Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Garland County Tea Party

Similar documents
Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Jonesboro Exchange Club

Lorie Tudor, P.E. Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer. Alma Area Chamber of Commerce

Scott E. Bennett, P.E. Director. Arkansas Society of Professional Lobbyists

Scott E. Bennett, P.E. Director. Arkansas Asphalt Pavement Association

ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

District 8 New Funding Project Selection

South Fulton Comprehensive Transportation Plan of Fulton County Transportation Coordinating Committee August 08, 2014

Community Development Agency Capital Improvement Program TIM Fee Program Cash Proforma (by Revenue Grouping)

South Carolina s. Road Map to the Future

Public Meeting #5 Summary

Genoa Township Area Road and Bridge Projects

2016 Measure B Program Areas

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

Newton County. Impact Fee Annual Update FY2011

2013 Louisiana Transportation Conference

Build America Transportation Investment Center. Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation

Transportation. Fiscal Research Division. March 24, Justification Review

FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Route 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor. Submitted By:

Highway and Light Rail Public-Private Partnerships in the U.S.: Protecting the Public Interest

Road Funding in Indiana

STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017

Public-Private Partnerships for Transportation

NCAT + MnROAD Pavement Preservation Study Ohio Asphalt Paving Conference Columbus, Ohio February 3, 2016 Mary Robbins, PhD

NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER

Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Route 3 South Managed Lanes Project DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

FY16 Annual Report WHAT IS GTIB? WHO ADMINSTERS GTIB? Summary of GTIB Funding Through FY16

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Local Roads Local Money

Funding the Federal-Aid Highway Program

WORK SESSION ITEM City Council

Interstate Tolling for Wisconsin: Why and How

Managing Access along Pennsylvania s Highways in the Delaware Valley

In-Step, In Line, On Time. Robert F. Tally Jr. FHWA Indiana Division Administrator Monday, November 16, 2009

AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch

First in Safety and Service Our highest priority is to strive to be a high performance organization that is effective, efficient and accountable for

Draft for approval by TCC on 8/8; TAQC on 8/14 and ARC on 8/27/14

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2018 Budget. Joe Flynn, Secretary of Transportation House Appropriations Committee February 27, 2017

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Roads & Bridges. Project Title

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

Mark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH

Renewed Measure M2 Eligibility Requirements Workshop. Orange County Transportation Authority April 12, 2011

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

Nicole Galloway, CPA

PROJECT DELIVERY MODELS ARKANSAS PLANNING RETREAT ON P3S. J. Douglas Koelemay, Director October 7, 2015

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D08-01 Date Submitted 6/29/2015. Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A. County, Route, Section HAM-4/ /7.

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of August 2, 2017.

Commissioner Partridge turned the meeting over to Commissioner Mark Waller to make a few comments.

Update on Transportation Funding and Potential Sources for Additional Revenue. June 19, 2017

CFLHD Organizational and Program Overview FEDERAL LAND ACCESS PROGRAM (FLAP) 55 th ACE Annual Conference

Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock Replacement Project

Regional Tourist Association Board of Directors Manual

Federal Tolling & Pricing Programs: MAP-21 Changes

Presentation to Roseville City Council April 15, 2015

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion.

Transportation Planning & Investment in Urban North Carolina

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018.

Utah s Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Rick Torgerson

DIRECTOR S REPORT TRANSPORTATION BOARD SEPTEMBER 10, 2018

FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

TRANSPORTATION. Roles and Responsibilities

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Roads & Bridges. Project Title

Contact person: Ernestine Mbroh (405)

Douglas P. Stanley County Administrator

FHWA SAFETY UPDATE. Michael Griffith Director, Office of Safety Technologies

RCTC Toll Program and Projects

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN

STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?

2011 Urban Renewal Authority Annual Report

WISCONSIN DOT ALL ROADS NETWORK PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION

Massachusetts Transportation Infrastructure Funding Gap: Revenue Alternatives - The Challenge and Potential Solutions

Special Meeting Agenda

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM

RESOLUTION ADOPTINGPRINCIPLES AND APPROVING A LIST OF CANDIDATE PROJECTS AND FUNDING REQUESTS FOR REGIONAL MEASURE 3

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM

Smart Scale Update. May 21, 2018

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2012 Legislative Policies

MINUTES OF THE FOURTH MEETING SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL FREEWAY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

Client: Boulder County Transportation Project: SH 119 Bus Rapid Transit & Bikeway Facility Design

Take the Pulse Survey

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Safer, Smarter, Sustainable Pavements through Innovative Research. Jerry Geib March 28, 2018

The Bluffs concept is all about helping to change these perceptions.

Revised COORDINATION PLAN RIVER VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PROVIDERS

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

TRANSPORTATION AD HOC COMMITTEE

Click to edit Master title style

Transcription:

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department Garland County Tea Party October 16, 2013

About AHTD

The Facts: 12 th Largest System in USA 43 rd Highway Revenue Per Mile

How We Compare State Mileage Revenue Per Mile Arkansas 16,400 $58,536 Illinois 16,040 $252,000 California 15,205 $682,000 New York 14,969 $237,000 Tennessee 13,881 $108,000 Florida 12,084 $694,532

How We Compare State Mileage Revenue Per Mile Arkansas 16,400 $58,536 Illinois 16,040 $252,000 California 15,205 $682,000 New York 14,969 $237,000 Tennessee 13,881 $108,000 Florida 12,084 $694,532

How We Compare State Mileage Admin. Cost Per Mile Arkansas 16,400 $1,821 How We Compare Illinois 16,040 $8,830 California 15,205 $109,417 New York 14,969 $84,062 Tennessee 13,881 $11,905 Florida 12,084 $16,985

AHTD Administrative Costs $13,000 $11,000 $9,000 $7,000 National Average $5,000 $3,000 Arkansas Average $1,000 National Average $12,772/mile Surrounding States Average $5,342/mile Arkansas $1,821/mile Arkansas Rank = 49 th

AHTD Employment Levels Year Employees 2013 3,539 2003 3,772 1993 4,052 1983 3,725 1973 3,583 1969 3,701

Recent Voter Approved Programs November 2011 November 2012

Scheduled Under Construction Complete

Connects Arkansas Increases Capacity 10-Year Revenue Cap

Planned Construction

Highway 270 Widening Hwy 227 Ouachita River Scheduled: Mid 2016 $15 million Highway 70 Widening Hot Springs Hwy 128 Scheduled: Early 2018 $42 million Interstate 30 Widening Hwy 70 Sevier St. Scheduled: Mid 2015 $75 million CAP Projects Regional View 4+ Lane Highways (Existing, Under Construction, Scheduled, and Proposed) Planned

Highway 270 Widening Hwy 227 Ouachita River Scheduled: Mid 2016 $13 million Highway 70 Widening Hot Springs Hwy 128 Scheduled: Early 2018 $42 million Highway 70 Widening Hwy 128 I-30 Scheduled: Early 2016 $41 million Interstate 30 Widening Hwy 70 Sevier St. Scheduled: Mid 2015 $75 million CAP Projects Regional View 4+ Lane Highways (Existing, Under Construction, Scheduled, and Proposed) Planned

Turnback Funds for cities and counties.

Garland County Turnback Funds County Est. Standard CAP Annual CAP Cumulative Garland $2,306,436 $874,885 $8,748,848

Garland County Turnback Funds County Ten Year Cumulative Garland $31,813,208

Garland County Turnback Funds City Est. Standard CAP Annual CAP Cumulative Fountain Lake $23,605 $8,959 $89,595 Hot Springs $1,651,526 $626,861 $6,268,606 Lonsdale $4,411 $1,674 $16,743 Mtn. Pine $36,134 $13,715 $137,153 Total $1,715,676 $651,209 $6,512,097

Garland County Turnback Funds City Ten Year Cumulative Fountain Lake $325,645 Hot Springs $22,783,866 Lonsdale $60,853 Mtn. Pine $498,493

Garland County Construction Projects Miles Cost Completed 119 $104,532,319 Under Construction 12 $18,017,953 Planned 44 $286,355,724 Total 175 $408,905,996 20

Safety Improvement Cost: $3,490,333 Sub Comp: Aug 2013

Safety Improvement Left Turn Lanes at Balboa Entrance

Safety Improvement Realigning curves at Highway 128

Highway Study Hot Springs Village Benton

Highway Study

Highway Study Hot Springs Village Benton

Interchange Work Cost: $6,949,177 Complete

Interchange Work Cost: $6,949,177 Complete

New Passing Lanes Cost: $6.5 million Schedule: TBD Project Location Passing Lanes To Be Determined

Hot Springs Major Widening Est. Award: 2016 Cost: $10 Million

5 Lanes/curb/gutter Est. Award: 2015 Cost: $8 Million

5 Lanes/New Bridge Est. Award: 2016 Cost: $10 Million

5 Lanes/curb/gutter Est. Award: TBD Cost: $2 Million Lake Hamilton Hot Springs

5 Lanes Curb/Gutter & Bike Lanes Hwy 7 South to Hwy 7 North

View: Northbound Beginning of Project

Add Passing Lanes Cost: $9,731,551 Complete

New Passing Lanes East of Crystal Springs

Ftn Lake High Hot Springs Bypass Hwy 70 E to Hwy 7 N (ON HOLD) Quarry Mtn. Rd. Log House Rd. Environmental Assessment Approved February 2005 Mill Creek Rd. Project on hold due to lack of funding Lynette Ln. Next: Partnering Proposal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,... -A Tale of Two Cities Charles Dickens

The Facts: $23 billion dollars in needs over 10 years Only had $4 billion to address those needs

The Facts: CAP added $1.8 billion

The Facts: Totaling nearly $6 billion toward $23 billion in needs

Needs vs. Revenue = 200 miles = 450 miles

Needs vs. Revenue + Total = 650 miles 3.9%

State General Revenues vs. AHTD Net Highway Revenues

(Year of Expenditure Dollars in Billions) HIGHWAY TRUST FUND ESTIMATED FEDERAL HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT PROGRAM FUNDING LEVELS Estimated Federal Highway WITH and NO Transit NET NEW Obligations REVENUES from Highway Trust Fund 45 Highway Safety Federal-aid Aid Highway Transit Transit 40 35 $40.7 $41.2 $40.8 $38.9 $39.4 $40.0 $31.4 $32.4 $33.4 $34.3 $35.0 $35.7 $36.2 $36.6 30 25 20 15 10 $9.4 $11.9 $11.3 $11.6 $11.7 $11.8 $7.7 $7.8 $8.0 $8.1 $8.1 $8.2 $8.3 $8.4 5 0 $3.7 $1.3 $1.3 $1.3 $1.2 $1.2 $1.3 $0.2 $1.3 $1.3 $1.4 $1.4 $1.4 $1.4 $1.5 $1.5 $0.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

We re being asked to do more with less...

We can only do less with less.

Needs vs. Revenue An additional $200 million annually is needed over the next 10 years for highway congestion, pavement and bridge conditions, maintenance, administration and operations to remain at current levels.

National Survey: American Manufacturers 70 % American infrastructure is in fair or poor shape and needs a great deal or quite a bit of improvement

National Survey: American Manufacturers 70 % American roadways are getting worse

National Survey: American Manufacturers 65 % Do not believe that infrastructure is positioned to respond to the competitive demands of a growing economy over the next 10 to 15 years

National Survey: Americans Value Good Roads 78 % Driving a motor vehicle is Very or Extremely important to conducting daily lives

National Survey: Americans Value Good Roads 88 % Transportation infrastructure is important to maintaining a strong economy

National Survey: Americans Value Good Roads 83 % Transportation network is important to ensuring national defense and emergency response

Average Monthly Household Expenditures Electricity/Gas $159.34 Telephone $161.25 TV/Internet Roads $123.93 $46.33

Construction Zone Locations Live Traffic Conditions Weather Radar Live Traffic Cameras (Coming Soon)

ArkansasHighways.com Litter Hotline 866-811-1222 @AHTD