Knowledge Cluster Initiative

Similar documents
Current Situation of Academia-Industry Collaboration in Japan

Press Conference President of JST

University Entrepreneurship and Innovation Ecosystem at the University of Tokyo

Creating and Nurturing Startups That Can Contribute to the Development of New Key Industries

Role and Activities of NGO on Export Control. Hiroshi NAKAO Center For Information On Security Trade Control (CISTEC) JAPAN

Beyond Pasteur s Quadrant

Reform of Japan s Nuclear Safety Regulation

Second Term Medium-range Industrial Cluster Plan

Medical Innovation as a National Strategy

JETRO s Support for Business Expansion to Japan

Prize winner s voice

Call for Nominations

Keio University Annual Report on Research Activities. 2003o2004

Supporting links between universities and industry. Anne Kjersti Fahlvik Executive Director, Division for Innovation

Discussion points for the e-asia Joint Research FORUM (Toward "The East Asia Science and Innovation Area")

Strategic Fund for Establishing International Headquarters in Universities (SIH) FY2007 Open Symposium

Export Control in Japan and CISTEC

The New Carolina Initiative

Global Activities of JST Strategic Basic Research Programs (CREST, PRESTO)

Support for SMEs New Business Activities in Japan. Small and Medium Enterprise Agency Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry July 2013

INNOVATIONS IN UKRAINE opportunities for cooperation. Ivan Kulchytskyy

For Accelerating the Reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake. February 2014 NEMOTO Takumi, Minister for Reconstruction

Mid-term Targets of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) *(Provisional Translation)

IEEE Japan Strategy. - Enhancing Member Value and Membership Growth. Lawrence Wong. Tokyo 8-9 November2014

Toward UTokyo 3.0 : The University of Tokyo in the next 70 years

Guidelines for Conflict of Interest Issues Related to Clinical Studies in Artificial Organs. Attached Documents

Waseda University s Global Engagement Strategy

Research grant management schemes in the pharmaceutical industry

Valuating intellectual property in innovation support. OSEO s experience

PALM 5 LEADERS' DECLARATION ANNEX 2: ACTION PLAN

UPDATE ON INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN RUSSIA

Key Points 2002 Economic and Industrial Policy Forward-Looking Structural Reform toward Self-Sustained Growth (Provisional translation)

Chapter 2 Governance of the Education Sector and Disaster Risk Reduction

Introduction of Tokyo Institute of Technology. (Tokyo Tech) and Main Purpose of the Workshop including related activity at Tokyo Tech

The Role of National Association in Incubator Development - Thoughts from Japanese Experiences -

Intellectual Property Development in Nigeria: An Investor s Perspective building a knowledge-based economy in Nigeria.

INCENTIVES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS TO FOSTER PRIVATE SECTOR INNOVATION. Jerry Sheehan. Introduction

Detailed planning for secure health care delivery

New Growth Strategy (Basic Policies)

INNOVATION POLICY FOR INCLUSIVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE ARAB REGION

The Japan Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (J.CLAIR), Singapore

Innovation processes management and its efficiency for area development

Poland s s New Innovation Initiatives

Russia s National System of Innovation: strengths and weaknesses Studying the business sector of Russia s NSI

Innovation and Technology in Spain

JPO s Experience in Promoting Intellectual Property (IP) and Cooperative Activities with African Countries

Entrepreneurial & Capital Formation Initiative

Invitation to Apply for Partnering Forum 2007

THE BETTER ENTREPRENEURSHIP POLICY TOOL

The Advanced Technology Program

Development of Science Parks in Thailand

CENTER FOR ENERGY ECONOMICS AND PUBLIC POLICY MOVING TOWARD A LOW CARBON ECONOMY

History of Competition policy on Telecommunications & Recent revision of Telecommunication Business Law

Entrepreneurship Education Program at the University of Tokyo

Research Funding System in Latvia: Request for Specific Support

Bussines driven innovation

HEALTH TRANSFORMATION: An Action Plan for Ontario PART V OF THE ONTARIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE S HEALTH TRANSFORMATION INITIATIVE.

Section 3. Organization of the MOD/SDF

November Dimitri CORPAKIS Head of Unit Research and Innovation DG Research and Innovation European Commission

The Financial Position of Kyoto Prefecture. January, Kyoto Prefecture

Tokyo, 20 th September 2017, Tokyo International Forum Dr. Florian Welter, Project Management Jülich, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH.

THAILAND SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT & BEST PRACTICE

Health care innovations and medical technology: reaching the unreached

Japan s Initiatives on Globalization of Higher Education. Prof. Dr. Tsutomu KIMURA

Application for Japanese Fiscal Year 2013 Subsidy Program for Projects Promoting Asian Site Location in Japan

Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Rural Development: Some Key Themes

Macro Economy Research Conference CHINA S TRANSITION AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY Hotel Okura Tokyo, November 13, 2012 DRC

CLMV Project Supporting Equitable Economic Development in ASEAN

CLEANTECH MÉXICO 2015 ECOINNOVATION Y RECOMENDACIONES LA ECOINNOVACIÓN NACIONAL. Powered by

European Investment Fund in Support of Tech Transfer

2. Research Categories Depending on the content and the scale of the research, different research categories have been established. Research categorie

National Museum of Nature and Science

Public Disclosure Copy. Implementation Status & Results Report Second Private Sector Competitiveness and Economic Diversification Prj (P144933)

Action Plan for Startup India

Guidelines for the development of new services and applications in the era of the digital economy. Antonio Garcia Zaballos

Application Guidelines The 5 th DBJ Women Entrepreneurs New Business Plan Competition

CLUSTERS Typology and Training Needs. Intelspace Innovation Technologies SA

2018 Federal Pre-Budget Submission Toronto Financial Services Alliance

Chapter 4. Promotion of Comprehensive Measures to Reverse the Birth Rate Decline in a Society with a Decreasing Population

(SME s) Access to Finance, Going Forward Strategy

EU GREEN GATEWAY TO JAPAN

Integration of marine spatial data in Japan: "Japan's Marine Cadastre"

Global Financial City: Tokyo Vision

Implementing Economic Policy for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: The Mexican Case. Lorenza Martinez April, 2012

ROGRAM UIDELINES THE JAPAN FOUNDATION. Fiscal Year 2016 (April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017) Download the Application Form

Digital Economy.How Are Developing Countries Performing? The Case of Egypt

State Aid Rules. Webinar TAFTIE Academy 22th of October 2015 Maija Lönnqvist, Tekes

2018/SMEWG/DIA/009 INADEM s Programs to Support SMEs, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Cluster Policy Report

Invitation for Research Proposals

The Triple Helix Model Role of different entities

Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Thomas O Neal Associate Vice President Office of Research and Commercialization University of Central Florida

Massachusetts Regional Competitiveness Councils

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science BRIDGE Fellowship Program FY2018 Application Guidelines

ENHANCEMENT OF THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IN THE SOUTHERN MEDITERRANEAN

Regional innovation system in the South Moravian Region

"EU-New Zealand cooperation in research and innovation: recent achievements and new opportunities under Horizon 2020"

ONTARIO S FIRST CHIEF SCIENCE OFFICER

Measures of Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city on Promoting Industrial Development

III. The provider of support is the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (hereafter just TA CR ) seated in Prague 6, Evropska 2589/33b.

Transcription:

Knowledge Cluster Initiative -present state & issues- Yasushi Taguchi Director Office for the promotion of Regional R&D Activities Science and Technology Policy Bureau MEXT Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Framework of the S&T Policy in Japan 1995 The Science and Technology Basic Law was established Obligation for the government to establish the basic science and technology plan on every 5 years is stated 1996 The First Science and Technology Basic Plan was enacted Encouraging fundamental research activities additional 17 trillion ($ 154.5 billion) government investment was planed over 5 years (which means the amount of the budget became twice as much as what it used to be) Promoting cooperation within industry, academia and government 2001 The Second Science and Technology Basic Plan was enacted the Four Key Fields is established: Life Sciences, IT, Environment and Nanotech/Materials Government Investment for R&D activities more additional 24 trillion ($218.2 billion) government investment has been planed over 5 years (which means the 1 % of the GTP of Japan constantly invested each year) Reformation of the S&T system of Japan * Calculated as US$1=110yen 1

The Second Science and Technology Basic Plan (established by the Cabinet in March 2001) Regional S&T Promotion Policy of the Government of Japan Formation of the Knowledge Clusters Carrying out the regional S&T promotion policy smoothly 2

The S&T Budget National / Local governments $ billion FY *calculated as US$1=110yen 33

The Regional S&T Promotion Budget of MEXT $ million FY * initial budget ** calculated as US$1=110yen 4

clusters Knowledge Cluster Initiative To create an innovative and internationally competitive regional base which integrates research institutions, R&D industries or universities Annual budget about 500 million ($4.5million)/cluster -year project *1$=110yen Kansai Wide Area Cluster Kyushu Wide Area Cluster 5

Selection Process Selecting 30 candidate regions May 1 st Stage [potential for R&D] Existence of a core research organization and its activities 55 regions regions [potential of industry] main industry s sales > 300B Jyen or machinery s product > 100B Jyen 2 nd Stage 30 candidate regions Potential of Core research organization & technical seeds System for collaborations Persons of talent VC Incubation Traffic infrastructure 6

Selection Process 30 regions submitted proposals of their own cluster s plans. MEXT selected 12 regions to be subsidized in 2002. And 6 regions were selected in 2003 and 2004. Selection Criteria Basic factors focus on a specific field existence of a core research organization infrastructures Technical factors competence of R&D activities possibility of going into business System for projectspromotion assistance capabilities of a core organization structure of the Cluster Headquarters Program carried by regional initiative promoting S&T policy adjustment to their future visions Leadership of the local government 7

FY 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 12 clusters (Start in 2002) Evaluation 3 clusters (Start in 2003) Trial Evaluation 3 clusters (Start in 2004) Trial Evaluation Budget [yen] 6.6 billion 7.8 billion 9 billion 10 billion 8

Structure of the Knowledge Cluster Initiative MEXT Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology MEXT selects areas and assists core organizations Cluster Creation Plans of Local Governments Reforms of science and technology systems Technology innovation creation programs in which Universities take core part Cooperation Local governments make their own action plans Intensive promotion of various projects for creating Knowledge Clusters Cooperative systems by industry, academia and government in which universities etc. take core part Setting up the Knowledge Cluster Headquarters (Control Tower) Promotion of supporting systems by S&T coordinators etc. Area with a high concentration of knowledge and industry Setting up Knowledge Cluster Headquarters Cooperative systems in which universities or other public research institutions take core part. Universities, etc. Cooperation Core Organizations Foundations or other corporations designated by local governments Sponsor research Cooperation Cooperation Planning /Implementation *Various projects Firms and other related entities Cooperation TLO, JST ** Conducting industry-academia-government successive joint research in which universities or other public institutions take core part Staffing with specialist Science and Technology Coordinators Promotion of Patenting, incubating and developing of research results Forums or other type of meeting on research results will be held Knowledge Cluster Initiative will positively cooperate with other relevant projects like the Industrial Cluster Project of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). 9

Characteristics of the project Initiative of Local L Government The core organization financing universities for research Leadership of the cluster headquarter Competition with other regions 500 organizations, 1500 researchers promoting reformations of university's systems 10

Knowledge Cluster Initiative ( 2002-2004fy) Newa patents treatises awards to other funds product Sales Dms. abr. paper TV journal Dms. abr. app. acq. app. acq. (yen) Sapporo Sendai Nagano Hamamatsu Kyoto Keihan-na Ooala(Saito) Kobe Hiroshima Takamatsu Fukuoka Kita-Kyushu Toyama-Takaoka Nagoya Tokushima Kanazawa Gifu Ube Total

Intermediate Evaluation -Policy- PURPOSE : Effective implementation of the Knowledge Cluster Initiative in each region and formation of clusters TRAGET : 12 clusters which started in FY2002 POLICY : Evaluation from a long-term point of view in consideration of regional autonomy (as this is the support system in a developing phase for the formation of Knowledge Clusters in the future) Each cluster should be motivated to evaluate and reexamine its own project appropriately. Subsidy in FY2005 for each cluster increases or decreases according to the results of the evaluation under a sense of rivalry. MEXT evaluates the progress of past 2.5 years, self-evaluation, plans for next 2.5 years 12 16

Item Item Intermediate Evaluation Criteria

Intermediate Evaluation-scheme- Submit self-evaluation report (Nov. 2004) Evaluating Gr. Weighting Gr.

Intermediate Evaluation Results-Total Score- Announced on March 23, 2005 21 15

16 Autonomy Autonomy B Self Self-Evaluation Evaluation D Management Management C Cluster formation Cluster formation E R&D R&D A Average Score of the cluster Average Score of 12 clusters 22

Intermediate Evaluation Results-to be solved- Some clusters lack the course toward business in some research themes. integration of intellectual property strategy between Cluster headquarters and the universities. Some clusters need more market need analysis, numerical targets and involvement of private corporations. global activities toward the internationally competitive clusters. to foster or secure talented people in and out of the region. Some clusters in life sciences field are hampered by scope of claims and lead time for clinical trials regulated by pharmaceutical affairs law. Government has to address the system development to capitalize upon the outcome of university-level research. 17

Subsequent Development of of the the Knowledge Cluster Initiative Methodology of Ex-post evaluation Plan post- Knowledge Cluster Initiative key-wards -give priority -widen area -diversify -harmonize & connect various policies 18

Cooperation with the Industrial Cluster Project of METI CSTP : Council for Science and Technology Policy, Cabinet Office METI : Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry CSTP Regional S&T Cluster Ministries Concerned Committee at the national level Committees at the local level within 9 regions established in October 2004 MEXT Knowledge Cluster Initiative New technology seeds form industry-academiagovernment joint research Setting up committees for regional cluster promotion, holding joint conferences to announce project results Encouraging cooperation within local entities Cluster Forum 2005 at Tokyo Big Sight to be held possibly form November 30 to December 1. METI s budget to put new technology seeds from the Knowledge Cluster Initiative to practical use MEXT s budget for universities to carry out joint research with the corporations which take part in the Industrial Cluster Project METI The Industrial Cluster Project New business based on the industry-academiagovernment networks Continuous support from the creation of seeds to business 8 19

The Third Science and Technology Basic Plan!? (to (to be be enacted enacted in in 2006, 2006, now now under under discussion discussion at at CSTP) CSTP) Building of a regional innovation system toward the region of affluence and vitality Significance of regional S&T promotion Sophisticate and diversify national S&T Revitalize regional economy Secure safety and quality of life Promote dialogue between the scientific community and society Consistency with the strategic priority setting of national S&T Cooperation and complementary relations between the national and local governments 20

Please visit our website and get the cluster brochure http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/kagaku/chiiki/cluster/index.ht m Cluster Forum held at Tokyo Big Sight on September 29, 2004 21