Meaningful Use Final Rule:

Similar documents
Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Proposed Meaningful Use Incentives, Criteria and Quality Measures Affecting Critical Access Hospitals

Medicare & Medicaid. William Kassler, MD Chief Medical Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Boston, MA

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

ASCs and Meaningful Use. Patrick Doyle, Vice President Sales Jessica McBrayer, RN, Business Analyst Ron Pelletier, Vice President Market Strategy

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

HITECH Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Stimulus Package. HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU)

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Final Rule. Implementing the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009

2011 Measures 2013 Objectives Goal is to guide and support care processes and care coordination

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

EHR Incentives for Professionals and Hospitals. Paul Forlenza, VP Policy, VITL updated October 1, 2010 v.8.1

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

What Will Stage I Mean for Consumers and Purchasers

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

California Medical Association

during the EHR reporting period.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Russell B Leftwich, MD

Provide an understanding of what comprises "meaningful use" of EHR technology

The History of Meaningful Use

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Final Rule. Implementing the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and Beyond

in partnership with EHR Meaningful Use Guide for HITECH Attestation

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Specifics of the Program for Hospitals. August 11, 2010

Meaningful Use: A Brief Overview for Society of Health Systems

Meaningful Use May, 2012

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Behavioral Health Clients

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

A complete step by step guide on how to achieve Meaningful Use Core Set Measures in Medgen EHR.

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Strategies. Presented by: C. Johnson, BS-HSA

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

MEANINGFUL USE BASICS

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Understanding Your Meaningful Use Report

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Meaningful Use Roadmap

Meaningful Use of an EHR System

Meaningful Use Stage 1 Guide for 2013

EHR Meaningful Use Guide

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule CPeH Advocacy Opportunities

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Meaningful Use: a Primer

The Incentive Roadmap

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

Meaningful use glossary and requirements table

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Iatric Systems Supports the Achievement of Meaningful Use

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Moving HIT and Meaningful Use

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

2014 PCMH Standards: How CPCI Can Help with Transformation. CHCANYS Quality Improvement Program November 20, 2014

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Summary. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare and Medicaid Programs

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals Q Update from 2013 HIE Survey Participants

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Transcription:

Meaningful Use Final Rule: Safety and Quality of Care Jonathan Teich, FACMI, FHIMSS, MD, PhD CMIO, Elsevier Health Sciences August 4, 2010 Today s webinar is sponsored by

History HITECH Feb. 2009 Initial proposals Jul. 2009 Notice of Proposed Rule Making Jan. 2010 > 2000 comments All or nothing Inflexible Few would pass Final rule on display July 13, 2010

Final MU rule Eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, critical access hospitals Core and menu set philosophy p Rollback of thresholds for tasks Reduced # of quality measures Emphasis on this as first of three stages

Meaningful Use categories 1. Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce health disparities 2. Engage Patients and Families 3. Improve Care Coordination 4. Protect Privacy and security of Personal Health Info 5. Improve Population and Public Health

Quality philosophy of Final Rule Balance between improving quality as much as possible and encouraging widespread adoption / avoiding excessive work burden Ensures that you have the functional capability, and get your feet wet Many criteria will reappear in phase 2 & 3 (2013+)

Tasks

Task changes from proposed rule 25 objectives divided into 15 core objectives and menu set (fulfill 5 out of 10) 24 objectives (14 core + 5/10) for hospitals Exclusions as well, where objective doesn t apply Lowered thresholds for most objectives New adds: providing patient resources, advance directivesi Calculations simplified in some cases (e.g., patients, not encounters); no chart review Claims & eligibility transactions removed

Threshold changes (examples) E prescribing: 75% 40% of prescriptions transmitted CPOE: reduced from: 80% of all orders of all kinds done via CPOE, to: 30% of patients (who have meds at all) with at least one medication order in CPOE CDS rules: 5 1

Things not changed Some thresholds (e.g., 80% of patients to have problems/allergies/meds documented) Clinical quality measures reporting timeline will stay the same MU reporting period of 90 days for first year and one year thereafter.

Core tasks (sample) Task Criterion 1. Record patient demographics (sex, Morethan 50% of patients demographic race, ethnicity, date of birth, data recorded as structured preferred language, and in the case of data hospitals, date and preliminary cause of death in the event of mortality) 2. Record vital signs and chart changes More than 50% of patients 2 years of age (height, weight, blood pressure, or older have height, body mass index, growth charts for weight, ihtand blood pressure recorded ddas children) structured data 3. Record smoking status for patients 13 More than 50% of patients 13 years of years of age or older age or older have smoking status recorded as structured data

Core tasks Demographics Vital signs, BMI, growth Problem List Medication List Allergy List Smoking Status Givepts clinical encounter summaries Givepts health summary Transmit prescriptions (EP) CPOE for med orders Drug drug and drug allergy checks Test ability to exchange clinical information One clinical decision support rule & track it Security risk analysis Report quality measures

Formulary checking Clinical lab test results Lists of pts with specific conditions UseEHR to identify educational resources specific to the pt Pts get summaries for use in referrals (Test) Send data to immunization registry Menu Set (pick 5) Med reconciliation Send syndromic surveillance data (test) Advance directives for pts > 65 (H) Reportable labs to public health (H) Send preventive care reminders (EP) Give pts access to problems/meds/labs (EP)

Clinical Decision Rule Implement one clinical decision support rule relevant to specialty or high clinical priority along with the ability to track compliance with that rule

Quality Measures

Quality Measure changes NPRM: report on 90 core and specialtyrelated quality measures Final: EPs: 3 core quality measures (3 alternatives) + 3 others from menu of 38 Hospitals: 15 core measures (report all, even if zero), down from 35

Selection of Quality Measures Designed to favor well established and endorsed measures, but not to duplicate measures from other Federal programs Measures for which electronic specifications are available Focus on CAD, CHF, diabetes, asthma, obesity, hypertension, prenatal care, cancer screening, cancer treatment

Core Measures for EPs Hypertension and Blood Pressure Management Tobacco Use Assessment and Tobacco Cessation Intervention Adult Weight Screening and Follow Up Alternatives: Weight assessment for pts <21 Flu shots for pts >50 Childhood immunization status

Menu set Measures (pick 3) Diabetes: A1C, LDL, BP, eye/foot exam, UA CHF: ACE/ARB, betablocker CAD: Beta blockers, Plavix, statins, BP check, Aspirin, Pneumovax Mammography Colon ca. screening Antidepressants Smoking counseling Glaucoma: reevaluation Diabetic retinopathy reexam Asthma med treatment Asthma assessment Antibiotics for pharyngitis Many more..

If your practice doesn t see this then your denominator is zero Must try to find 3 core measures and 3 menu measures with nonzero denominators If not, then report six measures anyway and attest that all theotherswould be zeroes 2011 only

Quality measures for hospitals ED throughput for admitted patients (2) Stroke: thrombolysis, antithrombotic meds by day 2 and for A Fib (3) Stroke: discharge on antithrombotic med and statin, stroke education, rehab assessment (4) VTE prophylaxis after admission and ICU (2) VTE: overlap of heparin and warfarin, platelet monitoring for UFH, discharge instructions, preventable in hospital VTE (4) *VTE=venous thromboembolism

Attestation and timelines

Eligible Provider definition changes Hospital based ambulatory practice is ok (just not inpatient or ED practice) Multiple locations requirements and measurements apply only at sites where certified technology is available (must be >50% of total encounters) Select any 90 day period in year 1

Claiming MU Tasks are scored by: # patients, # actions, yes/no (drug checks), tests (exchange) 2011 Manual attestation including clinical quality measure numerator, denominator, exclusions to CMS or to State

Claiming MU 2012 Electronic submission through certified EHR technology Upload files through CMS portal Submit files through a registry or HIE (later) Rules to be posted by 4/1/2011 /

Timelines Register for program in January 2011 Only 90 days reporting needed in year 1 (goes to full year) Attestation begins in April (format TBD)

The present and the future (to stage 2 and beyond)

Returning for stage 2 CMS states that many measures and tasks removed from stage 1 (e.g., specialty measures) will return in stage 2 Minimum performance criteria may replace some report only measures Menu set likely to all become core tasks CPOE usage requirement goes to 60%; CDS rules and thresholds likely to increase

Stage 2 goals (2013) Disease management Clinical decision support Medication management Patient access to health information Transitions in care Quality measurement and research Communication to/from public health

Stage 3 goals (2015) Improvements in quality/safety/efficiency Clinical decision support for national highpriority conditions Patient self management tools Access to comprehensive patient data (HIE) Population health outcomes

What does it all mean? Significant rollback in the level of quality monitoring and quality related tasks from proposed rule Emphasis was placed d(ft (after feedback) on ensuring adoption first QI provisions essentially deferred for 2 years, in expectation that more providers will be comfortable with their new EHRs by then ( make the computer your friend first )

What does it all mean? Rolled back provisions still ensure that all claimants get their feet wet in: adopting technology suitable for QM / QI / CDS Measuring and reporting quality metrics Using CPOE, e prescribing, drug checks, decision rules, HIE

Enablers HITRC / Regional Extension Centers Mission to bring providers into MU and keep them there as it progresses Learning communities Beacon communities ONC and AHRQ contracts regarding better implementation, dissemination, simplification, and sharing of clinical decision support

For further information

http://www.cms.gov/ehrincentiveprograms/

http://healthit.hhs.gov

Other references Blumenthal summary in NEJM HIMSS page contains updated fact and commentary www.himss.org/economicstimulus Nice collection of presentations at http://news.avancehealth.com/2010/07/finalrule on meaningful use.html use.html

Meaningful Use Final Rules Webinar Series August 11 12:00 1:00PM Central Implication of Meaningful Use for Eligible Professionals August 18 12:00 1:00 PM Central Regulatory Impact for Business Associates August 25 12:00 1:00 PM Central Overview of Standards, Implementation Specifications and Certification Criteria Available On Demand in HIMSS elearning Academy (www.himss.org/education) Overview of Meaningful Use Implication of Meaningful Use for Hospitals

Contact info: Jonathan Teich j.teich@elsevier.com or jteich@harvard.edu

Meaningful Use Final Rule: Safety and Quality of Care Today s webinar was sponsored by