Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide

Similar documents
Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

Value Based Purchasing

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

CMS in the 21 st Century

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (At a Glance)

Our Hospital s Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Journey

Dianne Feeney, Associate Director of Quality Initiatives. Measurement

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Step-by-Step Calculations for Value-Based Purchasing

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MODIFYING THE QUALITY- BASED REIMBURSEMENT INITIATIVE AFTER STATE FY 2010

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

Facility State National

IMPROVING HCAHPS, PATIENT MORTALITY AND READMISSION: MAXIMIZING REIMBURSEMENTS IN THE AGE OF HEALTHCARE REFORM

An Overview of the. Measures. Reporting Initiative. bwinkle 11/12

KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Understanding Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Innovative Coordinated Care Delivery

PASSPORT ecare NEXT AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges

Quality Care Amongst Clinical Commotion: Daily Challenges in the Care Environment

FFY 2018 IPPS PROPOSED RULE CHA MEMBER FORUM

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

CMS Value Based Purchasing: The Wave of the Future

Medicare Payment Strategy

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

Value-Based Purchasing & Payment Reform How Will It Affect You?

P4P Programs 9/13/2013. Medicare P4P Programs. Medicaid P4P Programs

Presented by: Gara Edelstein, CNO, CHS & St. Catherine of Siena Nicolette Fiore-Lopez, CNO, St. Charles Hospital Susan Penque, CNO, South Nassau

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Special Open Door Forum Participation Instructions: Dial: Reference Conference ID#:

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

Care Coordination What Matters

Improving Compliance

Connecting the Revenue and Reimbursement Cycles

The Wave of the Future: Value-Based Purchasing & the Impact of Quality Reporting Within the Revenue Cycle

Program Summary. Understanding the Fiscal Year 2019 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Page 1 of 8 July Overview

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE AND VALUE BASED PURCHASING: Leigh Humphrey, MBA, LMSW, CPHQ

Value Based Purchasing: Improving Healthcare Outcomes Using the Right Incentives

Is Emergency Department Quality Related to Other Hospital Quality Domains?

PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units MARCH DATA - Final Report 2

PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units APRIL DATA - Final Report 2

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) / PREMIER HOSPITAL QUALITY INCENTIVE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

HCAHPS. Presented by: Bill Sexton. Proudly recognized as one of the Nation s Top 100 Critical Access Hospitals - ivantage Health Analytics

Troubleshooting Audio

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

Quality and Health Care Reform: How Do We Proceed?

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

FY 2014 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

The Data Game. Vicky A. Mahn-DiNicola RN, MS, CPHQ VP Research & Market Insights

Performance Scorecard 2013

Financial Policy & Financial Reporting. Jay Andrews VP of Financial Policy

New Mexico Hospital Association

Copyright 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Quality Measures Are You Ready?

Troubleshooting Audio

Troubleshooting Audio

System Quality Control and. Peter Shamamian, MD FACS Vice President and Chief Quality Officer Vice Chairman for Quality and Performance Improvement

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

How Your Hospital s Total Performance Score (TPS) Will Impact Your Medicare Payments

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

HACs, Readmissions and VBP: Hospital Strategies for Turning Lemons into Lemonade

CY 2012 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

Overview of DataGen Analyses Wyoming Hospital Association

How the compliance department can support quality of care initiatives

An Update on Medicare s Value-based Purchasing and Readmissions Reduction Programs:

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

HACs, Readmissions and VBP: Hospital Strategies for Turning

Next Generation of Healthcare in the World of ACOs and VBP

Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2012

Improving quality of care during inpatient hospital stays

OVERVIEW OF THE FY 2018 IPPS FINAL RULE. Published in the Federal Register August 14 th Rule to take effect October 1 st

Strategy/Driver Prevention Strategies Action Strategies

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

Q & A with Premier: Implications for ecqms Under the CMS Update

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Future of Quality Reporting and the CMS Quality Incentive Programs

To Admit or Not to Admit: How Do We Answer this Question?

Transcription:

Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide This material was prepared by Qualis Health, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Idaho and Washington, under a contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents presented do not necessarily reflect CMS policy. ID/WA-C7-QH-757-03-12 1

Instructions Purpose: The Qualis Health VBP Worksheet gives hospitals the opportunity to estimate (or model) how their performance on VBP measures will eventually translate into a Total Performance Score for FY2014. Benefits: Helps identify areas for process improvement Gives flexibility to update performance data in real-time during performance period Allows user to monitor progress and assess potential risk throughout performance period Facilitates ongoing communication between quality department, leadership, and front line Limitations: This Model VBP Worksheet is for educational use only. No payment incentives or penalties are to be applied based on these data. Access: To request a copy of the FY2014 VBP Worksheet, contact qhmedicareteam@qualishealth.org Instructions: Enable Macros when you open the worksheet For Process Measures Update the date range for the data you will enter (FYI - VBP FY2014 Baseline for Process and HCAHPS data is 4/1/2010-12/31/2010 and for Performance Period it is 4/1/2012 to 12/31/2012) Enter numerator (num) and denominator (den) for each measure under Baseline and Your Performance columns for your hospital Data source is mechanism your hospital uses for reporting these measures to CMS for Inpatient Hospital Reporting You must enter data for at least four measure under Your Performance column and each must have at least 10 in the denominator to receive a domain score As you enter new data, you will see changes in the Percentage (%) for that measure and in the Output fields For HCAHPS Dimensions Update the date range for these columns to reflect the data you will enter (VBP specified Baseline and Performance periods for HCAHPS are the same as for Process Measures) Enter percent scores for each dimension in Your HCAHPS Survey Baseline and Performance columns. Potential data sources are Hospital Compare website and/or your HCAHPS vendor You must enter data for all eight dimensions under Your Performance to receive a domain score As you enter new data, you will see changes for that dimension and in the Output fields 2

Instructions For Outcome Measures Update the date range for data you will enter (FYI - VBP FY2014 Baseline for 30-day Mortality Baseline is 7/1/2009 to 6/30/2010 and Performance is 7/1/2011 to 6/30/2012) Enter your best estimate for risk-adjusted 30-day mortality rate for each condition. Potential data source is last value published on Hospital Compare website. You must enter data for at least two of the three mortality measures to receive an outcome domain score The Worksheet will convert the 30-day mortality rate you enter into a survival rate so it can use benchmarks and thresholds provided by CMS to compute point assignment As you enter new data, you will see changes for that dimension and in the Output fields CMS has not released point assignment examples for outcome measures. The final rule suggests they will use the same approach as with process measures. Special Notes: You receive the higher of your achievement or improvement points for each measure or dimension If there is no data for a measure during baseline, you will be assigned only achievement points based on your performance period data You must have process, HCAHPS, and 30-day mortality data for the worksheet to compute a Total Performance Score For process measures, you must have at least 10 cases in your denominator for at least 4 measures during the performance period to compute achievement points For process measures, you must have at least 10 cases in your denominator for at least 4 measures during the baseline period and performance period to compute improvement points If you had no HCAHPS data during the baseline period, once you enter HCAHPS data for each of the eight (8) dimensions under Your Performance column you will receive a HCAHPS Domain Score and a Total Performance Score For HCAHPS dimensions, you must have at least 100 surveys during the baseline period and performance period to compute improvement points. For HCAHPS dimensions, you must have at least 100 surveys during the performance period to compute achievement points. For 30-day mortality measures, you must have at least 10 cases for at least 2 measures during the baseline and performance period to compute improvement points. For 30-day mortality, you must have at least 10 cases for each condition for at least 2 measures during the performance period to compute achievement points. 3

Reference Guide 1 Process Measures National Clinical Data Performance Standards FY2014 National Clinical Data Performance Standards FY2014 Inpatient Hospital Process Measures AMI-7a Fibrinolytic agent received w/in 30' of hospital arrival AMI-8a PCI received w/in 90' of hospital arrival PN-3b Blood culture Before 1st antibiotic received in hospital PN-6 Appropriate antibiotic selection for CAP in Immunocompetant patients Benchmark Threshold Inpatient Hospital Process Measures 96.30 80.66 SCIP-2 Received Prophylactic Abx Consistent w/ Recommendations 100.00 93.44 SCIP-3 Prophylactic Abx Discontinued w/in 24hrs of Surgery End Time or 48 hrs for Cardiac Surgery 100.00 97.30 SCIP-4 Controlled 6 AM Postoperative Serum Glucose - Cardiac Surgery 99.58 94.46 SCIP-VTE1 Recommended VTE Prophylaxix Ordered During the Admission HF-1 Discharge instructions 100.00 92.66 SCIP-VTE2 Received VTE Prophylaxix w/in 24 hrs Prior to or After Surgery SCIP-1 Prophylactic antibiotic received w/in 1 hr prior to surgical incision 100.00 98.07 SCIP-CARD2 Pre-Admission Beta-blocker and Perioperative Period Beta-blocker SCIP-9 Postoperative urinary catheter removal on postoperative day 1 or 2 Benchmark Threshold 100.00 98.13 99.96 96.63 100.00 96.34 100.00 94.62 99.83 94.92 100.00 95.65 99.89 92.86 1. This Model VBP Reference Guide is for educational use only. No payment incentives or penalties are to be applied based on these data. 2. Assigning Points for Achievement For each VBP process measure that counts toward incentive payment, a hospital can earn from 0 to 10 points for achievement based on where its score for the measure fell relative to the achievement threshold and the benchmark. All achievement points are rounded to the nearest whole number. Achievement points are only assigned if they are at least 10 cases in the denominator during performance period. If the hospital s score is equal to or greater than the benchmark, then the hospital receives 10 points for achievement. If the hospital s score is within the attainment range (greater than the achievement threshold, but below the benchmark), then the hospital receives between 1 and 9 points based on a discrete linear scale established for the achievement range. If a hospital s score is equal to or less than the achievement threshold (i.e., the lower bound of the achievement range), then the hospital receives 0 points for achievement. 4

Reference Guide 1 Process Measures 3. Assigning Points for Improvement For each VBP process measure tied to incentive payment, a hospital can earn from 0 to 9 points for improvement based on improving its score on the measure from its baseline performance. A unique improvement range for each hospital on each VBP measure is established to define the distance between the hospital s baseline score on a measure and the national benchmark for the measure during baseline. All improvement points are rounded to the nearest whole number. Improvement points are only assigned if they are at least 10 cases in the denominator during baseline and performance periods. If a hospital s score is greater than the hospital s baseline score and less than or equal to the national benchmark, then the hospital receives between 1 and 9 points. If the hospital s score is equal to or less than its baseline score, then the hospital receives 0 points. 4. Calculation of the Overall VBP Process Domain Score A hospital s overall VBP process domain score is based on all process measures for which the hospital submitted data and for which it had a sufficient number of cases. The number of measures for each hospital can vary, depending on the services that the hospital provides. As described above, for each applicable measure a hospital receives from 0 to 10 points for achievement and 0 to 9 points for improvement, whichever is higher. The points earned for each measure are summed to determine total earned points: Total earned points = Sum of points earned across all reported measures Each hospital will also have a corresponding universe of total possible points which is calculated as: Total potential points = Total number of measures reported by hospital x 10 pts The hospital s VBP process domain score is a percent computed as follows: VBP process domain score = Total earned points / Total possible points x 100% Because the process domain score is based only on the process measures for which a hospital can report, given its patient population and service mix, the scores are normalized across hospitals that report different numbers of measures. 5

Reference Guide 1 Process Measures 5. Weight of Hospital Performance Domains and Calculation of the Hospital VBP Total Performance Score Clinical process domain score will receive 45% weighting in TPS for the FY2014 Hospital VBP program. 6. Translation of VBP Performance Score into Incentive Payment The Total Performance Score will be multiplied by a linear exchange function (slope) to determine incentive payment. CMS will compute this slope after the close of the performance period. 6

Reference Guide 2 Process Measures Note: CMS examples below use FY2013 achievement and benchmark values. We include them here as they offer a visual representation of point assignment 7

Reference Guide 2 Process Measures Note: CMS examples below use FY2013 achievement and benchmark values. We include them here as they offer a visual representation of point assignment 8

Reference Guide 3 HCAHPS Dimensions HCAHPS Performance Standards FY2014 HCAHPS Performance Standards FY2014 HCAHPS Dimensions Floor Benchmark Threshold HCAHPS Dimensions Floor Benchmark Threshold Communication with Nurses (% Always ) Communication with Doctors (% Always ) Responsiveness of Hospital Staff (% Always ) 42.84 84.99 75.79 Communication About Medications (% Always ) 55.49 88.45 79.57 Cleanliness and Quietness (% Always ) 32.15 78.08 62.21 Discharge Information (% Yes ) 36.01 71.54 59.85 38.52 78.10 63.54 54.73 89.24 82.72 Pain Management (% Always ) 40.79 77.97 68.99 Overall Rating of Hospital (% 9 or 10 ) 30.91 82.55 67.33 1. This Model VBP Reference Guide is for educational use only. No payment incentives or penalties are to be applied based on these data. 2. Assigning Points for Achievement For each HCAHPS VBP dimension that counts toward incentive payment, a hospital can earn from 0 to 10 points for achievement based on where its percentage score for the dimension fell relative to the achievement threshold and the benchmark. All achievement points are rounded to the nearest whole number. Achievement points are only assigned if they are at least 100 surveys during performance period. If the hospital s percentage score is equal to or greater than the benchmark, then the hospital receives 10 points for achievement. If the hospital s percentage score is within the achievement range (greater than the achievement threshold, but below the benchmark), then the hospital receives between 1 and 9 points based on a discrete linear scale established for the achievement range. If a hospital s percentage score is equal to or less than the achievement threshold (i.e., the lower bound of the achievement range), then the hospital receives 0 points for achievement. 9

Reference Guide 3 HCAHPS Dimensions 3. Assigning Points for Improvement For each HCAHPS VBP dimension tied to incentive payment, a hospital can earn from 0 to 9 points for improvement based on improving its percentage score on the dimension from its baseline performance. A unique improvement range for each hospital on each VBP dimension is established to define the distance between the hospital s baseline percentage score on a dimension and the national benchmark for the dimension during baseline. All improvement points would be rounded to the nearest whole number. Improvement points are only assigned if at least 100 surveys during baseline and performance periods. If the hospital s percentage score is between the hospital s baseline percentage score and the national benchmark, then the hospital receives between 0 and 9 points based on the discrete linear scale that defines the improvement range. If a hospital s percentage score is equal to or lower than its baseline percentage score on the dimension, then the hospital receives 0 points for improvement. 4. Assigning Points for Consistency The Minimum Value Formula from the final rule is applied to each HCAHPS dimension score from the performance period to determine a minimum value for each (so the minimum value is not necessarily the same as the face value of your lowest HCAHPS score). Minimum Value Formula = (Your Performance Score - Floor Score)/(Threshold score - Floor score) The lowest computed minimum value is then plugged into another formula for consistency point assignment: Formula = (20*min) - 0.5 10

Reference Guide 3 HCAHPS Dimensions 5. Calculation of the Overall Patient Experience of Care domain (HCAHPS) Performance Score CMS will calculate the overall HCAHPs performance score as follows: For each of the eight dimensions, determine the larger of the 0-10 achievement score and the 0-9 improvement points Sum these eight values to arrive at a 0-80 score Calculate the 0-20 HCAHPS consistency points To arrive at the HCAHPS total earned points, or HCAHPS overall domain score, sum the HCAHPS base score and the consistency score 6. Weight of Hospital Performance Domains and Calculation of the Hospital VBP Total Performance Score HCAHPS domain score will receive 30% weighting in TPS for the FY2014Hospital VBP program. 7. Translation of VBP Performance Score into Incentive Payment The Total Performance Score will be multiplied by a linear exchange function (slope) to determine incentive payment. CMS will compute this slope after the close of the performance period. 11

Reference Guide 4 HCAHPS Dimensions Point assignment examples Note: CMS examples below use FY2013 achievement and benchmark values. We include them here as they offer a visual representation of point assignment 12

Reference Guide 4 HCAHPS Dimensions Point assignment examples Note: CMS examples below use FY2013 achievement and benchmark values. We include them here as they offer a visual representation of point assignment 13

Reference Guide 5 Outcome Measures Inpatient Hospital Outcome Measures Outcome Performance Standards FY2014 Benchmark Threshold Mort 30 - AMI 86.73 84.77 Mort 30 - HF 90.42 88.61 Mort 30 - PN 90.21 88.18 1. This Model VBP Reference Guide is for educational use only. No payment incentives or penalties are to be applied based on these data. 2. The final rule for FY2014 VBP indicates that CMS will use a point assignment approach for the outcome measures that is similar to that used for process measures. No detailed description or visual representation for outcome measures point assignment has been made available as of April 2012. Qualis Health will adapt the point assignment methodology for outcome measures as necessary when/if further detail provided by CMS. 3. Assigning Points for Achievement For each VBP outcome measure that counts toward incentive payment, a hospital can earn from 0 to 10 points for achievement based on where its score for the measure fell relative to the achievement threshold and the benchmark. All achievement points are rounded to the nearest whole number. Achievement points are only assigned if they are at least 10 cases in the denominator during performance period. If the hospital s score is equal to or greater than the benchmark, then the hospital receives 10 points for achievement. If the hospital s score is within the attainment range (greater than the achievement threshold, but below the benchmark), then the hospital receives between 1 and 9 points based on a discrete linear scale established for the achievement range. If a hospital s score is equal to or less than the achievement threshold (i.e., the lower bound of the achievement range), then the hospital receives 0 points for achievement. 14

Reference Guide 5 Outcome Measures 4. Assigning Points for Improvement For each VBP outcome measure tied to incentive payment, a hospital can earn from 0 to 9 points for improvement based on improving its score on the measure from its baseline performance. A unique improvement range for each hospital on each VBP outcome measure is established to define the distance between the hospital s baseline score on a measure and the national benchmark for the measure during baseline. All improvement points are rounded to the nearest whole number. Improvement points are only assigned if there are at least 10 cases in the denominator during baseline and performance periods. If a hospital s score is greater than the hospital s baseline score and less than or equal to the national benchmark, then the hospital receives between 1 and 9 points. If the hospital s score is equal to or less than its baseline score, then the hospital receives 0 points. 5. Calculation of the Overall VBP Outcome Domain Score A hospital s overall VBP outcome domain score is based on all outcome measures for which the hospital has data and for which it has a sufficient number of cases. As described above, for each applicable measure a hospital receives from 0 to 10 points for achievement and 0 to 9 points for improvement, whichever is higher. The points earned for each measure are summed to determine total earned points: Total earned points = Sum of points earned across all reported measures Each hospital will have a corresponding universe of total possible points which is calculated as: Total potential points = Total number of measures reported by hospital x 10 pts The hospital s VBP outcome domain score is a percent computed as follows: VBP process domain score = Total earned points / Total possible points x 100% 6. Weight of Hospital Performance Domains and Calculation of the Hospital VBP Total Performance Score The outcome domain score will receive 25% weighting in TPS for the FY2014 Hospital VBP program. 7. Translation of VBP Performance Score into Incentive Payment The Total Performance Score will be multiplied by a linear exchange function (slope) to determine incentive payment. CMS will compute this slope after the close of the performance period. 15

Reference Guide 6 Outcome Measures Point assignment examples NOTE: As of the release of this Model VBP FY2014 Workbook in April 2012, CMS has not distributed any visual for 30-day mortality point assignment. 16