AHRQ Quality Indicators. Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission October 21, 2005 Marybeth Farquhar, AHRQ

Similar documents
Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Hospital Discharge Data, 2005 From The University of Memphis Methodist Le Bonheur Center for Healthcare Economics

Additional Considerations for SQRMS 2018 Measure Recommendations

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) / PREMIER HOSPITAL QUALITY INCENTIVE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

(202) or CMS Proposals to Improve Quality of Care during Hospital Inpatient Stays

Healthcare Reform Hospital Perspective

The Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program

Clinical Documentation: Beyond The Financials Cheryll A. Rogers, RHIA, CDIP, CCDS, CCS Senior Inpatient Consultant 3M HIS Consulting Services

Rural-Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals

Quality Reporting in the Public Domain

Total Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015

AHRQ Quality Indicators Program Update OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Expert Group May 22, 2014

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

Improving Care Transitions

Pay-for-Performance. GNYHA Engineering Quality Improvement

FY 2014 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

Coding for Quality Reporting Measures

Cigna Centers of Excellence Hospital Value Tool 2016 Methodology

Association between organizational factors and quality of care: an examination of hospital performance indicators

Ambulatory-care-sensitive admission rates: A key metric in evaluating health plan medicalmanagement effectiveness

3M Health Information Systems. The standard for yesterday, today and tomorrow: 3M All Patient Refined DRGs

Paying for Outcomes not Performance

Understanding HSCRC Quality Programs and Methodology Updates

Quality Measures in Healthcare Facilities for Patient Family Advisory Council members

Cigna Centers of Excellence Hospital Value Tool 2015 Methodology

Surgeon Champion: Getting Started, What You Need to Know

Star Rating Method for Single and Composite Measures

2015 Executive Overview

Nielsen ICD-9. Healthcare Data

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Chapter VII. Health Data Warehouse

Population health and potentially preventable events 3M solutions for population health, patient safety and cost-effective care

3M Health Information Systems. 3M Clinical Risk Groups: Measuring risk, managing care

Conditions of Use & Reporting Methods of Patient Safety Indicators in OECD Countries

Using Secondary Datasets for Research. Learning Objectives. What Do We Mean By Secondary Data?

CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE/HOSPITAL VALUE TOOL 2011/2012 METHODOLOGY

Hospital Acquired Conditions: using ACS-NSQIP to drive performance. J Michael Henderson Jackie Matthews Nirav Vakharia

WilCo Wellness Alliance. Summit Presentation. Cara Woodard Account Manager. April 25, 2017

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

Performance Scorecard 2013

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)

Hospital data to improve the quality of care and patient safety in oncology

Development of Emergency Department (ED) Community Health Indicators

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)

Health Indicators. for the Dallas/Fort Worth Combined Metropolitan Statistical Area Brad Walsh and Sue Pickens Owens

Examples of Measure Selection Criteria From Six Different Programs

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program. Hospital-Specific Report User Guide Fiscal Year 2017

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges

Catherine Porto, MPA, RHIA, CHP Executive Director HIM. Madelyn Horn Noble 3M HIM Data Analyst

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

Health Economics Program

Is there an impact of Health Information Technology on Delivery and Quality of Patient Care?

Impacting Quality Initiatives through Documentation Improvement. Fran Jurcak, MSN, RN, CCDS Vice President of Clinical Innovation Iodine Software

This is the Full Title of a Session

Analysis of Final Rule for FY 2009 Revisions to the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Program Selection Criteria: Bariatric Surgery

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated May 2011

Iowa Healthcare Collaborative - HEN 2.0 Measures

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

Mastering the Mandatory Elements of the Affordable Care Act. Melinda Hancock Walter Coleman

Initiative Qualitätsmedizin (IQM)

Volume to Value Based Healthcare Dr. Thilo Koepfer, VP International, 3M Health Information Systems

Learning Objectives. Medicare P4P Programs. How to Interpret Medicare s Hospital Pay for Performance Reports

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

Episode Payment Models Final Rule & Analysis

Linking Supply Chain, Patient Safety and Clinical Outcomes

Physician Compensation Methodologies and Building Clinically Integrated Communities. Walter Kopp Medical Management Services

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Exhibit A Virginia Quantitative Measures

Preventable Readmissions

National Priorities for Improvement:

Quality Provisions in the EPM Final Rule. Matt Baker Scott Wetzel

BCBSIL iexchange Reference Guide

Multi-Level Networks High Tech Diagnostic Imaging Management

Quality and Health Care Reform: How Do We Proceed?

Healthcare Solutions Nuance Clintegrity Quality Management Solutions. Quality. The Discipline to Win.

Quality Provisions in the EPM Proposed Rule. Matt Baker Scott Wetzel

A23/B23: Patient Harm in US Hospitals: How Much? Objectives

Updated validation of AHRQ Prevention Quality Indicators in the USA

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: APPENDICES TO MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, CHAPTER 4654

STATISTICAL BRIEF #9. Hospitalizations among Males, Highlights. Introduction. Findings. June 2006

Comparing Patient Safety in Rural Hospitals by Bed Count

THE IMPACT OF MS-DRGs ON THE ACUTE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER. Dynamics and reform of the Diagnostic Related Grouping (DRG) System

Managing Your Patient Population: How do you measure up?

Physician and Hospital Collaboration: Reducing Harm & Improving Care Delivery Through Quality-based Incentives!

The Nexus of Quality and Finance

Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations in Tennessee, Final Report. May 2006

Implementing Coordinated Care for Dual Eligibles: Conflicts and Opportunities Prepared by James M. Verdier Mathematica Policy Research

Topics for Today s Discussion

VALUE. Critical Access Hospital QUALITY REPORTING GUIDE

Fiscal Year 2017 Statistical Profile

Definitions/Glossary of Terms

Transcription:

AHRQ Quality Indicators Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission October 21, 2005 Marybeth Farquhar, AHRQ

Overview AHRQ Quality Indicators Current Uses of the Quality Indicators Case Studies of P4P Future Enhancements

AHRQ Quality Indicators (QIs) Developed through contract with UCSF-Stanford Stanford Evidence-based Practice Center Use existing hospital discharge data, based on readily available data elements Incorporate severity adjustment methods (APR- DRGs, comorbidity groupings) in IQIs Current modules: Prevention QIs, Inpatient QIs, and Patient Safety Indicators

Example Indicator Evaluation LITERATURE REVIEW USER DATA INITIAL EMPRICAL ANALYSES AND DEFINITION PANEL EVALUATION FURTHER EMPIRICAL ANALYSES REFINED DEF. FURTHER REVIEW? FINAL DEFINITION

Overview of AHRQ QIs Prevention Quality Indicators Inpatient Quality Indicators Patient Safety Indicators Ambulatory care sensitive conditions Mortality following procedures Mortality for medical conditions Utilization of procedures Volume of procedures Post-operative operative complications Iatrogenic conditions

Structure of AHRQ QI Definitions based on ICD-9-CM CM diagnosis and procedure codes Often along with DRG, MDC, sex, age, procedure dates, admission type, admission source, discharge disposition, discharge quarter (new) Numerator is the number of cases flagged with the outcome of interest (e.g., Postoperative sepsis, avoidable hospitalization on for asthma, death) Denominator is the population at risk (e.g. pneumonia patients, elective surgical patients, county population from census data) The observed rate is numerator / denominator Volume counts for selected procedures

Advantages Public Access All development documentation and details on each indicator available on website www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov Software available to download at no cost Standardized indicator definitions Can be used with any administrative data: HCUP, MedPac, state datasets, payer data, hospital internal data

Advantages (cont d) Scope 79 individual measures, will be more Each measure can be stratified by other variables including patient race, age, sex, provider, geographic region Include priority populations and areas: Child health, women s s health (pregnancy and child- birth), diabetes, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, stroke, asthma, patient safety, preventative care Focus on acute care but do cross over to community and outpatient care delivery settings.

Advantages Indicator Maintenance National Benchmarks National Healthcare Quality Report National Healthcare Disparities Report HCUPnet

Limitations Data-known limitations of administrative data Developed for quality improvement, evaluations conducted within that context Risk-adjustment limitations Evidence-base timing: Research vs. demand for information

General Uses of the AHRQ QIs Hospital Quality Improvement Internal and External Individual hospitals and health care systems Hospital association member-only reports National, State and Regional Reporting National Healthcare Quality/Disparities Reports Public Reporting by Hospital Texas, New York, Colorado, Oregon, Massachusetts, Wisconsin Pay-for for-performance by Hospital CMS/Premier Demo, Anthem of Virginia Hospital Profiling Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Illinois

Pay for Performance: Case Studies CMS/Premier Demonstration Project Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Illinois Anthem BC/BS Virginia Pay for Performance Project

National Comparative Reporting: Pay for Performance CMS / Premier: Pay for Performance Demonstration Project Two PSIs Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma and Postoperative physiological and metabolic derangement In two distinct patient populations - hip and knee replacement and CABG Will create composite score (quality and safety)

State Level Comparative Reporting: Pay for Performance (cont.) Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois (BCBSIL) Hospital Profiles include multiple aspects of hospital performance. Indicators include: Compliance with the Leapfrog standards AHRQ Quality Indicators Inpatient and Patient Safety for 2004 profiles Hospital-specific specific satisfaction and quality indicators from the BCBSIL Accreditation status Percentage of board certified physicians And several other indicators...

State Level Comparative Reporting: Pay for Performance (cont.) Anthem BC/BS Virginia Pay for Performance Project Hospitals select 2 of 9 PSIs Focus on monitoring patient safety, not on specific scores Virginia Health Information reports to hospitals hospital compared to peer groups

QI Guidance Document Guidance for Using the AHRQ Quality Indicators for Hospital-level Public Reporting or Payment Prevention Inpatient Patient Safety Quality Indicators Quality Indicators Indicators http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/

Guidance Document - Highlights Does not endorse any individual or set of QIs for hospital level public reporting or P4P Notes all potentially appropriate based on: Program purpose / goals Data availability Data quality (integrity, reliability, validity) Suggests looking at process and outcome measures for a more complete picture of quality; consider staged implementation; use of composite measures, etc.

Future Enhancements & Activities Development of Pediatric QIs (PedQIs): Release will occur two phases First - Refinement of existing QIs to reflect more accurately uniqueness of measurements applied to the pediatric population Second - Development of new QIs

Future Enhancements & Activities Expanded contract support Literature review all QIs Standardization with other measures when possible Evaluation of risk-adjustment methodology Enhance documentation for differing audiences

Future Enhancements & Activities Scheduled indicator updates Updates for ICD-9 9 coding changes yearly PQIs: November IQIs: December PSIs: January Updates for indicator refinements based on literature review, updated evidence and user feedback yearly as needed PQIs: November IQIs: December PSIs: January

Future Enhancements & Activities Reporting Template Composites Development NQF Process

For More Information on AHRQ QIs Additional information and assistance E-mail: support@qualityindicators.ahrq.gov Website: http://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/ QI documentation and software is available Support Phone: (888) 512-6090 (voice mail) Marybeth Farquhar, RN, MSN mfarquha@ahrq.gov 301-427 427-1317