TRUST CORPORATE POLICY RESPONDING TO DEATHS

Similar documents
Learning from Deaths Policy A Framework for Identifying, Reporting, Investigating and Learning from Deaths in Care.

Learning from Deaths Policy LISTEN LEARN ACT TO IMPROVE

Learning from Deaths Framework Policy

Learning from the Deaths of Patients in our Care Policy

Mortality Policy - Learning from Deaths (CG627)

Learning from Patient Deaths: Update on Implementation and Reporting of Data: 5 th January 2018

Mortality Policy. Learning from Deaths

Learning from Deaths Policy

Learning from Deaths; Mortality Review Policy

SWH Mortality Review Policy

MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY

h. HULL AND EAST YORKSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY. Broad Recommendations / Summary

LEARNING FROM DEATHS (Mortality Policy)

Appendix 1 MORTALITY GOVERNANCE POLICY

Mortality Report Learning from Deaths. Quarter

Learning from Deaths Policy

Mortality Monitoring Policy

Authors: Head of Outcomes & Effectiveness, Quality Project Manager and Deputy MD, Sponsor: Medical Director

Learning From Deaths Policy

Surrey & Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust. Learning from Deaths (Mortality Review) Policy

RM57 HOSPITAL MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY

Learning from Deaths Policy. This policy applies Trust wide

Policy on Learning from Deaths

Active date: 25 th Sept Exclusions: None

Evidence Search Completed by..joanne Phizacklea.Date

Learning from Deaths Policy

LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY

Policy on Learning from Deaths

Unique Identifier: Review Date: November Issue Status: Approved Version No: 1.4 Issue Date: November 2017

CRM012 - Identifying, Reporting, Investigating And Learning From Deaths In Care

MORTALITY REVIEW & LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY

Learning from Deaths, Mortality Review Policy

LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY SEPTEMBER 2017

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Clinical Governance Policies and Procedures

POLICY FOR MORTALITY REVIEW

Document Title Investigating Deaths (Mortality Review) Policy

LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY

Learning from Deaths - Mortality Report

Learning from Deaths Policy

Policy Summary. Policy Title: Policy and Procedure for Clinical Coding

Mortality Report. 1. Introduction / Background

Percentage of provider spells with an invalid primary diagnosis code

Learning from Deaths Trust Board in public

Scottish Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR)

Quality Surveillance Team. Neonatal Critical Care (NCC) Quality Indicators

Bereavement Policy. 1 Purpose of Policy 2. 2 Background 2. 3 Staff Responsibilities 3. 4 Operational Issues and Local Policies/Protocols/Guidelines 4

Indicator 5c Mortality Survey

MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY REVIEW POLICY

The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust

CO119, Learning from Deaths policy

A summary of: Five years of cerebral palsy claims

Appendix 1. Policy on the Dissemination, Implementation and Monitoring of National Clinical Guidance

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated September 2007

Learning from Deaths Policy

Central Alerting System (CAS) Policy

Version: 3.0. Effective from: 29/08/2012

Mortality Review Policy Learning from Deaths

QUALITY COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference

Policy for the Reporting and Management of Incidents Including Serious Incidents. Version Number: 006

Learning from adverse events. Learning and improvement summary

April Clinical Governance Corporate Report Narrative

FT Keogh Plans. Medway NHS Foundation Trust

Serious Incident Management Policy

Procedure for inquest arrangements

SUBJECT: CLINICAL GOVERNANCE

Document Details Clinical Audit Policy

My Discharge a proactive case management for discharging patients with dementia

London CCG Neurology Profile

Appendix A: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Draft Action Plan in Response to CQC Recommendations

Trust Policy and Procedure Document Ref. No: PP (17) 283. Central Alerting System (CAS) Policy and Procedure. For use in: For use by: For use for:

NON-MEDICAL PRESCRIBING POLICY

Decision Discussion Information

Reference costs 2016/17: highlights, analysis and introduction to the data

Teesside University Pre-registration Nursing Programme Service Improvement Placement Information Booklet for Students (1209 onwards)

NHS WALES INFORMATICS SERVICE DATA QUALITY STATUS REPORT ADMITTED PATIENT CARE DATA SET

JOB DESCRIPTION. The hospital has been consistently growing over the past few years, almost doubling since 2008.

Executive Director of Nursing and Chief Operating Officer

This paper provides an update on the the recent national SPSP conference the programme of work for Tissue Viability Acute Adult Care SPSP

Reducing In-hospital Mortality

Scottish Government s Response to the Duty of Candour Monitoring and Reporting Group s Final Report

Trust Board Meeting: Wednesday 13 May 2015 TB

Pressure Ulcer Policy - Tissue Viability Top Ten

TRUST BOARD MEETING JUNE Data Quality Metrics

SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTING & MANAGEMENT POLICY

Evidence on the quality of medical note keeping: Guidance for use at appraisal and revalidation

Visit report on Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust

Morbidity and Mortality Meetings

NHS WALES INFORMATICS SERVICE DATA QUALITY STATUS REPORT ADMITTED PATIENT CARE DATA SET

Department. Clinical Coding. Comment / Changes / Approval Initial version published on Tarkanet.

Page 1 of 26. Clinical Governance report prepared for NHS Lanarkshire Board Report title Clinical Governance Corporate Report - November 2014

Date 4 th September 2015 Dr Ruth Charlton, Joint Medical Director / Jill Down, Associate Director of Quality Laura Rowe, Compliance Manager

Annual Complaints Report 2014/15

The non-executive director s guide to NHS data Part one: Hospital activity, data sets and performance

Primary Care Quality Assurance Framework (Medical Services)

NHS TAYSIDE MORTALITY REVIEW PROGRAMME

Briefing: supporting the implementation of ICD-10

Focus on hip fracture: Trends in emergency admissions for fractured neck of femur, 2001 to 2011

Procedure for Discharge from Inpatient Units including 48 hour Follow Up. (Wotton Lawn only)

Date ratified November Review Date November This Policy supersedes the following document which must now be destroyed:

Quality Improvement Scorecard February 2017

Transcription:

SCOPE OF APPLICATION AND EXEMPTIONS CONSULT ATION COR/POL/224/2017-001 TRUST CORPORATE POLICY RESPONDING TO DEATHS APPROVING COMMITTEE(S) EFFECTIVE FROM DISTRIBUTION RELATED DOCUMENTS STANDARDS OWNER AUTHOR/FURTHER INFORMATION SUPERCEDED DOCUMENTS REVIEW DUE KEYWORDS INTRANET LOCATION(S) Trust Policies Committee Date of Approval All Trust Date approved: 29/09/17 Sudden Unexpected Death in Infants and Children under 18 (SUDIC): (COR/POL/092/2013-001) Bereavement Care Before, During and After Death: (COR/POL/099/2013-001) Clinical Audit: (COR/POL/086/2013-001) Adverse Incident: (COR/POL/041/2017-001) Health Record Keeping Guidelines: (COR/POL/137/2014-001) RCP (LD and Mortality), CQC learning, TDA mortality surveillance Chief Medical Officer Clinical Effectiveness Unit Manager Previous or legacy mortality policies Three years after approval Death, Mortality, Review, http://bartshealthintranet/policies/policies.aspx Barts Health External Partner(s) Chief Medical Officer Chief Nurse Site Clinical Directors of Quality and Safety Site Directors of Nursing Included in policy: For the groups listed below, failure to follow the policy may result in investigation and management action which may include formal action in line with the Trust's disciplinary or capability procedures for Trust employees, and other action in relation to organisations contracted to the Trust, which may result in the termination of a contract, assignment, placement, secondment or honorary arrangement. All Trust staff, working in whatever capacity Other staff, students and contractors working within the Trust Staff employed or contracted within Trust Premises by Partner Organisations No staff groups working within the Trust are exempt from this policy. Page 1 of 10

TABLE OF CONTENTS Press F9 to update table of contents. Delete if policy less than 6 pages 1 INTRODUCTION AND AIMS 3 2 DEFINITIONS 3 3 CONDUCTING MORTALITY REVIEWS 5 4 SPECIALIST GROUPS 6 Deaths of Patients with Learning Disabilities 6 Deaths of Patients with Mental Health Needs 7 Maternal Deaths, Neonatal Deaths, Stillbirths and Late Foetal losses 7 Infant or Child Deaths 8 Deaths where a concern has been raised 8 Deaths relating to a trend or area of interest 8 5 SHARING LEARNING FROM MORTALITY 8 6 DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING 9 7 OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITIES 9 8 MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS POLICY 10 Appendix 1: All patient Mortality Review Template 10 Appendix 2: Comprehensive Mortality Review Template (Second Stage) 10 Appendix 3: Mortality Trend Review Template 10 Appendix 4: Local M&M Meetings Terms of Reference Template 10 Appendix 5: Mortality Review Group Terms of Reference 10 Page 2 of 10

RESPONDING TO DEATHS 1 INTRODUCTION AND AIMS 1.1 National concern around the quality and consistency of the mortality review process at NHS Trusts increased following the 2016 CQC report Learning, Candour and Accountability: How NHS Trusts review and investigate the deaths of patients in England. In response, the Department of Health and NHS England provided requirements for NHS Trusts to meet, which was then formalised in the National Quality Board National Guidance on Learning from Deaths report 2017. 1.2 This policy relates to the review of all patient deaths at Barts Health and all patient deaths within 30 days of an encounter with the Trust. The policy is mainly concerned with inpatient deaths but may also apply to eligible outpatient deaths in specialist areas, in which case details will be provided in the relevant section. 1.3 It describes the processes through which clinical teams are required to review and document action following a patient death, and the approach used by the Trust to investigate and learn from mortality trends and local mortality review and to disseminate this learning through the Trust. 1.4 The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all patient deaths are appropriately reviewed in a consistent and co-ordinated Trustwide approach, and, where needed, escalated or reported, that learning takes place following all deaths and is implemented and shared across the organisation to minimise the risk of avoidable death. 2 DEFINITIONS Avoidable/Preventable CHKS Crude Mortality Expected Deaths Dr Foster Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) These terms are used interchangeably in the NHS; this policy will use avoidable and unavoidable to describe whether a change in the management of care for the patient would have an effect on the outcome. An independent company that provides support to a number of hospital trusts to analyse and compare their data with that of their national peers. The total number of inpatient deaths as a percentage of the total number of spells. This metric is not risk adjusted but used in combination with other information to highlight potential areas for in-depth mortality review. This is the total number of deaths that a Trust could expect to observe in a year based on the case-mix of all the patients admitted to the Trust in the same year. Each episode of patient care is given a value for risk, calculated from information such as the gender, age and primary diagnosis of the episode. The sum of these values gives the total expected number of deaths. An independent company, linked to the Imperial College Dr Foster Unit, that provides analysis and comparison of mortality data to the CQC and some NHS Trusts. This is the methodology devised by the Dr Foster which provides an indicator of risk-adjusted mortality within an NHS Trust. The ratio is observed deaths (total number of in-patient deaths) to the number of expected deaths. The risk adjustment is calculated for the 56 Clinical Classification System groups. The metric is available two months in arrears. Page 3 of 10

Mortality Mortality and Morbidity (M&M) Meeting Mortality Review Group NHS Digital Risk Adjusted Mortality Indicator (RAMI) Serious Incident (SI) Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) Inpatient mortality relates to any in-hospital death and 30-day mortality refers to any death within 30 days following discharge from the Trust. This assumes that the patient has not been admitted to another NHS Trust within this period. This is a regular, local meeting which brings a range of clinical colleagues together to discuss the whole journey of care provided from admission to discharge, where discharge ended in death. One or more patients may be discussed at a meeting and meetings may be held as frequently as necessary to review all deaths. This is a monthly formal meeting, chaired by the Chief Medical Officer, which disseminates information around a standard agends of mortality topics: the crude and risk adjusted mortality at Barts Health by Trust, Site and Ward; deaths in Low Risk HRG Groups; positive or negatively outlying specialties or diagnosis groups; deaths in specialist areas of concern, such as Learning Disabilities; and deaths following serious incidents or claims and inquests. The NHS organisation that acts as an information and technology resource for the health and care system. They are responsible for compiling and monitoring national healthcare data and provide SHMI on a quarterly basis. This is the methodology devised by the CHKS which provides an indicator of risk-adjusted mortality within an NHS Trust. The ratio is observed deaths (total number of in-patient deaths) to the number of expected deaths. The risk adjustment is calculated for the Health Resource Grouper (HRG) code. The metric is available two months in arrears. For the purposes of this policy, a serious incident is defined as acts or omissions occurring as part of NHS-funded healthcare (including in the community) that results in unexpected or avoidable death of one or more people. This includes: - Suicide / self-inflicted death - Homicide by a person in receipt of mental healthcare within the recent past. Further information regarding serious incidents can be found in the Trust Adverse Incident policy as referenced above. This is the methodology devised by NHS Digital which provides an indicator of risk-adjusted mortality within an NHS Trust. The ratio is observed deaths (total number of in-patient deaths and out of hospital deaths occurring within 30 days of discharge) to the number of expected deaths. The risk adjustment is calculated for 140 specified SHMI diagnosis groups. The metric is available quarterly, 5/6 months in arrears. Page 4 of 10

3 CONDUCTING MORTALITY REVIEWS Figure 1. Mortality Review Flowchart 3.1 The Trust has produced an initial two page Mortality Review Template (Appendix 1), which should be completed for all inpatient deaths within one week of date of death for inpatients and within one month of death notification for out of hospital deaths within 30 days of discharge. 3.2 The Mortality Review Template must be completed by the specialty responsible for the patient s care either on the electronic patient record via the appropriate powerform or completed manually and the file attached to the record. 3.3 The template asks for the reviewer to grade the care of the patient against the NCEPOD classification scale, given in table 1 below. Page 5 of 10

Table 1. NCEPOD Grading of Care Code A B C D E Grading of Care Good practice: A standard that you would accept from yourself, your trainees and your institution. Room for improvement: Aspects of clinical care that could have been better. Room for improvement: Aspects of organisational care that could have been better. Room for improvement: Aspects of both clinical and organisational care that could have been better Less than satisfactory: Several aspects of clinical and/or organisational care that were well below that you would accept from yourself, your trainees and your institution. 3.4 Secondary stage review provides a more in-depth analysis of the care the patient received at Barts Health prior to death. This is conducted using the Trust Comprehensive Mortality Review template (appendix 2), except where otherwise detailed within sections 3 and 4 of this policy. 3.5 Second stage review must be completed within 2 months of either the patient s date of death, notification of death in the trust or from the date where the review was first requested. 3.6 Deaths where the initial review has graded the care as E must be raised as an incident on Datix and managed in accordance with the Barts Health Adverse Incident Policy. Where a death is managed as a Serious Incident and a Comprehensive Investigation Report is available, this can be used in place of the Comprehensive Mortality Review Template. 3.7 Deaths where the initial review has graded the care as D or where the death was a patient considered part of a specialist group (see Section 4) require additional review. A Comprehensive Mortality Review Template (appendix 2) must be completed for each of these patients, unless otherwise detailed in section 4 of this policy. 3.8 A random sample of patients which have been graded A, B or C and are not considered part of a specialist group will be periodically reviewed with the Comprehensive Mortality Review template to provide assurance and continually inform the internal mortality review process. 3.9 All second stage reviews should be discussed at local Mortality and Morbidity meetings; where the patient is being reviewed by the MDT as part of an adverse incident investigation, this may be considered sufficient. 3.10 All Comprehensive Mortality Review Templates must be attached to the patient s electronic record on Cerner or submitted to the Clinical Effectiveness Unit for attachment. 4 SPECIALIST GROUPS Deaths of Patients with Learning Disabilities 4.1 All deaths of patients with learning disabilities require second stage review as detailed in Section 3. Page 6 of 10

4.2 Deaths in this specialist group are monitored by the Lead Nurse for Learning Disabilities, who is responsible for completing and submitting a futher external review of the patient care in accordance with the National Learning Disabilities Mortality Review (LeDeR) Programme. 4.3 A copy of both first and second stage reviews must be available for the Lead Nurse for Learning Disabilities to use to support the LeDeR submission. 4.4 The complete LeDer submission will be presented and disseminated Trustwide via the Mortality Review Group. Figure 2. LeDeR Process at Barts Health NHS Trust Deaths of Patients with Mental Health Needs 4.5 All deaths of patients with mental health needs require second stage review as detailed in Section 3. 4.6 These will be presented and disseminated Trustwide via the Mortality Review Group. Maternal Deaths, Neonatal Deaths, Stillbirths and Late Foetal losses 4.7 All perinatal deaths require second stage review using the National Perinatal Mortality Review Tool. Page 7 of 10

4.8 Deaths in this specialist group are monitored by the Maternity and Neonatal units, which are responsible for completing and submitting a futher external review of the patient care in accordance with the MBRRACE-UK programme. 4.9 In addition, the sudden, unexpected death of a neonate must be managed in accordance with the Barts Health Sudden Unexpected Deaths in Infants and Children under 18 (SUDIC) policy. 4.10 All maternal deaths must be managed in accordance with the Barts Health Maternity policy around Maternal Death. 4.11 These will be presented and disseminated Trustwide via the Mortality Review Group. Infant or Child Deaths 4.12 All deaths of paediatric patients require second stage review. This will be managed via the Child Death Overview Panel (CDOP) process. 4.13 In addition, the sudden, unexpected death of an infant or child must be managed in accordance with the Barts Health Sudden Unexpected Deaths in Infants and Children under 18 (SUDIC) policy. Deaths where a concern has been raised 4.14 All deaths where bereaved families and carers, or staff, have raised a significant concern about the quality of care provision require a second stage review. 4.15 These will be presented and disseminated Trustwide via the Mortality Review Group. Deaths relating to a trend or area of interest 4.16 All deaths which form part of a patient cohort or diagnosis group where a positive or negative trend has been highlighted may require second stage review and the completion of a Mortality Trend Review form. 4.17 These will be requested by the Mortality Review Group on behalf of the Chief Medical Officer and the appropriate clinical team will be contacted directly and provided with guidance to complete any reviews. 4.18 Summary reports will be presented and shared at the Mortality Review Group. 5 SHARING LEARNING FROM MORTALITY 5.1 All actions arising from local mortality review and discussion must be recorded and reported to the Clinical Effectiveness Unit. Actions must include an owner, status and date of completion. 5.2 All actions must be recorded and monitored via the Trust Mortality Action Log on Datix 5.3 These will be disseminated via the Mortality Review Group and Site Quality and Safety Meetings. Page 8 of 10

6 DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING 6.1 The Trust must provide quarterly reports to the Department of Health regarding the percentage of deaths reviewed, the percentage of deaths considered to be avoidable and a list of actions that will be taken following local M&M review and discussion, the submission of which will be facilitated by the Clinical Effectiveness Unit. 6.2 A list of inpatient deaths will be obtained each month by the Clinical Effectiveness Unit, who will ensure that a review has been conducted for each patient and is available on the electronic patient record. The number of reviews which have highlighted a patient deaths as avoidable via this form will be calculated. 6.3 All actions arising a local M&M review and recorded on Datix will be collated and submitted each quarter. 7 OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITIES Multi-Disciplinary Team Clinical Effectiveness Unit Mortality Review Group Trust Board Conduct the initial review of all deaths of patients under their care and provide this review on the electronic patient record. Conduct secondary stage reviews where required internally or externally or where requested by the Mortality Review Group. Follow any supplementary requirements or additional Trust policy with regards to specialist deaths. Hold regular local morbidity and mortality meetings, which are supported by an up to date Terms of Reference. Submit all actions arising from mortality review centrally using Datix and ensure these actions are implemented. Monitor the completion of reviews for all deceased patients covered by this report. Ensure the quarterly submissions to the Department of Health are submitted. Receive and monthly reports around the reviews of deceased patients at Barts Health Investigate and discuss any concerning cases or trends arising from mortality review and share this information with the relevant specialities for further review. Disseminate mortality information to Site Clinical Management. Receive quarterly reports from the Mortality Review Group around responding to deaths at Barts Health. Page 9 of 10

8 MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS POLICY Issue being monitored Monitoring method Responsibility Frequency Reviewed by and actions arising followed up by END Appendix 1: All patient Mortality Review Template Appendix 2: Comprehensive Mortality Review Template (Second Stage) Appendix 3: Mortality Trend Review Template Appendix 4: Local M&M Meetings Terms of Reference Template Appendix 5: Mortality Review Group Terms of Reference Page 10 of 10