Prime Enrollees Consumer Watch Lyster AHC-Ft. Rucker FY 2016 Defense Health Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation

Similar documents
Prime Enrollees Consumer Watch Naval Hlth Clinic New England FY 2016 Defense Health Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation

Prime Enrollees Consumer Watch

Prime Enrollees Consumer Watch McDonald AHC-Ft. Eustis FY 2016 Defense Health Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation

Prime Enrollees Consumer Watch Womack AMC-Ft. Bragg FY 2016 Defense Health Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation

Prime Enrollees Consumer Watch Bavaria Meddac FY 2017 Defense Health Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation

Prime Enrollees Consumer Watch 86th Medical Group-Ramstein FY 2016 Defense Health Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation

TRICARE Users Consumer Watch South Quarter 1 FY 2016

Prime Enrollees Consumer Watch Europe Quarter 1 FY 2017

Assistance. Improving. Consumer Health. Strategies for

Anthem BlueCross and BlueShield HMO

Note: Accredited is the highest rating an exchange product can have for 2015.

Anthem BlueCross and BlueShield

Quality Improvement Program

Colorado Choice Health Plans

Wake Forest Baptist Health Lexington Medical Center. CHNA Implementation Strategy

Benefits are effective January 01, 2017 through December 31, 2017

Benefits and Premiums are effective January 01, 2018 through December 31, 2018 PLAN DESIGN AND BENEFITS PROVIDED BY AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

United Medical ACO Participation Criteria

Benefits are effective January 01, 2018 through December 31, 2018 PLAN DESIGN AND BENEFITS PROVIDED BY AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

3. ACCESS TO CARE IN THE MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM

Benefits and Premiums are effective January 01, 2018 through December 31, 2018 PLAN DESIGN AND BENEFITS PROVIDED BY AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Benefits and Premiums are effective January 01, 2018 through December 31, 2018 PLAN DESIGN AND BENEFITS PROVIDED BY AETNA HEALTH PLANS INC.

J U N E TRICARE

King County City Health Profile Seattle

and HEDIS Measures

Kaiser Permanente QUALITY OVERVIEW OVERALL RATING : 3.4 COMPANY AT A GLANCE. Company Statistics. Accreditation Exchange Product

1. What is your ethnic origin? (Check one) 2. What is your gender? 3. What is your age? Page 1. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj.

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

2016 Community Health Needs Assessment Implementation Plan

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

2015 Member Incentive. Program Evaluation. Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life of our members

Foreign Service Benefit Plan

Illustrative Benefits, Value Added Services and Premiums are effective January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016

Friday Health Plans of Colorado

Kaiser Permanente Group Plan 301 Benefit and Payment Chart

An Integrative Health Home Pilot

Quality Measurement Approaches of State Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Programs

Pay for Performance in the Context of the Military Patient- Centered Medical Home

COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT HINDS, RANKIN, MADISON COUNTIES STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Selected Prevention Provisions 11/19

Big Rapids Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) Implementation Plan July 2015 June 2018

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Florida Medicaid: Performance Measures (HEDIS)

Community Analysis Summary Report for Clinical Care

CHAPTER I--OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

FirstHealth Moore Regional Hospital. Implementation Plan

FIDA. Care Management for ALL

Obesity and corporate America: one Wisconsin employer s innovative approach

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Molina Healthcare has defined the following goals for the QI Program:

PPC2: Patient Tracking and Registry Functions

TRICARE ONLINE HOW TO REGISTER, MAKE AN APPOINTMENT AND CANCEL AN APPOINTMENT

6/3/ National Wellness Conference. Developing Strategic Partnerships to improve the Health and Wellness of the Community. Session Objectives

Checklist for Ocean County Community Health Improvement Plan Implementation of Strategies- Activities for Ocean County Health Centers: CHEMED & OHI

MERCY MEDICAL CENTER - DUBUQUE TRADITIONAL PPO PLAN $10/20%/40% RX PROVIDED BY PREFERRED HEALTH CHOICES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2015

Community Health Improvement Plan

Community Health Needs Assessment Implementation Strategy Tallahassee Memorial HealthCare 1300 Miccosukee Road FY 2016

Senate Bill No. 165 Senator Denis. Joint Sponsor: Assemblyman Oscarson

FEE FOR SERVICE MEASURES

2012 QUALITY ASSURANCE ANNUAL REPORT Executive Summary

Appendix H. Community Profile. Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant Local Health Integration Network

Oregon's Health System Transformation

Community Health Needs Assessment IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY. and

NCQA s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2011 Standards 11/21/11

2018 Electric Boat Retiree Medical Plan Options

National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit

Kaleida Health 2010 One-Year Community Service Plan Update September 2010

Supplemental Table 1. Summary of Studies Examining Interpersonal Continuity and Care Outcome

Experiences of Iowa Medicaid Health Home Enrollees (Program Period )

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. A NONPROFIT HEALTH PLAN - HAWAII REGION

West Allis Health Department

Connecticut Department of Public Health

State of New Jersey Aetna Medicare SM Plan (PPO)

CHOOSING THE BEST HEALTHCARE PLAN IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA FOR NEWBRIDGE NETWORKS

2016 Member Incentive. Program Descriptions. Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life of our members

Community Health Plan. (Implementation Strategies)

Benefits and Premiums are effective January 01, 2019 through December 31, 2019 PLAN DESIGN AND BENEFITS PROVIDED BY AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Strategic Plan

Quality Peer Group UDS Best Practices and Data Sharing 9/9/16. ohiochc.org

The Florida KidCare Program Evaluation

Patient Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards

Health Care Sector Introduction. Thank you for taking the time to complete this Health Care Sector survey.

Piedmont Access to Health Services. Standing Orders for Patient Work-ups

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Accountable Care and the Laboratory Value Proposition. Les Duncan Director of Operations Highmark Health - Home and Community Services

Patient-centered medical homes (PCMH): eligible providers.

Partners in Care Molina Healthcare of California Fall 2010

Physical Health Check: Guidelines for use

MyHealth. results with your doctor. Talk High. to him or her about how often 3. Eat foods low in saturated 140/90 or higher

Community Counseling Centers, Inc. & North Country Health Care

CareFirst BlueChoice. District of Columbia

The SOCSO Health Screening Programme A case of the Social Security Organisation

Community Health Needs Assessment: St. John Owasso

The SOMC Employee Wellness Program

Community Health Needs Assessment

A3-X - Strategic Plan

Provider Training Quality Enhancement 2016

Practice Improvement Program 2017 Program Guide Primary Care

North Carolina. CAHPS 3.0 Adult Medicaid ECHO Report. December Research Park Drive Ann Arbor, MI 48108

Healthcare Effectiveness Data Information Set (HEDIS ) Methods and Approaches

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE Primary Health Care and Family Health Teams FACT SHEET

Transcription:

Prime Enrollees Consumer Watch Lyster AHC-Ft. Rucker 16 Defense Health Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation Lyster AHC-Ft. Rucker: Sample size-1,455 Response rate-1.5% Source: Health Care Survey of DoD Beneficiaries Inside Consumer Watch TRICARE Consumer Watch shows what at your MTF say about their healthcare in the Health Care Survey of DoD Beneficiaries (HCSDB). Every quarter, a representative sample of TRICARE beneficiaries are asked about their care in the last 12 months. Responses are adjusted for age and health status. Results from 14 to 16 are reported here. Starting in 13, results include scores from surveys fielded in only three quarters. The survey for quarter four was canceled as a result of sequestration. The HCSDB includes questions from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), a survey designed to help consumers choose among health plans. data, from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) for 15, are used in calculating s. a Significantly exceeds (p<.5). b Significantly falls short of (p<.5). See appendix for table data. Health Care Figure 1: Health Care Rating 74 69 71 71 were asked to rate their healthcare from to 1, where is worst and 1 is best. Figure 1 shows the percentage who rated their healthcare 8 or above for each of the following time periods: 14, 15, and 16. Labels refer to the year a survey was fielded. Numbers in red italics are significantly different from the (p<.5). Health care ratings depend on things like access to care, and how patients get along with the doctors, nurses, and other care providers who treat them. 57 Health Plan Figure 2: Health Plan Rating 76ᵃ were asked to rate their health plan from to 1, where is worst and 1 is best. Figure 2 shows the percentage who rated their plan 8 or above for each reporting period. Health plan ratings depend on access to care and how the plan handles things like claims, referrals and customer complaints. Personal Provider 76ᵃ 63 who have a personal provider were asked to rate their personal provider from to 1, where is worst and 1 is best. Figure 3 shows the percentage who rated their doctor 8 or above for each reporting period. Personal doctor ratings depend on how the patient gets along with the one doctor responsible for their basic care. Specialist Figure 3: Personal Provider Rating 82 78 75 78 Enrollees who have consulted specialist physicians were asked to rate from to 1 the specialist they had seen most in the previous 12 months. Figure 4 shows the proportion of enrollees who rated their specialist 8 or above for each reporting period. Specialist ratings depend on beneficiaries access to doctors with the special skills they need. Figure 4: Specialist Rating 81 73 7 1

Lyster AHC-Ft. Rucker 16 Health Care Topics Health Care Topics scores average together results for related questions. Each score is the percentage who usually or always got treatment they wanted or had no problem getting a desired service. 9 7 5 Figure 5: Access Composites Getting needed care Getting care quickly 86 84 Figure 5 (Access Composites) includes the composites Getting needed care and Getting care quickly. Scores in Getting needed care are based on getting referral to a specialist and getting needed treatments. Getting care quickly scores concern how long patients wait for an appointment or urgent care. Figure 6 (Doctor s Communication) includes the composite for How well doctors communicate. Scores in How well doctors communicate are based on whether the personal doctor spends enough time with patients, treats them respectfully and answers their questions. Figure 7 (Claims/Service Composites) includes composite scores for Customer service and Claims processing. Scores in the Customer service composite concern patients ability to get courteous service and information about their health plan. Claims processing scores are based on both timeliness and correctness. 95 9 85 75 Figure 6: Doctor's Communication Doctors' communication 95 Preventive Care The preventive care table compares rates for diagnostic screening tests and smoking cessation with goals from Healthy People, a government initiative to improve Americans health by preventing illness. The mammography rate shown is the proportion of women or above with a mammogram in the past two years. Pap smear is the proportion of adult women screened for cervical cancer in the past three years. Preventive Care Type of Care 2 14 2 15 2 16 Hypertension is the proportion of adults whose blood pressure was checked in the past two years and who know whether their pressure is too high. Prenatal care is the proportion of women pregnant now or in the past 12 months who received prenatal care in their first trimester. Percent not obese is the proportion with a body mass index below 3. The non-smoking rate is the proportion of adults who currently do not smoke. Counseled to quit is the number of smokers or tobacco users whose doctor told them to quit, over the number of smokers and tobacco users with an office visit in the past 12 months. He a lthy Pe ople 2 2 Goa l Mammography - 94ᵃ 89 81 (w omen > ) (43) Pap Smear 96 9 89 93 (w omen > 18) (83) Hypertension Screen 96 91 92 95 (adults) (137) Prenatal Care - - - 78 (in 1st trimester) - Percent Not Obese 74 ᵃ 75 69 (adults) (124) Non-Smokers 91 87 93ᵃ 88 (adults) (133) Figure 7: Claims/Service Composites Customer service Claims processing a Counseled to Quit - - - - (adults) - ᵃNumbers in green significantly exceed the Healthy People goal (p<.5). ᵇNumbers in red significantly fall short of the Healthy People goal (p<.5). The number of responding beneficiaries for each type of care is in parentheses. 9 7 86 85 2

Figure 1: Health Care Rating 74 14 69 15 71 16 71 Figure 2: Health Plan Rating 57 14 76 a 15 76 a 16 63 Figure 3: Personal Provider Rating 82 14 78 15 75 16 78 Figure 4: Specialist Rating 81 14 15 73 16 7

Figure 5: Access Composites Getting Needed Care For Getting Needed Care Getting Care Quickly For Getting Care Quickly 14 82 86 83 84 15 86 86 84 16 82 86 82 84 Figure 6: Doctor's Communication Doctor's Communication 14 93 95 15 97 95 16 88 95 Figure 7: Claims/Service Composites Customer Service For Customer Service Claims Processing For Claims Processing 14 85 97 a 86 15-85 88 86 16 91 85 93 86

Preventive Care Type of Care 14 15 16 Healthy People Goal Mammography (women >= ) - 94 a 89 (43) 81 Pap Smear (women >=18) 96 9 89 (83) 93 Hypertension Screen (adults) 96 91 92 (137) 95 Prenatal Care (in 1st trimester) - - - 78 Percent Not Obese (adults) 74 a 75 (124) 69 Non-Smokers (adults) 91 87 93 a (133) 88 Counseled to Quit (adults) - - - - a. Numbers in green significantly exceed the Healthy People goal (p<.5). b. Numbers in red significantly fall short of the Healthy People goal (p<.5). The number of responding beneficiaries for each type of care is in parentheses.