BC Certified Organic Program Consultation: Summary of Stakeholder Input

Similar documents
Buy BC Partnership Program FAQ ARE YOU BASED IN BRITISH COLUMBIA?

BC Cancer Foundation Cause Related Marketing Policy

Agriculture by Choice Program. GUIDELINES April 1, March 31, 2018

Alberta Approved Farmers Market Program Application Form

» HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS» YOUTH LEADERS» COLLEGE STUDENTS» PARENTS» TEACHERS

Scaling up Free Range Poultry Meat Processing

Health. Business Plan to Accountability Statement

Kentucky Department of Agriculture Organic Certification Application

APPLICATION FORM Agri-Food Growth Program

September 19, 2016 Meeting Notes

Request for Proposals: Organic Market Research Study

4 OUTBREAK OF AN ENTERIC ILLNESS

Report of the Auditor General to the Nova Scotia House of Assembly

Request for Proposals for Identifying Regional Opportunities for Local Production. Request Date: April 1, Deadline: May 15, 2018, 12:00pm EST

Specialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance 2012 Farm Bill Policy Recommendations

XL Foods Inc. Independent Review Recommendations and Government Action Plan

BC Fires Support to Small Business and First Nations Cultural Livelihoods Program Additional Financial Assistance Application Instructions

Grant Programs Overview

Somalia Growth, Enterprise, Employment & Livelihoods (GEEL) Project

Producer Application for Taylor County

Annual provider survey results 94%

Ministry of Health Patients as Partners Provincial Dialogue Report

2016 B.C. Public Library Board Governance and Planning Survey Results. A report of the British Columbia Library Trustees Association

Livestock Genetic Enhancement Program. Guidelines

Authors: Carlo Marra, Larry Lynd, Natalie Henrich, Pamela Joshi & Kelly Grindrod

Illinois Department of Agriculture Farmers Market Forums

AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES - FOOD SAFETY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Farm Energy and Agri-Processing Program Terms and Conditions

United States Department of Agriculture Office of Inspector General

Results of the Clatsop County Economic Development Survey

The Economic Case for Incubation

Oregon FFA Association 2018 Scholarship Instructions and Application

Although the AFID may be used to make loans, the preference is to use the AFID to make grants.

Phone#..._(._

Metro West Inter-Municipal Business Licence Pilot Program

Aboriginal Service Plan and Reporting Guidelines

Western Canada Cleantech findings. RemTech Workshop October 14, 2009

STATEMENT OF AGENCY ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION

Local Economy Directions Paper

This presentation should take between 30 and 40 minutes, depending on how much interaction there is between the audience and the presenter.

Farm to School Canada Grants 2018 Grant Application. January 2018

Rapid Intervention Service Kenora (RISK) Table Report May May 2017

H.O.P.E local 2220 UBCJA Healthcare office and Professional Employees Union

United Nations Development Programme. Terms of Reference

Agricultural Waste Control Regulation Intentions Paper Response Form

Youth Job Strategy. Questions & Answers

Integrated Offender Management Participant Exit Survey Report

Improving the recruitment and retention of Domiciliary Care workers in Wales

Review of the BC Care Aide & Community Health Worker Registry: An Action Plan

Salutation First Name Initial Last Name Job Title $100,000 - $249,999 $250,000 - $499,999 $25,000 - $49,999 $5M - $9.99M $10M - $49.9M $1M - $1.

Volunteers and Donors in Arts and Culture Organizations in Canada in 2013

Family Service Practice Audit

Terms and Conditions

Introducing the Canadian Agricultural Partnership

Rural Economies: Diversify or Die? Small steps towards Quality of Life in the East Neuk: The Steadings Project Balcaskie Pittenweem Fife

Escalation Policy and Procedure

GUIDANCE FOR PROVIDERS ON THE APPOINTMENT OF A REGISTERED MANAGER

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Moving from Recommendations to Action

Tackling antimicrobial resistance theme 4: Behaviour within and beyond the healthcare setting Call specification

WNC Agricultural Options 2016 Application for Individual Farm Businesses

NC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS)

If you are unable to apply online (preferred method), please fill out the enrolment form clearly. Salutation First Name Initial Last Name Job Title

Demographic Profile of the Officer, Enlisted, and Warrant Officer Populations of the National Guard September 2008 Snapshot

Perceptions of Adding Nurse Practitioners to Primary Care Teams

Partnering with Haiti to Rebuild the State

Five Star Wealth Manager Award

Understanding the scope and scale of food hubs and public markets

RE: Docket No. FDA 2015 N FDA Food Safety Modernization Act: Focus on Implementation Strategy for Prevention-Oriented Food Safety Standards

2015 Associations Matter Study Interim Results

NC AgVentures Grant Opportunity for Individual Farm Operations

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS UNDER THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT

FINANCIAL PLANNING STANDARDS COUNCIL 2017 ENFORCEMENT AND DISCIPLINARY REVIEW REPORT

Chapter F - Human Resources

APPLICATION. Beginning Farmer Institute. National Farmers Union. Application postmark deadline is April 30, 2011

Ministry of Health Patients as Partners Provincial Dialogue Event Summary Two Day Annual Event

Guidance for applying to Funds A and B

The Agency for Co-operative Housing 2015 Client Satisfaction Survey. Prepared by TNS Canada. December 21, 2015

2008 Development Marketplace Global Competition Sustainable Agriculture for Development

Keogh Mortality Review outcome - Colchester Hospital University Foundation Trust

The Penn State Center Pittsburgh & Our Land Grant Urban Journey. The Art of Bucking the System

Request for Proposals to Identifying Gaps in Local Food Product Supply for Ontario Agri-Product Processors. Request Date: April 1, 2018

Working in the NHS: the state of children s services. Report prepared by Charlie Jackson, Research Fellow (BACP)

Transgender/Trans* Health

Child Care Program (Licensed Daycare)

A Review of Fresh Produce Benefit-Cost Studies and Potential Ratios from Canadian Fresh Produce Checkoff

Personal Care Home Regulation

May 2018 PROMOTING HEALTHY EATING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN K 12: AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT.

Mississauga Halton Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) Francophone Community Consultation - May 9, 2009

Nursing and Personal Care: Funding Increase Survey

RECORD KEEPING AWARD INFORMATION. Record Keeping Awards. See Evaluator Guidelines Below

Manage the RFP Process

2007 Survey Report on Farmer Entrepreneurship

The Characteristics of an Effective Nuclear Regulator

THE COLLEGE OF LE COLLÈGE DES FAMILY PHYSICIANS MÉDECINS DE FAMILLE OF CANADA DU CANADA A VISION FOR CANADA

Community Seeds: Increasing Participation Yields in the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program

Overview of 2016 HIQA regulation of social care and healthcare services. April 2017

Infection Prevention and Control in Child Care Centres, 2016

Employers are essential partners in monitoring the practice

FSMA Update. Jennifer Thomas Interim Director for FSMA Operations Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration May 2018

Transcription:

Table of Contents Consultation process... 3 Consultation results... 4 Demographics:... 4 Question 1: Contact information.... 4 Question 2: Please indicate your age range.... 4 Question 3: Please tell us about your operation.... 4 Question 4: Please tell us about yourself (Certified, non certified)... 5 Main Survey... 6 Question 5: Intention of becoming certified organic... 6 Question 6: Positive or negative impacts on current certified organic operators... 7 Question 7: Transitional support strategies... 8 Question 8: Barriers affecting organic operator in becoming certified:... 9 Question 9: Complience & enforcement... 10 Question 10: Other Comments... 10 Next Steps... 11 Appendix A: Results Tables... 12 Question 3:... 12 Question 8:... 12 Page 2 of 14

CONSULTATION PROCESS The Ministry of Agriculture conducted a web based consultation with the organic sector about developing a three pillar approach to strengthen the awareness and reputation of British Columbia s (B.C.) organic foods, locally, across Canada, and internationally. The survey instructions were sent by email to 178 farmers, associations and businesses. Over the 64 day consultation period, which concluded on March 31, 2015, we received 195 completed surveys. To assist in informing the survey, Ministry of Agriculture developed a backgrounder document to describe the model under consideration. In summary, the proposed model consists of: Regulating the use of the term organic ; so consumers purchasing local products are confident the producers and processors are certified under either the provincial or federal certification program. If the producer or processor is not certified they would not be able to use the term organic to describe or market their products; Developing transitional strategies that support farmers to become certified through initiatives such as assistance with business strategies, market development programs and a suitable period of transition; Developing a compliance and enforcement system; and Exploring branding options to market B.C. organic foods. Requiring organic certification would assure consumers the products they purchase are grown using recognized organic practices, and promote the use of consistent standards of organic production in B.C. Currently, companies with organic products produced, handled, and sold exclusively within B.C., may voluntarily participate in the BC Certified Organic Program, which is administered by the Certified Organic Association of BC (COABC). The survey was composed of eleven questions to gain an understanding of the organic sector views on the proposed model, which include the identification of: Non certified organic producers that will become certified; Potential impacts to the sector; Preferred transitional support strategies; Barriers to certification; Administration, compliance and enforcement options; and, Other issues that may not be identified. The Ministry of Agriculture worked with industry stakeholders including the COABC and the BC Association of Farmer Markets (BCAFM) in developing distribution lists, to reach as many organic producers (certified and non certified) as possible. Industry was also consulted on the backgrounder and online survey questions. This document presents the results of the online survey. Page 3 of 14

CONSULTATION RESULTS In response to the consultation, the Ministry of Agriculture received two types of submissions. These submissions included 195 completed survey responses and 86 emails. Overall, the majority of the email responses expressed support for the proposed model. The survey results also indicated a majority support of the proposed model and want to see it implemented as soon as possible. The concerns raised by the minority of respondents related to limited return on investment and the cost to certification for small operators. DEMOGRAPHICS: Questions 1 3 are demographic questions, to provide some insight into the types of responses. Please see Appendix A for full details on demographic questions that are not restricted because of privacy. Question 1: Please provide us with your contact information: Name and Organization/Business. Response is restricted because of privacy Question 2: Please indicate your age range. Response is restricted because of privacy Question 3: Please tell us about your operation. Type of operation: The largest type representation: farms that grow mixed plants only (31%) Second: mixed farm that includes raising livestock (17%) Third: tie between dairy and tree fruit/berry producers (6%) Approximate annual farm gate sales: Less than $10,000 $10,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $499,999 $500,000 to $1,000,000 Greater than $1,000,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 *total responses = 157 Page 4 of 14

Duration of operating: 1 to 4 5 to 10 Number of Yrs 11 to 20 21 to 30 31 to 50 50 + *total responses = 185 Question 4: Please tell us about yourself: All certified organic respondents represent (55%) All non certified organic respondents represent (24%) Count % a) Certified organic producer in BC 91 47% b) Certified organic processor in BC 11 6% c) Certified organic retailer/wholesaler in BC 3 2% d) Non certified organic producer in BC 41 21% e) Non certified organic processor in BC 3 2% f) Non certified organic retailer/wholesaler in BC 2 1% g) Other, please explain: (see next table for breakdown) 44 23% *total responses = 195 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 The other option provided an open text comment for those respondents who do not fit the predefined categories: Count % g) Other: 44 Conventional producer, processor, retailer, wholesaler 14 32% Other agency (certifying body, consultant, verification officer and the like) 11 24% Transitioning to organic 8 17% Interested in becoming certified organic 3 7% Peer review "organic" producer (not following Canada Organic Standards) 5 11% Marketing term other than organic 4 9% *total responses = 44 Page 5 of 14

MAIN SURVEY Question 5: As a non certified organic operator in BC, please indicate whether you intend to become certified should the Province of BC choose to regulate the term Organic in British Columbia: Count % I am undecided 29 40% No, I do not intend to become certified 26 36% Yes, I intend to become certified under the regional program 14 19% Yes, I intend to become certified under the national program 3 4% *total responses = 72 Additional comments from respondents were collected and presented in the following table. The comments related to the reasons behind intentions to become certified or not. Count % Certification too costly 13 35% Do not plan on changing current farming practices 12 32% In transition or interested in certifying 7 19% General support for proposed model 5 14% *total responses = 37 Page 6 of 14

Question 6: As a certified organic operator in BC, please identify any positive or negative impacts to your operation that would result should the Province of BC choose to regulate the term Organic in British Columbia? The majority of responses (78%) indicate general support or positive impacts. The removal of operators who make false organic claims which levels the playing field, as well as benefitting from increased consumer confidence are the top positive impacts. A minority of respondents are concerned about the negative cost impact on small producers and the impact on relationships within the farming community. This highlights the need create educational programs, outreach, and public relations campaigns. Impacts on Organic Operators Do not want added bureaucracy 1% No Impact Too costly 9% 7% Do not support 5% General support 6% Increase consumer confidence 36% Level playing field 36% *total responses (positive & negative) = 116 Page 7 of 14

Question 7: As a non certified organic operator in BC considering certification, please indicate the level of importance of the following transitional support strategies should the Province of BC choose to regulate the term Organic in British Columbia? Preferred transition option of respondents who are undecided about becoming certified: Providing sufficient time to become certified prior to the requirement being put into effect. Preferred transition option of respondents who intend to become certified: Business strategy programs providing funds and business advice on a plan to become certified. *total responses = 36 Transition Support: Non Certified Organic Operators Business strategies Provide sufficient time to become certified Programs to expand domestically Education and outreach Very important Important Neutral Somewhat important Not important Undecided Programs to expand internationally 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Respondents were given the opportunity to provide comments on alternative transition options that are important for government to consider: Count Create simple application forms and process 4 Subsidize program and transition costs 3 Education programs to help producers talk to customers 2 Research funding to advance organic practice 1 Urban farm transition options 1 *total responses = 11 Page 8 of 14

Question 8: Barriers to certification for non certified organic operators have been identified. Please indicate the degree of severity the following barriers affect an organic operator in becoming certified: The most severe barrier to respondents who are undecided about becoming certified: Return on investment for size of operation tied with costs of certification. The most severe barrier to respondents who are intending to become certified: Amount of paperwork tied with costs of certification. The most severe barrier to respondents who do not intend to become certified: Return on investment for size of operation. Barriers to become Certified Organic Costs of certification Return on investment for size of operation Amount of paperwork Need for education/outreach on requirements of standard Large Moderate Small None Undecided Marketing, promotion and logo change costs Creating a business plan for transition 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 *total responses = 145 Respondents were given an opportunity to provide comments about other barriers to becoming a certified organic operator. Most of the comments (49%) reiterated cost of certification or need for education. Other comments were made about limited access to inputs and the input cost (14%). A few others identified the ability to meet the Canada Organic Standards because of their location or area of land (9%). Please see Appendix A for full details. Page 9 of 14

Question 9: Consideration will need to be given to the development of an effective and efficient administration and enforcement system. What do you see as necessary for the development and implementation of such a system? *total responses = 141 Respondents provided a broad range of comments which were organized into themes and are reported by number of individual comments rather than a percentage of the total respondents. The largest theme group (32 comments) indicated that an escalating enforcement model (17) that starts with education, outreach and public promotion of the certified organic program itself, is an important aspect of administration and enforcement. Key considerations for how the system works: Introduce fines as both a deterrent and a consequence of non compliance (11) A complaint based system with a hotline where anonymous complaints may be made (19) Some wanted to see people on the ground doing random compliance checks across the value chain to maintain integrity of the whole system (6) Some requested the system should be scalable to small farms or allow exemptions to small farms (9) Key considerations for who enforces Government involvement in inspection, enforcement and organic program was important (5) Industry led with an adequate number of knowledgeable inspectors and enforcement officers (4). Other key considerations include: Stable funding for the administration and enforcement program and for transitioning (14) Keep the system simple with clear rules that are easy to follow (13) Question 10: Are there other issues that have not been identified? *total responses = 95 This question provided a forum for respondents to raise other topics or issues they felt were important for the ministry to consider, but had not previously identified. Highlights include: Certified organic producers indicated support for a public outreach campaign to inform consumers of the meaning behind the term organic. Transitional support workshops and tools to educate specialized producers (aquaculture, horticulture, urban farms, etc) could be useful. Parts of the current system should be maintained, such as: current administrative model which includes the national standards, and focus on promoting the certified organic term. Page 10 of 14

These comments re state what has already been identified, but they help to illustrate the issues that are most important to respondents: Lower the barriers of costs and time to complete paperwork for certification for small farms or create exemptions. Certified organic producers highlighted the need for transitional support, which can help the sector stay unified. Certified organic producers indicated that more verification officers, or inspectors, would be beneficial to the sector. These inspectors should be knowledgeable and trained such that they are consistent in their requirements and expectations. NEXT STEPS The Ministry of Agriculture would like to thank all those who took the time to respond to the survey and send in e mails. Your feedback is important to us and is used to identify what issues are most important. After completing the analysis of this feedback, we look forward to providing information on progress in fall 2015. Page 11 of 14

APPENDIX A: RESULTS TABLES Question 3: Type of Operation Count Count Mixed Farm, plants only 61 Vineyards 4 Mixed Farm, incl. livestock 34 Distribution/Retail 3 Dairy 12 Grain 3 Tree Fruits/Berries 12 Beef 2 Mixed Livestock 11 Hazelnuts 2 Farm Other 10 Nursery/Horticulture 2 Processor/Manufacturing 10 Sheep 2 Regulatory/Certification 9 Hemp 1 No Farm/Other 5 Apiary 1 Poultry 5 Brewery/Hops 1 Aquaculture 4 Goats 1 *total responses = 195 Question 8: Table represents the comments from respondents on other barriers to becoming a certified organic operator. Count Cost to certify/added bureaucracy 11 Lack of education on how to certify 10 Limited access to inputs and input cost 6 Ability to meet Canada Organic Standards 4 Time to certify 3 Does not support other farm models 2 Not enough specialists to provide assistance 2 Standards not backed up by science or too low 2 Voluntary program not everyone following rules, no reason to certify 2 Non organic products just as healthy, no reason to certify 1 *total responses = 43 Page 12 of 14

Question 9: Table represents the comments from respondents on alternative enforcement options. Theme Count Education/outreach/training for all operators 22 Escalating enforcement / quick responses 17 Identify secure long term funding for system 14 Keep it simple 13 Certification issue (improvement to existing program) 12 Fines/consequences 11 COABC continues administration 10 Hotline 10 Public education (what to look for, how to get information) 10 Complaint based 9 Low cost to farmer/scalable to revenue 9 Exemption for small farms 6 Online system (applications, monitoring, research, status, complaints, list of offenders) 6 Third party inspection/audit/enforcement random 6 Use certifying bodies for enforcement 6 Use existing experts & industry to come up with details 6 Does not support taking away word "organic" 5 Government led enforcement 5 Government staff to provide outreach and specialized services 5 Retail enforcement 5 Conventional should disclose farming methods 4 Industry led C&E 4 Make sure there are enough enforcement officers 4 Time to become certified 4 Funding support for transition 3 Knowledgeable / well trained inspectors 3 Model after existing systems 3 Regional compliance and enforcement 3 Adopt federal program 2 Clear rules 2 Free certification 2 Accessible administration system 1 Build on existing system 1 Do not combine existing voluntary program and Federal program together 1 Don't need a mandatory system 1 Easy to access 1 Farm names on all product 1 Fines proportionate to income 1 Page 13 of 14

Theme Count Funding for certifying body enforcement 1 Funding to support existing farms mentor new ones 1 Government takes over administration and adopts federal system 1 Government to increase research opportunity / knowledge base on organic issues 1 Peer review 1 Provide incentives to require producers to display evidence of certification 1 Tax break to existing organic operators 1 Use BC checkmark logo 1 *total responses = 141, total counted themes 236 Page 14 of 14