Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent

Similar documents
The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Wildland Fire Assistance

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

U.S. Army Reserve Base Realignment & Closure (BRAC) Sustainable Design & Construction in Action

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Capability Planning for Today and Tomorrow Installation Status Report

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Streamlining U.S. Army Military Installation Map (MIM) Production

at the Missile Defense Agency

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Smart Power Infrastructure Demonstration for Energy Reliability and Security (SPIDERS)

Report Documentation Page

Drinking Water Operator Certification and Certificate to Operate Criteria/Requirements for US Navy Overseas Drinking Water Systems

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

NORAD CONUS Fighter Basing

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Promoting Data Integrity for the Department of Defense

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

Information Technology

AMCOM Corrosion Program

The Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Competitive Procurement

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

The Shake and Bake Noncommissioned Officer. By the early-1960's, the United States Army was again engaged in conflict, now in

FUDS Military Munitions Response Program

Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management. The Army s Technology Demonstration Program

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

Joint Basing and Explosives Safety from the US Navy Perspective

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

VSE Corporation. Integrity - Agility - Value. VSE Corporation Proprietary Information

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps


United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Impact of Corrosion on Ground Vehicles: Program Review, Issues and Solutions

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

Financial Management

Report No. D February 22, Internal Controls over FY 2007 Army Adjusting Journal Vouchers

Transcription:

DoD Executive Agent Office Office of the of the Assistant Assistant Secretary Secretary of the of Army the Army (Installations Installations, and Energy and Environment) Work Smarter Not Harder: Utilizing an Environmental Management Information System to Meet Regulatory Compliance and Reporting Requirements for a Major Source Title V Facility. Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems The NDCEE is operated by: 10 May 2011 Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 10 MAY 2011 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Work Smarter Not Harder: Utilizing an Environmental Management Information System to Meet Regulatory Compliance and Reporting Requirements for a Major Source Title V Facility 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) National Defense Center for Energy and Environment (NDCEE),Concurrent Technologies Corporation,100 CTC Drive,Johnstown,PA,15904 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presented at the NDIA Environment, Energy Security & Sustainability (E2S2) Symposium & Exhibition held 9-12 May 2011 in New Orleans, LA. U.S. Government or Federal Rights License 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 18 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Mission Training Fort Benning, Georgia Infantry, Ranger, Airborne, Armor, and Officer Candidate Schools Support to training and families Infrastructure and support facilities Hospital, Hotel, Instructional space, Barracks, Dining Facilities, Administration Buildings, Warehouses. Population 100,000+ 40,000+ vehicles daily Soldiers, their Families, DA Civilians, Contractors, and Trainees. Base Realignment and Maneuver Center of Excellence 113 construction or renovation projects National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 2

Environmental Concerns Impacts from site operations Training Construction Policy implications DoD Federal and State Compliance concerns Increasing and changing regulation Resource limitations Personnel and funding Sustainability drivers National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 3

Air Quality Compliance at Fort Benning Major Source under Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Major Source of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) National Emission Standard of Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Part 70 Operating Permit (Title V) Title VI Stratospheric Ozone Protection Greenhouse Gas (GHG)Mandatory Reporting Rule Executive Order 13514 National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 4

Fort Benning Air Program Objectives Compliance Data collection Record keeping Reporting Planning Construction projects New equipment/ emissions sources EMS Metrics Emissions reduction (VOC, GHG) Fossil fuel use reductions Alternative energy use National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 5

Compliance Data Collection Multiple data sources User Operator Energy or other program managers Service contractors Various data reporting and collection methods Spreadsheets Monthly emails Hand written notes or log sheets Faxes National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 6

Compliance Record Keeping and Reporting Multiple spreadsheets for record keeping Minimum of three days per month for verification and entry Requires manual data entry Separated by source Complied according to permit condition Emissions calculations completed with formulas or macros Verify and certify for compliance Reporting Deviations or Excursions Two, Semi-Annual Compliance Reports Annual Compliance Certification Multiple weeks to compile each compliance report National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 7

Environmental Management Information System (EMIS) Ongoing Dem Val of EMIS (Enviance, in this case) Cloud Software as a Service (SaaS) computing No software to purchase No additional hardware required Increased data availability and transparency Uniform methods and techniques Flexibility to handle numerous programs Air (Fort Benning) Water/DMR (Fort Benning) Hazardous Waste (Fort Carson) EMS (Hawaii Garrison, West Virginia National Guard) National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 8

Project Purpose Build a single, unified management and reporting system for compliance and planning Configure it specifically for Fort Benning Streamline Title V data collection, compliance management, and reporting Harmonize the emissions inventory estimating methodologies for Title V, PSD, GHG, and state emissions inventory reporting Develop a What if tool for project and new source analysis Improve compliance and reporting efficiency so resources could be allocated to EMS and Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan goals National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 9

Challenges Fort Benning Title V Permit Originally contained 128 conditions 13 additional conditions added during the project 9 source categories Emissions and operating limits Requires a number to demonstrate compliance o Fuel usage o Hours of operation Required actions Requires a task record to demonstrate compliance o Inspection report for opacity o Fuel delivery ticket review National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 10

Challenges Emissions Harmonization Heating and combustion units were particularly challenging Inconsistent basis for calculating State Air Emissions Inventory reported in lb/mmcf Greenhouse Gas reported in kg/mmbtu Prevention of Significant deterioration calculated in lb/hour Need to make all calculations run off a single data point Example: Monthly natural gas meter reading for Boiler #H008 Reported by service contractor to Air Program as ccf. Must be converted to a different reporting unit depending on the requirements. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 11

Challenges Reporting State does not have a set format for Semi-annual Title V compliance reporting but does for the Annual Report Develop a format for the semi-annual that was similar to annual reporting, but enhanced to comply with state requests for supporting documentation and usage GHG tool is as yet not released Georgia is developing a new Air Emissions Inventory tool that is not fully released Questions remain regarding what will actually be reported and how it will be formatted for each of the agencies National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 12

Path of Progress Georgia EPD approval Suggested report formatting Basis for emissions limit calculations Link a single data point to numerous solutions and outputs Configure each source, permit condition and calculation methodology Format reports and outputs National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 13

Title V Compliance Solution Each permit condition is incorporated Fully described and structured Pertinent source data is stored and available Task driven such that task completion satisfies recordkeeping requirements EMIS performs emissions calculations and compares results to conditions or limits Emissions caps (e.g., 12-month rolling NOx sums) Operating limits (e.g., 12 month rolling fuel use sums) Deviation reports are generated automatically Report output is formatted to meet State requirements National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 14

Emissions Harmonization Solution Modified methodology to use the same physical basis for calculating emissions of PSD, TV, GHG, and EI reporting Aggregated insignificant sources, not specifically limited under TV, but reportable for PSD, GHG, and EI Built emissions calculations for each source category Adding a new boiler or engine test cells is simplified Setting up a source for PSD, structures it for GHG and EI at the same time Complete final reporting format once EPA and GA EPD release their final emissions reporting tools National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 15

Final Outcomes A single, unified management and reporting system for compliance and planning Configured specifically for Fort Benning Streamlined Title V data collection, compliance management, and reporting Harmonized the emissions inventory estimating methodologies. Developed What if tool for project and new source analysis A single data entry supplies information to satisfy TV compliance, PSD, GHG, and State EI calculations. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 16

Cost Savings and Program Improvements Realized Streamlined Title V compliance system creates efficiencies Monthly data entry reduced from 3 days to a few hours Report preparation reduced from several weeks to a few hours Emissions Harmonization FY11 funding released by Air Program ($50K), not requested for FY12. FY11 funding planned for PSD analysis being reallocated. Expected Increased TV, PSD, GHG, and EI efficiencies result in better resource allocation for planning and EMS and SSPP improvements. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 17

Points of Contact DoD Executive Agent Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army Installations, Energy and Environment www.ndcee.ctc.com NDCEE Technical Monitor Name: Dr. Chris Hamilton Organization: Ft. Benning Phone: (706) 545-4211 Email: christopher.e.hamilton@us.army.mil Technical Monitor Support Name: Ms. Tannis Danley Organization: Ft. Benning Phone: (706) 545-1857 Email: tannis.danley@us.army.mil CTC Project Manager PMt Name: Angie Degory Phone: (814) 269-2704 Email: degorya@ctc.com This work was funded through the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army Installations, Energy and Environment and conducted under contract W91ZLK-10-D-005 Task 0711. The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this paper are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision unless so designated by other official documentation. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment 18