Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Similar documents
Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Wildland Fire Assistance

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Streamlining U.S. Army Military Installation Map (MIM) Production

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

~ NATO STANDARDIZATION ~ 60 YEARS of NORMATIVE SUCCESS. NATO Standardization Agency

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

National Continuity Policy: A Brief Overview

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES


The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Intelligence, Information Operations, and Information Assurance

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

Drinking Water Operator Certification and Certificate to Operate Criteria/Requirements for US Navy Overseas Drinking Water Systems

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

at the Missile Defense Agency

Systems Engineering Capstone Marketplace Pilot

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

Applying the Goal-Question-Indicator- Metric (GQIM) Method to Perform Military Situational Analysis

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Report Documentation Page

A Military C2 Professional s Thoughts on Visualization

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Transcription:

12th ICCRTS Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM Brian Ulicny a, Christopher J. Matheus a, Gerald Powell b Robert Dionne a and Mieczyslaw M. Kokar a,c a VIStology, Inc., 5 Mountainview Drive, Framingham, MA, U.S.A. b U.S. Army RDECOM CERDEC I2WD, Fort Monmouth, NJ, U.S.A c Northeastern University, Boston, MA, U.S.A.

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE JUN 2007 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 19-06-2007 to 21-06-2007 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM (briefing charts) 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) US Army RDECOM CERDEC I2WD,Fort Monmouth,NJ,07703 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12th International Command and Control Research & Technology Symposium 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 16 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Talk Outline What is METT-TC? What is meant by representability? What is JC3IEDM? Representation of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM JC3IEDM deficiencies for METT-TC representation

What is METT-TC? Information that is gathered as part of the Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (IPB) process Acronym for several factors: Mission Enemy Troops Terrain and Weather Time available Civilian Considerations Defines the context in which intelligence analysis is carried out during a military operation

Representability in a KR If a statement can be translated into an equivalent KR statement it is representable. If only into unstructured text, weakly representable. E.g. English -> French If the KR has a formal semantics, it is formally representable. E.g. English -> FOL Permits automated inferencing. Ax & Bx => Ax

What is JC3IEDM? Joint Consultation, Command & Control Information Exchange Data Model (JC3IEDM) Generic Hub -> Land C2IEDM -> C2IEDM -> JC3IEDM Developed by the Multinational Interoperability Programme (MIP) NATO organization Goal: international interoperability of C2IS to support multinational (NATO) combined and joint operations Relational Data Model for Information Exchange 289 entities 396 relationships between entities 1729 entity attributes nearly 7000 value codes

JC3IEDM High-level Entities RULE-OF-ENGAGEMENT CANDIDATE-TARGET-LIST REPORTING-DATA CAPABILITY ACTION REFERENCE CONTEXT VERTICAL-DISTANCE OBJECT-TYPE OBJECT-ITEM LOCATION COORDINATE-SYSTEM AFFILIATION GROUP-CHARACTERISTIC ADDRESS

Objects in JC3IEDM

Actions

Representing Complex Actions

Mission/Time Available What How Who Ordered (Sequence of) ACTION-TASKs and subtasks RULE-OF-ENGAGEMENT (Unstructured text) ACTION-RESOURCE UNIT When (Time Available) Where Absolute or Relative Expected Start/End Time LOCATION Why ACTION-RESOURCE intent-text (unstructured text)

Enemy/Troops Organization, strength, location and tactical mobility Equipment UNIT, LOCATION, MOBILITY-CAPABILITY EQUIPMENT Capabilities CAPABILITY Doctrine Vulnerabilities Assumed ACTION-TASK (citing REFERENCE) Possible X ACTION-TASK On/At Y Probable COAs Likely ACTION-TASK

Terrain & Weather Observation X observes Y Fields of Fire Cover Concealment Obstacles Key/Decisive Terrain Avenues of Approach Weather Zone-of-Fire X is-protected-by Y Type of CONTROL-FEATURE FEATURES, FACILITIES ROUTE, with subtypes METEOROLOGIC-FEATURE, Fog, Haze, etc.

Civil Considerations Areas Structures Bounded LOCATIONS with AFFILIATIONs FACILITIES, at building level. Little capacity for detail. Organizations (non-military) GROUP-ORGANISATION People PERSON (GROUP has-as-member, is-under-command-of) Events (Limited) ACTION-EVENT e.g. no religious holidays

JC3IEDM: METT-TC Deficiencies Mission Intent and Rules of Engagement can only be represented as unstructured text. Concealment relations are not expressible at all. Civil events can only be represented as national holidays. The relationship of various groups of the population to one another is not easily represented. The needs and intentions of groups (and, by inference, the persons that belong to them), can only be represented as unstructured text.

Acknowledgements Work support in part by: U.S. Army SBIR Contract Number W15P7T-05-C-T204

Questions?