Patient Falls Metric (2018)

Similar documents
THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. DUTY OF CANDOUR - NEW CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENT Guidance and frequently asked questions

Degree of harm FAQ Contents

IQC/2013/48 Improvement and Quality Committee October 2013

Improving the reporting of medication-related safety incidents

The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

Pressure ulcers: revised definition and measurement. Summary and recommendations

TRUST BOARD SAFETY AND QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2013

Appendix 5. Safeguarding Adults and Pressure Ulcer Protocol: Deciding whether to refer to the Safeguarding Adults Procedures

CalNOC Data Definitions and Calculations: Prevalence Studies Reports

Achieving Consensus in Pressure Ulcer Reporting

Guideline scope Intermediate care - including reablement

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Policy for the Reporting and Management of Incidents Including Serious Incidents. Version Number: 006

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Clinical Governance & Risk Management Awareness. Incl. investigation of accidents, complaints and claims. Unit 2

Directorate Medical Operations Patients and Information Nursing Policy Commissioning Development

Ensuring our safeguarding arrangements act to help and protect adults PRACTICE GUIDANCE FOR REPORTING MEDICATION INCIDENTS INTO SAFEGUARDING

THE CODE. Professional standards of conduct, ethics and performance for pharmacists in Northern Ireland. Effective from 1 March 2016

PRESSURE ULCER THEMATIC ADVERSE EVENT REPORT - MARCH The aim of this report is to provide NHS Borders Board with a thematic review of:-

Root Cause Analysis for Pressure Ulceration This tool MUST be completed electronically paper copies will not be accepted.

Reducing Medication Errors: National Update

Appendix 1 MORTALITY GOVERNANCE POLICY

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Improving harm from falls as part of the Patient safety initiative

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS THAT ARISE IN LONG TERM CARE PART 2 REPORTING OBLIGATIONS

Welcome and Instructions

Wrong route administration of an oral drug into a vein

TRUST BOARD. Jo Furley, Interim Chief Nurse Dr Ben Lobo, Medical Director. Jo Hunter, Deputy Chief Nurse. Mary Heritage, Assistant Director of Quality

Appendix Five Decision Pathway Pressure Ulcers and safeguarding Adults (A3 format)

THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST NHS SAFETY THERMOMETER

Meeting of Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body. Title: Bristol CCG Management of Serious Incidents Agenda Item: 17

Unit 2 Clinical Governance & Risk Management Awareness

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Improving compliance with oral methotrexate guidelines. Action for the NHS

Iowa Healthcare Collaborative - HEN 2.0 Measures

Nottingham University Hospitals Emergency Department Quality Issues Related to Performance

Review of F323 Related to Falls. Marilyn Hirsch Region V December 16, 2015

Learning from Deaths Policy

Proposed Standards Revisions Related to Pain Assessment and Management

TRUST BOARD 22 December Nursing, Quality & Patient Experience Directorate. TISSUE VIABILITY Update and Ambition

Medicines Optimisation Patient Safety And Medication Safety. Dr David Cousins Associate Director Medication Safety and Medical Devices

Preventing falls in hospital - information for patients & their families. Patient information

Clinical Strategy

Safe medication practice what can we learn from root cause analysis and related methods?

National Health Regulatory Authority Kingdom of Bahrain

Reconciliation of Medicines on Admission to Hospital

Elaine Andrews, Assistant Director of Nursing & Safety and Caroline Booton Quality Analyst Jill Asbury, Acting Director of Nursing

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Reducing Risk: Mental health team discussion framework May Contents

Chapter 13. Documenting Clinical Activities

Annual Quality Account 2015/2016

Reducing Medication Errors

New Mexico DDSD General Events Report (GER) Guide

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

National Reporting and Learning Service (NRLS) Data Quality Standards. Guidance for organisations reporting to the Reporting and Learning System (RLS)

Adopting Standardized Definitions The Future of Data Collection and Benchmarking in Alternate Site Infusion Must Start Now!

The Care Values Framework

Required Organizational Practices Resources for 2016

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Thinking Differently Acting Differently. Higher staff satisfaction = better patient outcomes & better patient experience

Section Title. Prescribing competency framework Catherine Picton, Lead author

SELF - ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICINES AND ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICINES SUPPORTED BY FAMILY/INFORMAL CARERS OF PATIENTS IN COMMUNITY NURSING

Medicine Reconciliation FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS NATIONAL MEDICATION SAFETY PROGRAMME

OASIS ITEM ITEM INTENT

Trust Board meeting: Wednesday 8 th May2013 TB

Blood Transfusion Policy. Version Number: 6.1 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead: On: December 2014.

Using mortality data to improve the quality and safety of patient care December 2015

Martina Khundakar - Senior Clinical Pharmacist Teresa Barnes - Lead Clinical Pharmacist - Specialist Care. Timothy Donaldson, Trust Chief Pharmacist

Document Author: Tissue Viability Nurse Date 15/02/2017

Quality Improvement Strategy Safe care Effective care Excellent patient experience

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospitals

Patient Safety. At the heart of all we do

Revalidation FAQs for Trainees (October 2013)

Slips, trips and falls in hospital

Final Version Simple Guide to the Care Act and Delayed Transfers of Care (DTOC) SIMPLE GUIDE TO THE CARE ACT AND DELAYED TRANSFERS OF CARE (DTOC)

Anti-Coagulation Monitoring (warfarin, acenocoumarol, phenindione) Primary Care Service (PCS:01) NHS Standard Contract Service Profile Pack ( )

We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards.

Leveraging Your Facility s 5 Star Analysis to Improve Quality

Influence of Patient Flow on Quality Care

Richard Wilson, Quality Insight and Intelligence Director

Whittington Health Quality Strategy

BOARD PAPER - NHS ENGLAND

Best Practice Guidelines - BPG 9 Managing Medicines in Care Homes

Thresholds for initiating Adult Safeguarding Referrals or Care Concerns

The Criminalization of Adverse Events. Joy Schank, MSN Caroline E. Fife, MD,

Policy for Patient Identification. Controlled Document Number: Version Number: 3 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board

RAI Panel Q&As August-September 2008

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Management of Reported Medication Errors Policy

PHARMACY SERVICES/MEDICATION USE

SFHPHARM27 - SQA Unit Code FA2P 04 Undertake an in-process accuracy check of assembled prescribed items prior to the final accuracy check

New Mexico DDSD General Events Report (GER) Guide

NHS Safety Thermometer

Mental Health : Engagement in the journey to recovery

Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement in the Ophthalmic ASC

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

SOMERSET PARTNERSHIP NHS FOUNDATION TRUST QUALITY ACCOUNT PRIORITIES 2016/17. Report to the Trust Board 22 March 2016

Date of publication:june Date of inspection visit:18 March 2014

Transcription:

Patient Falls Metric (2018) Falls Unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor or other lower surface (NPSA 2010) Include all slips, trips and falls e.g. if a patient is found on the floor, lowered themselves onto the floor, slipped from a chair, rolled out of bed, etc. Figures required for each fall per degree of harm. The 'level of harm' must be allocated within 48 hours of when the incident happened. No Harm Any patient safety incident that ran to completion but no harm occurred How this might relate to your IPU Patient found on the floor with no signs of injuries and is able to explain why they are there. No additional observations taken other than routine nursing checks. Low Harm Harm requiring first aid level treatment or extra observation only (e.g. bruises, grazes). Any patient safety incident that required extra observation or minor treatment and caused minimal harm, to one or more persons receiving care. How this might relate to your IPU A patient who has bruising and grazes and only requires first aid and/or additional observation.

Moderate Harm Severe Harm Death Harm requiring hospital treatment or a prolonged length of stay but from which a full recovery is expected (e.g. fractured clavicle, laceration requiring suturing). Any patient safety incident that resulted in a moderate increase in treatment and which caused significant but not permanent harm, to one or more persons receiving care. How this might relate to your IPU A patient whose injuries resulting from the fall requires a visit to A & E for investigation. They may not need a hospital stay. This would also include patients where a decision is made not to transfer someone to A & E if very near end of life and further investigation may not change the management. Harm causing permanent disability (e.g. brain injury, hip fractures where the patient is unlikely to regain their former level of independence). Any patient safety incident that appears to have resulted in permanent harm to one or more persons receiving care. Where death is directly attributable to the fall References - National Patient Safety Agency 2010 Slips trips and falls data update NPSA: 23 June 2010. - NPSA Seven Steps to Patient Safety.

Pressure Ulcer metric (2018) Pressure Ulcers Include each pressure ulcer only ONCE. Count the number of Pressure Ulcers and NOT the number of patients. Include ONLY hospice acquired pressure ulcers, grade 1 and above and also capture if they were avoidable /unavoidable. The PU is recorded only once over the episode of care. This will be at the end of that phase of care when the patient has been discharged or died (e.g. If the patient has been in your care in Q1 and dies in Q2, it is recorded only in Q2 at the grade it was at that end of care phase). Use the EPUAP classification system in the reference below. Admitted with /inherited 1. The patient is admitted onto the IPU with a pressure ulcer from any care setting (e.g. home, care home, and hospital). 2. If the patient is assessed on admission and found to have suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI). When the SDTI re-assessed at any point and found to have become a PU this is to be graded and recorded as admitted with/ inherited. 3. For the purpose of this benchmarking we are NOT capturing inherited PU s regardless of length of stay or whether it improves or deteriorates Acquired The patient develops a pressure ulcer whilst on the IPU which was NOT present on admission.

Of the Acquired Pressure Ulcers, are they a/n: Avoidable Pressure Ulcer The person receiving care developed a pressure ulcer and the provider of care did not do all of the following: 1. Assess and evaluate the person s clinical condition and pressure ulcer risk factors. 2. Plan and implement interventions that are consistent with the person s needs, goals and recognised standards of practice. 3. Monitor and re-evaluate the impact of the interventions 4. Revise the interventions as appropriate. 5. Record findings and intervention. Unavoidable Pressure Ulcer The person receiving care developed a pressure ulcer even though the provider of the care had completed and recorded the following: 1. Assessed and evaluated the person s clinical condition and pressure ulcer risk factors 2. Planned and implemented interventions that are consistent with the person s needs, goals and recognised standards of practice 3. Monitored and re-evaluated the impact of the interventions within the time frame of the local practice guidelines 4. Revised the interventions as appropriate; or the individual person refused to adhere to prevention strategies in spite of education of the consequences of non-adherence1 References Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers EPUAP 2014 http://www.tissueviabilityscotland.org/downloads/epuap%20gradin g%20tool.pdf)

Medication Incidences Metric (2018) Medication Incidents Please review your incident reporting records to ascertain level of harm identified Safety in doses; improving the use of medicines in the NHS, National Patient Safety Agency, National Reporting and Learning Service (2009) Medication errors are any incident where there has been an error in the process of prescribing, dispensing, preparing, administration, monitoring or providing medicines advice, regardless of whether any harm occurred or was possible This is a broad definition and most errors result in no or low harm. Please note for the purpose of this benchmarking programme the focus is ONLY on patient harm. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Patient Safety Alert improving medication error incident reporting and learning (2014) Medication errors are Patient Safety Incidents (PSI). These PSI s can be divided into two categories; errors of commission or errors of omission. The former include wrong medicine, wrong dose. The latter include an omitted dose or a failure to monitor. Medical Error National Patient Safety Agency (2010) Collect from level 0 Level 0 No harm; incident prevented Incident prevented near miss (the incident did not cause harm to the patient but was judged to have the potential to cause harm) Level 1 No harm; incident not prevented For example: wrong dose prescribed but noticed before dose given to patient Incident occurred - but no harm was caused to the patient For example: wrong dose given or dose missed but no adverse affect on patient.

Level 2 Low harm Any incident that required extra observation or minor treatment (but there was no change in the clinical status) For example: Opioid dose given too high and required observations and but no adverse affect on patient Level 3 Moderate harm Any incident that resulted in a moderate increase in treatment/laboratory monitoring (change to the clinical status), but not permanent harm to the patient For example: Opioid dose given too high and patient became opioid toxic requiring naloxone Level 4 Severe harm Any incident that appears to have resulted in permanent harm to the patient Level 5 Death Any incident that has directly resulted in the death of the patient Please consider if the Duty of Candour may apply