SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Similar documents
General Plan Referral

School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Plan

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PACKET FOR Anti-Discriminatory Housing Policy

APPLICATION FOR PARCEL MAP

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY TIERED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY CREATIVE ARTS & HOLLOWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT

Public Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report

CITY OF HOOD RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING REQUIREMENT

COMMUNITY MEETING NOTES UCSF Mission Bay Phase 2 Study. Meeting Date: June 17, 2010 Genentech Hall Mission Bay campus Subject: Community Meeting 1

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ

APPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

REPORT. To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager. May 9, 2016

City of Westbrook. 2 York Street Westbrook, Maine (207) Fax:

Bartlesville City Planning Commission SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCEDURE AND APPLICATION

PRE-APPLICATION MEETING

Comprehensive Plan Amendment

CITY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA 300 Richards Blvd. DEPARTMENT

M E M O R A N D U M. The Project and the items that the Commission will be considering at the June 15 th, 2010 meeting are summarized below.

Planning Commission Motion No HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2014

116 UNION AVENUE SNOHOMISH, WASHINGTON (360)

Master Land Use Instructions B Abutting Owner=s Notification Los Angeles City Planning Department

LARGE PROJECT AUTHORIZATION

MOBILE FOOD UNIT FOOD CART (TYPE I)

Planning Board Submission Process and Instructions

2011 SURVEY OF MUNICIPAL REGULATIONS AND FIRE CODE REGULATIONS AFFECTING CHILD CARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY

Section F: Committee of Adjustment: Minor Variance and Consent Applications

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

CITY COUNCIL File #

University of San Francisco 2012 Institutional Master Plan. SUPPLEMENT A Proposed Student Residence Hall December 2013

BULLETIN NO. 2. Planning Department Priority Application Processing Guidelines PLANNING DIRECTOR.

General Plan Land Use Amendment

COMMUNITY MEETING 3 February 15, Mission Bay Phase Two

Cone Mill Master Development

City of Signal Hill Wireless Communications Facility Application

ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET

Casino Reinvestment Development Authority c/o: Lance Landgraf, PP, AICP CRDA Director of Planning 15 South Pennsylvania Avenue Asbury Park, NJ 08401

1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA Cycle Distributed: 08/24/2015

TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: ACTION ITEM 1

2017 PARKLET APPLICATION

VARIANCE FROM THE PLANNING CODE

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Institutional Master afl

Economic Development Subsidy Report Pursuant to Government Code Section 53083

SECTION 1: PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS

REQUEST FOR ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING PRE-DESIGN SERVICES

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 16, 2005 MALIBU ACCESS: DAN BLOCKER BEACH. File No Project Manager: Marc Beyeler

CITY OF BROCKVILLE APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL Residential Development

CEQA Exempt Referral Staff Approval Permit

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT KYLE BUTTERWICK, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Home-Based Business in Mount Pearl

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Mr. George McNabb, Principal Paragon Real Estate 1400 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA January 23, 2015

Executive Summary Conditional Use Authorization

Synopsis of Revised Changes to DCA s Rules for Developments of Regional Impact

CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN GUIDELINES

CITY OF MONTEBELLO AND MONTEBELLO SUCCESSOR AGENCY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

Storefront Cannabis Retailer Rezoning Information and Application

HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY

RESOLUTION NO. -- The applicant, PPF OFF 100 West Walnut, LP ("Applicant"),

City of Lynwood MODIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

California Pacific Medical Center Hospital Rebuild

Guide to Rezoning. Step 1. Step 2. Step 5. Step 6. Step 7. Step 8

CITY OF LONG BEACH DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REDEVELOPMENT BUREAU

Fiscal Year 2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Application for Funding

Determination. Reception: Deborah Kartiganer, Esq.

Discretionary Review Analysis

1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA Cycle Distributed: 07/08/2013

City of San Mateo. Policy and Procedures for the Installation of On-Street Physically Challenged Accessible Spaces

RE: Planning Case No: ZA CUB, ENV CE Project Address: 300 S Grand Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90071

TO: Keith Wolff Reception: PPA Case No PPA for 1055 Geary Street

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 5, 2014 CHAVEZ AND SOTO JOINT DEVELOPMENT

/r \ SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

COMMUNITY CARE FACILITY - CLASS B AND GROUP RESIDENCE GUIDELINES

OGUNQUIT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OCTOBER 27, 2014

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDANCE

CAIS Trustee Head Conference 2014 Developing a Successful Project Entitlements Team & Strategy

Addendum. Final Environmental Impact Report for North Campus Project. California State University Los Angeles SCH# March 2018.

1136 Dupont Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Port of Long Beach Community Grants Program. Community Infrastructure

is hereby found to be consistent with said program and plans, in accordance with Section 882(3)(a) of the Local Government Act.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

METHODOLOGY - Scope of Work

COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION

C i t y of T a c o m a

9 WHEREAS, Planning Code, Section provides for the imposition of interim zoning

Educational Specifications Guidelines

INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS

CITY GATE COMMERCE PARK DRI NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE IN COLLIER COUNTY

STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT

Town of Salem, New Hampshire. Development Handbook (last rev. April 2008)

CRA/LA BU ILDING COMMUNITI ES

York Mills Road Rezoning Application Refusal Report

CMGT 380 Green Building Practices and LEED Certification Department of Construction Management California State University, Chico

~r_ ~ SAN FRANCISCO ~o ~ x ~ $ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~?b3s..a. 0~5~7

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN COMMENT PERIOD

1 Introduction. 1.1 Specific Plan Background

ZONING OR REZONING Community Development Department 8101 Ralston Road Arvada, Colorado 80002

City of Aurora Façade Improvement Matching Grant Program

The City of Oxnard invites qualified consulting firms or individuals to submit qualifications for On-Call Permit Processing Services.

Transcription:

SAN FRANCISCO Date received: Environmental Evaluation Application The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies to review the environmental impacts of proposed projects. In San Francisco, environmental review under CEQA is administered by the Major Environmental Analysis (MEA) division of the Planning Department. The environmental review process begins with the submittal of a completed Environmental Evaluation (EE) Application to the Planning Department. Only the current EE Application form will be accepted. No appointment is required but staff is available to meet with applicants upon request. The EE Application will not be processed unless it is completely filled out and the appropriate fees are paid in full. Checks should be made payable to the San Francisco Planning Department. See the current Schedule of Application Fees and contact the staff person listed below for verification of the appropriate fees. Fees are generally non-refundable. Documents in italics are available online at sfgov.org/planning. The EE Application is comprised of four parts. Part I is a checklist to ensure that the EE Application is complete; Part 2 requests basic information about the site and the project; Part 3 is a series of questions to help determine if additional information is needed for the EE Application; and Part 4 is a project summary table. The complete EE Application should be submitted to the Planning Department staff as follows: For projects greater than 10,000 square feet in size and where Part 3 Questions #3, #8, #10, or #11 are answered in the affirmative, or for projects that require mitigation measures, please send the application materials to the attention of Ms. Fordham or Ms. Poling. For all other projects, please send the application materials to the attention of Ms. Pereira. Monica Pereira 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 575-9107, monica.pereira@sfgov.org Chelsea Fordham or Jeanie Poling 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 575-9071, chelsea.fordham @sfgov.org (415) 575-9072, jeanie.poling@sfgov.org Not PART 1 - EE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Provided Applicable Two copies of this application with all blanks filled in Two sets of project drawings in 11x17 format (see "Additional Information" on page 4) 0 Photos of the project site and its immediate vicinity, with viewpoints labeled Fee Supplemental Information Form for Historical Resource Evaluation and/or Historic Resource Evaluation Report, as indicated in Part 3 Questions I and 2 Geotechnical Report, as indicated in Part 3 Questions 3a and 3b 0 Tree Disclosure Statement, as indicated in Part 3 Question 4 0 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, as indicated in Part 3 Question 8 0 Additional studies (list) 0 Applicant s Affidavit. I certify the accuracy of the following declarations: a. The undersigned is the owner or authorized agent of the owner(s) of this property. b. The information presented is true and corre ho best of my knowledge. c. I understand that other appli tions informatio may be required. Signed (owner or agent) Date: 3 (For Staff Use Only) Case No. I Address: L Block/Lot: o

PART 2- PROJECT INFORMATION Future Proposed Owner - Property Owner SF Recreation and Park Dept. Telephone No. (415) 831-2700 Address 30 Van Ness Ave, 41h Floor Fax. No. 415-581-2540 San Francisco, CA 94102 Email Project Contact Holly Pearson Telephone No. (415) 575-5603 SF Recreation and Park Company Department - Planning Division Fax No. (415) 581-2540 Address 30 Van Ness Ave., 41h Floor Email hollv.earson San Francisco, CA 94102 Site Address(es): 3861 241h Street, San Francisco, CA 94114 Nearest Cross Street(s) Sanchez Street & Vicksburg Street Block(s)/Lot(s) 6509/040 Zoning District(s) NCD Si t e Square nm cm 10,829 c1 kifl,1l-i,,-i- AnV S fl.151 Lu LLAIIX L.#flJJ 1LI. -SJ-JS Present or previous site use Community Plan Area (if any) Parking Lot o Addition 0 Change of use 0 Zoning change 0 New construction o Alteration 0 Demolition 0 Lot split/subdivision or lot line adjustment Other (describe) Property acquisition Estimated Cost Unknown at this Describe proposed use City of property (currently a CA1EaOR1c.jy EX,p F1Q; Co6 0 VV" oil 1. 4. ito r a 4z r J CLaeoP f 0 0; SAN FRANCISCO 0C re6rv pk cl 0-AJ V3 2 07 3

Narrative project description. Please summarize and describe the purpose of the project. The San Francisco Recreation and Park Department proposes to acquire this property for public open space. The department proposes to continue its existing program currently of a seating area with benches in the x corner of the site, and ending the private paid parking operation which currently occupies most of the site. The site would remain paved as it is currently and continue to operate as the site of the Noe Valley Farmers Market. SAN FRANCISCO -3-

PART 3 ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFORMATION Yes No 1. Would the project involve a major alteration of a structure constructed 50 or more years ago 0 Z or a structure in an historic district? If yes, submit a Supplemental Information Form for Historical Resource Evaluation. Instructions on how to fill out the form are outlined in the San Francisco Preservation Bulletin No. 16 (see pages 28-34 in Appendix B). 2. Would the project involve demolition of a structure constructed 50 or more years ago or a 0 structure located in an historic district? If yes, a Historic Resource Evaluation Report (HRER)* will be required. The scope of the HRER will be determined in consultation with the Department s Preservation Coordinator. 3a. Would the project result in excavation or soil disturbance/modification greater than 8 feet 0 Z below grade? If yes, how many feet below grade would be excavated? What type of foundation would be used (if known)? 3b. Is the project site located in an area of potential geotechnical hazard as identified in the San Francisco General Plan or on a steep slope or would the project be located on a site with an average slope of 20% or more? If yes to either Question 3a or 3b, please submit a Geotechnical R eport.* 0 Z 1 Would th...i.. nroiec f ir iolre r eynciruon of nn eyi1-incr hi jildinor envelone or new c onctruiction -.---.-. --------------------o-------------------- ---------------, fl I l ---------------- l UI IctUI1I, 01 iiew LUIU LUtS, UI ueiituiiiiutt If yes, please submit a Tree Disclosure Statement. 5. Would the project result in ground disturbance of 5,000 gross square feet or more? 0 Z 6. Would the project result in any construction over 40 feet in height? 0 If yes, apply for a Section 295 (Proposition K) Shadow Study. This application is available on the Planning Department s website and should be submitted at the Planning Information Center, 1660 Mission Street, First Floor. 7. Would the project result in a construction of a structure 80 feet or higher? 0 If yes, an initial review by a wind expert, including a recommendation as to whether a wind analysis* is needed, may be required, as determined by Department staff. 8. Would the project involve work on a site with an existing or former gas station, auto repair, 0 dry cleaners, or heavy manufacturing use, or a site with underground storage tanks? If yes, please submit a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA).* A Phase II ESA (for example, soil testing) may be required, as determined by Department staff. 9. Would the project require any variances, special authorizations, or changes to the Planning 0 Code or Zoning Maps? If yes, please describe. Change in Zoning from NCD to P - OS 10. Is the project related to a larger project, series of projects, or program? 0 Z If yes, please describe. 11. Is the project in Eastern Neighborhoods or Market & Octavia Community Plan Area? 0 If yes, and the project would be over 55 feet tall or 10 feet taller than an adjacent building built before 1963, please submit an elevation or renderings showing the project with the adjacent buildings. * Report or study to be prepared by a qualified consultant who is contracted directly by the project sponsor. SAN FRANCISCO 7 24, 20 12-4-

PART 4- PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE If you are not sure of the eventual size of the project, provide the maximum estimates. Net New Gross Square Existing Uses to be Existing Uses Construction and/or Footage (GSF) Retained Addition Residential Project Totals Retail Office Industrial Parking 10,829 SF 0 SF 0 SF 10,829 SF Other (specify use) Total GSF 10,829 SF 10,829 SF Dwelling units Hotel rooms Parking spaces Loading spaces Number of buildings 0 0 0 0 Height of building(s) 0 0 0 0 Number of stories 0 0 0 0 Please describe any additional project features that are not included in this table: Additional Information: Project drawings in 11x17 format should include existing and proposed site plans, floor plans, elevations, and sections, as well as all applicable dimensions and calculations for existing and proposed floor area and height. The plans should clearly show existing and proposed off-street parking and loading spaces; driveways and trash loading areas; vehicular and pedestrian access to the site, including access to off-street parking and parking configuration; and bus stops and curbside loading zones within 150 feet of the site. A transportation study may be required, depending on existing traffic conditions in the project area and the potential traffic generation of the proposed project, as determined by the Department s transportation planners. Neighborhood notification may also be required as part of the environmental review processes. Al0 p\;qos jqrk S$Oc2Ic+dtkMS Poc,t r J-0 OL Ckayl 0 2 L4 6-e CX(Q. - Sp ok-c G r 4o 14 LAe P91"