Cook Primary School Balanced Scorecard Indicators

Similar documents
STUDENT WELFARE WELLNESS AND HEALTH SERVICES

PROCEDURES: To ensure the health and well-being of all students, the Board establishes that the agency shall provide to students:

School Wellness Policy Elements. Bremen City Schools School Nutrition Program Excellence in all we do!

WELLNESS POLICY BOARD ADOPTED: May 2, 2006

VICTORIA REGIONAL JUVENILE JUSTICE CENTER

ADOPTED: 7/17/2018 REVISED: SCHOOL WELLNESS

LOCAL SCHOOL WELLNESS POLICY FILE: IHAM. Health Education and Setting Nutrition Education Goals

SCHOOL WELLNESS POLICY

CHAPEL HILL PRIMARY SCHOOL. Chapel Hill Primary School P&C Tuckshop Convenor. Parents and Citizens Association

COAL CITY COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Goals for Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Other Wellness Activities

WELLNESS POLICY. The Village for Families & Children Revised 11/10/2016 Page 1 of 7

Diocese of Harrisburg: School Wellness Policy Department of Catholic Schools Adopted: June 28, 2017 Revised: 1. Purpose

Cleburne ISD Wellness Plan

DIOCESE OF DES MOINES Catholic Schools Policies/Regulations adopted by Dowling Catholic High School

Nutrition Education, Physical Education, Foods and Beverages and other Wellness Activities

KIDSPEACE POLICY Copyright, KidsPeace Corporation

STUDENT WELFARE WELLNESS AND HEALTH SERVICES

PINE REST CHRISTIAN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES COMMUNITY AND RESIDENTIAL SERVICES CENTER FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENTIAL SERVICES. Wellness Policy APPROVAL:

1. The health education curriculum will include comprehensive sequential nutrition education which will promote the following:

Position Description. Long-Term Care Ombudsman Representatives Program Coordinator

Students BP Student Wellness

Kern Health Systems Offers A New School Wellness Grant Program!

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LANCASTER

SANGER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. Students WELLNESS

School Wellness Policy. Physical Activity and Nutrition

Students STUDENT WELLNESS

Wellness Policy Assessment SY 14-15

MEMO SD33 Innovation Grant

N E I S D. School Health Index Summary Report

STUDENT WELLNESS BP 5030

NEW DIANA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT WELLNESS PLAN

Campus Middle School General Information School Year

WESTMINSTER SCHOOL DISTRICT

HEALTHY CHILDREN ARE PREPARED TO LEARN. PK-6 th

Health Services Manager

ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Wellness Policy

LYNNFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS WELLNESS POLICY

School Wellness Team Mini Grant Funding Application

FIRST LEGO League (FLL) Robotics Program FAQ A partnership of the Y of Central Maryland and City Schools

Indiana Healthy Schools Action Plan St. Anthony of Padua Clarksville, Indiana

21 st Century Charter School at Gary Policy ID School Wellness Policy Policy # July 5, 2006 WELLNESS POLICY

KNIGHT S.H.I.F.T. SCHOOLS HELPING IN FAMILY TRANSITION

POLICY FAMILY HEALTH AND SAFETY OF STUDENTS 649

Life Threatening Allergies Natick Public Schools

SHELL KNOB SCHOOL 2017 DISTRICT WELLNESS PROGRAM

BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICIES SECTION C GENERAL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION

Proposition 1: Educational Programs and Operations Levy. Updated

Governor s Budget Proposal

School Support Team Training. Nerissa Erickson, M.A.Ed., M.Ed. Title I/NCLB Consultant Region 10 ESC

Building Local Partnerships & Sustainability. Additional Resources

DRAFT Goals (A, B, C...), Best Practices (1, 2, 3...), and Indicators (a, b, c...)

BRAC. Sponsorship Opportunities. Engage. Connect. Build your brand.

Sheffield-Sheffield Lake City Schools Board of Education Agenda

Fiscal Year. Fiscal Year. Leading Change. Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

Grant Opportunities. Applications are due July 19, To request an application go to

Orientation to School Nutrition Management

ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT Shared Between Child Nutrition Program Sponsors. and. From to Effective Dates

PERCY HEDLEY EDUCATION SERVICES

Thank you, Sara Pelkey. Advocates for Healthy Youth, Center for Population Health, Cheshire Medical Center, 580 Court St, Keene NH 03431

Impact of IPE on professional practice and health care outcomes:

SECTION A CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAM

Child Nutrition Programs ISBE Update. Illinois State Board of Education Nutrition and Wellness Programs Division

OLDHAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS ADMINISTRATION 1OOO-AR

Watkins Glen School District Plan for Student with Peanut Allergy in the School

PEP GRANT 101. Roundtable Discussion (writing, receiving and implementing)

Innovatively Weaving the Measurement of Outcomes Content into DNP Program Curricula

DESCRIPTIONS OF POSITIONS. Administrative Staff

Crowdfunding Best Practices

STUDENT DATA SHEET. Student s Legal Last Name Legal First Name Middle Name Preferred Name. Student s Residence Street Address City State Zip Code

Maplewood Richmond Heights School District Ensuring a Healthy Sustainable Future

Wissahickon School District Ambler, Pennsylvania 19002

Dear Potential Applicant,

Budget Thomas J. Waters Elementary

Administrative/Professional Pay Plan Carroll ISD

Using the CDC School Health Index to Promote Healthy School Environments for Staff

TL9- The Various Methods by Which Direct Care Nurses Access Nurse Leaders

EASTERN MIDDLE SCHOOL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Revenue Generating Idea Review. Boyertown Area School District C.U.B. Meeting 9/14/11

1. Title: Health and Safety Policy

GRANT PROPOSAL GUIDELINES

Telephone and ed complaints:

Unified Pay Scale - Grade Assignments SY

Employee Climate Survey

WHOLE SCHOOL FOOD POLICY INCLUDING FOOD SAFETY

NUTRITION AND DIETARY REQUIREMENTS POLICY

A Guide To Starting The Summer Food Service Program In Your Community

DEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

HERMITAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT

The Children s Home of Reading

CEO Leadership Council Fall Meeting. October 11, 2017

Development and assessment of a Patient Safety Culture Dr Alice Oborne

Serving Healthy School Meals

October 2015 TEACHING STANDARDS FRAMEWORK FOR NURSING & MIDWIFERY. Final Report

ALTERNATIVE REHABILITATION COMMUNITIES, INC.

EFFECTIVE COLLABORATION WITH SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN GRANT PROPOSALS

Office of the Governor Criminal Justice Division. Funding Announcement: Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund

Newtownhamilton Primary School

Succession Planning in an Academic Medical Center Nursing Service. Cynthia Barginere, DNP, RN FACHE Lynne M. Wallace, SPHR

Funding Toolkit INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

Cook Primary School Balanced Scorecard Indicators I. Area of Focus Continuous evaluation and progress in measured student achievement Objective Measure/Indicator Grade Subject 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 A. Students will perform in Reading students at level 2 and 3 students at level 3 1 Reading 2 Reading 1 Reading 2 Reading * 87.5% 88.5% 27% 35.5% * 90% 90% 32% 49% * 59% 91% 15% 62% Performance Target 2014 94.6% 94.6% B. Students will perform in English Language Arts students at level 2 and 3 students at level 3 1 ELA N/A N/A 2 ELA N/A N/A 1 ELA N/A N/A 2 ELA N/A N/A 74% 84% 39% 40% 93% 93% C. Students will perform in Math students at level 2 and 3 students at level 3 1 Math 2 Math 1 Math 2 Math 85% 86% 23% 29% 91% 95% 44% 36% 68% 81% 24% 35% 88.1% 88.1% *Local benchmarks no statewide assessment available 1

I. Area of Focus Continuous evaluation and progress in measured student achievement Objective Measure/Indicator Grade Subject 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 D. Kindergarten students will perform on or above grade level in English Language Arts GKIDS: % of Elements Consistently Demonstrated K ELA 65.5% 77.7% 78.6% E. Students will perform in Math GKIDS: % of Elements Consistently Demonstrated K Math 75.2% 83% 81.6% F. Students will perform in Approaches to Learning. GKIDS: % of Elements Consistently Demonstrated K Approaches to Learning 49% 68.4% 72.7% G. Students will perform in Personal/Social Development GKIDS: % of Elements Consistently Demonstrated K Personal and Social Development 69.3% 74% 86.3% 2

II. Area of Focus Measures of community support of school. (Survey results rounded to the nearest % and may not total 100%) A. Parent support will be indicated through the results of an annual perception survey. My child s school has a clear focus on academic learning and success for each student. My child is challenged to reach his/her potential. Teachers at Cook Primary have high expectations for my child s performance My child learns good work habits and respect for self and others at Cook Primary. School personnel treat my child in a fair and consistent manner. 2010-2011 462 62% 27% 1% 0 2011-2012 345 69% 30% 1% 0 2012-2013 649 98% 1% 1% 2010-2011 464 63% 35% 2% 0 2011-2012 343 72% 27% 1% 0 2012-2013 649 96% 2% 1% 2010-2011 459 68% 31% 1% 0 2011-2012 350 71% 28% 1% 0 2012-2013 650 96% 2% 1% 2010-2011 456 64% 34% 2% 0 2011-2012 344 71% 27% 1% 0 2012-2013 649 97% 1% 1% 2010-2011 462 64% 34% 2% 0 2011-2012 351 70% 28% 2% 0 2012-2013 650 94% 3% 2% The faculty and staff are responsive to my concerns. Cook Primary keeps me informed of my child s progress through phone calls, notes, report cards, agendas, newsletters, test scores, conferences, etc. 2010-2011 464 64% 33% 2% 1% 2011-2012 352 69% 29% 2% 0 2012-2013 649 96% 2% 1% 2010-2011 469 66% 30% 2% 2% 2011-2012 353 71% 27% 1% 1% 2012-2013 648 95% 3% 1% 3

A. Parent support will be indicated through the results of an annual perception survey. Parent and community volunteers are encouraged and appreciated at Cook Primary. Cook Primary provides high quality programs for gifted students. Cook Primary provides high quality programs for special needs students. 2010-2011 461 60% 39% 1% 0 2011-2012 355 65% 34% 2% 0 2012-2013 646 93% 2% 5% 2010-2011 420 55% 42% 2% 1% 2011-2012 330 60% 38% 2% 0 2012-2013 650 95% 3% 1% 2010-2011 424 63% 35% 2% 0 2011-2012 324 61% 37% 1% 1% 2012-2013 641 70% 1% 28% III. Area of Focus Internal Climate Measures A. Employee support and satisfaction will be indicated by the results of annual staff perception survey(s). Teachers engage in a process of collaborative planning for curriculum implementation to ensure that they agree on core content and required student performance. Teachers and administrators use a systematic process for monitoring and evaluating implementation of the curriculum A comprehensive system is in place to ensure that all administrators and instructional personnel use assessment data to design and adjust instruction to maximize student achievement. High expectations for all learners are consistently evident. 2010-2011 100 45% 52% 1% 2% 2011-2012 87 52% 44% 5% 0 2012-2013 121 84% 5% 11% 2010-2011 100 38% 57% 4% 1% 2011-2012 84 43% 51% 6% 0 2012-2013 121 83% 6% 12% 2010-2011 100 42% 55% 2% 1% 2011-2012 84 43% 54% 4% 0 2012-2013 120 85% 4% 11% 2010-2011 100 45% 49% 6% 0 2011-2012 84 52% 43% 5% 0 2012-2013 120 89% 8% 3% 4

A. Employee support and satisfaction will be indicated by the results of annual staff perception survey(s). The school vision and mission are the basis for all aspects of continuous improvement. All staff work collaboratively to ensure that rules, policies, and procedures related to sustaining a safe and productive learning environment are clearly communicated and implemented throughout the school. The school as a community of learning involves parents and community members as active participants. provide leadership that reinforces a commitment to high expectations for student achievement. School governance and leadership are shared and school improvement is viewed as a collective responsibility. The school leadership team is operational, representative and data driven. support the learning environment through strong management and organizational skills. clearly set high expectations for both students and staff. guide the process of decision-making and problem solving in such a way that all staff members have the opportunity to provide input. 2010-2011 99 52% 47% 1% 0 2011-2012 84 49% 51% 0 0 2012-2013 121 92% 4% 4% 2010-2011 98 52% 40% 7% 1% 2011-2012 87 40% 53% 5% 0 2012-2013 120 84% 16% 0% 2010-2011 99 46% 49% 3% 1% 2011-2012 84 44% 51% 5% 0 2012-2013 115 95% 5% 0% 2010-2011 100 47% 50% 2% 1% 2011-2012 87 46% 46% 8% 0 2012-2013 122 90% 7% 3% 2010-2011 99 41% 50% 5% 3% 2011-2012 84 40% 46% 8% 5% 2012-2013 122 89% 7% 4% 2010-2011 100 42% 52% 3% 3% 2011-2012 84 36% 55% 6% 4% 2012-2013 121 88% 5% 7% 2010-2011 100 39% 53% 7% 1% 2011-2012 83 39% 47% 13% 1% 2012-2013 120 88% 10% 2% 2010-2011 98 41% 53% 5% 1% 2011-2012 84 42% 49% 10% 0 2012-2013 122 91% 7% 2% 2010-2011 100 40% 39% 18% 2% 2011-2012 84 37% 44% 17% 2% 2012-2013 122 84% 11% 4% 5

A. Employee support and satisfaction will be indicated by the results of annual staff perception survey(s). have 2010-2011 99 45% 48% 5% 1% quality contacts and interactions with staff 2011-2012 83 43% 43% 12% 1% and students and are visible at most school events. 2012-2013 121 85% 12% 2% establish a clear set of standard operating procedures for faculty and staff. promote a sense of community and cooperation, a positive climate and a shared vision that drives the work of the school. Our school celebrates and acknowledges achievements and accomplishments. 2010-2011 97 35% 59% 6% 0 2011-2012 84 38% 50% 12% 0 2012-2013 122 91% 5% 4% 2010-2011 99 43% 48% 7% 1% 2011-2012 84 37% 50% 11% 2% 2012-2013 122 87% 9% 4% 2010-2011 98 51% 49% 0 0 2011-2012 85 52% 44% 5% 0 2012-2013 119 97% 2% 1% Our school fosters inclusion and diversity. 2010-2011 99 48% 49% 2% 0 2011-2012 81 47% 51% 2% 0 2012-2013 116 87% 5% 8% Our school culture supports professional growth of faculty and staff. Our school culture supports the growth and development of all learners. Programs for special needs students are of high quality. Guidance and counseling services meet identified student needs. The media program at my school supports the learning needs of the students and staff. 2010-2011 99 41% 53% 6% 0 2011-2012 82 43% 46% 9% 2% 2012-2013 117 87% 10% 3% 2010-2011 99 44% 54% 2% 0 2011-2012 80 43% 51% 4% 1% 2012-2013 116 91% 8% 2% 2010-2011 99 38% 55% 7% 0 2011-2012 86 47% 45% 8% 0 2012-2013 118 75% 14% 12% 2010-2011 98 19% 65% 11% 4% 2011-2012 83 31% 34% 22% 13% 2012-2013 119 57% 27% 16% 2010-2011 99 53% 45% 1% 1% 2011-2012 82 44% 49% 5% 2% 2012-2013 118 81% 11% 8% 6

IV. Area of Focus Measures of a safe and orderly environment A. Attendance Data Employees Year Average Sick Leave Days 2010-2011 8.79 2011-2012 10 2012-2013 9.62 Year Student Average Daily Attendance 2010-2011 95.33% 2011-2012 95.11% 2012-2013 94.9% B. Facilities and Services Food Nutrition Program will be effective as indicated by the results of annual perception surveys. My child likes the food served in the lunchroom. (Parent) There needs to be more food choices for my child in the lunchroom. (Parent) My child has enough time to each lunch. (Parent) The meals that are prepared to the USDA guidelines are suitable to the needs of the students and adults. (Staff) I get an adequate meal for the money I pay. (Staff) 2010-2011 459 30% 51% 17% 6% 2011-2012 253 37% 23% 28% 12% 2012-2013 641 49% 44% 6% 2010-2011 449 41% 38% 17% 4% 2011-2012 344 43% 39% 15% 3% 2012-2013 646 80% 12% 8% 2010-2011 451 34% 53% 10% 4% 2011-2012 344 41% 51% 6% 2% 2012-2013 644 78% 13% 9% 2010-2011 99 29% 51% 17% 3% 2011-2012 83 28% 51% 14% 7% 2012-2013 121 40% 60% 0% 2010-2011 99 27% 53% 13% 7% 2011-2012 84 24% 43% 17% 17% 2012-2013 120 48% 46% 6% 7

I would agree to pay more for a larger meal. (Staff) I agree with the reduction of fat, salt and sugar in the meals. (Staff) I would encourage students and parents to participate in the lunchroom program more. (Staff) 2010-2011 99 11% 26% 51% 12% 2011-2012 84 13% 31% 44% 12% 2012-2013 120 32% 63% 4% 2010-2011 99 28% 63% 8% 1% 2011-2012 84 31% 52% 12% 5% 2012-2013 118 57% 43% 0% 2010-2011 99 29% 55% 11% 5% 2011-2012 84 40% 39% 14% 6% 2012-2013 120 50% 49% 1% C. Facilities and Services Technology will be available and used effectively as indicated by the results of annual perception surveys. Technology tools are available in my school. (Staff) I can effectively use the technology tools available to me. (Staff) Adequate software is available in my school. (Staff) I can effectively use the software available to me. (Staff) Requests made to the technology specialist in my school are answered in a timely manner. (Staff) My child has opportunities to use technology for learning at Cook Primary School. (Parent) 2010-2011 100 48% 50% 2% 0 2011-2012 87 43% 41% 9% 7% 2012-2013 117 91% 4% 4% 2010-2011 100 40% 57% 2% 1% 2011-2012 83 37% 47% 10% 6% 2012-2013 117 89% 5% 6% 2010-2011 100 45% 50% 5% 0 2011-2012 84 32% 44% 15% 8% 2012-2013 118 88% 8% 4% 2010-2011 99 40% 54% 5% 1% 2011-2012 83 30% 55% 7% 7% 2012-2013 118 92% 4% 4% 2010-2011 100 50% 46% 2% 2% 2011-2012 83 41% 47% 5% 7% 2012-2013 117 93% 1% 6% 2010-2011 414 61% 39% 0 0 2011-2012 306 62% 36% 2% 0 2012-2013 650 94% 1% 5% 8

Students and Staff will be provided a safe and secure environment. Cook Primary is safe and secure. (Parent) 2010-2011 459 65% 34% 0 0 2011-2012 358 69% 30% 1% 0 2012-2013 645 69% 1% 29% B. Facilities and Services Maintenance is effective. Cook Primary is clean well maintained and attractive. (Parent) Playground and PE areas are safe and well maintained. (Parent) Athletic facilities are safe and attractive. (Parent) My room/area and the school are clean and well maintained. (Staff) Playground and PE areas are safe and well maintained. (Staff) Athletic facilities in Cook County are safe and attractive. (Staff) 2010-2011 409 66% 32% 2% 1% 2011-2012 340 64% 32% 3% 1% 2012-2013 647 97% 2% 1% 2010-2011 421 59% 36% 3% 1% 2011-2012 336 59% 36% 4% 2% 2012-2013 647 90% 5% 4% 2010-2011 410 59% 40% 1% 0 2011-2012 336 57% 41% 1% 1% 2012-2013 647 87% 2% 11% 2010-2011 100 14% 46% 30% 10% 2011-2012 87 38% 33% 13% 16% 2012-2013 119 91% 8% 2% 2010-2011 99 17% 46% 22% 14% 2011-2012 84 27% 36% 21% 15% 2012-2013 118 64% 30% 7% 2010-2011 98 23% 69% 5% 2% 2011-2012 84 37% 58% 5% 0 2012-2013 118 80% 6% 14% 9

B. Facilities and Services Transportation is effective, safe and secure. I believe my child has a safe and secure bus ride. (Parent) Bus rules are clear and consistently enforced. (Parent) Buses are clean and well maintained. (Parent) Bus drivers treat students fairly and with respect. (Parent) Bus rules are clear and consistently enforced. (Staff) Buses are clean and well maintained. (Staff) Bus drivers treat students fairly and with respect. (Staff) 2010-2011 357 42% 46% 6% 6% 2011-2012 286 47% 36% 12% 6% 2012-2013 622 69% 13% 18% 2010-2011 353 45% 44% 9% 3% 2011-2012 286 49% 36% 10% 5% 2012-2013 619 66% 14% 20% 2010-2011 353 39% 51% 9% 2% 2011-2012 278 44% 43% 9% 4% 2012-2013 619 62% 11% 26% 2010-2011 354 41% 42% 11% 6% 2011-2012 284 49% 36% 8% 7% 2012-2013 620 63% 12% 24% 2010-2011 100 26% 58% 14% 2% 2011-2012 87 25% 46% 18% 10% 2012-2013 120 52% 17% 32% 2010-2011 99 21% 59% 17% 3% 2011-2012 83 19% 46% 29% 6% 2012-2013 120 38% 29% 33% 2010-2011 99 17% 67% 12% 4% 2011-2012 83 18% 54% 20% 7% 2012-2013 120 41% 11% 48% 10