The QIS was designed to achieve several objectives:

Similar documents
NEW LONG TERM CARE SURVEY PROCESS PHASE 2 REQUIREMENTS OF PARTICIPATION AUGUST 23, 2017

This presentation will be updated as new information becomes available.

Facility Name/CCN: Survey Date: Preceptor Name: Surveyor Name: New Surveyor Observational Survey Guidelines Long-Term Care

Housekeeping. Welcome! Harmony Healthcare International, Inc.

New Long Term Care Survey Process

QIS 4.0 Checklist. Task 1: OFFSITE PREPARATION Survey Team Import Survey Shell

This presentation will be updated as new information becomes available.

Overview of the New Long-Term Care Survey Process FOR LONG-TERM CARE (LTC) PROVIDERS

BLENDED SURVEY PROCESS

Trends in Nursing Facility Standard Health Survey Citations

Highlights of the New LTCSP and Regulations

The QIS Survey Process: How to Prepare

PACAH 2018 SPRING CONFERENCE April 26, 2018

The LTC Quality Inspection Program

WhWwhaht. SNF CMS, RoP, Survey, and Regulatory Update October /25/2017. The New and Improved Survey Process

Understanding the Critical Elements for Activities in the Quality Indicator Survey

The New Survey Process What To Expect Paula G. Sanders, Esq.

Objectives. The New Long Term Care Survey Process 9/5/2018 THE NEW SURVEY PROCESS- LESSONS LEARNED

10/3/2017 FALL 2017 MDS AND SURVEY UPDATES OBJECTIVES:

2. D Mood E Behavior F Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities G Functional Status H Bladder and Bowel

Linking QAPI & Survey April 30, 2015

Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process

Quality Assessment and Assurance. Guidance Training (F520) (o)

II. HOW NURSING FACILITIES ARE REGULATED

Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group

Lesson #12: Survey and Certification Issues

The New Survey Process for the NAC. Carol Maher, RN-BC, RAC-CT, RAC-MT, CPC

Annual Quality Improvement Report: The Nursing Home Survey Process REPORT TO THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2014

The Regulatory Focus. Critical Access Hospitals The Regulatory Process

National Regulatory Overview. Lyn Bentley, Vice President Quality & Regulatory Affairs September 19, 2018

New Strategies for Managing Medicare Risk

What to Expect on Your Next Survey

Why is the Five Star Rating Important in Today s LTPAC Reimbursement World?

QIES Help Desk. Objectives. Nursing Home Quality Initiatives and Five-Star Quality Rating System

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Report to the General Assembly: Nursing Home Inspection and Enforcement Activities. A Report to the 105 th Tennessee General Assembly

Medical Director Requirements for Nursing Facilities Advance Issuance of Revised Survey Guidance HIGHLIGHTS

2/28/2018. Marilyn Mines RN, BC, RAC CT

CMS OASIS Q&As: CATEGORY 2 - COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT

Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process and Progress Reports on Other Legislatively Directed Activities

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group

US Health Health Policy

Long Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP) Procedure Guide Effective May 6, 2018

9/27/2017. Getting on the Path to Excellence. The path we are taking today! CMS Five Elements

Complaint Investigations of Minnesota Health Care Facilities

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Rehabilitative Services for Persons with Mental Illness (RSPMI)

United Methodist Association National Conference Integrating Risk Management and Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Facility: Date: Surveyor: Surveyor Clinical Checklist Intermediate Care Facility/Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities

NURSING FACILITY ASSESSMENTS

MDS Accuracy and Compliance: Where There s Smoke

New Jersey. Phone. Agency. Department of Health, Division of Health Facilities Evaluation and Licensing John Calabria

Frequently Asked Questions Related to Long Term Care Regulations, Survey Process, and Training

NEBRASKA DID NOT ALWAYS VERIFY CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

Overview HOSPICE QUALITY REPORTING PROGRAM (HQRP) 10/10/2016

Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal

Review of F323 Related to Falls. Marilyn Hirsch Region V December 16, 2015

Informal Dispute Resolution and Independent Informal Dispute Resolution Key Elements and Updates

ANNUAL SURVEY PREPARATION. For Year-Long Compliance May 21, 2014 Adam Snyder, RVP, Unidine Jenny Overly, Director of Innovation, Unidine

CAH PREPARATION ON-SITE VISIT

Assisted Living Facility Resource Manual

Illinois Department of Public Health Critical Access Hospital Program Certification Process Preparation

Joint Commission Update for Ambulatory Clinics

MEMORANDUM Department of Aging and Disability Services Regulatory Services Policy*Survey and Certification Clarification

Basic Orientation Agenda

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Survey Protocol for Long Term Care Facilities

CMS Staffing Data Requirements

LIMITED-SCOPE PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT

4/3/2018. Nursing Facility Changes to Conditions of Participation (& Enforcement): What You Need to Know. Revisions to State Operations Manual

HOSPICE QUALITY REPORTING PROGRAM

5/1/2017 THE BEST DEFENSE IS A GOOD OFFENSE OBJECTIVES. Preparing for a Home Health Medicare Recertification Survey

Oversight of Assisted Living Facilities, Innovations and Lessons Learned October 1, 2012

Key Issues in HFAP Accreditation. Beverly Robins, RN, BSN, MBA Director of Accreditation October 25, 2012

SWING BED (SWB) Rural Hospitals under 100 Beds and Critical Access Hospitals

Understanding Your Quality Measures. Craig Bettles Data Visualization Manager Consonus Healthcare

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Pub State Operations Provider Certification Transmittal- ADVANCE COPY

9/8/2017. Making the Connection: Linking the Facility Assessment and QAPI Plan. Cindy Mason VP Provider Services. Final Rule. Providigm, LLC,

TESTIMONY OF THOMAS HAMILTON DIRECTOR SURVEY & CERTIFICATION GROUP CENTER FOR MEDICAID AND STATE OPERATIONS CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES

Managing employees include: Organizational structures include: Note:

The Patient Centered Medical Home Guidelines: A Tool to Compare National Programs

State Operations Manual. Appendix M - Guidance to Surveyors: Hospice - (Rev. 1, )

CACFP : Conducting Five-Day Reconciliation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program, with Questions and Answers

To Be or Not to Be.. a Rural Health Clinic

Understanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network

Report of Survey RURAL HEALTH CLINICS

State Operations Manual. Appendix V Interpretive Guidelines Responsibilities of Medicare Participating Hospitals In Emergency Cases

National Association of Rural Health Clinics

Disclaimer. Learning Objectives

SENIOR SERVICES AND HEALTH SYSTEMS BRANCH DIVISION OF HEALTH FACILITIES EVALUATION AND LICENSING OFFICE OF CERTIFICATE OF NEED AND HEALTHCARE FACILITY

Maximizing the Power of Your Data. Peggy Connorton, MS, LNFA AHCA Director, Quality and LTC Trend Tracker

Readiness Tool: Medicare Survey Preparation

QAPI Plan QAPI Plan. snits: Sanitas, Denver, CO. Effective Date: 01-Jan-2018

An Ombudsman s Guide to the Nursing Home Reform Law

AANAC Education Advancement. MDS Essentials: An Introduction. Learning Objectives 3/22/2017. Education Advancement

Hospice Care in the Nursing Home: The New Interpretive Guidelines for NF Surveyors

Integrating Quality and Compliance for Continuous Survey Readiness

Transcription:

CMS Quality Indicator Survey, ASE-Q The Quality Indicator Survey CMS is implementing the Quality Indicator Survey (QIS) which is a computer assisted long term care survey process used by selected State Survey Agencies and CMS to determine if Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes meet the Federal requirements. The production grade software, ASE-Q is now being used. The QIS was designed to achieve several objectives: Improve consistency and accuracy of quality of care and quality of life problem identification by using a more structured process; Enable timely and effective feedback on survey processes for surveyors and managers; Systematically review requirements and objectively investigate all triggered regulatory areas within current survey resources; Provide tools for continuous improvement; Enhance documentation by organizing survey findings through automation; and Focus survey resources on facilities (and areas within facilities) with the largest number of quality concerns. Description of QIS The QIS is a two-staged process used by surveyors to systematically review specific nursing home requirements and objectively investigate any regulatory areas that are triggered. Although the survey process has been revised under the QIS, the Federal regulations and interpretive guidance remain unchanged. The QIS uses customized software on tablet personal computers (PCs) to guide surveyors through a structured investigation. Figure 1 describes the QIS process. The process begins with offsite survey preparation activities including review of prior deficiencies, current complaints, ombudsman information, and existing waivers/variances, if applicable. Minimum Data Set (MDS) data for the facility are loaded offsite into surveyors tablet PCs. Upon entry at the nursing home, and entrance conference is conducted during which the team coordinator requests facility information. Concurrent with the entrance conference, surveyors conduct a brief tour to gain an overall impression of the facility, and the resident population being served. CMS Quality Indicator Survey/ASE-Q; page 1

FIGURE 1: OVERVIEW OF THE QIS PROCESS Offsite Survey Preparation Onsite Survey Preparation Entrance Conference Reconcile Stage 1 Sample Facility Tour Initial Team Meeting Stage 1 Preliminary Investigation Census and Admission Sample Reviews Care Area Investigations Mandatory Facility Tasks (non-staged) Transition from Stage 1 to Stage 2 Draw Stage 2 Sample Stage 2 Investigations Non-Mandatory Facility Tasks Continue Mandatory Facility Tasks Stage 2 Analysis and Decision Making Integration of Information Decisions to Cite or Not to Cite Conduct the Exit Conference Stage 1 Team Meetings Stage 2 Team Meetings Thresholds: With the release of ASE-Q, Census and Admission sample QCLIs will have two separate sets of thresholds, one for small samples and one for not small samples. Small Census sample thresholds will apply when there are 35 or fewer residents in the Census sample and Not Small Census sample thresholds will apply when there are 36 or more residents in the Census sample. The exception to this rule is for Family Interview QCLIs. There is one threshold for Family Interview QCLIs, regardless of the Family Interview sample size. Small Admission sample thresholds will apply when there are 9 or fewer residents in the Admission Sample and Not Small thresholds will apply when there are 10 or more residents in the Admission sample. The applicable threshold is automatically applied by the software; surveyors do not have to choose which threshold to use. Three distinct Stage 1 Samples are selected: 1) The census sample focuses on quality of care and quality of life and includes up to 40 randomly selected residents who are in the nursing home at the time of the survey. The random selection is only altered when in-facility complaint residents are added to the census sample. 2) The admission sample includes up to 30 recent admissions and emphasizes issues such as rehospitalization, death, or functional loss. This may include both current and discharged residents for a focused chart review. CMS Quality Indicator Survey/ASE-Q; page 2

3) The MDS data are used to create the resident pool from which the Stage 1 samples are randomly selected and to calculate the MDS-based Quality of Care and Quality of Life Indicators (QCLIs) for use in Stage 2. In addition, other residents and issues can be selected at the surveyors discretion. Stage 1 provides for an initial review of large samples of residents which includes resident, family, and staff interviews; resident observations; and clinical record reviews. Utilizing onsite automation, the results of these preliminary investigations are combined to provide a comprehensive set of QCLIs covering resident and facility-level regulatory areas. Mandatory Facility Tasks are started including resident council president interview; observations of dining and kitchen areas, infection control practices, medication storage, and medication administration; and review of the Medicare demand billing process and the quality assessment and assurance program. After the Stage 1 review is completed, ASE-Q uses the surveyors findings together with MDS data to determine which QCLIs exceed a national threshold and consequently trigger care areas and/or non-mandatory facility tasks for further investigation in Stage 2. Stage 2 Investigation includes: Care area investigations using a set of investigative protocols that assist surveyors in completing an organized and systematic review of triggered care areas; Completion of mandatory facility tasks; and Triggered non-mandatory facility tasks which include abuse prohibition, environment, sufficient staffing, personal funds, admission transfer and discharge. After all investigations have been completed, the team analyzes the results to determine whether noncompliance with the Federal requirements exists. The ASE-Q uses the same decision-making process to determine noncompliance, including severity and scope designation, as is used in the traditional survey. An exit conference is conducted, during which the nursing home is informed of the survey findings. CMS Quality Indicator Survey/ASE-Q; page 3

Differences between the Traditional Survey and the QIS TRADITIONAL SURVEY QIS AUTOMATION Survey team collects data and records the findings on paper The computer is only used to prepare the deficiencies recorded on the CMS-2567 Review OSCAR 3 and 4 report Survey team uses QM/QIs report offsite to identify preliminary sample of residents (about 20% of facility census) areas of concern Review of Roster Sample Matrix Form (CMS 802) Gather information about pre-selected residents and new concerns Determine whether preselected residents are still appropriate Sample size determined by facility census Residents selected based on QM/QI percentiles, and issues identified offsite and OFFSITE ENTRANCE INFORMATION TOUR SAMPLE SELECTION Each survey team member uses a tablet PC throughout the survey process to record findings that are synthesized and organized by the QIS software Review the Casper 3 Report and current complaints Download the MDS data to tablet PCs ASE-Q selects a random sample of residents for Stage 1 Obtain census number and alphabetical resident census with room numbers and units List of new admissions over last 30 days No sample selection Initial overview of facility The ASE-Q provides randomly selected sample of residents for the following: Admission sample is a review of up to 30 CMS Quality Indicator Survey/ASE-Q; page 4

on tour Resident sample is about 20% of facility census for resident observations, interviews, and record reviews Phase I: Focused and comprehensive reviews based on QM/QI report and issues identified from offsite information and facility tour Phase II: Focused record reviews Facility and environmental tasks completed during the survey Meet with Resident Group/Council Includes Resident Council minutes review to identify concerns SURVEY STRUCTURE GROUP INTERVIEW current or discharged resident records Census sample includes up to 40 current residents for observation, interview, and record review Stage 1: Preliminary investigation of regulatory areas in the admission and census samples and mandatory facility tasks started Stage 2: Completion of in-depth investigation of triggered care areas and/or facility tasks based on Stage 1 findings Interview with Resident Council President or Representative CMS Quality Indicator Survey/ASE-Q; page 5