ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

Similar documents
ARCHIVED REPORT. AGM-45 Shrike - Archived 10/2001

INTRODUCTION TO CREW SERVED WEAPONS B3M4078 STUDENT HANDOUT

ARCHIVED REPORT. Multi-Purpose Individual Munition - Archived 3/2003. Outlook. Orientation. Ordnance & Munitions Forecast

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

INTRODUCTION TO CREW SERVED WEAPONS W3I0001XQ-DM STUDENT HANDOUT

ARCHIVED REPORT. USC-38/LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM Terminals - Archived 02/2008

APEX Armor Piercing with Explosive The Dual Purpose Round for the F-35. Eva Friis Vegard Sande

UNCLASSIFIED. Close Combat Weapon Systems JAVELIN. Systems in Combat TOW ITAS LOSAT

Advanced Warhead Technologies

FCT and SOCOM Shoulder Fired Weapons

Development and Fielding of the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Unitary Warhead

Steven Costa Program Manager, Ammunition Marine Corps Systems Command

IHS Aerospace, Defence & Security. Missiles: 2013 In Review & Forecast Outlook. Ben Goodlad. February

ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Published on Arms Control Association (

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 P-1 Line #1

Development and Fielding of the Excalibur XM982 Warhead

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 21 R-1 Line #102

OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/ DESERT STORM Observations on the Performance of the Army's HeUfire Missile

Ammunition and Explosives related Federal Supply Classes (FSC)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

JAVELIN ANTITANK MISSILE

Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS)

MEADS MEDIUM EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM

2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective

Project Manager Close Combat Systems

To obtain additional copies of this report, contact the Secondary Reports Distribution Unit at (703) (DSN ) or fax (703)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

ARCHIVED REPORT. SHORTSTOP/Warlock VLQ-11(V), PLQ-7(V), GLQ-16(V) - Archived 7/2009

Arms Control Today. U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance

OSD Perspective. Presentation to the 2003 Munitions Executive Summit Falls Church, VA 12 February George W. Ullrich

Special Instructions Continued on Next page

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE MISSILES AND SPACE

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE

Precision Fires Rocket and Missile Systems. Brief to PSA. COL David Rice PFRMS, Project Manager. Any Warfighter, Anywhere, All The Time UNCLASSIFIED

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

S&T Advances Future Munitions Development Joseph A. Brescia, David Fair and Kevin T. Hayes

ARCHIVED REPORT. Battlefield Airborne Communications Node (BACN)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Soldier Division Director David Libersat June 2, 2015

PM Close Combat Systems Briefing for: Precision Strike Association. June 2009

IMPROVED INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS PERFORMANCE OF AN HE ROCKET WARHEAD

McAlester Army Ammunition Plant

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) FY 2012 OCO

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 Published on Arms Control Association (

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

This Protocol is organized into ten Parts.

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

The United States Army. Lieutenant Colonel Sean Morgan 24 August 2010

Chapter I SUBMUNITION UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE (UXO) HAZARDS

The TOW Missile Precise and Powerful

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

Project Manager Soldier Weapons Ammunition Programs

ARCHIVED REPORT TPN-31 ATNAVICS/FPN-67 FBPAR

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Excalibur - a Successful Swedish/U.S. Development Program

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Background AEF Vision

1THE ARMY DANGEROUSLY UNDERRESOURCED' AUSA Torchbearer Campaign Issue

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Current Force. Current Force

Next Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements. - Brief to Industry-

18. WARHEADS AND GUIDANCE SYSTEMS

New Artillery Sunday Punch

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

ARDEC Cluster Munition Replacement Technologies (CMRT) S&T Concepts

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element JA6: Joint Air-To-Ground Missile (JAGM)

ICBM MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT TO THE COMMITTEES ON ARMED SERVICES OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Anti-Access/Area Denial Challenges

A Strategy for Naval Energetics Surface Navy Association January 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007

Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1. the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget

Chapter 6. Weapons and Warhead Technologies

F-16 Fighting Falcon The Most Technologically Advanced 4th Generation Fighter in the World

Letter of Request (LOR) Checklist for PEO MS

2018 NDIA Armament Systems Forum COMMITMENT. &SOLUTIONS Act like someone s life depends on what we do.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

The Post-Afghanistan IED Threat Assessment: Executive Summary

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

ARCHIVED REPORT. Submarine Acoustic Warfare Development Archived 12/2002

JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM)

CRS Report for Congress

USMC Small Arms Modernization Brief

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

GROUND RADAR AND GUIDED MUNITIONS. Increased Oversight and Cooperation Can Help Avoid Duplication among the Services Programs

Transcription:

Ordnance & Munitions Forecast ARCHIVED REPORT For data and forecasts on current programs please visit www.forecastinternational.com or call +1 203.426.0800 Outlook FY12 was the last year of funding for U.S. Army M141 procurement has reportedly yet to score any export sales Production forecast reflects remaining production to complete existing U.S. Army procurement order only Orientation Description. A man-portable multipurpose weapon. Sponsor. The U.S. Department of Defense, through the U.S. Army, sponsors the development and U.S. Army procurement of the Bunker Defeat Munition. Status. Development through serial production. Total Produced. Through 2013, we estimate that the contractor produced 21,551 SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munitions. Application. A lightweight, man-portable, shoulder-fired multipurpose weapon system optimized for use by infantrymen on the move. In addition to its primary "bunker-buster" application, the Bunker Defeat Munition provides a minimal anti-armor capability (up to BTR-60 level). Price Range. The U.S. Army no longer maintains a budget line for the M141 BDM. According to U.S. Army FY14 budget request documentation (April 2013), the M141 BDM carried an FY12 unit price of $17,867.83. Contractors Prime Nammo Talley Defense Inc (formerly Talley Defense Systems) http://www.nammo.com, 4051 N Higley Rd, PO Box 34299, Mesa, AZ 85277-4299 United States, Tel: + 1 (480) 898-2200, Fax: + 1 (480) 898-2358, Email: marketing@nammotalley.com, Prime Comprehensive information on Contractors can be found in Forecast International's "International Contractors" series. For a detailed description, go to www.forecastinternational.com (see Products & Samples/Governments & Industries) or call + 1 (203) 426-0800. Contractors are invited to submit updated information to Editor, International Contractors, Forecast International, 22 Commerce Road, Newtown, CT 06470, USA; rich.pettibone@forecast1.com

Page 2 Ordnance & Munitions Forecast Technical Data Note: The following data reflect the limited amount of technical data available in the contractor's promotional literature for the Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon-Disposable (SMAW-D), which the U.S. Army adopted as the. Dimensions. The following data reflect the production-standard SMAW-D with the 83mm Mk 118 Mod 0 High Explosive Dual-Purpose (HEDP) warhead. SI Units U.S. Units Carry length 81.3 cm 32.0 in Projectile diameter 83 mm 3.27 in HEDP charge weight 1.1 kg 2.42 lb Total weight 7.26 kg 15.97 lb Performance. The target perforation data reflect the performance of the standard 83mm Mk 118 Mod 0 HEDP warhead against reinforced concrete walls and triple brick walls, respectively. SI Units U.S. Units Speed 220 mps 721.78 fps Altitude line of sight line of sight Effective range 250 m 273.4 yd Maximum range 500 m 546.8 yd Target perforation 20.32/30.48 cm 8/12 in Propulsion. Solid-fuel rocket motor consisting of a number of double-base propellant sticks bonded to a pin plate. Launcher Mode. The SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munition launcher consists of a disposable, telescoping tube. The launcher includes sealed end caps and a carrying sling as well as the sighting unit and firing mechanism. The operator discards the entire launch unit (except any attached optical sight) after use. Control & Guidance. The launch tube features a standard Picatinny rail system so that the operator can supplement the simple sight unit with the PVS-4 night sight as well as the PAQ-4A infrared or PEQ-2 laser aiming systems. Upon firing, eight ring-mounted, spring-loaded fins deploy to provide aerodynamic stabilization for the warhead in flight. Warhead. The 83mm Mk 118 Mod 0 multipurpose HEDP warhead is optimized for the penetration of Variants. None. Variants/Upgrades concrete, building materials, sandbags, and similar materials. The warhead also incorporates a blast / fragmentation capability. The SMAW-D fuze automatically selects the proper detonation mode to maximize destructive effects against soft or hard targets. Soft targets: fuze delays detonation until rocket buries itself deep into target. Hard targets: fuze detonates immediately upon impact with target. The contractor claims the SMAW-D warhead and fuze combination produces "enormous" target holes, propelling large fragments inside a vehicle or behind a wall. Additional warheads are reportedly in development, including one with a follow-through grenade and a flame warhead. Modernization and Retrofit Overview. Generally not applicable. The contractor integrates any product improvements as production cut-ins. October 2014

Ordnance & Munitions Forecast Page 3 Background. During Operation Just Cause in Panama (1989), the U.S. Army's need for a lightweight weapon to defeat bunkers, fortifications, and other built-up defensive structures became apparent. Although the U.S. Army senior staff subsequently identified a need for such a weapon, the Army had to resort to borrowing 125 Mk 150 Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapons (SMAW) from the U.S. Marine Corps during Operation Desert Storm (1991). Filling a Capabilities Gap However, while the Marines' Mk 150 SMAW could defeat the bunkers and similar targets, it was far too long and heavy for use by paratroopers. The Army's standard AT4/M136 exhibits similar limitations; it is also unsuitable for the bunker-busting requirement. Consequently, the U.S. Army initiated the Multi-Purpose Individual Munition (MPIM) program in September 1991 with the publication of an Operational Needs Statement for U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM). In early 1993, the U.S. Army made an initial down-selection of competing systems. In March 1993, the U.S. Army awarded contracts for 200 units each of the three finalists' systems for a nine-month competitive evaluation beginning later that year. This evaluation was essentially a "shoot-off" of productiondesign weapons. In September 1994, the U.S. Army selected the Talley Defense Systems SMAW-D for limited procurement; it was type-classified as the XM141 Bunker Defeat Munition. Congress Gets Involved However, as the result of congressional meddling over the proposed merging of the Bunker Defeat Munition Source: Nammo Talley Defense Inc Program Review program and the U.S. Marine Corps Predator program, initial deliveries of the Bunker Defeat Munition slipped to November 1997. Congress then issued a mandate that the U.S. Army procure only 6,000 Bunker Defeat Munitions, sufficient to equip the XVIII Airborne Corps (Fort Bragg, North Carolina). In 2000, Congress raised the limit to 8,000 units. In May 2001, the U.S. Army canceled the Multi-Purpose Individual Munition program. In the aftermath, there were calls for Congress to lift the mandated production cap for the Bunker Defeat Munition and fund its large-scale procurement. Subsequent defense budgets have maintained the line-item procurement of the M141 Bunker Defeat Munition. Talley continues to promote export sales of the SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munition, albeit without any success to date. Corporate Evolution In April 2007, Nammo AS (Raufoss, Norway) acquired Talley Defense Systems. The U.S. contractor continues to operate as Nammo Talley, a component of the Nammo Group. Description. The Bunker Defeat Munition is essentially a single-shot, disposable version of the Mk 150 SMAW. The telescoping launch tube features sealed end caps, a carrying sling, and a Picatinny rail system for a variety of day/night sighting system options. The contractor claims the weapon is simple to place into operation under any battlefield condition. The launch tube features a decal with detailed firing instructions. The SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munition is airdrop certified and easily transported by one soldier.

Page 4 Ordnance & Munitions Forecast Sequence of Operation To prepare the SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munition for firing, the operator attaches the appropriate optical sighting device to the integral Picatinny rail mount, if desired. He then extends the launch tube and mounts the tube on his shoulder. After acquiring the target through the integral open sights or the attached optical unit, the operator fires the weapon via the firing mechanism on the tube. The rocket motor burns out before exiting the launcher at a velocity of 220 meters per second (721.78 fps). After firing, the operator disconnects the optical sighting device from the launcher and discards the expended launch tube. Pressure from the motor firing initiates the warhead arming process; a mechanical timer completes the process after the warhead travels 15 meters (49.2 ft) downrange of the launcher. The warhead self-destructs upon impact. At a 250-meter (273.4-yd) range, hit probability is 90 percent. Multipurpose Assault Weapon Through its employment with the U.S. Marine Corps Mk 150 SMAW, the basic 83mm HEDP warhead Related News amassed a proven combat record in Operation Just Cause (1989) and Operation Desert Storm (1991). In the Bunker Defeat Munition application, the 83mm HEDP round has further proven itself during Operation Enduring Freedom (2001-present) and Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn (2003-2011). Like the Israeli B-300 and the Mk 150 SMAW, the SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munition is, at best, an effective bunker buster with only minimal anti-armor capability. The warhead technology is effective only against non-explosive reactive armor. The SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munition is not primarily an anti-armor weapon; it is actually a multipurpose assault weapon, a class of weapon gaining significant interest on the international market. While we do not expect the SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munition to garner any significant export sales, the basic weapon design will likely become the technological basis for new designs. Russian RPGs Dominate Man-Portable Anti-Armor Weapon Market As combat operations continue to demonstrate, the man-portable anti-armor weapon remains a particularly significant asset on the modern asymmetric battlefield. The role of the man-portable anti-armor weapon continues to morph from a dedicated anti-tank weapon to a general-purpose fire support asset for light and medium forces. Despite the glut of available weapons systems, the international market for man-portable anti-armor and bunker-buster weapons remains a highly competitive and dynamic environment, populated by the established market powerhouses and an influx of energetic new players. The Forecast International Weapons Group expects that the market will produce nearly 1.3 million man-portable anti-armor and bunker-buster weapons, worth over $3.45 billion, through 2023. The Russian Federation virtually dominates this market. Russian defense contractors, under the auspices of the Rosoboronexport organization, will account for 79.13 percent of man-portable anti-armor and bunker-buster weapon production, worth 60.93 percent of the total market value, through 2023. While the Russian-design RPG-7 series of weapons remains ubiquitous worldwide, the most significant new production continues to involve the RPG-26 and RPG-27 weapons, broadly based on the American M72 LAW (Light Anti-tank Weapon). Combined production of the RPG-26 and RPG-27 by the State Research and Production Enterprise "Bazalt" and the State Enterprise "Signal" will account for 64.64 percent of all new production, worth 39.18 percent of the total market value, through 2023. (FI, 12/13) Forecast International Projects $9.7 Billion Anti-Armor Missile Market over the Next 10 Years A new Forecast International analysis of the anti-armor missile market projects that manufacturers will produce more than 200,000 missiles worth nearly $10 billion through 2022. Like many other defense segments, the anti-armor missile market is evolving. Combat operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere have spurred anti-armor purchases by the U.S. and other militaries. Ironically, these missiles are not engaging tanks, but rather a host of other target types from terrorist hideouts to unarmored pickup trucks. Established market players have benefitted from this evolving trend. October 2014

Ordnance & Munitions Forecast Page 5 "U.S. and Israeli firms still have the largest share of the anti-armor missile market," said Larry Dickerson, Forecast International's senior missile analyst. During this period, "Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Rafael will earn $2.8 billion selling anti-armor missiles to customers worldwide," Dickerson said. The market positions of these manufacturers have become increasingly intertwined. For example, Lockheed Martin has cooperated with Raytheon in the development and production and marketing of the FGM-148 Javelin man-portable anti-armor missile system. The Javelin is the U.S. Department of Defense's standard man-portable anti-tank guided weapon, and nearly a dozen nations employ it. The Pentagon is interested in a more capable Javelin, the so-called Javelin ER, which would offer greater range than the original version and possibly some guidance enhancements and better performance against targets other than armored vehicle targets (e.g., bunkers and other reinforced structures). However, budget issues have scaled back some programs or forced their cancellation. The first blow to these companies came with the Pentagon's decision to cancel the Non-Line-of-Sight-Launch System program. The NLOS-LS program had an estimated worth of $2 billion. The Pentagon then began backtracking on its support for the Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) program, which was aimed at replacing the AGM-114 HELLFIRE and AGM-65 Maverick. Now, JAGM has suffered the same fate as its predecessor, the Joint Common Missile (JCM). Another acronym may take over for JAGM; however, until a new missile is ready, the Pentagon will continue to purchase HELLFIREs, Mavericks, and TOWs. Meanwhile, new systems are emerging overseas. "Europe is working on next-generation systems to win back the market share it once had," Dickerson said. These include the Missile Moyenne Portee (MMP) and the Missile Longue Portee (MLP), which will replace MILAN and HOT, respectively. For its part, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems is Israel's leading anti-armor missile manufacturer. Against most expectations, Israel has slowly secured export production contracts for its anti-armor missiles and from an area once thought to present few opportunities Europe. Rafael can count seven European countries as customers of its family of SPIKE anti-armor missiles, providing a stable production base for the company. Companies are also working on new lightweight missiles that can perform various missions and demonstrate the blurring between different markets. "Missiles are slowly evolving, becoming more than just a weapon for use against tanks or aircraft or bunkers," Dickerson said. "Eventually, the anti-tank missile market will cease to be an independent entity, becoming submerged in a larger strike weapons market." (FI, 12/13) Market Intelligence Service Subscribers: For additional news, go to the on-line E-Market Alert page located in the Intelligence Center at www.forecastinternational.com and click on the links to the products you subscribe to. Funding The following table reflects U.S. Department of Defense budget request documentation related to procurement of the. All amounts are in millions of U.S. dollars. U.S. FUNDING FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY13 FY13 QTY AMT QTY AMT QTY AMT U.S. Army Procurement M141 BDM 1,485 19.4 388 10.0 - - FY14 FY14 FY15 FY15 FY16 FY16 QTY AMT QTY AMT QTY AMT U.S. Army Procurement M141 BDM - - - - - - FY17 FY17 FY18 FY18 FY19 FY19 QTY AMT QTY AMT QTY AMT U.S. Army Procurement M141 BDM - - - - - -

Page 6 Ordnance & Munitions Forecast Contracts/Orders & Options Since Jan 1, 2008, the U.S. Army has awarded the following procurement contract for the M141 Bunker Defeat Munition. Date Contract Contractor Amount Description 2008/03/21 W15QKN-08-D-0422 Nammo Talley Defense Inc $26,136,932 Unspecified number of M141 Bunker Defeat Munitions. Timetable Month Year Major Development 1990 U.S. Army defines requirement for bunker-busting weapon following Operation Just Cause Sep 1991 FORSCOM drafts operational needs statement Mar 1993 U.S. Army awards competitive evaluation contracts Apr 1994 Competitive evaluations completed Jun 1994 Congress mandates termination of Bunker Defeat Munition program and integration of Multi-Purpose Individual Munition warhead technology with Predator program Sep 1994 U.S. Army selects Talley Defense Systems SMAW-D for interim Bunker Defeat Munition, type-classified M141 for limited procurement Apr 2007 Nammo AS completes acquisition of Talley Defense Systems 2014 Production of remaining U.S. Army order ongoing; marketing continues Worldwide Distribution/Inventories Export Potential. The international market has shown at least a moderate level of interest in the SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munition in light of the weapon's performance during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn. However, this interest has yet to translate into export sales. Countries. United States. Forecast Rationale According to U.S. Army budget request documentation, serial production of the under the existing U.S. Army procurement contract was scheduled to be completed by June 2014. Limited Procurement While U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq have validated the need for a relatively inexpensive shoulder-fired weapon capable of destroying fixed structures, the U.S. Army has shown only limited interest in funding the Bunker Defeat Munition program. Indeed, FY12 was the final year of funding for the Army's BDM procurement program. Lack of Export Sales Nammo Talley continues to offer the SMAW-D/Bunker Defeat Munition for export. However, while the international market has shown at least a moderate level of interest in this weapon system, this interest has yet to translate into sales. Revised Procurement Still Falls Short The U.S. Army's procurement objective for the remains at 23,540 units. Nevertheless, this revised figure still falls far short of the original 40,000-unit procurement objective. Indeed, it now appears unlikely the U.S. Army will ever meet this revised procurement objective. October 2014

Ordnance & Munitions Forecast Page 7 Ten-Year Outlook ESTIMATED CALENDAR YEAR UNIT PRODUCTION Designation or Program High Confidence Good Confidence Speculative Thru 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Nammo Talley Defense Inc M141 Tube <> United States 21,551 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 Total 21,551 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 148