STATE HIGHWAY (SH) 34 FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING

Similar documents
Appendix F Public Meeting Summaries. F1: May 2013 Public Meeting Summary F2: September 2013 Public Meeting Summary

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District

Dallas North Tollway Extension Phase 4B/5A Alignment Presented to: Regional Transportation Council

Appendix A: Public Involvement Plan

Welcome to the Public Meeting for the State Highway 68 Project. SH 68 Project Office Information Environmental Constraints & Study Corridors

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

Client: Boulder County Transportation Project: SH 119 Bus Rapid Transit & Bikeway Facility Design

REGIONAL 10-YEAR PLAN AND NEXT DECADE OF PROJECTS. Regional Transportation Council December 8, 2016

Throughout the Open House, the following informational stations will be available:

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PUBLIC MEETING. For I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604

Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting #52. February 16, :00 PM - 8:00 PM Progress Park Downey Ave, Paramount, CA MEETING SUMMARY

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

Managing Access along Pennsylvania s Highways in the Delaware Valley

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS. February 1, Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

Pecue Lane/I-10 Interchange Project Public Meeting Transcript

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Appendix E Major Stakeholder Meeting Summaries. E1: Ash Grove Cement Company E2: Holcim E3: UPRR E3: BNSF E4: IIIPOD E5: Skyline Landfill E6: Oncor

REGIONAL TRANSIT FEASIBILITY PLAN

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement, I-495 & I-270 Managed

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY Amarillo District May FY 2010 Quarterly Revisions

2013 Louisiana Transportation Conference

Toll Project Development Policy. Mark Boggs, P.E.

I-69 Angelina and Nacogdoches Counties Committee Charge and Purpose

MINUTES. Regional Transportation Council PUBLIC MEETING. Kaufman County Regional Toll Revenue Transportation Funding Initiative Recommendations

Section 1201: Requirements for Traveler Information

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

IH 20 Ranger Hill Schematic Design and Environmental Documentation CSJ:

Module 2 Planning and Programming

TxDOT Funding and Accelerated Construction Program

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2019 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

NORTHEAST CONNECTOR EXPRESSWAY PROJECT ADVISORY GROUP (PAG) LOCATION: Narcoossee Community Center, 5354 Rambling Road, St. Cloud

SH 121: FM 423 To SH 121 At US 75 Interchange. APPENDIX B: Coordination and Policy

Puget Sound Gateway Program

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

In-Step, In Line, On Time. Robert F. Tally Jr. FHWA Indiana Division Administrator Monday, November 16, 2009

Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Call

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016

US 59 Diboll Relief Route (Future I-69) Angelina County Open House Summary and Comment Response Report March 3, 2015

School Siting and Transportation

Central City Line Steering Committee

Smart Region Smart Transportation

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

Tennessee Department of Transportation 15 Project Case Study

I-66 Inside the Beltway Initial Traffic Analysis and Framework Agreement

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

FAIRFIELD AVENUE, EWING STREET, SUPERIOR STREET, AND WELLS STREET PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY

Guidance for Urban/Metropolitan Area Installation/Bases

Meeting Minutes. Project: Subject: Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Location: Attendees:

Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual

November 4, 2013 Office of Transportation Public Private Partnerships

RFP for Bicycle/Pedestrian Scoping Study Page 1

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION

South Carolina s. Road Map to the Future

METHODOLOGY - Scope of Work

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Addendum. Final Environmental Impact Report for North Campus Project. California State University Los Angeles SCH# March 2018.

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

Draft Project Coordination Plan

SAFETEA-LU SECTION 6002 COORDINATION PLAN

May 17, To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. Step Two. fixed-guideway. Program. for. Background

To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. the City of. Background. began the. As part of with both

NCDOT Planning Summary for NCTA Projects

Tentative Project Schedule. Non-Discrimination i i Laws. Para Preguntas en español

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

CITY OF MADISON, ALABAMA

Greater Dallas Planning Council Metromorphosis Seminar October 9, 2009

Federal, State, Local Funding and Assistance Programs. Nicole Fox, Iowa DOT Office of Local Systems

I-69 System (I-369) Harrison County/Marshall Route Study. December Working Group Recommendation Report

Central City Line Kick-off and Tour

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Uptown Main Street/US 25 Traffic Calming Analysis. Date Issued: June 5, 2018

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Commonwealth Transportation Board Briefing

SELECTION PROCESS & QUESTION DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPING A GOOD PURPOSE AND NEED. Patrick Lee TxDOT Environmental Affairs Division

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE US 59/LOOP 20/I-69W PROJECT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS SUBASE NEW LONDON JOINT LAND USE STUDY (JLUS) IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

Route 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor. Submitted By:

Public Meeting #5 Summary

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

www molran org 00c55A MIDLAIID April L3, 2015

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY AMARILLO DISTRICT. AUGUST FY 2009 Quarterly Revisions

Project Selection Policy Update. Philip Schaffner June 20, 2018

State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project Update. State Route 91 Advisory Committee June 4, 2010

US Army Corps of Engineers Periodic Inspection Report 9 Update. Dallas City Council June 3, 2009

PRE-SOLICITATION MEETING US 290 FROM RM 12 TO RM 1826

Module 3 Advance Funding Agreements between the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and a Local Government (LG) for Transportation Projects

SMART SCALE Application Guide

REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR CSJ: PASS-THROUGH FINANCE PROJECT

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation

Mark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH

State Project No. XXXXXX City Project No. c401807

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) POLICY

2018 Project Selection Process

PROJECT SELECTION Educational Series

Transcription:

STATE HIGHWAY (SH) 34 FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING From FM 2578 in Terrell to SH 243 in Kaufman CSJ: 0173-04-056 June 28, 2018

WHAT IS A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHAT IS A FEASIBILITY STUDY? A feasibility study is when a project is in the very early stages of development. The study helps determine if the project should move forward to more in-depth environmental analysis, public involvement, schematic design and right-of-way mapping. The project team, in coordination with the working group comprised of city and county officials, and stakeholders, would develop project goals and objectives, assess environmental and engineering constraints, and identify preliminary route options. With input from the public and community, and additional technical analysis, the project team would refine and recommend route options for further study. These route options would be the starting point for any future phases of project development, including an environmental study, should the project advance. 2

Study Goals The goal of the study is to evaluate existing SH 34 and other options identified in the surrounding area of SH 34 in order to better serve the community. ALONG WITH PARTNERS, WE ARE EVALUATING: Improvements in safety and mobility Reduction in traffic congestion Population growth Social and community impacts Environmental and socio-economical impacts Savings in maintenance and construction costs 3

Overview Study Limits: From FM 2578 in Terrell To SH 243 in Kaufman (approx. 10 miles) Existing SH 34 The purpose of this meeting is to: Provide a status update on the Explain the proposed project and describe any potential impacts Collect, document, and analyze public input 4

Background History Kaufman County 2035 Thoroughfare Plan Identifies SH 34 as a Principal Arterial (in yellow). Existing SH 34 The plan also identifies a Proposed Principal Arterial adjacent west of existing SH 34 (in purple). 5

Study Considerations Mobility and Congestion PM peak hour congestion Green, orange and red indicate low, moderate, and high traffic congestion, respectively Congestion along I-20 ramps. Significant congested areas will worsen with regional growth. 6

Background History 1996 Feasibility Study: 4 alternatives evaluated 2006 Feasibility Study: 11 alternatives evaluated 7

Draft Alignment Evaluation Not all of the eleven alignments evaluated in the 2006 Feasibility Study were determined to be viable. The main reasons identified for lack of viability were: Impact a significant number of homes and business Conflict with major future development plans Impact floodplains or floodway, parks, and/or federally protected lands Did not provide congestion relief Conflict with regional goals Of the eleven alignments identified in the 2006 Feasibility Study, eight were moved forward for further evaluation. HOWEVER, THE EIGHT ALIGNMENTS PRESENTED AT THIS MEETING TONIGHT ARE THOSE THAT OUR STUDY TEAM FOUND TO BE THE MOST VIABLE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS AND CORRIDOR ALIGNMENTS (AS SHOWN ON THE NEXT SLIDE). 8

Alignment Alternatives Proposed tie-in alternatives in Terrell. Proposed tie-in alternatives in Kaufman. 9

Proposed Roadway Configuration SH 34 is currently a two-lane roadway. The study will evaluate and analyze possible solutions and alignments for a four-lane divided roadway. PROPOSED RURAL ROADWAY CONFIGURATION PROPOSED URBAN ROADWAY CONFIGURATION 10

WE NEED YOUR INPUT ON DRAFT ALIGNMENTS THAT ARE AVAILABLE FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT. KEEP IN MIND: Draft alignments are available for your review and comment. A final alignment has not been chosen. These are conceptual alignments. It is possible a combination of alignment segments could be merged for comment at our next Public Meeting. Alignments are being shown with 150 to 250 foot right of way. Your official comments will help us decide with alignments to further define. 11

Anticipated Timeline WE ARE HERE 12

Study Contacts CHARLES TAPP, P.E. TxDOT Project Manager PHIL ULLMAN, P.E. Study Team Project Manager LISA WALZL Public Information Officer 214-320-6252 Charles.Tapp@txdot.gov TxDOT Dallas District 4777 E. Highway 80 Mesquite, Texas 75150-6643 972-202-4242 Phil.Ullman@rpsgroup.com 5810 Tennyson Suite 280 Plano, Texas, 75024 214-320-4403 Lisa.Walzl@txdot.gov TxDOT Dallas District 4777 E. Highway 80 Mesquite, Texas 75150-6643 13

THANK YOU for taking time to provide input and help shape the future of SH 34 and Kaufman County. 14