Joint FIAS/World Bank FIJI investment approvals reform program

Similar documents
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE REFORM (SCOTLAND) BILL

The World Bank Group, Solomon Islands Portfolio Overview

Health Profession Councils National Strategic Plan

TAFE NSW HIGHER EDUCATION APPLIED RESEARCH GUIDELINES

Trust Board Meeting: Wednesday 13 May 2015 TB

Thank you for the opportunity to present submissions to the inquiry into Charity Fundraising in the 21 st Century.

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Services

abcdefghijklmnopqrstu

Northern Ireland Social Care Council Quality Assurance Framework for Education and Training Regulated by the Northern Ireland Social Care Council

2015 FORUM ECONOMIC MINISTERS MEETING

Targeted Regeneration Investment. Guidance for local authorities and delivery partners

Background paper December 2016

Innovation and Improvement Fund

INTEGRATION SCHEME (BODY CORPORATE) BETWEEN WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL AND GREATER GLASGOW HEALTH BOARD

This report will be open to the public on 11 July 2017.

Your response to this survey is strictly anonymous and will remain secure.

GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY

The use of lay visitors in the approval and monitoring of education and training programmes

Ministry of Defence and New Zealand Defence Force: Further report on the acquisition and introduction into service of Light Armoured Vehicles

Transforming bailiff action. Ombudsman Services response to Ministry of Justice s consultation on Transforming bailiff action

A new mindset: the Five Year Forward View for mental health

1. NHS Tayside Independent review by Grant Thornton UK on financial governance in NHS Tayside, including endowment funds

Australian Medical Council Limited

APEC Food Safety Cooperation Forum

Minister s Monitoring Committee On Workers Compensation

Project Report: Achieving Value for Money Charles Jago Northern Sport Centre

CALL FOR PROPOSALS LOCAL INITIATIVES ON INTER-MUNICIPAL COOPERATION IN MOLDOVA

For personal use only

Health Workforce 2025

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Interim Process and Methods of the Highly Specialised Technologies Programme

A Brief History of the Western Australian Homelessness Service System Pre-1985 to 2012 Pre SAAP SAAP I

Internationalization of MSMEs crucial to inclusive growth

Public Disclosure Copy. Implementation Status & Results Report Second Private Sector Competitiveness and Economic Diversification Prj (P144933)

WIPO REGIONAL SEMINAR ON SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INVENTORS, VALUATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF INVENTIONS AND RESEARCH RESULTS

Process for Establishing Regional Research Institutes

Welsh Government Response to the Report of the Public Accounts Committee: A Picture of Public Services

Trust Health and Safety Policy

2 Toward Clinical Excellence

SAN JUAN COUNTY LODGING TAX DESTINATION MARKETING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

AID FOR TRADE EXPERT DIALOGUE BANGKOK, 18 th Nov Case study: Bangladesh Presented by: Mohammad Farhad Bangladesh Foreign Trade Institute

This statement should be seen as a stimulus to further discussion and development, and is not definitive policy.

Delegated Commissioning Updated following latest NHS England Guidance

Report to Cabinet. 19 April Day Services for Older People (Key Decision Ref. No. SMBC1621) Social Care

Workplace Health, Safety and Wellbeing Policy

WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel

Farm Data Code of Practice Version 1.1. For organisations involved in collecting, storing, and sharing primary production data in New Zealand

University Health and Safety Consultative Committees Procedure

PRIVACY MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Annex 3 Information and Communication Requirements EEA and Norway Grants

National VET Data Policy

Western Australian Industry Participation Strategy (WAIPS)

A Maternity Network for Wales

WHO s response, and role as the health cluster lead, in meeting the growing demands of health in humanitarian emergencies

NHS continuing health care joint dispute resolution procedure

UPDATE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE HANDBOOK

Topical Peer Review 2017 Ageing Management of Nuclear Power Plants

A Case Review Process for NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts

NATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY PROGRAMS LEADING TO REGISTRATION AND ENDORSEMENT IN AUSTRALIA

Project Request and Approval Process

TRUST BOARD 27 OCTOBER 2011 QUARTERLY CUSTOMER CARE REPORT

Local Governments and Sustainability Survey

Adults and Safeguarding Committee 19 March Implementing the Care Act 2014: Carers; Prevention; Information, Advice and Advocacy.

Decision Regulation Impact Statement for changes to the National Quality Framework

GUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF SENIOR ACADEMIC GPs (ENGLAND) August 2005

Priorities for exit negotiations

Sport Ireland - Transport, Tourism & Sport Committee

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. CALL - EAC/A01/2015 Erasmus+ Vocational Education and Training Mobility Charter

April 17, 2004 Regulatory Update Volume Nine, Fifth Issue MMIV Charles E. Rumbaugh

Guidance For Health Care Staff Within NHS Grampian On Working With The Pharmaceutical Industry And Suppliers Of Prescribable Health Care Products

Interim Progress Report Interim Progress Report on implementing the Government s Response to the Power of Information Review (Cm7157)

Patient Experience Strategy

1. New accreditation programmes on the way

GUIDELINES FOR JUNIOR DOCTORS USING THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS

DESIGNATED PRESCRIBING AUTHORITY FOR REGISTERED NURSES WORKING IN PRIMARY HEALTH AND SPECIALTY TEAMS

The. Credentialling Framework for New Zealand Health Professionals

SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT FUNDING CONDITIONS FOR DELIVERING PROJECTS THROUGH THE NON PROFIT DISTRIBUTING MODEL

1. Introduction. 2. Purpose of the Ethical Framework

Lao Business Forum: Improving the business environment through constructive dialogue

INCENTIVE SCHEMES & SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS

PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM SECRETARIAT

Counterpart International Afghanistan Afghan Civic Engagement Program (ACEP) Request for Applications (RFA) Government Monitoring Grant(GMG)

MDUFA Performance Goals and Procedures Process Improvements Pre-Submissions Submission Acceptance Criteria Interactive Review

IEG Convenor s Report to CTI

LISTENING TO THE PACIFIC

Chester County Vision Partnership Grant Program January 2017

ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES POLICY FOR CONTINUING HEALTHCARE FUNDED INDIVIDUALS

The introduction of nurse and midwife prescribing inireland: an overview

Masonic Charitable Foundation 2017 Hospice Grants Bereavement Care. Information and criteria

Developing a New Strategy for the Visitor Economy

III. The provider of support is the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (hereafter just TA CR ) seated in Prague 6, Evropska 2589/33b.

Fulfilling lives: Supporting people with multiple and complex needs

Public Diplomacy, Policy Research and Outreach Devoted to the European Union and EU-Canada Relations

Key development issues and rationale for Bank involvement

Signing Ceremony for Benefactor Memorandum of Understanding between PepsiCo and Arab International Women s Forum. Speech by

Erasmus+ Vocational Education and Training Mobility Charter Specifications for call - EAC/A02/2016

Unsolicited proposals. Guidelines for submission and assessment

HEADER. Enabling the consumer role in clinical governance A guide for health services

England. Questions and Answers. Draft Integrated Care Provider (ICP) Contract - consultation package

ERASMUS+ Study Exchanges and Traineeships. Handbook for School/Departmental Exchange Co-ordinators

VELINDRE NHS TRUST PUBLIC TRUST BOARD REPORT. Procurement Services. Andy Butler, Director of Finance, NWSSP

Transcription:

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Joint FIAS/World Bank FIJI investment approvals reform program A donor update document 27 May 2005 Public Disclosure Authorized Foreign Investment Advisory Service A joint service of the International Finance Corporation and The World Bank

Contents The Fiji investment approvals reform program...1 The program objectives...1 Impact and outcomes of the program to date...1 The main program inputs...2 Outcome of the program mid-point review...3 Importance of the program...4 Impact and outcomes of the program to date...4 The program inputs and design...4 Future program evolution...5 Supplementary letter of request for continued inputs...5 Appendix Program development...6 Program structure...7 Stage 1: Initial FIAS mission to Fiji...7 Stage 2: Benchmarking survey and initial agency reform planning by regulatory reform implementation specialist...8 Stage 3: Involvement by technical specialists, reporting and establishment of private sector approval process satisfaction survey...9 Stage 4: Implementation of agency reform plans and reporting...10 Stage 5: Program evaluation and presentation...11 extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc

The Fiji investment approvals reform program The program objectives The program started in September 2004 for an initial 12 month period in association with the Ministry of Commerce, Business Development and Investment (MCBDI) and with the support of the Ministry of Finance and national Planning (MFNP). Details on how the program was developed and its staged are set out in the Appendix. The program incorporates the provision of hands-on, practical assistance to the 18 government agencies involved in implementing reforms to their investment approval procedures. The key objectives are to: facilitate improved efficiencies within the relevant government agencies through a change management process that will result in a sustainable and long term improvement in investment approval processing procedures provide specialist advice and assistance to government agencies identified as having priority in reforming/streamlining their approval procedures establish workable procedures for effective coordination between the various government agencies involved in investment approvals ensure that each government agency can effectively monitor their performance through selfassessment processes and that procedures are in place to rectify shortcomings in achieving realistic targets on a sustainable basis set in place constructive dialogue between government and the private sector to ensure that the reform process in maintained and expanded to a mutually agreed agenda. Impact and outcomes of the program to date The program has had a positive impact on implementing reform and delivering positive outcomes e.g.: The World Bank Doing Business indicators: report a decline in the number of days required to start a business in Fiji from 64 (2004) to 46 days (2005) due to investors now being able to do a number of tasks concurrently. extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 1

Foreshore leases: average processing time of 5 months July-Dec, versus upwards of 11 months under the old system. Work permits: average processing time for new foreign investors 14 working days during Q4 2004 versus 40-60 days under the old system. Foreign investment registration average processing time 3.8 working days July to December 2004, versus upwards of 3 weeks under the old system (prior to July 2004). The main program inputs FIAS based in Sydney has been managing the program in association with the World Bank in Washington. The key features of the program include: Establishment and support for the operation of a new public/private sector Task Force to identify priority regulatory obstacles and guide the simplification of regulations and their administration. The Task Force reports directly to the Minister of MCBDI, who, in turn, reports to the Cabinet Sub-Committee on Investment (CSI), chaired by the Prime Minister. The involvement of a regulatory reform implementation specialist (Mike Mullins), attached to the MCBDI. Mike has worked directly with the Task Force, the MCBDI and the government agencies involved with investment approvals. A private sector benchmarking survey during the second stage of the program. In April 2005 we commissioned Tebbutt Research, in agreement with the MCBDI, to undertake the first survey. The focus is to assess the private sector s experience complying with investment approvals processes in Fiji. Presentation of the survey results will be at the end of June 2005. Identification of by the Task Force on the more difficult priority areas within agencies requiring specialist resource support. Two priorities have been identified and agreed so far: extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 2

Review terms of reference A review of the improving the system for lodging, processing, storing and providing business registration information in the Fiji Islands. For this we have contracted Norway Registers Development AS (double click on the attached file on the left to read the terms of reference for this review). The review will start in June 2005 in collaboration with the Ministry of Justice and the Office of the Registrar of Companies (ORC). Info summaries terms of reference The preparation of summary information about selected investment approvals processes (double click on the attached file on the left to reaed the terms of reference for this project). We are in discussions with a Suva based consultant to start this work in June 2005 with Fiji Trade and Investment Bureau. Establishment of local counterpart teams in each agency. These teams will work with the regulatory reform implementation specialist and the other consultants on the implementation of each agency s reform plan. Secondment of staff from the MCBDI and the MFNP. These will constitute a counterpart team, working under the direction and management of Mike Mullins. Outcome of the program mid-point review In April 2005 we reached the six month point in the program. This involved a roundtable review discussion with MCBDI, The World Bank, FIAS and the Suva-based consultant, via video link, on Tuesday 12 April 2005. The meeting addressed key aspects of the program: its importance to MCBDI and to improving the environment for the private sector impacts and outcomes from the program to date design of the program and areas for improvement. Consultant Q1 2005 report The discussions are summarised in the remainder of this section (double click on the attached file on the left to read the consultant report used as the basis for the review discussions). extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 3

Importance of the program MCBDI reiterated the importance of the program for improving Fiji s business environment. MCBDI indicated that the partnership with the private sector in streamlining of regulatory processes reducing investment approvals processing times, improving transparency and reducing investor compliance costs is regarded by the Fiji Government as an essential requirement for increasing levels of private investment and business activity in Fiji. MCBDI also highlighted that Cabinet had endorsed the reforms based on improving the investment and business environment for the private sector and requires progress reports from the MCBDI reporting through the Cabinet Sub-Committee on Investment, Chaired by the Prime Minister. Impact and outcomes of the program to date The program has had a positive impact on implementing reform and delivering positive outcomes. MCBDI acknowledged that much of the progress to date has focused on ensuring that there are sufficiently robust processes in place to provided sustainability of reform. There was a realisation this needs more work to ensure quantitative and qualitative measures in place to demonstrate outcomes from the implementation of reforms. We consider that the Doing Business Indicators will provide a good annual update on progress in regulatory reform and that the private sector survey (postponed from earlier in the program on MCBDI CEO s the advice), should proceed. The workshop held on 23 March in Suva endorsed this. The program inputs and design The existing design of the program has been working well. In particular two aspects have been being particularly useful: The placement of Mike Mullins full time within the MCBDI to guide the overall reform process and work with authorities and the private sector on their reform activities has been effective. MCBDI see his presence as critical in its ability to maintain the momentum for reform and to support the reform efforts of other agencies. The availability of supporting resources that is accessible once the Public/Private Task Force has provided endorsement of their need. MCBDI considered this a unique feature of the program, compared with other donor funded initiatives. The flexibility built into the program has allowed us to quickly respond to needs as they arise. extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 4

Future program evolution There has been substantive progress over the past six months. However, we all acknowledged that there remains much to be completed. We recognised that the current focus has been on establishment related approvals, which is included under one of the World Bank s Doing Business Indicators the time and cost to start a business. We anticipate that, going forward, the focus will expand to include more of the regulatory and administrative reforms covered by the Doing Business Indicators. MCBDI stressed that this would need organising in line with available resources, especially from within the Ministry itself. Collectively, we acknowledged that there will be a need to work more closely with authorities and the private sector to ensure the effective implementation of reform. As an example, MCBDI foreshadowed implementation of recommendations from the review to improve the system for lodging, processing, storing and providing company/business registration information. The Ministry of Justice has since asked MCBDI to fund a project manager fund a short-term project manager/business analyst to work with ORC to assist with: the implementation of recommendations from the FIAS-funded review of the system for lodging, processing, storing and providing business registration information the overall strengthening of the customer service aspects of the ORC. Supplementary letter of request for continued inputs In light of progress made to date, and coupled with the work that remains to be completed, the MCBDI indicated that the program should continue in its current form to the end of the proposed program in September 2005. We have subsequently received a letters from: MCBDI letter to FIAS MFNP letter to WB the MCBDI (double click on the attached file to read the letter from MCBDI to FIAS) (MFNP (double click on the attached file to read the letter from MCBDI to the World Bank. Both letters request that we consider extending the duration of the program beyond the current termination date of September 2005 to September 2006. We are considering this within the context of the FIAS and World Bank budget position. We will also discuss this with MCBDI at the end of May and early June 2005 extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 5

Program development and structure Program development In December 2003, we received a formal request from MCBDI. This was to assist assistance in implementing reforms to the investment approvals processes across other agencies. In total, 18 agencies were been identified as being involved in investment approvals. The request follows FIAS support for changes to the foreign investment legislation. It also complements FIAS assistance to FTIB in its implementation of reform by introducing investment registration rather than approvals, providing a wider whole of government framework for reform of investment approvals. As the basis for the request, the Fiji Government had previously commissioned a review of the investment approval process from KPMG, during the latter part of 1992. In summary, the report concluded: On average, a new investor s application currently takes between eight to eleven weeks to be processed when the project does not require specific licenses (i.e. project requires approvals only from the following authorities: Fiji Islands Trade and Investment Bureau, Immigration Department and Companies Office). In addition to the above, specific licenses/approvals (e.g. land leases, mineral exploration licenses etc) can take between four weeks and eleven months to be approved. This means that on average a total of between eight weeks and a year pass between lodgement of the initial application by the investor and obtaining the necessary approval to commence business. From an investment promotion perspective this time is too long and unacceptable. 1 This overall conclusion is reflected in the Doing Business 2005. For example, the data provide an indication of the lengthiness of approvals for a SME to start a business processes businesses have, in relation to best practice. In Fiji, for example, these data currently show that it takes 46 days to start a business the second highest number of days in the Pacific and 44 days more than the global good practice of 2 days. The Fiji Government has accepted that the agencies involved in investment approval procedures require improved efficiency. More specifically, Government ministries and departments involved in the investment approvals process have been directed by Cabinet to submit action plans detailing their reforms to efficiently facilitate investment applications. 1 KPMG, Review of the Investment Approval Process, January 23, 2003, page 1. extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 6

The Government has further reinforced this requirement, acknowledging that they need to change their attitude in their dealings with the private sector if Fiji is to enhance its location offer and to avoid discouraging potential investors. For example, in a recent speech, the Prime Minister, the Hon. Laisenia Qarase, made it clear that the Government is committed to improved and more investor friendly approval procedures within government agencies. Program structure The program has five stages, over a 12 month period, starting September 2004: 1. Initial FIAS mission to Fiji. 2. Benchmarking survey and initial agency reform planning by regulatory reform implementation specialist. 3. Involvement by technical specialists, reporting and establishment of private sector approval process satisfaction survey. 4. Implementation of agency reform plans and reporting. 5. Program evaluation and presentation. We discuss each of these stages in more detail below. Stage 1: Initial FIAS mission to Fiji The objective of this stage is to confirm the overall program parameters and to establish the public /private Task Force. The World Bank contracted regulatory reform implementation specialist will be briefed by FIAS in Sydney prior to departure for Fiji. An initial FIAS mission to Fiji will be undertaken for: discussions with the MCBDI, other ministries, development agencies and the CSI, chaired by the Prime Minister agreement on the positioning of the regulatory implementation specialist within this Ministry and on the involvement of the secondment of five staff from the MCBDI and the MFNP officials workshop with relevant agencies, NGOs and private sector to outline the program and to garner support extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 7

follow up consultations with private sector and government to establish the joint public/private sector Task force (with chairperson possibly from the CSI) and to agree on the Task Force s role, responsibilities and work plan selection and briefing of local contractor to undertake the private sector benchmarking and on-going private sector approval process satisfaction surveys generation of publicity on the program through local media briefings. By the end of this stage, there would be a clear understanding by stakeholders of the program s objectives, timetable and their obligations. Stage 2: Benchmarking survey and initial agency reform planning by regulatory reform implementation specialist A local contractor 2 will undertake the benchmarking survey of private sector. Input from those investors who went through investment approval procedures over the previous 6-12 months will be collated into a report. This will establish the benchmarks against which future improvements in individual agencies investment approvals processes are measured. The findings will also help identify the problematic procedures in terms of uncertainty and costs from the private sector s perspective a long list of potential priority problem areas. The results of this survey will be submitted to FIAS and a summary report on the findings and implications sent by FIAS to the Task Force for discussion, endorsement and subsequent presentation to the Minister for MCBDI. Timing will coincide with the presentation of the first monitoring and evaluation reports by agencies, scheduled for consideration by the CSI in October 2004. An important element of the FIAS report will be recommendations on the specialist technical support required by agencies responsible for the identified priority problem areas. Agreement on the most difficult priority problem areas would be secured from the Task Force before we recruit these specialists. In parallel with the private sector survey, the regulatory reform implementation specialist will work with the government agencies on a range of activities including, but not necessarily limited to: confirmation of counterparts in each of the individual agencies 2 Suva based Tebbutt Research Pty. Ltd. was awarded the contract. extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 8

an initial workshop with counterpart teams from the individual agencies to detail the proposed approach and to establish coordination within, and the sharing of information and experience between, the agencies confirmation or establishment of, as appropriate, the work plan for the counterpart team within each agency and over-sight of their individual monitoring and evaluation procedures (refining as necessary and coupled with the provision of program and implementation support and tools preliminary work on the options for reform/streamlining of procedures and on the identification of the costs to the agencies of the existing procedures. The five-person counterpart team from the MCBDI and the MFNP will work with the regulatory reform implementation specialist during these activities. This is to ensure that they develop a clear understanding of both the need for and the rationale behind the reform processes. Stage 3: Involvement by technical specialists, reporting and establishment of private sector approval process satisfaction survey The local private sector survey contractor will commence the on-going private sector approval process satisfaction survey, as new applicants complete investment approval procedures (expected to be 40-50 respondents per month), with input from FTIB. The regulatory reform implementation specialist will continue with the work program and assist/guide agencies with preparations for the end of December monitoring and evaluation reports to the Minister of Commerce, Business Development and Investment, which will be considered by the CSI in January 2005. Increasing emphasis will be given to guiding the counterpart teams in each agency on the required investment reform and streamlining procedures. FIAS will begin recruitment of the specialist consultants to work with individual agencies on the agreed more difficult/complex priority reform procedures for a period of up to 4 weeks in the particular agency. These specialist consultants will work closely with the regulatory reform implementation specialist and the counterpart teams in the relevant agency and will report to FIAS. Progress reports will be submitted to FIAS by early December 2004 will comprise: a progress report by regulatory reform implementation specialist extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 9

reports by any of the specialist consultants who complete their work during this stage update report by local contractor on findings and any identified trends from the on-going private sector approval process satisfaction survey. FIAS will then prepare a summary report for consideration by the Task Force and subsequent delivery to the Minister for Commerce, Business Development and Investment. A FIAS mission to Fiji will follow to: review the initial outcomes from the program with the stakeholders establish an agreement with the Task Force, the Minister and CSI on the details of the next implementation stages report on progress achieved to a public/private sector Task Force workshop, and to consider the proposed next stages, if required give publicity through the local media, on the program and the details of the next stages. Stage 4: Implementation of agency reform plans and reporting The regulatory reform implementation specialist will continue during this stage but with the following expected adjustments in focus: those agencies with a proven track record in securing change will receive more limited assistance other agencies will be provided with increased assistance/guidance through their counterpart teams an overall greater emphasis on reforms/streamlining of procedures rather than monitoring and evaluation. The additional specialist consultants will assist with the resolution of identified complex problem areas in individual agencies. During this stage, the 5-person counterpart team will be encouraged to become more involved in resolving these more complex problem areas, particularly in those cases where the regulatory regime remains a significant impediment. extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 10

The on-going private sector approval process satisfaction survey as new applicants complete investment approval procedures will continue. The local survey contractor will provide regular reports to FIAS. These will be submitted to the Task Force for consideration to coincide with the required three monthly monitoring and evaluation reports by agencies. When the Task Force forwards these reports to the Minister of Commerce, Business Development and Investment and the CSI, they will provide a useful reference point against which to validate the agencies self-assessment reports. The regulatory reform implementation specialist will complete the assignment at the end of this stage. Each agency and the five-person counterpart team will be left with the skills and tools to maintain the self-assessment, reporting and reform/streamlining procedures. Stage 5: Program evaluation and presentation There will be a final evaluation of progress completed in this stage. The evaluation report will be prepared by FIAS indicating the level of success in implementing change by agency and providing measures of improvement in performance. The report will also provide recommendations for an ongoing reform strategy. The report will be submitted to the Task Force and Minister of MCBDI and the CSI. Once the evaluation report has been reviewed, FIAS will undertake a final program mission to Fiji in order to: present the reports discuss with individual ministries the recommendations for future activities to sustain and broaden the reform and streamlining procedures and the technical/infrastructure support they will require to achieve effective outcomes present an information workshop for the private sector and media on the outcomes from the program and the agreed future reform program. Consideration may also be given to a roll out of reforms to other approval and reporting procedures that impact adversely on the private sector in Fiji. extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 11

extfiji0invest2reform0update0270505.doc 12