HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

Similar documents
AFRL-ML-WP-TP

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Improving Safety of Demil Operations Through Automation. Mark M. Zaugg July 14, 2010

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

MK 83 WARHEAD EFFECTIVENESS TESTS

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Expeditionary Basecamp Passive

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

PREPRINT MAGNETIC UXO RECOVERY SYSTEM (MURS) (BRIEFING SLIDES)

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

User Manual and Source Code for a LAMMPS Implementation of Constant Energy Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD-E)

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Wildland Fire Assistance

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

C-Band Working Group Update. Steve O'Neal AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 2/20/13

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Technical Considerations for Alamo Lake Operation

M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round (EPR) Media Day

Area Fire Weapons in a Precision Environment: Field Artillery in the MOUT Fight

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

WEATHER. User's Manual. January 1986 CPD-52. Generalized Computer Program. US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

US Army TARDEC Ground Vehicle Mobility: Dynamics Modeling, Simulation, & Research

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

at the Missile Defense Agency

High Velocity Penetrating Weapon Program Overview

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Intelligence, Information Operations, and Information Assurance

DON Mentor-Protégé Program

IMPROVED INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS PERFORMANCE OF AN HE ROCKET WARHEAD

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

AIRFIELD DAMAGE REPAIR THE FUTURE NOW

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Transcription:

AFRL-MN-EG-TP-2005-7412 HIGH-G TESTING FOR FUZE RESEARCH HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL 32542-5430 ALAIN BÉLIVEAU Applied Research Associates 962 W. John Sims Parkway Niceville, FL 32578 SEPTEMBER 2005 Symposium Presentation This presentation was made at the 74th Shock & Vibration Symposium, San Diego, California, October 28, 2003. One or more of the authors is a U.S. Government employee working within the scope of his/her position; therefore, the U.S. Government is joint owner of the work. If published copyright may be asserted. If so, the U.S. Government has for itself and others acting on its behalf, the right to copy, distribute, and use the work by or on behalf of the U.S. Government. Approved for public release - Distribution Unlimited AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY, MUNITIONS DIRECTORATE Air Force Materiel Command United States Air Force Eglin Air Force Base

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 30-09-2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE High-G Testing for Fuze Research 2. REPORT TYPE Symposium Presentation 01-10-2002 30-09-2003 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Howard G. White, Timothy Tobik, Richard Mabry, Alain Béliveau 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 62602F 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 2502 5e. TASK NUMBER 11 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 25 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL 32542-5430 Applied Research Associates 962 W. John Sims Parkway Niceville, FL 32578 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) AFRL-MN-EG Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL 32542-5430 12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTT APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; Distribution Unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S AFRL-MN-EG-TP-2005-7412 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This presentation was made at the 74th Shock & Vibration Symposium, San Diego, California, October 28, 2003. One or more of the authors is a U.S. Government employee working within the scope of his/her position; therefore, the U.S. Government is joint owner of the work. If published copyright may be asserted. If so, the U.S. Government has for itself and others acting on its behalf, the right to copy, distribute, and use the work by or on behalf of the U.S. Government. 14. ABSTRACT The Fuzes Branch of the Air Force Research Laboratory, Munitions Directorate, has performed/instrumented numerous experiments in support of fuze development. These experiments include a wide shock spectrum ranging from relatively benign bench level experiments up to high velocity impact into multi-layered hardened structures. In this presentation we will discuss the Air Force requirements for high-g shock testing for fuze research and our testing and instrumentation capabilities. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Fuzes, Ordnance, Shock Testing, High-g Shock, Dynamic Fuze Testing, VHG, Drop Tower, Hopkinson Bar 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT Unclassified b. ABSTRACT Unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES c. THIS PAGE Unclassified SAR 21 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Howard G. White 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include area code) (850) 883-0587 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18

High-G Testing for Fuze Research Howard White, Timothy Tobik, Richard Mabry USAF Research Laboratory, Munitions Directorate Eglin AFB, FL Alain Beliveau Applied Research Associates Niceville, FL 74 th Shock & Vibration Symposium San Diego, California October 28, 2003 1

Outline What s a Fuze Requirements Testing Capabilities Challenges 2

What s a Fuze A fuze ensures that munitions: Do not explode prematurely Determines when and where to detonate Safe Arm Initiates the detonation Burst Point Decision Fire Detonator Lead Charge Booster 3

Penetrating Weapon 4

Penetration Fuzing Electronic Bomb Fuze FMU-143 B/B Fixed Pyrotechnic Delay Joint Programmable Fuze FMU-152 /B Proximity Fire, Electronic Select, Impact Delay Hard Target Smart Fuze FMU-159 /B Smart Void, Layer, Time 5

The Future of Penetration Fuzing More robust More reliable Smaller Smarter Different sensors Focused initiation Communication Between munitions During impact 6

Guidelines Safety Rules (MIL-STD 1316) Explosives Environmental Sensors Arming Safe Separation Launch Safety rules evaluated in context of each Munition System e.g. safe separation for AMRAAM different than Mk- 82 bomb Rules applied depending on explosive train design 7

The Problem At Hand Understand the acceleration environment Lower frequencies to determine rigid body response for development of burst point control fuzing Higher frequencies to define the environment the fuze must survive Create realistic environments; known and repeatable No Mil Std for shock survivability, outside of transportation 8

Testing Capabilities for Shock Dynamic Shock Facility Hopkinson Bar Drop Tower Very High G (VHG) Machine Centrifuge Field Testing Cannon Sled Track Air-Delivered 9

Hopkinson Bar Attributes: Air driven impactor 1 in. diameter titanium bar Programmers used to shape leading edge of pulse Used for: Instrumentation Studies Material Properties Testing Shock-isolation materials & techniques 10

Drop Tower Attributes: Drop heights up to 10 ft. Free fall or driven with a bungee cord Programmers used to shape pulse Payload 25 lbs Used for: Component Testing Full-up Fuze 11

Very High G (VHG) Machine Attributes: Air driven 10 lbs impactor Payload 10 lbs Pulse shaped using: Different anvil materials Programmers Used for: Instrumentation Studies Component Testing Full-up Fuze 12

Centrifuge Attributes: 20-30 kg Payload 5 lbs Long-duration high-g testing RF data transmission Used for: Instrumentation Studies Component Testing 13

Cannon Testing Attributes: Howitzer Cannons various barrel sizes Smooth bore and rifled Projectiles OD 3.6-8 in. Weight between 25 250 lbs Targets 4 in. thick to 4 ft thick 30 in. dia. to 7 ft x 9 ft Single or multi-layer configurations Used for: Full-up Fuze Component Testing Instrumentation Studies 14

Sled Track Attributes: 2000 ft long Velocities > 2000 fps for a 2000 lb item Unlimited target size Used for: Full-up Fuze Full-scale weapon (integration) testing 15

Air-Delivered Attributes: Realistic missions Realistic environment Used for: Full-up fuze Full-scale weapon system (integration) testing 16

Objective vs. Capabilities 100,000 80,000 Hopkinson Bar g-level 60,000 40,000 20,000 VHG Drop Tower Field Data Requirement 0 10 μsec 100 μsec 1 msec 10 msec 100 msec Time, msec 17

Challenges Can t afford to conduct just field tests (nor is it appropriate) Currently limited to 1-D environments in the lab Experience has shown that to survive a sled test an entire suite of tests must be conducted in the lab, e.g., Normal Reverse Lateral at varying angles (0, 45, 90, etc.) 18

Summary Changing requirements More severe environments Perform additional functions Combination of lab/field tests required Interesting testing and instrumentation challenges remain Realistic environments Testing techniques Accurate, robust instrumentation 19