LOCATION QUOTIENTS. Berks, Chester, Lebanon, Lancaster, Lehigh, Montgomery, Schuylkill counties

Similar documents
2015 Cumberland County Benchmarking Report PER CAPITA ANALYSIS (Based on the 2015 Counties Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

INTRODUCTION nonprofit organizations are also a major force in the state s economy

See footnotes at end of table.

Table A-4 Population by County: Pennsylvania, 1990 and 1999

Central Pennsylvania Workforce Development Area Commuting Patterns

BUSINESS INCUBATION COMMUNITY READINESS ASSESSMENT Dalton-Whitfield County. October 17, 2012 Erin Rosintoski

Pennsylvania Department of Health - Health Status Indicators - Page 18

Employment and Wage Trends 3 rd Quarter 2015 for the Healthcare Sector by Parish

BUSINESS REGISTRATION POLICY. The County of Northern Lights believes in assisting and promoting local business developments.

Standard Penn State Poll Demographic Questions/Recodes Included in the Per Question Cost

Issues and Strategies Shaping Brampton s Economic Base. Presented by Dennis Cutajar, EcD (F), MSc Brampton Economic Development February 10, 2006

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

Health Care Sector Profile for the Lake Charles RLMA. Employment and Wage Trends 4th Quarter 2015 for the Health Care Sector by Parish

Qualified Provider Assurances: How Pennsylvania Reports on the Quality of Home and Community Based Service Providers to CMS

Emergency Medical Services System

SBA s Size Standards Analysis: An Overview on Methodology and Comprehensive Size Standards Review

Area. Market. Average Establishments. Monroe Region. makes up. o 14.77% in Madison

Testimonials. ~ Karissa Kersey, Benefits and Compensation Manager, Trihydro, Corporation

Oakland Workforce Development Board (OWDB) Confirming Local & Regional Priority Industry Sectors

MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW NIPISSING DISTRICT MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY YEAR IN REVIEW

Monthly Review of the Texas Economy November 2013

WorkSource Georgia: Yesterday Today Tomorrow

Durham Region Toronto Buffalo. Cleveland Pittsburgh

Background/Strategic Planning

Kentucky Education and Workforce Development Cabinet releases April 2018 unemployment report

Labour Market Information Monthly

Monthly Review of the Texas Economy May 2012

Economic Impact of the proposed The Medical University of South Carolina

HOW THE PROGRAM WORKS Job training that allows Pennsylvania companies and their workers to perform and compete at a higher level

AT TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY. By Ali Anari, Research Economist Mark G. Dotzour, Chief Economist TECHNICAL REPORT

Alternative payment model to meet the needs of stakeholders in a community & school-based behavioral health service

38 Unique Healthcare Organizations. Tioga. Crawford Wayne. Lycoming. Clinton. Union. Snyder. Juniata Perry. Huntingdon. Franklin.

PPL FOUNDATION GRANT INFORMATION

The PAMAP Program Ortho and LiDAR GIS-T 2008 Houston, TX Special thanks for to Helen Delano & Chris Markel, BAE Systems

Utilizing the Public Workforce System to Increase Your Employee Recruitment Pool and Retention. Jesse McCree CEO, SCPa Works September 26, 2017

Pennsylvania Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW PARRY SOUND DISTRICT MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY YEAR IN REVIEW - PARRY SOUND DISTRICT

Monthly Review of the Texas Economy

Higher Higher in the Tree

Chapter 5 Planning for a Diversified Economy 5 1

CCIS of Erie County 155 West 8 th Street, Suite 316 Erie, Pennsylvania Crawford Mercer. Beaver Washington

Phase II Grower/Processor Applicants

The New Carolina Initiative

SECTION 2 INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION

Snohomish County Labor Area Summary April 2017

)HGHUDO+LJKZD\$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ± 6HSWHPEHU 3HQQV\OYDQLD&RUULGRU3HUVSHFWLYH

Metro Areas See Improvement in April s Unemployment Numbers

CITY OF PROVIDENCE: ECONOMIC CLUSTER STRATEGY. Presentation to City Council Final Analysis November 18 th, 2015

Connected Care Connected Car Program Connected Care

Board of Commissioners, Pennsylvania Game Commission

Labour Market Information Monthly

Southeast Region Labor Market Analysis

Employment & Unemployment

Pennsylvania. Department of Environmental Protection. Program Guidelines & Application for Assistance

Draft. Tewksbury Master Plan Economic Development Chapter. Introduction

Dual Diagnosis Treatment Team (DDTT)

OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAMS BUREAU OF AUTISM SERVICES. Adult Autism Waiver. Supports & Services Directory. September 2017

Vermont Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

North Dakota Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

New Hampshire Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

NYC Quarterly Labor Market Brief

I-605 CORRIDOR HOT SPOT INTERCHANGES

Town of Richmond Economic Development Strategy

South Carolina Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

The Economic Impact of Highway & Bridge Construction Investment in Virginia

Gunnedah Shire Local Government Area NORTHERN INLAND NSW

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION

Domestic Violence Services Subcontractors

Riverdale Farms Commercial Tracts - Warrior Drive Murfreesboro, TN

Alliance. Chesterfield-Daleville. Linking Local Economic Analysis to Economic Development Strategies Economic and Real Estate Development

Pennsylvania s EPIC B.E.S.T. Initiative

May 16, 2018 Outreach Webinar TIME S UP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

Benefits and Services for Veterans and Their Beneficiaries in Pennsylvania

Saskatchewan Polytechnic Employer Survey Graduates. September 2016

2017 Workforce Education Conference

Active Emission Schools By County for the Web

Rhode Island Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

PARK HILL INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR MICRO CLUSTER ANALYSIS. October 2009

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

2018 SOX & Internal Controls Professionals Group State of the SOX/Internal Controls Market Survey

Jobs Demand Report. Chatham / Kent, Ontario Reporting Period of April 1 June 30, July 7, 2015

South Central Illinois Regional Industry Cluster Analysis. Industry Cluster Structure and Trends

Labour Market Information Monthly

Durable Medical Equipment (DME) Providers

Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Annual Performance Report for Northeastern Pennsylvania

Tennessee Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

October 17, Prepared for

STARMETRICS May, David W. Robinson, Ph.D., Professor & Executive Vice Provost, OHSU

Employment & Unemployment

Persian Gulf Conflict Veterans Benefit Program Fiscal Year Report PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS

2012 CEDS PLAN. Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Committee. July 12, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council

Employment & Unemployment

Lehigh/Capital Children NCSO Children NCCO. Follow-up after non-hospital D&A Rehab

Job Vacancies in the Portland Tri-County Area Lynn Wallis, Workforce Analyst, (971)

Where. Number of Vacancies. Employment in Occupation 2,105 2,100 1,557 1,429 1,

Litchfield Hillsborough County, New Hampshire

Texas Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

Employment & Unemployment

RAPID BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT CONSTRUCTION UPDATE: SPRING 2018

Community Based Organizations- Pennsylvania

Transcription:

LOCATION QUOTIENTS Berks, Chester, Lebanon, Lancaster, Lehigh, Montgomery, Schuylkill counties 2001-2013

What is a location quotient? Metric for gauging the relative concentration or specialization of one or more industries, industry sectors or industry clusters in an area. Use BEA employment data from previous memo (2001-2013) Compare same counties vs. Pennsylvania Local employment in industry/ Total local employment ------------------------------------------ = Location Quotient State employment in industry/ Total state employment

How are they used? Location quotients (LQ) can identify potential sources of both comparative and competitive advantage and areas of regional specialization. LQs are helpful in identifying areas that have existing concentrations of workers with transferable skills, interconnected businesses, suppliers, and related industries, or growing industry areas where concentrated employment in that sector is weak but growing. Can be stacked with other employment data to evaluate competitiveness.

Comparative vs. Competitive Advantage There are specific reasons why each regional economy has a unique industry mix. Comparative advantages (Ease of production): Natural resource availability, location advantages (major highways), or existing availability of a highly or uniquely skilled labor force. Examples: Schuylkill County coal, Lehigh County highways, Berks County manufacturing base Competitive advantages (E.g. Lower costs of labor, land and doing business) Examples: Lower land/labor costs, incentives, strategic infrastructure investment (public pre-treatment wastewater plants, inland ports), addressing skills gap (Go Build Georgia program, Louisiana Fast Start)

Who uses them? Planners (Present and future land use, transportation needs) Public sector economic development efforts (Better understanding of the competitive realities in the marketplace) Workforce development (The workforce you have vs. the one you need) Private sector site selection (Available, skilled labor/workforce is a top concern (2013 and 2014 Area Development Corporate Survey) Companies (Minimize risk for hiring, retaining, and developing the workforce) Staffing agencies (Drive time, radius)

OK, Better, Best BEST: An industry with an LQ of 1.2 or higher indicates some degree of specialization. Industries with these quotients generate goods and services in excess of what it required inside the geography. BETTER: LQs of 0.8 to 1.2 indicate normal distribution of that industry with little specialization. It serves only the economy inside the geography. OK: LQs of less than 0.8 may indicate that the industry in the region is weak. This means other geographies are generating those goods and services. As a rule, you can interpret location quotients of >1.2 as high and <0.8 as low.

2013 Seven County LQ 2013 County LQ Berks Chester Lancaster Lebanon Lehigh Montgomery Schuykill Forestry, fishing, and related activities 1.47 2.68 2.06 1.32 * 0.12 1.16 Mining 0.21 0.15 0.23 0.12 * 0.11 1.66 Utilities 1.24 0.53 0.24 * 0.84 1.23 1.36 Construction 1.09 0.96 1.47 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.89 Manufacturing 1.66 0.76 1.60 1.76 0.90 0.88 1.99 Wholesale trade 1.12 1.38 1.39 * 1.21 1.43 0.66 Retail trade 1.09 0.92 1.16 1.15 0.98 0.99 1.09 Transportation and warehousing 0.80 0.63 1.12 1.41 1.44 0.48 2.46 Information 0.59 1.30 0.84 0.92 1.08 1.57 0.49 Finance and insurance 0.71 1.76 0.67 0.50 0.86 1.56 0.54 Real estate and rental and leasing 1.03 1.54 0.97 0.89 0.96 1.27 0.65 Professional, scientific, and technical services 0.80 1.84 0.74 0.50 0.77 1.81 0.44 Management of companies and enterprises 1.15 1.32 0.69 0.34 2.17 1.16 0.55 Administrative and waste management services 1.13 0.96 0.86 1.07 1.45 1.32 0.76 Educational services 0.43 0.66 0.57 0.55 0.58 0.86 0.24 Health care and social assistance 0.93 0.73 0.91 0.81 1.28 0.90 0.96 Arts, entertainment, and recreation 0.92 1.05 0.97 0.72 1.06 0.91 0.50 Accommodation and food services 0.90 0.73 1.04 0.86 0.93 0.80 0.77 Other services, except public administration 1.02 1.00 1.05 0.97 0.89 0.87 0.94

2001-2013 Seven County LQ Change Location Quotient Change 2001-2013 Berks Chester Lancaster Lebanon Lehigh Montgomery Schuykill Forestry, fishing, and related activities -2.1% 2.2% 1.0% * * -1.4% 1.3% Mining -3.9% -4.6% -5.3% * * -4.5% * Utilities 2.5% -5.0% -4.5% * -8.7% 4.4% 1.7% Construction 0.0% -0.7% 0.9% 0.0% -0.6% -0.8% -0.1% Manufacturing 0.8% -1.3% 0.1% 1.2% -2.4% -0.9% 1.1% Wholesale trade 1.3% 0.8% 1.1% * 0.6% 0.3% -1.2% Retail trade 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% -0.1% 0.3% 0.5% -1.1% Transportation and warehousing -1.7% -0.6% 1.4% 2.2% 3.2% -0.9% 7.7% Information 0.7% 1.6% 0.7% * -0.4% 0.0% * Finance and insurance -2.2% 0.4% -0.3% 1.2% -2.1% -0.2% -0.3% Real estate and rental and leasing 1.0% 0.1% -0.9% * -0.6% 0.2% 0.0% Professional, scientific, and technical services -0.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.5% -0.4% Management of companies and enterprises -4.2% 2.8% -2.8% 3.1% 3.2% -1.4% 0.6% Administrative and waste management services 0.7% -2.0% -0.5% 3.9% 0.9% -0.8% 5.0% Educational services 0.8% 0.6% 2.2% 1.6% -0.9% 0.8% -1.8% Health care and social assistance 1.5% -0.4% 1.3% -1.3% 0.6% -0.6% 0.1% Arts, entertainment, and recreation -1.4% -0.4% 0.0% 0.0% -0.8% 0.2% 0.0% Accommodation and food services 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% -0.6% 0.1% 0.5% -1.5% Other services, except public administration 0.1% -0.2% 0.3% -0.1% -0.4% 1.0% -2.0%

Connecting LQs to our March discussion Combining employment growth and LQ, we can group our industries into four (4) categories: Competitive: Industries with an LQ of 1.0 or greater with employment growth; Emerging: Industries with an LQ less than 1.0 with employment growth; At-Risk: Industries with an LQ of 1.0 or greater with employment loss; Declining: Industries with an LQ less than 1.0 with employment loss.

Berks County industries by category Berks 2001 2013 LQ Growth 2001-2013 Employment Growth 2001-2013 Competitive (LQ>1.0, employment growth) Management of companies and enterprises 1.94 1.15-4.2% 2.0% Administrative and waste management services 1.03 1.13 0.7% 1.6% Wholesale trade 0.95 1.12 1.3% 1.2% Real estate and rental and leasing 0.91 1.03 1.0% 3.9% Other services, except public administration 1.01 1.02 0.1% 0.6% Emerging (LQ<1.0, employment growth) Health care and social assistance 0.77 0.93 1.5% 3.4% Arts, entertainment and recreation 1.09 0.92-1.4% 1.1% Accommodation and food services 0.89 0.90 0.1% 1.2% Professional, scientific and technical services 0.86 0.80-0.6% 0.5% Educational services 0.39 0.43 0.8% 2.6% Mining 0.34 0.21-3.9% 2.5% At-Risk (LQ>1.0, employment decline) Manufacturing 1.51 1.66 0.8% -2.2% Forestry, fishing and related activities 1.89 1.47-2.1% -0.8% Utilities 0.92 1.24 2.5% -0.6% Construction 1.10 1.09 0.0% -0.3% Retail Trade 1.07 1.09 0.2% -0.3% Declining (LQ<1.0, employment decline) Transportation and warehousing 0.98 0.80-1.7% -0.8% Finance and insurance 0.92 0.71-2.2% -1.0% Information 0.55 0.59 0.7% -2.2%

Selected industries

Manufacturing Manufacturing 2013 LQ Seven Counties Schuylkill 1.99 Lebanon 1.76 Berks 1.66 Lancaster 1.60 Lehigh 0.90 Montgomery 0.88 Chester 0.76 3rd Class Counties York 1.79 Erie 1.77 Berks 1.66 Lancaster 1.60 Westmoreland 1.27 Northampton 1.23 Luzerne 1.11 Lackawanna 0.97 Lehigh 0.90 Chester 0.76 Dauphin 0.67 Cumberland 0.66

Transportation and Warehousing Transportation and Warehousing 2013 LQ Seven Counties Schuylkill 2.46 Lehigh 1.44 Lebanon 1.41 Lancaster 1.12 Berks 0.80 Chester 0.63 Montgomery 0.48 3rd Class Counties Cumberland 2.31 Luzerne 1.83 Lehigh 1.44 Westmoreland 1.35 Northampton 1.35 York 1.17 Lackawanna 1.17 Lancaster 1.12 Dauphin 1.08 Berks 0.80 Chester 0.63 Erie 0.58

Health care Health care 2013 LQ Seven Counties Lehigh 1.28 Schuylkill 0.96 Berks 0.93 Lancaster 0.91 Montgomery 0.90 Lebanon 0.81 Chester 0.73 3rd Class Counties Lehigh 1.28 Erie 1.12 Lackawanna 1.10 Luzerne 1.01 Dauphin 0.97 Berks 0.93 Lancaster 0.91 Westmoreland 0.89 York 0.82 Northampton 0.74 Chester 0.73 Cumberland 0.70

Management of Companies Management of Companies 2013 LQ Seven Counties Lehigh 2.17 Chester 1.32 Montgomery 1.16 Berks 1.15 Lancaster 0.69 Schuylkill 0.55 Lebanon 0.34 3rd Class Counties Lehigh 2.17 Cumberland 1.61 Chester 1.32 Berks 1.15 York 0.97 Dauphin 0.90 Westmoreland 0.71 Lancaster 0.69 Luzerne 0.53 Northampton 0.53 Lackawanna 0.47 Erie 0.24