Federal Demonstration Partnership Meeting January, 2012

Similar documents
Persistent Identifiers in the Authoring Process

Reviewer and Author Recognition

GROWING ORCIDS, TIPS FOR AGENCIES

Author Best Practices

IRINS. Indian Research Information Network System. Kannan P, Scientist C (LS) INFLIBNET Centre

ORCID: building academic trust

Funding Focus: The New NIH Biosketch. Presenter: Rachel Dresbeck Date: June 19, 2014

Linking Researchers with their Research: Persistent identifiers, registries, and interoperability standards

Current Status of Research Information Management in Peru

Supporting US Funder Compliance

SciENcv and the Research Impact Infrastructure. Neil Thakur, Ph.D. National Institutes of Health January 8, 2017

ORCID in Publishing Workflows: An Update Editorial Manager User Group Conference Boston, June 17, 2016

2017 Survey of Research Information Management

30 TH REFEDS MEETING Working Group proposal: ORCID & Organization IDs in FIM 4 October 2015

Allergy & Rhinology. Manuscript Submission Guidelines. Table of Contents:

OpenAIRE einfrastructure for Open Science

FDP SciENCV Pilot. January 28, 2013

Research Information Ecosystem & RIALTO, a Research Intelligence System for

PLOS Submission to RCUK Review Panel Submitted by Cameron Neylon and Catriona MacCallum, 30 September 2014

RIM: Challenges for the UK

St. James s Hospital Research Governance and Support Framework

Research & Impact. Open Access. The basic Open Access overview. ulster.ac.uk

Institutional Repository Project Summary Report Sept 2007 Sept 2010

The biorxiv preprint service and its integration with journals

Preserving e-journals: A review of the digital preservation landscape. Ken DiFiore, MLS, MS Director, Library Relations

Managing All Research Information in an IR

OPENWORKS GUIDE TO OPEN ACCESS FOR SUPPORT STAFF

OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING POLICY

Data Curation as a Form of Collaborative Research

CIP Publications Policy

Preparing for the OSTP Open Access Mandates: Iowa State University, Digital Commons and Digital Iowa State University

Christian Herzog, Giles Radford

Saving Time in the Long Run: A New Workflow for Thesis Submissions

FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot: Sixth Progress Report One Year into the Initiative

NIH public access policy:

Beyond Systematic Reviews: Finding Our Place in the Academic Research Process

Headings: Name authority records (Information retrieval) Author name disambiguation. Scholarly publishing. Grants management

Feasibility Study Into the Reporting of Research Information at a National Level Within the UK Higher Education Sector

Western Regional Storage Trust: Cooperative Storage for Print Journals

Ryan Schryver Ebling Library

Open Science. Empowering Knowledge: Elsevier and Open Science

Leveraging Health Care IT Investment

Ways forward with CERIF

International Exchanges Scheme Kan Tong Po Visiting Fellowships Programme

Goldsmiths Open Access Statement:

Making HKU Research Discoverable & Findable: The HKU Scholars Hub. Knowledge Exchange Conference, Hong Kong, 5-6 December 2011

Thomas Jefferson University

Thesis and Project Guidelines. What you need to know before you begin the Graduate Studies Submission Process

Patient Matching within a Health Information Exchange

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

New Electronic Tools for Research: The Kuali Coeus Implementation Project

RESEARCH POLICY MANUAL

FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot: Ninth Progress Report March 1st, 2017

JOINT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TEMPLATE

VIVO Project Charter v 1.1

Newton Mobility Grants

Researchfish outcome reporting system. User Guide for Researchers

Sample. Research funding area Please select from the drop-down list the funding area that you consider your research falls under

Public Access Policy Mandates & How Publishers Are Responding

Royal Society Wolfson Laboratory Refurbishment Scheme

The FoS Forum: A System for Reflecting on Scholarly Activities in a University Setting and Data-Integration Lessons we Learned Building It

Persistent identifiers the needs. Gerry Lawson (NERC), Barcelona Thursday 6th September 2012

Rutgers Open Access Policy & SOAR

Integration - editors

Building a Successful Service: Developing Open Access Funding and Advocacy at University College London. Click for updates

Innovative research practices and tools

Tri-Agency Data Management Policy Initiative. Matthew Lucas, PhD. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.

Eloy Rodrigues. University of Minho, Portuga

Duration of funding: Awards are available for either up to 3 months, 1 year or 2 years.

OpenAIRE einfrastructurefor Open Science

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NOAA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER SERIES TABLE OF CONTENTS. as of December 8, 2008

Nordic Open Access. Background and Developments. 10th Fiesole Collection Development Retreat March 28-29, 2008

January 10, 2017 MEMORANDUM FOR: SEE DISTRIBUTION

The Current State of Data Sharing

Current and future standardization issues in the e Health domain: Achieving interoperability. Executive Summary

H2020 Programme. Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COLLABORATING FOR VALUE. A Winning Strategy for Health Plans and Providers in a Shared Risk Environment

WATER RESOURCES: MAPPING OUT THE RESEARCH LANDSCAPE

INITIATION GRANT PROGRAM

Project Information. PRIME (Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata Exchange)

The National Research Information System: Conceptual Framework

Introduction to using IDEALS. Savvy Researcher

Belmont Forum Collaborative Research Action:

BERNARD BECKER MEDICAL LIBRARY Washington University School of Medicine

Unique Health Safety Identifier. Across The Continuum of Care

Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020

Science Forecasts: Measuring, Predicting, and Communicating Scientific Developments

The Shared Stewardship of Research Data

18th International XBRL Conference

Training Calendar.

University Research Fellowships 2018 Republic of Ireland applicants

Preparing an Academic CV

Scientific Technical and Medical (STM) journal publishing industry overview

RECORDINGS AT RISK. Application Guidelines CONTENTS

Alliance. Committed to improving lives through digital identity

ACQA THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU DO TODAY

User Group Meeting. December 2, 2011

Data sharing, credit and re-use: who s accountable?

The Research Excellence Framework (REF)

Transcription:

Federal Demonstration Partnership Meeting January, 2012 Laure Haak, PhD Chief Science Officer Custom Analytics and Engineered Systems 13 January 2012

RESEARCH REPORTING WORKFLOW Identify people, concepts, and organizations Determine connections Track research activities and outputs 2

DEFINING THE PROBLEM 3

NAME AMBIGUITY How do I get credit for my work? 4

RESEARCHER If it provides a more efficient way to manage my profile data and institutional and funder reporting requirements, I ll use it. I need to submit a paper I need to list my scholarly output in a grant application biosketch I want to know what other papers were published by these authors I want to find potential collaborators 5

REPORTING CHALLENGES Funding, personnel, and output data sources were not designed for the purpose of tracking or reporting 6

RESEARCH INSTITUTION If it provides a more efficient way to manage expertise and impact data and supports seamless institutional reporting, we ll use it. We need to understand our institutional research strengths and impact We want to know how we compare to other institutions We need to track faculty publications for our institutional repository and/or profiling system. We want to know with whom our faculty are collaborating 7

FACING THE CHALLENGE Adopt definitional standards within and across data sources and types Apply unique ID to person records across data sources and types Enlist all sectors in data collection and standards effort 8

NIRVANA: INTEROPERABILITY Publication Submission Publication author and usage data Usage Reporting Institution-based researcher profile data IR, Annual Reporting, P&T Can stakeholders agree on common standards and identifiers? Grant Application Funding agency grants data Portfolio Analysis 9

STANDARDS AND UNIQUE IDENTIFIERS 10

ORCID ORCID is a permanent registry of unique contributors ORCID provides a disambiguation service ORCID is the crux of a disambiguated record of research activity Example ID: http://orcid.org/0137-1963-7688-2319 11

WHY ORCID? TRUSTWORTHY: Inclusive and transparently governed not-for-profit GLOBAL: Not limited by discipline, institution, geography OPEN: Data and source code available under recognized open licenses EFFICIENT: Third-party seeding of profiles INTEGRATED: Part of institutional, publisher, and funding agency infrastructure 12

ORCID IN CRITICAL WORKFLOWS Researcher Joins faculty Joins student body Track output of researchers Locate collaborators Applies for grant Streamline application process Support research assessment Streamline data input Create author links Submits manuscript 13

AUTHOR ORCID PUBLISHER WORKFLOW Researcher Registers ORCID::DOI pairings submitted to ORCID Researcher Profile Updated Unique ORCID and Researcher Profile Metadata and ORCID deposited to CrossRef Manuscript processed and content published ORCID passed to manuscript submission system 14

ORCID PROFILE Researchers create and maintain an ORCID ID and profile free of charge, with fine-grained control of privacy settings 15

46533489 RESEARCHER IDENTIFICATION STANDARD ORCID will interact with other researcher identification systems 16

ORCID BRINGS STAKEHOLDERS TOGETHER ORCID members include publishers, research institutions, funding organizations, and data aggregators. ORCID governance is majority non-profit by design Software developed by ORCID will be released under an Open Source Software license. 17

TIMELINE 2010 Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Build Sandbox Alpha Prototyping ORCID Members Demo Organization Established Wellcome/ MIT Survey Principles/Scope Defined Profile Exchange Research & Development Alpha Testing 18

ORCID SYSTEM In August, 2011, ORCID and Thomson Reuters reached an agreement that enables ORCID to start building the ORCID service based on Researcher ID code, giving ORCID the critical technology to create its system. 19

TIMELINE 2011-12 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Build Phase 1 Start Registering ORCIDs API available 11/11 Build Phase 2 VIVO Technology Research Mellon Market Research Sponsorship Drive 1 Obtain Loans and Sponsorship Drive 2 Staff Hired Start Collecting Fees? Profile Exchange Research & Development 20

ORCID PHASE 1 SYSTEM Researcher self-claim, delegated management, and institutional seeding of data Fine-grained control of privacy settings (public/private/protected) Data exchange into grant/manuscript submission systems ORCID identifier resolution and metadata search via GUI and REST API API mockups posted at https://github.com/orcid 21

PHASE 1 QUERY TYPES Name Key Returned Description Bio ORCID Profile metadata Given an ORCID, give me name and affiliation data. Works ORCID List of work metadata Full ORCID Profile metadata, work metadata and ORCIDs Given an ORCID, tell me what works they have contributed to. Given an ORCID, tell me what works they have contributed to, name and affiliation data. Work Work identifiers (e.g. DOIs) ORCIDs & associated metadata Given a work, tell me who contributed to it. Search ORCID, Work identifiers, or profile metadata ORCIDs & associated metadata Given whatever metadata I have, give me a ranked list of potential parties identified by that metadata. 22

ORCID PHASE 2 Non-university, third-party deposit of data Automatic de-duplication of records Ability to collect and protect sensitive data Ability to claim non-publication contributions Ability for institutions and/or publishers to verify researcher claims Ability to capture contribution roles (for example, second author, editor, reviewer, etc.). 23

QUESTIONS? Laure Haak Chief Science Officer Discovery Logic/Thomson Reuters laurel.haak@thomsonreuters.com 24

APPENDIX 25

Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information Scope of Research Data Standards Master entity profiles with data elements, semantic definitions, structural specifications and codes tables Business documents as point-intime snapshots of profile data Exchange packages grouping related business documents Research Personnel Data Research Activity Data Research Organization Data Research Impact Data Research Classification Taxonomy http://dictionary.casrai.org ORCID for Personnel DOI for Research Outputs Exploring ID options for Activities and Organizations 26

COMMUNITY-VALIDATED PROFILES Self-asserted + socially-validated + organizationally-asserted attribution = more credible assertion Self-Asserted Identity Socially- Validated Identity Organization- Validated Identity Disambiguated Identity 27

MICRO ATTRIBUTION WorkClaim: for a particular work (i.e., a DOI), tell me not only what contributors (ORCIDs and associated metadata) are responsible for it, but also what each contributor actually contributed (e.g., wrote paper, designed study, collected data, performed experiments, contributed reagents, performed statistical analysis, acquired funding, etc.) 28

ORCID FUNDERS TO DATE VIVO to model VIVO-ORCID profile exchange Mellon to conduct business feasibility study and planning NSF to examine the value of ORCID in advancing the science of science policy, via NSF-ORCID-UChicago/Harvard profile exchange Wellcome Trust market research, and forthcoming workshop on micro-attribution 29

OTHER SPONSORS APS Wiley Elsevier NPG Hindawi Mendeley Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals American Society of Civil Engineers Copyright Clearance Center Digital Science PNAS California Digital Library / Innovation Alliances and Services Royal Society Publishing Emerald Group Publishing American Institute of Physics Springer CSIRO Publishing MIT Portland Press Limited HFSPO American Astronomical Society Royal Society of Chemistry Aries Systems American Chemical Society SAGE Publications Oxford University Press California Institute of Technology APA IOP Publishing ACM Thomson Reuters Wellcome Trust PLoS Taylor and Francis National Institute of Informatics University of Vienna - Vienna University Library Ringgold Annual Reviews AAAS Hogrefe Group Cornell University Library Harvard University Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre ejournal Press SSRN Microsoft Research Atypon JSTOR 30

DECADAL MEMBERSHIP TARGETS 31

MEMBERSHIP TIERS Membership is at the institutional not library level. Tiers tied to level of research intensity, a function highest degree granted and number of faculty 32