a "whole of government" approach seeking to support enduring stability and peace in Europe and Eurasia. Long-Range & Heavy Lift Transportation, Information Collaboration with Partner Nations & Agencies, Coalition/Partner Nation Security Cooperation/Interoperability 17

US Africa Command Environment & Technologies "Working with our African partners is not only our highest priority; it is our only priority Building Partnership Capacity, Intra-Theater Mobility, Surveillance, Social-Cultural Understanding/Translation 18

US Strategic Command Environment & Technologies Cyberspace Enabling Tools, Strategic Force Maintenance, Networking Enhancements, Space Monitoring and Asset Employment 20

US Transportation Command Environment & Technologies Transportation Asset Protection, Airlift/Sealift Capabilities Sustainment, Intra- Theater Airlift Options, Transportation Worldwide Command & Control 21

US Joint Forces Command Environment & Technologies USJFCOM Goals Make Irregular Warfare A Core Competency Design Integrated, Properly Structured Command and Control Improve as Joint Force Provider Accelerate Efforts toward a Whole of Government Approach Modeling & Simulation, Training Enhancements, Command & Control Interoperability, Tactical Networks Integration, Data Standards and Information Technology Integration, Joint Force Deployment Planning and Execution Tools

Development Model for Technology Solutions Transition to Procurement & Sustainment more Maturity of Operational Concept and Technology less Joint Training Readiness & Suitability Confirmation Test & Evaluation Military assessment of utility Functional Validation; Tailored Form/Fit/Function DOTMLPF construct development and confirmation Demonstration Technical Concept Design & Development Prototyping Alternatives Development & Assessment Experimentation Red Teaming Analysis Conceptualization Needs identification/lessons learned/assessment Tech push exploitation 23

Adapting Technologies to Defense JCIDS User Needs Acquisition Process Acquisition/Technology Development Processes Strategic Guidance Joint Concepts Capabilities - Based Assessment ICD MDD Materiel Solution Analysis A Technology Development B CDD Engineering & Manuf Development C CPD Operations & Support Production & Deployment O&S OSD/JCS COCOM FCB hypothesis formulation, rigorous analytical assessment Data Studies & Collection Analyses JCOA, JWAC, JAWP, et al EXPERIMENTATION CGA Conceptual DOT_LPF Solution Validation Exploration Framework Refinement & Discovery Definition (Field Trials) RRTO Materiel Solutions Prototyping Test & Evaluation Demonstration TTI, JCTDs, JT&E, CWID, CWP, et al Influence of policy, e.g. Guidance for Force Development Developmental doctrine; Tactics, Training & Procedures Innovative employment of existing capabilities 24