MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan

Similar documents
AFCEA Mission Command Industry Engagement Symposium

LOE 1 - Unified Network

Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)

The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)

NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018

UNCLASSIFIED/ AFCEA Alamo Chapter. MG Garrett S. Yee. Acting Cybersecurity Director Army Chief Information Officer/G-6. June 2017 UNCLASSIFIED

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

COE. COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES CONNECTING OUR SOLDIERS EXAMPLE SERVICES. COE Enables. EcoSystem. Generating Force

Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet

Future Force Capabilities

PEO C3T PD Cyber Operations & Defense

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

Mission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division

Force 2025 and Beyond

Army Network Campaign Plan and Beyond

Delivering the Tactical Network

Joint Information Environment. White Paper. 22 January 2013

Presentation to AFCEA

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Strong. Secure. Engaged: Canada s New Defence Policy

Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel

America s Army Reserve Ready Now; Shaping Tomorrow

ABCA Armies CIS Update. MilCIS 2016

Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction

C4I System Solutions.

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO

US Army Combined Arms Center SOLDIERS AND LEADERS - OUR ASYMMETRIC ADVANTAGE. Synthetic Training Environment (STE) STE Update to PALT

Army Vision - Force 2025 White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

2018 Army Signal Conference

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY DR. MIKE GRIFFIN UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING BEFORE THE

USASOC Strategy-2035

To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.

Speaking with One Voice

AUSA ILW LANPAC 2018 Forum 2: Industry Multi-Domain Operations in the Pacific

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #156

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL JOHN M. MURRAY DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY, G-8 AND

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

38 th Chief of Staff, U.S. Army

DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN VERSION 1 A COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCY

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

5th Signal Command (Theater), headquartered at Wiesbaden Army Airfield, Germany, is NETCOM Headquarters communications arm in Europe and provides

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace. Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability

Air-Sea Battle: Concept and Implementation

Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Armor Basic Officer Leaders Course

Castles in the Clouds: Do we have the right battlement? (Cyber Situational Awareness)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: STRAT WAR PLANNING SYS - USSTRATCOM. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

THE U.S. ARMY LANDCYBER WHITE PAPER

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

Army Identity and Access Management (IdAM)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Strategic Vision. Rapidly Delivering Cyber Warfighting Capability From Seabed to Space. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command

The Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

NETWORK INTEGRATION EVALUATION OPENING REMARKS

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

COMMON OPERATING ENVIRONMENT COE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. OCTOBER 2015

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

Air Force Cyberspace Command NDIA 2007 DIB Infrastructure Protection Symposium

UNCLASSIFIED 11-SEP T15:30:00Z UNCLASSIFIED

24th Air Force/ AFCYBER Delivering Outcomes through Cyberspace

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

Joint Test and Evaluation Program

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

Cryptologic and Cyber Systems Division

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

SECURE GLOBAL COMBAT AWARENESS

FORCE INTEGRATION and Joint Capability

Supporting the Army Warfighters Science and Technology Needs

AUSA Army Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy Symposium and Exposition November 2018 Cobo Center, Detroit, MI. Panel Topic Descriptions

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

COMMANDER S HANDBOOK DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM ARMY (DCGS-A)

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE

DOD STRATEGY CWMD AND THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF EOD

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Soldier Division Director David Libersat June 2, 2015

Next Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements. - Brief to Industry-

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:

Maintenance Operations and Procedures

Directorate of Training and Doctrine Industry Day Break out Session

Transcription:

MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan Mission Command Center of Excellence 1

Principles (Why) Warfighting Requirements CSA s Mission, Principles, Characteristics of the Network & Requirements Network Characteristics (Qualities and Attributes) Technical Network Requirements Mission: The Army must fight and win wars against adversaries 1 st Principles: The Army network must enable: 1. Conduct of War: Execution of expeditionary, world-wide, Unified Land Operations (ULO) to shape, prevent, and win as a part of UnifiedAction in all domains and all environments (Note 1/2/3/4) 2. Preparation for War: Execution of Title 10 responsibilities to man, train, and equip the force, and to build and sustain readiness. Note 1: Unified Actions Partners Consisting of Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multi-National (JIIM) partners Note 2: Domains Land, maritime, air, space, cyber Note 3: Environments Permissive, nonpermissive, contested, denied Able to fight, shoot, move, communicate, protect, and sustain Reliably communicate anywhere, anytime, in all domains, in all environments, against any foe Simple and Intuitive, single mission command suite (Single COP), installed, operated and maintained by Soldiers Available, Reliable and Resilient with the ability to operate in all operational environments against any enemy Expeditionary and Mobile, voice, data, and video on the move Standards-based, protected, and dynamic network that is upgradeable over time Enables the Warfighter to Observe, orient, decide, and act faster than the enemy in the conduct of ULO (Note 4) Enables use of the network as a weapon system Enable Leaders to lead and fight their formations from anywhere they choose Must be capable of adequate secure communications, provides voice, data, video in all environments Capable of providing situational awareness down to Platoon level Device works anywhere in the world; installed, operated and maintained by Soldiers Standardized: Runs on a COE, common graphics, applications, and integrated data Ensures continuous Joint interoperability enabling agile and adaptable operational flexibility i.e., Enables Rapid Task Organization and employment of joint capabilities Mitigates electronic signature Accessible to allies and coalition partners Note 4: ULO Simultaneous offense, defense, and stability or defense support of civil authorities tasks to seize, retain, and exploit the initiative and consolidate gains to prevent conflict, shape the operational environment and win our nations wars as part of unified action 2

Doesn t enable mission command Lacks end-to-end interoperability Fragmented = lack of common standards Complex and Fragile EMS Vulnerable Multiple identities Current State Crypto mod challenges Software baselines = interoperability challenges Four Lines of Effort: Transport Modernization Path Network Modernization Plan Mission Command Suite Command Posts Interoperability Addressing the Threat FY18-19: Fight Tonight, Address most pressing OPLAN Mobility, Survivability, Interoperability Improve common operating environment Augment the Network FY20-23: Address emerging threats Protected SATCOM Assured PNT Counter EW/Cyber Assured PNT Crypto Modification Next Generation Tactical Radios Future State Seamless end-to-end connection and PACE plan Self-generating, self-healing, multilayered integrated network Unified Transport Layer End User Device Unified Mission Command Suite Simple and Intuitive Available, Reliable and Resilient Expeditionary and Mobile Standards-based, protected, upgradeable OODA Faster than the enemy Network is a weapon system 3

Mission Command Network Capabilities Global Enterprise Joint Information Environment 11 1 Converged Mission Command Network 5 Network augmentation & extension 2 Synthetic Training Environment Brigade HQs (Deployed) Joint Interoperability Coalition Accessibility 4 Common Operating Environment (Unified suite of mission command applications) C3 Battalion HQs (Deployed) 3 Integrated Command Posts Company (Deployed) Capabilities work in a disrupted, intermittent, limited (DIL) environment Devices & radios seek multiple communication pathways 4

Globally Responsive, Converged Regionally Engaged Mission Command Home Station Mission Command Center Network Command Post Capabilities Main CP (integrated containers/platforms - tailored to formation) Signature management Distributed and reduced footprint Simplified, flexible configuration Improved mobility Enroute and Airborne TAC CP (integrated platforms - tailored to formation) Distributed data & computing Common situation awareness Big Data analytic tools & decision aids (artificial intelligence) Mobile Command Group (tailored to formation) Dismounted Mission Command Mounted Mission Command 5

AMERICA S ARMY THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Network Modernization Strategy What is the Army s Network Modernization Strategy? Vision: An integrated/unified, end-to-end, warfighting network that is flat, fast, mobile and protected which enables leaders to lead and fight their formations from anywhere they choose Ends: A cascading set of successive future states achieved through four lines of effort: Unified Network - Supporting all theater of operations Common Operating Environment Unified suite of mission command applications Interoperability Among all Army elements, Joint and Coalition partners Command Posts Deployable, mobile and survivable Ways: Implement the pillars of halt, fix and pivot across the four lines of effort. Objectives established over time allowing the Army to develop and apply the means to achieve successive future states. Means: Reinvest the funding from the programs halted in FY18 to fix our fight tonight capability (improve readiness) and then shift to focused investments in RDT&E and proven industry, Joint and SOF solutions to pivot to the next generation network. 6

AMERICA S ARMY ARMY: THE Globally STRENGTH Responsive, OF THE Regionally NATION Engaged Implementation Plan Framework A cascading set of successive future states achieved through four lines of effort 7

Future State Objectives: 2020 & 2025 Line of Effort Unified Network: Unified Transport Unified Network: Network Enabling Functions Common Operating Environment Interoperability Objectives Pilot Future State 2020 o Network Baseline & Modernization o Integrated Computing Infrastructure o Converged Network o Integrated DODIN OPS & Cyber Security o Integrated Services (Enterprise & Tactical) o Protected, Resilient, Survivable Network o Establish IOC of Synthetic Training Environment o Deliver and Staff COE Requirements o IOC of COE o Deliver STE to MPE o Deliver COE to STE o Implement COE Cross-Cutting Capability o Joint Interoperability o Establish Coalition-accessible Network Objectives Future State 2025 o IOC of Integrated Tactical Network o IOC of Cloud Services o Operationalize Cybersecurity o Achieve WorldWide Spectrum Supportability o FOC of STE o Achieve Network Survivability o FOC of COE o Assimilate all Legacy Programs of Record o IOC of Single Identity and Access Management o FOC of FIE o IOC of Unified Network Operations o FOC of MPE o Joint and Coalition Policy Review and Mod o IOC of UAP Secure Voice Interop Solutions o FOC of COE on MPE Solutions Command Post o Implement Command Post Directed Requirement o Integrated Mission Command o Establish Integrated CP Design o IOC of CPI2 CP Infrastructure o IOC of Joint and Multi-Natl MC Nodes o IOC of Decision Aids o Formation and Platform Integration 8