California Economic Snapshot 3 rd Quarter 2014

Similar documents

TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

Index of religiosity, by state

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD

LOOKING FORWARD DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE, ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY, & THE FUTURE OF THE GOLDEN STATE

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

Transcript Convalidation Process

Interstate Pay Differential

STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX

5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017

HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations

Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016

2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15

MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008

SECTION 7. The Changing Health Care Marketplace

PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;

FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic

Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014

STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations

The Job Market Experiences of Gulf War II Era Veterans

Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI)

Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:

Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot)

Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016

Rutgers Revenue Sources

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Copyright, The Joint Commission

2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

VOLUME 35 ISSUE 6 MARCH 2017

The Regional Economic Outlook

Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017

States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Q Copyright, The Joint Commission

REGIONAL AND STATE EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT JUNE 2010

Annex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources

HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY

Larry DeBoer Purdue University September Real GDP Growth. Real Consumption Spending Growth

Is this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate?

FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY

Senior American Access to Care Grant

TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS

Weights and Measures Training Registration

Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]

Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis

Critical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION FACULTY SALARIES

THE METHODIST CHURCH (U.S.)

2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS

Fiscal Research Center

*ALWAYS KEEP A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE FOR YOUR RECORDS IN CASE OF AUDIT

EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project

Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions)

GROWING THE MIDDLE: SECURING THE FUTURE LOS ANGELES

Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC)

Survey of Nurse Employers in California

How North Carolina Compares

REGIONAL AND STATE EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT MAY 2013

Name: Date: Albany: Jefferson City: Annapolis: Juneau: Atlanta: Lansing: Augusta: Lincoln: Austin: Little Rock: Baton Rouge: Madison: Bismarck:

CRMRI White Paper #3 August 2017 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing?

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014

SEARCH IS ON FOR THE 2013 DELEGATES TO THE FILIPINO AMERICAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP PROGRAM (FYLPro) IN THE PHILIPINES

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016

November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q2 Update

How North Carolina Compares

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q4 Update

Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2018Q1 Update

FOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT

Fiscal Research Center

U.S. Army Civilian Personnel Evaluation Agency

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016

Economic Freedom of North America

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET

Ethnic Studies Asst 54, ,315-3, ,229 6,229. Gen Honors/UC Asso 64, ,402-4, ,430 24,430

Fiscal Research Center


FINANCING BRIEF. Implementation of Health Reform for Children s Mental Health HEALTH REFORM PROVISIONS EXPLORED

YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH IS WORSENING AND ACCESS TO CARE IS LIMITED THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE REFORM IS HELPING

F O R E S T R I V E R M A R I N E

Table of Contents Introduction... 2

STATE AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING S. 744 AS APPROVED BY THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE

Transcription:

Provided By: State Annual Nonfarm Job Growth, Sept-14 Upper Upper-Middle Lower-Middle Lower North Dakota 5.0% California 2.1% Hawaii 1.5% Idaho 0.8% Utah 3.7% Missouri Rhode Island 1.4% Nebraska 0.8% Texas 3.7% South Carolina Kentucky 1.4% New Mexico 0.8% Nevada 3.2% Georgia Maine 1.4% Michigan 0.8% Florida 2.8% Montana New York 1.3% Pennsylvania 0.7% Colorado 2.7% Wyoming 1.9% Connecticut 1.3% Kansas 0.7% Delaware 2.6% Massachusetts 1.9% Arkansas 1.3% Maryland 0.6% Oregon 2.5% West Virginia 1.9% New Hampshire 1.2% Ohio 0.6% Tennessee 2.2% Indiana 1.8% Iowa 1.1% South Dakota 0.5% North Carolina 2.2% Alabama 1.7% Illinois 1.0% Virginia 0.2% Oklahoma 2.1% Minnesota 1.6% District of Columbia 0.9% Vermont 0.2% Arizona 2.1% Louisiana 1.6% Mississippi 0.9% New Jersey 0.1% Washington 2.1% Wisconsin 1.5% Alaska -0.3% With a 2.1-percent increase in the number of jobs on Nonfarm payrolls in the past 12 months, California ranked 14 th and placed in the upper-middle tier of job growth among all states. North Dakota posted the strongest annual job growth at 5.0 percent, followed by Utah and Texas, both at 3.7 percent many of the job gains in these states are in the Goods Producing sectors. In terms of the annual absolute change in jobs, Texas, California, Florida, and New York led the way, supporting more than 39 percent of the national net-job gain. Nineteen states, including California, are now seeing employment levels above the prerecession peak, with Texas and New York showing the most robust expansions. 4.5% Comparison State Annual Nonfarm Job Growth 3.5% 2.5% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 3.3% 2.1% California United States Arizona Nevada Texas Oregon Washington California s annual job growth has exceeded the national average for several years, but the gap has been closing in recent months as the state has seen job growth slow and the nation has begun to see a slight uptick. With slowing job growth, California has dropped behind many of the states it competes with for business investment in the Western United States. Unlike California, both Texas and Nevada, two states also in an expansion cycle, posted stronger annual job growth than at the same point in the previous year. The California Economic Snapshot is produced quarterly by Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) through a research partnerships with the California Academy for Economic Development, a foundation managed by the California Association for Local Economic Development (CALED). EPS is a full-service urban economics consulting firm with expertise in economic development, real estate economics, public finance, and public-private partnerships. To learn more about EPS, visit www.epsys.com. For questions regarding the report findings, please contact Ryan Sharp, EPS Senior Vice President, at (916) 649-8010 or rsharp@epssac.com. For media and other inquiries, please contact Gurbax Sahota, CALED Executive Director, at (916) 448-8252 or gsahota@caled.org.

4.5% 3.5% 2.5% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% -0.5% -1.0% California Annual Industry Segment Job Growth 2.6% 2.3% 0.6% -0.3% Goods Producing (13%) Service Providing (72%) Government (15%) California s Service Providing sectors, which account for 72 percent of all jobs, are posting the strongest annual job growth, with Information, Professional & Business Services, and Educational & Health Services leading the way. Annual job growth in the state s Goods Producing sectors is showing an uptick in recent months as recovery in the Construction sector is becoming more widespread, with nearly every metropolitan area in the state now seeing gains in this sector. Annual job declines in federal and local government activities were greater than increases in state government activities, leading to overall negative growth in the Government sector. California and United States Annual Major Sector Job Growth, Sept-14 Total Nonfarm 2.1% Construction 3.9% 6.2% Mining & Logging 5.1% 6.0% Information 0.8% 4.9% Profess. & Business Serv. 3.8% 4.7% Educational & Health Serv. 1.9% Leisure & Hospitality 2.3% 2.6% Trade, Transp., & Utilities 1.5% 1.9% Other Services 0.6% 0.9% Manufacturing -0.3% 1.3% Government -0.3% 0.3% Financial Activities -0.4% 1.2% -1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% California United States California s annual job growth outpaced the nation in only four major sectors in September 2014, including Construction, Information, Professional & Business Services, and Educational & Health Services these sectors are showing healthy performance across most metropolitan areas in the state. As the nation posted annual job gains in every major sector, California shed jobs in Manufacturing, Government, and Financial Activities. Nationally, the most robust annual job growth occurred in Mining & Logging, Construction, and Professional & Business Services. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page 2

California Annual Job Gains and Losses, Sep-14 Total Nonfram 312,400 Profess. & Business Serv. 110,300 Educational & Health Serv. 68,400 Trade, Transp., & Utilities 40,900 Construction 40,400 Leisure & Hospitality 39,800 Information 22,300 Other Services 3,000 Mining & Logging 1,600 Financial Activities -3,400 Manufacturing -3,500 Government -7,400-50,000 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 Over the 12 months ending September 2014, California added more than 312,000 jobs to Nonfarm payrolls, which accounts for roughly 12 percent of all jobs added nationally. The greatest annual gains were seen in the state s Professional & Business Services sector, with notable gains in the employment services segment (temporary and job placement), as well as consulting, engineering, and accounting services. Job gains among the leading major sectors are creating demand primarily for office and retail space. State Annual Average Unemployment Rate, Sept-14 Upper Upper-Middle Lower-Middle Lower North Dakota 2.7% Idaho 5.1% West Virginia 6.2% New Jersey 7.0% South Dakota 3.6% Virginia 5.2% Florida 6.3% Oregon 7.0% Nebraska 3.6% Louisiana 5.3% Massachusetts 6.3% Tennessee 7.1% Utah 3.8% Texas 5.5% Missouri 6.4% Arizona 7.2% Vermont 3.9% Colorado 5.7% Alaska 6.6% Georgia 7.5% Wyoming 4.3% Wisconsin 5.9% Alabama 6.6% Kentucky 7.6% Iowa 4.4% Maine 5.9% New Mexico 6.7% District of Columbia 7.7% Hawaii 4.5% Maryland 6.0% North Carolina 6.7% Michigan 7.7% Minnesota 4.6% Indiana 6.1% New York 6.7% Mississippi 7.8% New Hampshire 4.6% Pennsylvania 6.1% Arkansas 6.8% Illinois 7.8% Kansas 4.9% South Carolina 6.1% Connecticut 6.9% California 7.8% Oklahoma 4.9% Ohio 6.2% Nevada 8.2% Montana 5.0% Delaware 6.2% Rhode Island 8.5% Washington 6.2% California posted an annual average unemployment rate of 7.8 percent in September 2014, placing it 49 th and among the lower tier of all states. Most of the states in the upper tier posted annual average unemployment rates below the full employment level of 5 percent, where wage and labor availability pressures begin to arise. Recent estimates of the real unemployment rate in California which account for workers that are discouraged, marginally attached, and employed part time for economic reasons still are a little more than double the generally reported rates. On an absolute basis, the annual average number of unemployed California residents was roughly 1.5 million, accounting for about 15 percent of unemployment nationally. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page 3

11.0% Comparison State Annual Average Unemployment Rate 10.0% 9.0% 9.3% The annual average unemployment rate in California fell by 1.5 percentage points in the past 12 months. 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 7.8% Despite the rapid decline, the state s annual average unemployment rate remained well above the national average, as well as most states it competes with for business investment in the Western United States. 5.0% California United States Arizona Nevada Texas Oregon Washington Structural elements of California s unemployment partly drive the mismatch between job creation and unemployment for example, about 36 percent of the state s unemployed have been out of work for more than 27 weeks, a notably higher proportion than the national average and other states. Metropolitan Area and Non-Metropolitan County Annual Nonfarm Job Growth, Sept-14 Upper Upper-Middle Lower-Middle Lower Plumas County 10.0% Calaveras County 2.2% Santa Barbara MSA 1.6% Lake County 1.0% Alpine County 9.1% Santa Rosa MSA 2.2% Napa MSA 1.4% Hanford MSA 0.8% Sierra County 7.8% Vallejo MSA 2.1% San Luis Obispo MSA 1.4% Merced MSA 0.7% Glenn County 7.5% Sacramento MSA 2.1% Salinas MSA 1.4% Amador County 0.6% Siskiyou County 6.3% Oxnard MSA Tuolumne County 1.4% Nevada County 0.3% Trinity County 5.9% Los Angeles MSA 1.8% Santa Cruz MSA 1.3% Yuba City MSA 0.3% San Jose MSA 3.5% Lassen County 1.8% Stockton MSA 1.3% Humboldt County 0.0% San Francisco MSA 2.9% Del Norte County 1.8% Mendocino County 1.1% Inyo County -0.1% San Diego MSA 2.5% Bakersfield MSA 1.7% Modesto MSA 1.1% Madera MSA -0.3% Fresno MSA 2.5% Mariposa County 1.7% El Centro MSA 1.0% Mono County -2.1% Chico MSA 2.4% Tehama County 1.7% Redding MSA 1.0% Colusa County -3.7% Riverside MSA 2.4% Visalia MSA 1.6% Modoc County -3.9% The strongest annual Nonfarm job growth in California was among a group of nonmetropolitan-area counties in the northern part of the state, with Plumas County topping list at 10 percent. The upper tier of annual job growth also includes the major coastal metropolitan areas of San Jose, San Francisco, and San Diego, which saw rates between 2.5 percent and 3.5 percent. Only four nonmetropolitan-area counties and one metropolitan area in the state shed jobs in the past 12 months, which reflects a notable improvement over the same point in the previous year. Almost 45 percent of the state s absolute annual net job gain was created by the Los Angeles and San Francisco metropolitan areas. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page 4

5.0% California Large MSA Annual Nonfarm Job Growth 3.3% Five of California s six largest metropolitan areas posted slower annual job growth in September 2014 compared to September 2013 only San Diego has seen a general upward pattern. 1.0% 2.1% Among the group of large metropolitan areas, San Jose posted the strongest annual job growth nearly every major sector added jobs in the past 12 months in this market. 0.0% California Sacramento Los Angeles Riverside San Diego San Francisco San Jose Annual job growth in the Los Angeles metropolitan area has been tracking below the statewide average for quite some time as it struggles through its recovery cycle. Metropolitan Area and Non-Metropolitan County Annual Average Unemployment Rate, Sept-14 Upper Upper-Middle Lower-Middle Lower Napa MSA 5.4% Sacramento MSA 7.5% Redding MSA 9.5% Glenn County 11.0% San Francisco MSA 5.6% Humboldt County 7.7% Lassen County 9.9% Alpine County 11.2% Santa Rosa MSA 5.7% Mono County 7.7% Tehama County 10.1% Stockton MSA 11.6% San Luis Obispo MSA 5.8% Los Angeles MSA 7.8% Lake County 10.3% Siskiyou County 11.7% San Jose MSA 5.9% Mariposa County 8.1% Del Norte County 10.3% Fresno MSA 11.7% Santa Barbara MSA 6.1% Santa Cruz MSA 8.5% Modoc County 10.4% Modesto MSA 11.8% San Diego MSA 6.5% Tuolumne County 8.5% Madera MSA 10.5% Hanford MSA 12.5% Nevada County 6.7% Amador County 8.6% Plumas County 10.7% Visalia MSA 13.2% Mendocino County 6.8% Chico MSA 8.8% Sierra County 10.7% Merced MSA 13.4% Oxnard MSA 6.9% Riverside MSA 8.9% Trinity County 10.7% Yuba City MSA 13.5% Vallejo-Fairfield MSA 7.3% Calaveras County 9.0% Bakersfield MSA 10.8% Colusa County 17.8% Inyo County 7.4% Salinas MSA 9.3% El Centro MSA 23.4% Annual unemployment rates in 21 of California s markets remained in double-digit territory, with the El Centro metropolitan area at more than 23 percent. The Napa metropolitan area posted the lowest annual average unemployment rate in September 2014 at 5.4 percent, followed closely by the San Francisco and Santa Rosa metropolitan areas. Only the six markets at the top of the upper tier posted annual average unemployment rates below the national average. About 47 percent of the state s unemployed residents were in the Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Diego metropolitan areas, with the Los Angeles metropolitan area containing an annual average count of almost 426,000 unemployed. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page 5

11.0% California Large MSA Annual Average Unemployment Rate 10.0% 9.0% 9.3% Five of California s six largest metropolitan areas saw annual average unemployment rates close to or below the statewide average. 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 7.8% The annual average unemployment rate in the major inland Riverside metropolitan area has been tracking more than 1 percentage point higher than the statewide average, as it has been one of the markets slower to recover from the recession. California Sacramento Los Angeles Riverside San Diego San Francisco San Jose The state s six largest metropolitan areas all experienced declines of more than 1 percentage point in the annual average unemployment rate over the past 12 months. State Leading Index, Sept-14 Upper Upper-Middle Lower-Middle Lower Michigan 4.91 Arizona 2.11 New Hampshire 1.39 Mississippi 0.78 Kentucky 4.21 Hawaii 2.09 South Dakota 1.35 Wyoming 0.67 Alabama 3.99 New York 2.05 Wisconsin 1.33 Iowa 0.60 Tennessee 3.38 Utah 2.02 Nebraska 1.27 Virginia 0.53 Georgia 3.27 California 1.93 Rhode Island 1.19 Maine 0.43 North Carolina 2.98 Florida 1.92 Missouri 1.17 Louisiana 0.36 Idaho 2.84 Delaware 1.84 Washington 1.17 South Carolina 0.13 Nevada 2.83 Texas 1.84 Pennsylvania 1.16 Massachusett 0.10 North Dakota 2.80 Montana 1.61 Ohio 1.11 Wyoming 0.00 Connecticut 2.61 New Mexico 1.58 Arkansas 0.97 West Virginia -0.01 Oregon 2.56 Illinois 1.49 Oklahoma 0.92 Maryland -0.08 Colorado 2.51 New Jersey 1.46 Indiana 0.79 Vermont -0.81 Minnesota 2.32 Kansas 1.43 Alaska -1.34 Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; EPS The State Leading Index indicator predicts the 6-month growth rate of the Coincident Index for each state, which combines several indicators that summarize current economic conditions. The State Leading Index for California suggests economic conditions will improve notably over the next 6 months. California ranks in the uppermiddle tier for the State Leading Index four states in the Western United States are among the upper tier: Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, and Colorado. There are a few broad economic trends to watch moving forward: The impact of rising productivity on job creation and unemployment. The potential for less robust economic performance with movement through the expansion cycle. Signs of longer term structural elements to the unemployment problem. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page 6