EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C February 27, 2018

Similar documents
Delayed Federal Grant Closeout: Issues and Impact

Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) (USD(C))/Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Department of Defense

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 Unemployment Insurance (UI) Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Grants

DOD MANUAL ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICT)

UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY ACCELERATION GRANT (UTAG) FY18 FALL PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT

[DOCUMENT TITLE] [Document subtitle]

ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO TOTAL FORCE MANAGEMENT (SEC. 933)

DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate

Eligibility. In addition, the Foundation will NOT fund grants for the following purposes or activities:

Commercial Solutions Opening Innovation in Contracting

Virginia Growth and Opportunity Fund (GO Fund) Grant Scoring Guidelines

The Community and Regional Economic Support (CARES) program is a two-year initiative under the Alberta Jobs Plan that runs from 2016 to 2018.

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

COMMONWEALTH RESEARCH COMMERCIALIZATION FUND (CRCF)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY REORGANIZATION PLAN November 25, 2002

DOD INSTRUCTION NATIONAL SECURITY EDUCATION PROGRAM (NSEP) AND NSEP SERVICE AGREEMENT

EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY. Sponsored Research Accounting Cost Share Guidelines

FY 2015 Value Pricing Pilot Program Discretionary Grant Program

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L))

CHAPTER Council Substitute for Council Substitute for House Bill No. 83

Research Announcement 16-01

Title 24: Housing and Urban Development

41 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

DoD Audit Readiness Progress

Accountability Framework and Organizational Requirements

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Medicaid and Human Services Transparency and Fraud Prevention Act Progress Report

Florida Center for Cybersecurity Collaborative Seed Award Program

PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCES

COMPARISON OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, VIRGINIA CODE AND VIRGINIA PART C POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE DRAFT

August 23, Congressional Committees

Defense Travel Management Office

Fiscal Year 2016 Report to Congress on Laboratory Directed Research and Development at the DOE National Laboratories

The Office of Innovation and Improvement s Oversight and Monitoring of the Charter Schools Program s Planning and Implementation Grants

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS THE ROSE HILLS FOUNDATION INNOVATOR GRANT PROGRAM RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP APPLICATION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Alteration of Bridges

Application Package

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

WILMINGTON CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SUPPORT FUND POLICY & GUIDELINES

Stakeholder Guidance American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 March 3, 2009

HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP) State Project/Program: DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

Rules and Procedures Overview. Kickstart:Wyoming Program SBIR Phase I and II Matching Program

Legacy Resource Management Program Guidelines for Full Proposal Applicants (2016)

Deloitte Consulting LLP. Comprehensive workplace transformation How enhanced mobility can drive federal cost savings

SMART SCHOOLS BOND ACT LEGISLATION (excerpt from Chapter 57, Laws of 2014)

Disability Research Grant Program

Grant Program Guidelines

The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 A Guide to Risk-Based Grants Management

Other Defense Organizations and Defense Finance and Accounting Service Controls Over High-Risk Transactions Were Not Effective

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

University of San Francisco Office of Contracts and Grants Subaward Policy and Procedures

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the National Coordinator

PART 22-DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS--AWARD AND ADMINISTRATION. Subpart A-General Purpose, relation to other parts, and organization.

SUITABILITY AND SECURITY PROCESSES REVIEW REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT FEBRUARY 2014

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of the Army Human Capital Big Data Strategy)

Department of Early Education and Care. Head Start Supplemental Grant. Renewal Application. Fund Code 390

CHIEF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU INSTRUCTION

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 R E P O R T COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.R. 5136

July 30, July 31, 2012

CAPITALIZATION GRANT FOR STATE REVOLVING FUND. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Invitation to CDCs to apply for: Advancing Equitable Development in Milwaukee HUD Section 4 Capacity Building Grants

I 2 Program Frequently Asked Questions

CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Request for Applications Seniors to Sophomores Early Adopters Program

NFMC Round 10 & Supplemental Grant Funds

Criminal Justice Division

Policies and Procedures for Funded Agencies

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Funding Opportunity Announcement: DEVELOPMENT OF RESEARCH AND CREATIVITY (DRC) GRANTS

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #6: Streamlining the Contracting Process)

Department of Defense Executive Agent Responsibilities of the Secretary of the Army

FACTS for Accountability and Transparency

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

a GAO GAO DOD BUSINESS SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION Improvements to Enterprise Architecture Development and Implementation Efforts Needed

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD SPACE ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE AND PRINCIPAL DOD SPACE ADVISOR (PDSA)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Executive Agent (EA) for the DoD Cyber Crime Center (DC3)

2018 BPS SEED GRANT APPLICATION FOR PGY-2 RESEARCH PROJECTS

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

EARLY ACHIEVERS GRANT GUIDELINES

Grants Program Request for Proposal (RFP)

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

Request for Proposal (RFP) Released: Friday, September 16, 2016

CONTEXT FOR ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS: WHY DO WE HAVE TO DO VE? WHO HAS AUTHORITY OVER VE? THE CUSTOMER WON T PAY FOR VE!

Opioid Resource Grant Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of. ACTION: Notice of availability of grant application and application deadline.

OVERALL WORK PROGRAM. Process and Procedures

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ER U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-P Washington, DC Regulation No February 2016

Collaborative Operations and Services Grant Program GUIDELINES Revised January 15, 2014

DOD DIRECTIVE E ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM (CBDP)

Colonias Infrastructure Board Resolution

2016 Rising Stars in Urology Research Award

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA

Transcription:

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 THE DIRECTOR February 27, 2018 M-18-12 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES FROM: Mick Mulvaney..J.J/ Director ~l'o SUBJECT: Implementation of the Modernizing Government Technology Act The Modernizing Government Technology (MGT) Act is a key component of this Administration's continued efforts to improve Federal technology by providing financial resources and technical expertise to agencies. The MGT Act will allow agencies to invest in modem technology solutions to improve service delivery to the public, secure sensitive systems and data, and save taxpayer dollars. This memorandum sets forth Administration objectives and necessary actions agencies should take in order to implement the MGT Act. Background The MGT Act was enacted as part of the Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on December 12, 2017. 1 The MGT Act has two primary provisions that address agency information technology (IT) modernization needs: 1. The establishment of a centralized Technology Modernization Fund (TMF) and Technology Modernization Board (Board); 2 and 2. The authorization for all CFO Act agencies 3 to establish IT Working Capital Funds 4 (WCFs). This memorandum provides guidance to all agencies regarding the necessary planning for upcoming TMF activities, including the initial process for submitting project proposals to the Board, additional guidance to CFO Act agencies 5 regarding the administration and funding of IT WCFs, and where to find additional information on topics such as disbursement and repayment process for the TMF funds. 1 Pub. L. No. 115-91, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018, Title X, Subtitle G ( 1076 through 1078). 2 Ibid. l 078(b )(I). 3 31 U.S.C. 90l(b). 4 Pub. L. No. 115-91, Title X, Subtitle G, l077{b)(i). 5 31 U.S.C. 901(b).

A. Guidance to Agencies on the Technology Modernization Fund and Technology Modernization Board Section A ofthis guidance is applicable to all agencies (as defined in 5 US. C. 551 (1)). Section 1 - The Technology Modernization Fund (TMF) The TMF provides a new funding model for Federal technology modernization projects. Agencies may submit project proposals for technology modernization projects to the Technology Modernization Board (Board), described in greater detail below in Section 2. The Board will consider project proposals based on financial, technical, and operational criteria. Approved projects will receive funds in an incremental manner, tied to specific project milestones and objectives, and will be regularly monitored by the Board for success. The MGT Act authorizes up to $250,000,000 in appropriations for the TMF for each of fiscal years 2018 and 2019. Appropriations for fiscal year 2018 are currently pending. The Board will evaluate and recommend for funding the proposals that show the strongest case for delivering on agency mission objectives and a strong likelihood of success. Agencies must reimburse TMF for any transfer of TMF funds in accordance with the terms of a written agreement. 6 The written agreement will document the purpose for which the funds will be used and the terms of repayment, which may not exceed 5 years unless approved by OMB. Successful projects will demonstrate a strong execution strategy, technical approach, and have a strong team with a demonstrated history of successful modernization efforts. Agencies should, to the extent practicable, consider the adoption of commercial technology solutions in their proposals and provide a strong technical approach and acquisition strategy to implement those solutions. Furthermore, agencies are encouraged to submit proposals for common platforms and shared solutions or other modernization projects that will serve multiple components within a single agency or multiple agencies. OMB anticipates that the TMF will be a testbed for projects and procedures that agencies can operationalize through their IT planning processes and in their execution of their exi-sting appropriations. Where legally permissible, TMF funding may be used to accelerate modernization efforts that are ongoing. The TMF is not intended to duplicate funding provided through existing appropriations, including any agency funding of IT modernization projects through established IT WCFs. Consistent with the MGT Act, agencies may not submit any requests to the TMF, or utilize funding transferred into an agency WCF, to fund any project that has been expressly denied or restricted by Congress. 6 For more information on the funds disbursement and repayment process, please visit www.policy.cio.gov/. 2

Section 2- The Technology Modernization Board The Board will evaluate proposals and make recommendations for project funding to the GSA Administrator. The Board's responsibilities will include, but are not limited to, the following: evaluating proposals submitted for TMF funding; establishing evaluation criteria; identifying opportunities to improve or replace legacy information technology systems; providing funding recommendations to the GSA Administrator; and, monitoring the progress and performance of approved modernization projects. Pursuant to the MGT Act, the Board will be established on March 12, 2018, and will consist of seven members: The Administrator of the Office ofe-government (Federal CIO), who shall serve as the Chair; A senior official from GSA with technical expertise in information technology development; A member of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD); and Four employees of the Federal Government primarily having technical expertise in information technology development, financial management, cybersecurity and privacy, and acquisition, appointed by the Director of OMB. The Board will distribute information and communications regarding the TMF, including updates to the submission and evaluation process, a charter governing Board operations, evaluation criteria for project proposals, and any other relevant information to www.policy.cio.gov. Section 3 -Initial Project Proposal Submissions Process All agencies are encouraged to begin submitting Initial Project Proposals to ofcio@omb.eop.gov using the template provided in Appendix A starting February 27, 2018. Appendix B provides some areas of consideration that are intended to aid agencies in an initial submission. Agencies may submit as many Initial Project Proposals as they wish. However, the submission oflnitial Project Proposals does not guarantee funding from the TMF, and selection of projects for funding by the GSA Administrator does not require agencies to accept funds for projects. Initial Project Proposals will continue to be collected at the address above until the Board issues further instructions for project submission. For updates, downloadable Initial Project Proposal templates, and additional information, please visit www.policy.cio.gov. Section 4 - Additional MGT Act Implementation Information Additional information on agency considerations for project proposals, the process and mechanics of TMF funds disbursement and repayment, and other matters relevant to the implementation of the MGT Act is available at www.policy.cio.gov. If necessary, OMB may 3

provide additional supplemental guidance on the areas described above or other relevant matters that may arise out of initial MGT Act implementation. Questions regarding this memorandum should be directed to ofcio@omb.eop.gov. B. Guidance to CFO Act Agencies on IT Working Capital Funds Section B ofthis guidance is applicable to all CFO Act agencies (as defined in 31 USC 901 (b)). Under the MGT Act, all CFO Act agencies are authorized to establish an IT Working Capital Fund (WCF). 7 IT WCFs may only be used: (A) to improve, retire, or replace existing information technology systems to enhance cybersecurity of existing systems and to improve efficiency and effectiveness of the life of a given workload; (B) to transition legacy information technology systems to commercial cloud computing and other innovative commercial platforms and technologies, including those serving more than one covered agency with common requirements; (C) to assist and support covered agency efforts to provide adequate, risk-based, and cost effective information technology capabilities that address evolving threats to information security; (D) to reimburse funds transferred to the agency from the Technology Modernization Fund; and, (E) for a program, project, or activity or to increase funds for any program, project, or activity that has not been denied or restricted by Congress. By March 27, 2018, all CFO Act agencies should notify their OMB Resource Management Office (RMO) and the OFCIO Desk Officer ifthe agency intends to establish an IT WCF in FY 2018 and initiate the process of creating a new Treasury account for the WCF. If an agency determines it will establish an IT WCF after February 27, 2018, the agency should notify their OMB RMO and the OFCIO Desk Officer at least 30 days prior to establishment. If an agency establishes an IT WCF under the MGT Act, OMB will oversee the fund and the IT investments it supports consistent with OMB's management and budget development role. In the fiscal quarter after an agency establishes an IT WCF, and every quarter thereafter, the agency will report to OMB on all IT investments funded out of the IT WCF. Pursuant to the MGT Act, each agency shall submit to OMB: a) All planned transfers and reprogramming actions for the upcoming quarter, including a brief narrative justification; b) Updates to the IT Dashboard, reflecting changes to all investments or projects funded from the IT WCF in the prior quarter and planned for funding in the upcoming quarters (including all necessary updates to IT Portfolio/Business Cases/Standard Reports); and c) A summary by fiscal year of actual obligations, expenditures, and unused balances. OMB will align IT WCF reporting to pre-existing reporting processes (such as the OFCIO integrated data collection (IDC) process, Agency Strategic reviews, PortfolioStats, and TechStats). Agencies that establish WCFs should consider, to the extent applicable, the criteria and guidance the TMF Board formally approves for TMF projects. 7 Pub. L. No. 115-91, Title X, Subtitle G, 1077(b)(l). 4

Agencies are reminded that, pursuant to the MGT Act, all transfers and reprogramming offunds to the WCFs are subject to any applicable appropriations law restrictions. The MGT Act does not confer transfer authority. Therefore, agencies may transfer funds to WCFs only ifthey have other authority that authorizes the transfer of such funds. Agencies are encouraged to review their existing agency-specific authorities to identify accounts with applicable transfer authority. In concert with the decision to establish a WCF, agencies should identify accounts with applicable transfer authority and submit the account names to their OMB RMO and OFCIO desk officer. Enclosures 5

APPENDIX A Initial Project Proposal Template Instructions: Please fill out all ofthe information requested below. Initial Project Proposals selected by the Technology Modernization Board (Board) for further consideration may receive assistance in developing an in-depth proposal and business case to present to the Board. Please avoid the use ofacronyms or terminology likely to be unfamiliar to someone outside of your agency and/or program area. Please complete the form using plain language and submit to OMB, as a.docx file, at ofcio@omb.eop.gov. Please limit Initial Project Proposals to 2 pages, using 10 point font ("General Information" excepted). General Information Project Name: Sponsoring Agency: Project Sponsor Name: Project Sponsor Title and Office: Project Sponsor Email: CIO Sponsor Name, Title and Email: CFO Sponsor Name, Title, and Email: I. Describe how the project fulfills your Agency's mission, identify the problem this project solves and how successful execution ofthis project solves the problem. (1-3 sentences) 2. Provide an estimation ofthe TMF funding request and the method used for cost estimation. If less than the estimated total project cost, also state the estimated total project cost and how you intend to repay the TMF. 3. Describe the key metrics for success andyour suggested initial milestones for implementation, including the deliverables, anticipated completion dates, and other criteria through which you will demonstrate that your intended milestones were met. 6

4. Describe why the project will succeed, citing examples such as: (I) executive level support for this effort, (2) the strength or experience ofthe team, including any agency digital service experts, other agency development resources, the availability ofcontractor support (3) the preparedness to begin executing this project, and (4) other relevant factors that will demonstrate the likelihood ofproject success. 5. Describe why the Technology Modernization Fund makes sense for this project and how the approach you are takingfor this effort is different than what you have previously attempted. 7

APPENDIXB Relevant Considerations in Preparing an Initial Project Proposal A thoughtful IT modernization strategy prioritizes projects based on impact and probability of success. Impact can be measured by effect on users, risk reduction, opportunity enablement, and common solutions. Probability of success can be measured by team and project strategy strength. The following topics are neither exhaustive nor may be applicable to all agency projects, but serve to provide a framework to identify projects ripe for IT modernization. Agencies submitting Initial Project Proposals are encouraged (though not required) to address these considerations, including citing or attaching evidence that their project meets any applicable considerations. Agency project sponsors should also be able to address these issues as part of the evaluation process, should a project merit additional examination by the Board. Impact on Agency Mission User Impact and Expected Outcomes: Successfully executing this project will have a demonstrable and visible impact to the public, in alignment with the agency's mission. The project will articulate a desired end state that clearly showcases how expected outcomes will enhance the delivery of services that reduces burden, improves performance, or has the potential to produce positive long term benefits. Improving Security: The project will address an urgent problem (cybersecurity, financial, operational, or another significant risk the agency has identified that could have a material impact on project execution) that would otherwise not be solved. The project leverages commercial capabilities and industry best practices where applicable in order to manage risk during execution and throughout the life and maintenance of the project. Feasibility Agency Sponsorship and Strength of Team: The project has strong executive visibility and support, so that any issues that arise during execution can be addressed quickly and effectively. Agency leadership understands and champions the project success as essential to achieving agency priority goals. Project Execution Strategy and Measures of Success: The project identifies key milestones for success and demonstrates how the use of funds will enable milestone achievement. A successful project also envisions an appropriate governance structure and operational model that will last beyond initial execution. The project will enhance and improve the existing agency IT modernization strategy, and the project will ultimately be executed according to a strong project management approach that aligns to industry best practices and incorporates, to the greatest extent practicable, commercial technology solutions 8

Opportunity Enablement Expected Cost Savings, Lasting Financial Impact, and Ability to Repay the TMF: A successful project will provide detailed information on how the agency will save costs or dramatically improve service quality through modernization. The project will describe the importance of the investment to the agency (i.e., how impactful this project is to agency mission) and the expected long-term savings and operational efficiencies expected through successful project execution. Projects will highlight how business process or change management advances (including the repurposing of workforce as necessary) will be achieved as a result of successful project execution. Common Solutions Reduction of Outdated, Insecure Systems to Modem, Scalable Platforms: A successful project will ensure that security is designed into execution from the outset and complements service delivery and mission objectives. Projects will leverage commercial products and services to the greatest extent practicable to boost security, decrease technical debt, and improve the ability of the project and the associated technology to adapt to a changing threat and operational environment. Where applicable, projects will demonstrate the ability ofthe agency to reduce outdated or duplicative systems (or to retired multiple systems) through modernization and deliver common solutions and reuse opportunities within an agency, or between the agency and external partners. 9