Innovative Lunar Demonstrations Data (ILDD) Overview NASA Advisory Council Planetary Protection Subcommittee May 11, 2011

Similar documents
Commercial companies are playing an increasing role in this traditionally government-led sector. Global Space Activity 2015 (Billions) 1

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Human, Social and Culture Behavior (HSCB) Modeling Advanced Development FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Centennial Challenges

Utah NASA Space Grant Consortium

Precision Landing and Hazard Avoidance Technology Demonstration Program. International Lunar Conference

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : DIGITAL BATTLEFLD COMM.

ESMD Overview: Imagining a Vibrant Future for Human Exploration of Space Laurie Leshin, Deputy AA ESMD April 6, 2011

ESMD Space Grant Collaboration

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Office of Contracting and Procurement REQUEST FOR TASK ORDER PROPOSAL

INDUSTRY DAY Real-time Full Spectrum Cyber Science & Technology ONR Contracts Proposal Preparation

Commercial Solutions Opening Innovation in Contracting

NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM

Component Description Unit Topics 1. Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the U.S. 2. The Culture of Healthcare

NASA FY 2005 Budget. This cause of exploration and discovery is not an option we choose; it is a desire written in the human heart.

ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Request for Proposal Robotic Lunar Crater Resource Prospecting

Question1: Is gradual technology development over multiple phases acceptable?

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

United States Special Operations Command. Science and Technology

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Reusable Suborbital Market Characterization. Prepared by The Tauri Group for Space Florida March 2011

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT FOR FY 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM (ESTCP)

YARL GEEK CHALLENGE SENIOR -Season 7 PROSPECTUS. August, 2018 YARL IT HUB Copyright 2018, Yarl IT Hub

STATEMENT OF ROGER D. WALDRON PRESIDENT OF THE COALITION FOR GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT BEFORE THE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

DARPA BAA HR001117S0054 Posh Open Source Hardware (POSH) Frequently Asked Questions Updated November 6, 2017

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: CREATIVE SERVICES

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Broad Agency Announcements. Joseph M. Goldstein

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NUCLEAR WEAPON MODERNIZATION FY 2012 OCO

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS State Public Health Departments to Pilot CSTE Recommended Surveillance Indicators for Substance Use and Mental Health

TERMS OF REFERENCE. remote and from Chisinau, Moldova (at least 3 business trips to Moldova for mentorship purposes) Expected duration of

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Other Missile Product Improvement Programs. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Innovative Public Procurement of Intelligent Transport Solutions City of Copenhagen

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

A Framework for Evaluating Electronic Health Records Overview - Applying to the Davies Ambulatory Awards Program Revised May 2012

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17

GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS)

Baker Middle School. To the Moon, Mars and Beyond

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

DARPA BAA Dispersed Computing Frequently Asked Questions

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Astrophysics Research Program. NASA Advisory Council Astrophysics Subcommittee

Art + Technology Lab 2018 Request for Proposals Deadline: February 21, 2018

nisenet.org

Application Deadline: March 9, 2007

Developing Proposal Budgets

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

MANAGERS COMMITTEE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIAN COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT RENEWAL

OHB System AG HR People & Organisation Development September 8th, 2017 Sigrid Pander, HR Director. OHB: Development of a Micro Moon Lander

Dr. Laura Yu. Manager, Innovation Procurement

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Advanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association

Best Practices for a FAR 15 Procurement PART 2 WHAT TO DO ONCE PROPOSALS ARE RECEIVED

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Let s Build a Rocket

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) SOLICITATION NO COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE. Nevada Rural Housing Authority Carson City, Nevada

US Army/AMRDEC S&T Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Air Traffic Control/Approach/Landing System (ATCALS) FY 2012 OCO

Space and Aeronautics at the U.S. National Academies

South Arts State Fellowship and Southern Prize Program

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)

Promoting the participation of young researchers in ICT FET Open

Future Combat Systems

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #124

Mr. Vincent Grizio Program Manager MISSION SUPPORT SYSTEMS (MSS)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Nomination Guidelines

CALGARY FOUNDATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR. Responsive Website Redesign calgaryfoundation.org. ISSUED: March 20, QUESTIONS BY: March 27, 2017

Missile Defense Agency SBIR/STTR Program

Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (Except Biotechnology)

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS for Regional Recycling Survey and Campaign. RFI No.

Request For Proposal: Local Heating of Piping

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 17 R-1 Line #87

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : OC-135 Open Skies Sensors

ASMO American Student Moon Orbiter

Adapting Cross-Domain Kill-Webs (ACK) HR001118S0043

2018 Digital Integrative Liberal Arts Center (DILAC) Grants

Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) Management Office. Mr. Randal Gaereminck, Director 16 October 2017

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Technology Consultation and Support

EW Modeling and Simulation: Meeting the Challenge

Design of a Grant Proposal Development System Proposal Process Enhancement and Automation

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

Joint Science and Technology Office

Historical Imagery Digitization Data Project

SECME NATIONAL STUDENT COMPETITIONS GUIDELINES

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Transcription:

Innovative Lunar Demonstrations Data (ILDD) Overview NASA Advisory Council Planetary Protection Subcommittee May 11, 2011 George Xenofos Johnson Space Center Exploration Missions and Systems Office

Google Lunar X-Prize The Google Lunar X PRIZE, abbreviated GLXP, sometimes referred to as Moon 2.0, is organized by the X-Prize Foundation, and sponsored by Google. It was announced at the Wired Nextfest on 13 September 2007. The goal of the Google Lunar X Prize is similar to that of the Ansari X-Prize: to inspire a new generation of private investment in hopes of developing more cost-effective technologies and materials to overcome many limitations of space exploration that are currently taken for granted. The Google Lunar X PRIZE is a $30 million competition for the first privately funded team to send a robot to the moon, travel 500 meters and transmit video, images and data back to the Earth. Teams must be at least 90% privately funded and must be registered to compete by December 31, 2010. The first team to land on the Moon and complete the mission objectives will be awarded $20 million; a second place prize of $5 million will be available for the second team to complete the competition objectives The final deadline for winning the prize was December 31, 2014. This deadline has been extended 1 year. Currently there are 29 international teams participating for the prize Additional information on GLXP can be found at: http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/ 2

ILDD Acquisition Overview NASA s intent is to obtain data and gather knowledge that reduces risks for future human and robotic lander designs by employing these missions as unique demonstration testbeds Innovative Lunar Demostrations Data (ILDD) Contracts will buy data associated with the development and operations of a robotic lunar lander. Multiple Award IDIQ BAA BAA Structure 4 Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) with well defined descriptions & set fixed prices in the solicitation Basic contract award to approximately 10 contractors. Fair opportunity provided to all contractors to submit proposals for each CLIN. Goal of up to 3 equal awards for each CLIN CLINs 3 and 4 have the potential for multiple (>3) awards Maximum Purchase: $10.01M If a contractor is awarded and successfully performs all 4 CLINs in their entirety it would earn a total of $10.01M Minimum Purchase: System Definition Review data package submission valued at $10K Why BAA? Purpose of the activity is for study and experimentation directed toward increasing knowledge and understanding of lander design and capabilities. Government wants to acquire research on development not related to the development of a specific Government defined system or hardware Why IDIQ? Allows for healthy competition throughout the process Allows for broader participation throughout the maturation process resulting in a better chance for the government to receive the desired data from a lunar landing Government anticipates meaningful proposals with varying technical approaches and varying schedules 3

Current ILDD Tasks Buying data resulting from completion of the tasks below, via data packages for each CLIN Contractors are not required to compete/bid on every CLIN or Delivery Order (DO) CLIN CLIN Title Value ($M) Min System Definition Review Package (FY10) 0.01 1 Critical Component Demo (FY11) 0.5 2 Ground Test/Mission Simulation of Flight Hardware 0.6 3 Basic Capabilities 2 3.1 Pre-launch -- $0.5M 3.2 In-Flight Activities -- $0.5M 3.3 Lunar Landing -- $1M 4 Enhanced Capabilities 6.9 4.1 Human Mission Profile Landing -- $2.5M 4.2 Identification of Hazards During Landing -- $1M 4.3 Precision Landing -- $1M 4.4 Video Survey of Lander Post-Landing -- $0.4M 4.5 Imagery of Landing Path -- $0.5M 4.6 Participatory Exploration -- $0.5M 4.7 Extended Duration Operations -- $1M TOTAL 10.01 4

ILDD Surveillance Deliverables Basic Deliverable, minimum order: requiring submission of SDR data package by all contractors Valued at $10K Detailed description of the products necessary for an acceptable SDR data package provided in the contracts Delivery Order CLIN Data Package Each CLIN will provide further definition in the specific delivery order In general, all CLINs will require written submissions of the data outlined within the BAA and further defined in the delivery orders Data may also be required in non-written formats: orally, visually, or direct telemetry (to be specified in delivery order) Project Office personnel will be, as needed, tasked to: Provide input into the CLIN Task Requests consistent with the themes provided in the BAA Evaluate the DRD submissions associated with each CLIN task Support the COTR in additional informational packages necessary 5

ILDD Contractors Six teams awarded ILDD Contracts Astrobotics Tech, Inc Draper Labs Frednet, Inc Moon Express Earthrise, Inc Dynetics, Inc 6

Lunar Exploration Luna 9 was first soft lander mission (landed February, 1966) Surveyor 1 was first US soft lander mission (landed June, 1966) Luna 24 was last soft lander mission (landed August, 1976) 7

Summary This procurement will allow the project office to increase its knowledge and understanding of the design, testing, and flight lessons to be learned through data obtained from these landers. Additionally, this information will enable the project office to quickly and efficiently implement a plan for building and testing relevant components of lander hardware to be utilized in future human and robotic landers. 8

Backup 9