OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Similar documents
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY USAMRMC & USAMRAA

Overview of the Congressionally Directed Medical

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

XII. Deployment Related Medical Research Program

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

WASHINGTON, OC

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

February 27, Senate Committee on Armed Services House Committee on Armed Services. Washington, DC Washington, DC 20515

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Congressiionalllly Diirectted Mediicall Research Programs

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, D. C

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Strategies for Achieving Regulatory Compliance and Economies in DoD-Supported Research

Fiscal Year 2016 Report to Congress on Laboratory Directed Research and Development at the DOE National Laboratories

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP)

August 23, Congressional Committees

STATEMENT OF MRS. ELLEN P. EMBREY ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR HEALTH AFFAIRS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Last Revised February 2018

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DHCC Strategic Plan. Last Revised August 2016

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-18.1-RRS

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Public Health Subcommittee

Participation in Professional Conferences By Government Scientists and Engineers

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC

CLOSED REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-15-RRS-2. Recruitment of Rising Stars

December 18, Congressional Committees. Subject: Overseas Contingency Operations: Funding and Cost Reporting for the Department of Defense

R E Q U E S T F O R A P P L I C A T I O N S RFA R-12-CFSA-1

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

BONE STRESS INJURIES

Defense Health Program Department of Defense Lung Cancer Research Program. Anticipated Funding Opportunities for Fiscal Year 2017 (FY17)

Peer Review at PCORI. August 26, 2013

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-18.2-HIHR

R E Q U E S T F O R A P P L I C A T I O N S RFA R-13-CFSA-1

The Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Competitive Procurement

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-18.1-IIRACCA

CPRIT PEER REVIEW FY 2017 HONORARIA POLICY 1. Peer Review Structure

Movember Clinician Scientist Award (CSA)

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Last Revised March 2017

B C R P. CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AWARD A pioneering, multi-institutional approach to. eradicating breast cancer PRE-PROPOSALS ARE DUE BY MARCH 24, 2004

Program Announcement. Lung Cancer Research Program

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-18.1-IIRA

USACE 2012: The Objective Organization Draft Report

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-18.1-RFT

U.S. Fire Administration and Fire Grant Programs Reauthorization: Examining Effectiveness and Priorities

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC MAR

CANCER COUNCIL NSW PROGRAM GRANTS PEER REVIEW GUIDELINES

R E Q U E S T F O R A P P L I C A T I O N S

By to:

STANFORD CANCER INSTITUTE 2019 CANCER INNOVATION AWARDS Full Proposal Submission Guidelines

CureSearch Young Investigator Awards in Pediatric Oncology Drug Development Request for Applications and Guidelines

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Grant Application Guidelines. June 2016 APCF

Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON. D C

CARE FUND INAUGURAL PLAN

Support the House provision (Section 1100) establishing a Critical Commerce Corridors Program.

February 1, The analysis depends critically on three key factors:

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-18.2-CFSA

FULL TEXT OF ANNOUNCEMENT Funding Opportunity Description Purpose The specific purpose of this funding opportunity is to provide support for the

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-18.2-MIRA

Gateway to Partnerships Innovate Collaborate Connect

October 18, Dear Chairmen Thornberry and McCain, and Ranking Members Smith and Reed,

DOD RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM

Program Announcement. Breast Cancer Research Program

Dear Chairman Alexander and Ranking Member Murray:

MSM Research Grant Program 2018 Competition Guidelines

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Manual. For. Independent Peer Reviews, Independent Scientific Assessments. And. Other Review Types DRAFT

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-16-RTA-1

HOW TO WORK WITH MTEC

PREPARED STATEMENT VICE ADMIRAL JOHN MATECZUN, MC, USN COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION MEDICAL BEFORE THE

The TBI Waiver: the North Carolina Brain Injury Advisory Council Recommendations to the Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services

Mécanismes d allocation des ressources humaines et financières

GAO CONTINGENCY CONTRACTING. DOD, State, and USAID Contracts and Contractor Personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan. Report to Congressional Committees

VIII. Behavioral Center of Excellence Awards

College of American Pathologists. Senior Director, Legislation and Political Action Position Profile October 2012

INVESTIGATOR-INITIATED CLINICAL TRIALS AWARD PROGRAM

GAO. DEFENSE CONTRACTOR RESTRUCTURING DOD Risks Forfeiting Savings on Fixed-Price Contracts


KyHealth Choices. Presentation to Medicaid Congress June 15, Mark D. Birdwhistell Secretary, Cabinet for Health and Family Services

TARGETED RFA IN PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH Predictive Markers

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

Defense Logistics: Plan to Improve Management of Defective Aviation Parts Should Be Enhanced

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

UNC Lineberger Developmental Funding Program. Proposal Due Dates: 5:00pm March 15 and September 15

Transcription:

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1200 HEALTH AFFAIRS The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman, Committee on Armed Services United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Mr. Chairman: The enclosed report is submitted in response to the Joint Explanatory Statement for H. R. 2638/Public Law l 10-329, which requested the Secretary of Defense provide a report to the congressional defense committees no later than 120 days after enactment that describes a plan for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research and includes Walter Reed Army Medical Center in the formulation of this plan. We are pleased to provide the final report with the plan for execution and management of the fiscal year 2009 funds for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research. The U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) will manage the $20 million appropriation using its established execution and management cycle. The following time line is anticipated: stakeholders meeting in February 2009; program announcements in May 2009; an external scientific peer review to evaluate proposals in October 2009; the integrated Joint Programmatic Committee review in December 2009; and awards completed by September 2010. USAMRMC will plan, execute, and manage the fiscal year 2009 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research funds with the same rigor and integrity as it has done in the past. Thank you for your continued support of the Military Health System. Sincerely, Enclosure: As stated cc: The Honorable John McCain Ranking Member 811».i.~ Ellen P. Embrey Performing the Duties of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) 0

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 1200 HEALTH AFFAIRS The Honorable Ben Nelson Chairman, Subcommittee on Personnel Committee on Armed Services United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Mr. Chairman: The enclosed report is submitted in response to the Joint Explanatory Statement for HR 2638/Public Law 110-329, which requested the Secretary of Defense provide a report to the congressional defense committees no later than 120 days after enactment that describes a plan for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research and includes Walter Reed Army Medical Center in the formulation of this plan. We are pleased to provide the final report with the plan for execution and management of the fiscal year 2009 funds for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research. The U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) will manage the $20 million appropriation using its established execution and management cycle. The following time line is anticipated: stakeholders meeting in February 2009; program announcements in May 2009; an external scientific peer review to evaluate proposals in October 2009; the integrated Joint Programmatic Committee review in December 2009; and awards completed by September 2010. USAMRMC will plan, execute, and manage the fiscal year 2009 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research funds with the same rigor and integrity as it has done in the past. Enclosure: As stated Thank you for your continued support of the Military Health System. cc: The Honorable Lindsey 0. Graham Ranking Member Sincerely, ~~ Ellen P. Embrey Performing the Duties of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) 0

OFFICE OF T HE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D C 20301-1200 HEAi.TH AFFAIRS The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Mr. Chairman: The enclosed report is submitted in response to the Joint Explanatory Statement for H. R. 2638/Public Law 110-329. which requested the Secretary of Defense provide a report to the congressional defense committees no later than 120 days after enactment that describes a plan for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research and includes Walter Reed Army Medical Center in the formulation of this plan. We are pleased to provide the final report with the plan for execution and management of the fiscal year 2009 funds for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research. The U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) will manage the $20 million appropriation using its established execution and management cycle. The following time line is anticipated: stakeholders meeting in February 2009; program announcements in May 2009; an external scientific peer review to evaluate proposals in October 2009; the integrated Joint Programmatic Committee review in December 2009; and awards completed by September 2010. USAMRMC will plan, execute, and manage the fiscal year 2009 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research funds with the same rigor and integrity as it has done in the past. Enclosure: As stated Thank you for your continued support of the Military Health System. cc: The Honorable Thad Cochran Ranking Member Sincerely, ~~ Ellen P. Embrey Performing the Duties of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) 0

OFFICE OF T HE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1200 HEALTH AFFAIRS The Honorable Ike Skelton Chairman, Committee on Armed Services U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr. Chairman: The enclosed report is submitted in response to the Joint Explanatory Statement for H. R. 2638/Public Law 110-329, which requested the Secretary of Defense provide a report to the congressional defense committees no later than 120 days after enactment that describes a plan for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research and includes Walter Reed Army Medical Center in the formulation of this plan. We are pleased to provide the final report with the plan for execution and management of the fiscal year 2009 funds for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research. The U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) will manage the $20 million appropriation using its established execution and management cycle. The following time line is anticipated: stakeholders meeting in February 2009; program announcements in May 2009; an external scientific peer review to evaluate proposals in October 2009; the integrated Joint Programmatic Committee review in December 2009; and awards completed by September 2010. USAMRMC will plan, execute, and manage the fiscal year 2009 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research funds with the same rigor and integrity as it has done in the past. Enclosure: As stated Thank you for your continued support of the Military Health System. cc: The Honorable John M. McHugh Ranking Member Sincerely, ~.~~ Petforming the Duties of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) 0

OFFICE O F T HE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFEN SE 1200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WAS HINGTON, DC 20301 1200 HEALTH AFFAIRS The Honorable Susan Davis Chairwoman, Subcommittee on Military PersoIU1el Committee on Armed Services U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Madam Chairwoman: The enclosed report is submitted in response to the Joint Explanatory Statement for House Report 2638/Public Law 110-329, which required that the Secretary of Defense provide a report to the congressional defense committees no later than 120 days after enactment that describes a plan for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research and includes Walter Reed Army Medical Center in the formulation of this plan. We are pleased to provide the final report with the plan for execution and management of the fiscal year 2009 funds for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research. The U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) will manage the $20 million appropriation using its established execution and management cycle. The following time line is anticipated: stakeholders meeting in February 2009; program aiu1ouncements in May 2009; an external scientific peer review to evaluate proposals in October 2009; the integrated Joint Programmatic Committee review in December 2009; and awards completed by September 2010. USAMRMC will plan, execute, and manage the fiscal year 2009 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research funds with the same rigor and integrity as it has done in the past. Enclosure: As stated Thank you for your continued support of the Military Health System. cc: The Honorable Joe Wilson Ranking Member Sincerely. WPJ.~ ElJen P. Embrey Performing the Duties of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) 0

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1200 HEALTH AFFAIRS The Honorable John P. Murtha Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr. Chairman: The enclosed report is submitted in response to the Joint Explanatory Statement for H. R. 2638/Public Law 110-329, which requested the Secretary of Defense provide a report to the congressional defense committees no later than 120 days after enactment that describes a plan for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research and includes Walter Reed Army Medical Center in the formulation of this plan. We are pleased to provide the final report with the plan for execution and management of the fiscal year 2009 funds for Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research. The U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) will manage the $20 million appropriation using its established execution and management cycle. The following time line is anticipated: stakeholders meeting in February 2009; program announcements in May 2009; an external scientific peer review to evaluate proposals in October 2009; the integrated Joint Programmatic Committee review in December 2009; and awards completed by September 2010. USAMRMC will plan, execute, and manage the fiscal year 2009 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research funds with the same rigor and integrity as it has done in the past. Enclosure: As stated Thank you for your continued support of the Military Health System. cc: The Honorable C. W. Bill Young Ranking Member Sincerely, ~p~ Ellen P. Embrey Performing the Duties of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) 0

REPORT TO CONGRESS U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH AND MATERIEL COMMAND CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED MEDICAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS LUNG CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAM 28 January 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS Background and Purpose ofreport... 3 FY 09 Lung Cancer Research Program......... 5 References...... 8

BACKGROUND and PURPOSE OF REPORT At the direction ofthe United States Congress, the Department ofdefense manages targeted biomedical research. The U.S. Anny Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) is responsible for administering many of these appropriations. The USAMRMC is a major subordinate Command ofthe United States Army Medical Command. The Commanding General (CG), USAMRMC is assigned authority as the Executive Agent for a number of medical research, development, and acquisition programs. Congressional appropriations totaling $4.8 billion for fiscal year (FY) 92-08 assigned to USAMRMC are managed by the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) office (a subordinate organization to the USAMRMC). The research programs supported by these funds include breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers; neurofibromatosis; autism; Gulf War illness; psychological health and traumatic brain injury; deployment-related medical; and other programs. The CDMRP is responsible for planning, coordinating, integrating, programming, budgeting, and executing these programs using a two-tier review process as recommended by the National Academy of Science's Institute of Medicine (1 OM) in its 1993 report 1 The CDMRP's flexible 7-year execution and management cycle includes the receipt ofannual congressional appropriations, stakeholders meeting, vision setting, proposal review, selection ofgrants for funding, and oversight ofresearch grants. Briefly, following receipt of appropriations, each program's external advisory board ofleading scientists, clinicians, and disease survivors (Integration Panel) develops an investment strategy for the upcoming year that meets the unique needs ofthe research field and encourages exploration of innovative, novel, and under-investigated areas spanning from basic laboratory science to clinical trials. Program announcements requesting research proposals through specific award mechanisms are subsequently prepared and released. Integration Panel members are not allowed to be involved as either collaborators or participants in the proposal processes including, but not limited to, concept design, proposal development, and conduct ofresearch. To ensure that each program's research portfolio reflects not only the most meritorious science, but also the most programmatically relevant research, the CDMRP developed a unique proposal review model based upon recommendations from the IOM 1993 report 1 The IOM

recommended a two-tier review procedure for research proposals composed ofscientific (peer) review and a separate programmatic review. ScientificaJly sound proposals that best meet the program's interests and goals are reconunended to the CG, USAMRMC, for funding. Once the CG approves the funding recommendations, awards are made in the form of 1-to 5-year grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements and assigned to Grants Managers for full cycle support ofresearch grants and outcomes. The programs that comprise the CDMRP are scientifically sound, innovative, and responsive to congressional intent and the needs ofthe public. The USAMRMC and CDMRP have been praised by the IOM, which issued a report in 1997 stating it was favorably impressed with the CDMRP and supported its continuation. 2 [n the FY 09 Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, a Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research Program was appropriated $20 million. The program was assigned by the Assistant Secretary ofdefense for Health Affairs, Force Health Protection to USAMRMC and to the CDMRP in November 2008 for execution. The conferees requested that an execution plan for the FY 09 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research Program be provided to the congressional defense committees within 120 days after enactment ofthis Act. The current report details the status ofthe FY 09 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research Program. 2

FY 09 LUNG CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAM The FY 09 Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act conferees requested that the $20 million appropriated for the FY 09 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research Program be utijized to support competitive research and the establishment ofa tissue bank. In addition, priority shall be given to the development of the integrated components to identify, treat, and manage early curable lung cancer. The Anny is expected to provide a plan for these funds and to include the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in the formulation ofthis plan. Planning for this program is ongoing. The first major milestone in the execution and management cycle ofthe Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research Program is the stakeholders meeting, currently scheduled for February 2009. Renowned scientists and clinicians from academia and from other funding agencies, such as the National Cancer Institute and the Department ofveterans Affairs, and disease survivors from advocacies such as the Lung Cancer Alliance will be invited to the stakeholders meeting to discuss issues and gaps critical to lung cancer, as well as potential means to address them. Utilizing the recommendations from the stakeholders, the Lung Cancer Research Program Integration Panel, to be composed of experts in the lung cancer field and disease survivors, will assemble in March 2009 to assist in determining the vision and investment strategy for the FY 09 Lung Cancer Research Program. Representatives from the Walter Reed Army Medical Center will participate in both the stakeholders and vision setting meetings as Integration Panel members to assist in establishing program priorities and an investment strategy for the FY 09 program that most effectively addresses emerging needs and evolving priorities. These program priorities shall focus on areas that will move the field forward and may include gaps in knowledge of lung cancer; unfunded or underfunded approaches to identifying, treating, and managing early curable lung cancer; or resources needed to conduct research. The CDMRP staff will then prepare and release program announcements in May 2009 to request proposals from investigators interested in competing for funds to conduct research on the FY 09 Lung Cancer Research Program priorities. As mentioned previously, members ofthe Lung Cancer Research Program 3

Integration Panel are not allowed to participate in the design, development, or execution ofa research proposal submitted to this program. In keeping with the CDMRP's two-tier proposal review process recommended by the IOM, scientific (peer) review, the first level of review for the FY 09 Lung Cancer Research Program will be conducted in October 2009 by an external panel that includes scientific experts and lung cancer survivors. Peer review is a criterion-based process whereby proposals are judged on their own scientific and technical merit based on established evaluation criteria which are delineated in the program announcements. Scientists and clinicians from the Walter Reed Army Medical Center will be eligible to serve as scientific peer reviewers. The second tier of review, programmatic review, will be conducted in December 2009 by the same Integration Panel that will have assisted in establishing the program priorities and investment strategy. In contrast to the scientific peer review, the goal ofprogrammatic review will be to develop funding recommendations based on the ratings and recommendations of scientific peer review that balance the most meritorious and innovative science across many discipjines and offer the highest promise for fulfilling the programmatic goals of the FY 09 Lung Cancer Research Program. As members ofthe FY 09 Lung Cancer Research Program Integration Panel, representatives from the Walter Reed Army Medical Center will participate in developing these funding recommendations. In summary, the CDMRP, USAMRMC will manage the $20 million appropriation for the FY 09 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research Program using its established execution and management cycle and will include the Walter Reed Anny Medical Center in the formulation ofthe plan for these funds. The following timeline is anticipated. A stakeholders meeting will take place in February 2009 with the vision setting and investment strategy meeting tentatively scheduled for March 2009. Program announcements requesting research proposals will be released in May 2009. Congressional language indicates that funds shall support competitive research and the establishment of a tissue bank, and priority shalj be given to the development ofthe integrated components to identify, treat, and manage early curable lung cancer. An 4

external scientific peer review will evaluate proposals for scientific merit in October 2009, and the Integration Panel will programmatically review proposals in December 2009. Following programmatic review, award recommendations will be submitted to the CG, USAMRMC. Award negotiations will commence following the CG's approval and will be completed by September 20 I 0. The CDMRP will plan, execute, and manage the FY 09 Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research Program with the same rigor and integrity as it has done for other research programs in the past. 5

REFERENCES 1. Strategies for Managing the Breast Cancer Research Program: A Report to the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command (1993) Committee to Advise the Department of Defense on Its Fiscal Year 1993 Breast Cancer Program, Institute ofmedicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 2. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research (1997) Committee to Review the Department of Defense's Breast Cancer Research Program, Institute of Medicine, N 6