Arizona Department of Corrections

Similar documents
DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Sheriff Koutoujian, Middlesex County

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department

Kern County Sheriff s Office Detentions Bureau 2016 Pretrial Staffing Plan

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment: New York County Alternative to Incarceration Program. May 13, 2011 ACT Roundtable Meeting

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

TARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2013 to FISCAL YEAR 2022

The Florida Legislature

Case 4:05-cv JAD Document 88-2 Filed 11/13/2007 Page 1 of 12

Eau Claire County Mental Health Court. Presentation December 15, 2011

ALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS

HEALTH SERVICES POLICY & PROCEDURE MANUAL

Tarrant County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 to FISCAL YEAR 2021

DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION:

TJJD the Big Picture OBJECTIVES

Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

Defining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program

Miami-Dade County Mental Health Diversion Facility July 2016

VIVIAN ALVAREZ, Ph.D.

INMATE CLASSIFICATION

GOB Project 193 Mental Health Diversion Facility Service Capacity and Fiscal Impact Estimates June 9, 2016

Closing the Revolving Door: Community. National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 2, 2011

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

State of North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Prisons

An Overview of Mental Health Services in the Nevada Department of Corrections

North Carolina Department of Public Safety Division of Adult Corrections. Predoctoral Internship in Professional Psychology

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

Fresno County, Department of Behavioral Health Full Service Partnership Program Outcomes Reporting Period Fiscal Year (FY)

Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation

Alcohol Drug & Mental Health Services INPATIENT SERVICES

annual REPORT Introduction July 1st, 2011

Chapter 7 MANAGING PRISONS AND PRISONERS. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

Nevada Department of Public Safety Division of Parole and Probation PAROLE AND PROBATION RE-ENTRY PROGRAMS

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing

St. Louis County Public Safety Innovation Fund Report

TEXAS CIVIL COMMITMENT OFFICE HOUSE CORRECTIONS COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 23, 2017

Kern County Sheriff s Office Detentions Bureau 2016 Minimum Facility Staffing Plan

Marin County STAR Program: Keeping Severely Mentally Ill Adults Out of Jail and in Treatment

Justice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

Department of Corrections Presentation for House Appropriation Committee January 27, 2016

CALIFORNIA SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FACILITY. And STATE PRISON CORCORAN

State of North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Prisons

Addressing the Re-entry Needs of Inmates with Serious Mental Illness. Council for State Governments St. Petersburg, Florida July 8, 2008

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

TIER I. AB-451 (Arambula) Health facilities: emergency services and care

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Annual Report

ALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS. Annual Report Revised 05/07/09

Transition from Jail to Community (TJC) Fresno County Sheriff s Department Fresno County Probation Department

Arizona Mental Health Criminal Justice Coalition. Goal is to reduce court involvement when possible (criminal AND civil)

Behavioral Health Services. San Francisco Department of Public Health

AGENDA ITEM FOR ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING ( ) Discussion only ( X ) Action FROM (DEPT/ DIVISION): County Counsel

RE: Grand Jury Report: AB109/AB117 Realignment: Is Santa Clara County Ready for Prison Reform?

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PROGRAM MONTHLY STATUS REPORT

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Department of Public Safety Division of Juvenile Justice March 20, 2013

NO TALLAHASSEE, July 17, Mental Health/Substance Abuse

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES. HEALTH SERVICES BULLETIN NO Page 1 of 15

DISTRICT COURT. Judges (not County positions) Court Administration POS/FTE 3/3. Family Court POS/FTE 39/36.5 CASA POS/FTE 20/12.38

SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board of Pardons and Paroles Correctional Managed Health Care Committee

The Benefits of Business Behind Bars

Nevada County Mental Health Court. Policies and Procedures Table of Contents

ASSISTED OUTPATIENT TREATMENT (W&I CODE 5345) (AB 1421) LAURA S LAW JUNE 13, The Nevada County Experience

Correctional Health Services (6300B)

Health Services Internship Opportunities

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Second Chance Act Grants: State, Local, and Tribal Reentry Courts

State of North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Prisons

Jail Standards. What are the minimum requirements?

VA Programs for Justice- Involved Veterans. William F. Russo VA Office of General Counsel

NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN (August 2005)

Office of Criminal Justice Services

OFFENDER REENTRY PROGRAM

FORECASTING FUTURE DESIGNS

*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

Merced County. Public Safety Realignment & Post Release Community Supervision

Grants. The county budget system contains three grant funds that are effective over three different grant periods:

Assisted Outpatient Treatment

empowering people to build better lives their efforts to meet economic, social and emotional challenges and enhance their well-being

Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facility (PRTF) Prior Authorization Request

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia

Intensive In-Home Services Training

SHASTA COUNTY MAIN JAIL Catch & Release. Section 919 of the California Penal Code requires the Grand Jury to inquire into the

Border Region Mental Health & Mental Retardation Community Center Adult Jail Diversion Action Plan FY

WHY IS THE LAW IMPORTANT? 1. Involuntary confinement for mental health purposes = deprivation of liberty. 2. Triggers due process rights

Effective Date: 4/7/2017. Replaces: 3/7/2017. Formulated: 3/85 Reviewed: 07/17

2016 Bidders Conference for Requests for Proposals (RFPs)

Transcription:

Arizona Department of Corrections March 5, 2016 Nicole Taylor, J.D., Ph.D.

Arizona Department of Corrections VISION Safer communities through effective corrections. MISSION To serve and protect the people of Arizona by securely incarcerating convicted felons, by providing structured programming designed to support inmate accountability and successful community reintegration, and by providing effective supervision for those offenders conditionally released from prison. CORE VALUES: PRICE Professionalism Responsibility Integrity Courage Efficiency 2

3

Overview Arizona Department of Corrections has 42,585 inmates statewide Approximately 10,800 inmates are considered mental health inmates (~25.3%) There are 10 State Complexes and 6 Private Complexes Incarcerated in State-Operated Beds: 36,160 (84.9%) Incarcerated in Privately-Operated Beds: 6,425 (15.1%) Community Supervision Offenders 5,474 4

Overview In a national comparison, Arizona had the 3 rd lowest per capita cost of the 13 Western States, and the 16 th lowest when compared to all 50 states. 5

Overview Inmates 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 1,915 Old Criminal Code - prior 2,472 2,667 3,054 3,211 3,377 3,651 4,442 5,549 6,438 7,426 8,248 Arizona Department of Corrections Annual Inmate Growth FY 1974 thru FY 2017 New Criminal Code - 9,283 10,634 12,223 13,044 14,071 14,941 16,181 17,098 18,922 21,133 22,323 23,280 25,081 26,169 26,402 27,263 29,273 30,741 31,631 32,664 34,797 37,088 38,897 40,412 40,477 Truth in Sentencing - January 1, 1994 to 40,181 39,877 40,686 41,773 Projected Inmate Growth Trend 75 per month / 900 per annum 42,611 43,093 43,993 - FY 1974 FY 1975 FY 1976 FY 1977 FY 1978 FY 1979 FY 1980 FY 1981 FY 1982 FY 1983 FY 1984 FY 1985 FY 1986 FY 1987 FY 1988 FY 1989 FY 1990 FY 1991 FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 (Fiscal Year -- July thru June) 6

Overview Inmates 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 1,468 Net 30,741 890 Net 1,033 Net 31,631 32,664 Arizona Department of Corrections Annual Inmate Growth FY 2003 thru FY 2017 2,133 Net 34,797 2,291 Net 37,088 1,809 Net 38,897 1,515 Net 65 Net (296) Net (304) Net 40,412 40,477 40,181 39,877 809 Net 1,087 Net 838 Net 482 Net Growt h 40,686 41,773 42,611 43,093 900 Net 43,993 Projected Inmate Growth Trend 20,000 15,000 10,000 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 (Fiscal Year -- July thru June) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 7

Overview Inmate Self-Harm Attempts by Year and Type FY CUTTING OVERDOSE BLUNT FORCE HANGING FIRES TOTALS 2012 209 164 69 48 12 502 2013 136 194 95 24 3 452 2014 134 121 70 48 6 379 2015 197 146 93 50 13 499 2016* 98 64 43 33 9 247 TOTALS: 774 689 370 203 43 2,079 *FY 2016 as of 1/31/2016 Inmate Deaths by Year and Cause 8

Overview Reception A mental health assessment is conducted on each new inmate by a mental health professional Review Continuity of Care/Transfer summary and medication reports from county jails DBHS automatically updates our system if the new inmate is SMI in the community Mental health needs scores are determined and recorded this provides information about where they can be housed All inmates identified with symptoms of mental illness are eligible for services Inmates not identified as a mental health inmate may obtain services through submission of a Health Needs Request (HNR) or by a referral 9

Overview Classification and subsequent placement: Inmates are placed based on their public and institutional risk Minimum, Medium, Close, and Maximum Inmates are placed based on their crime / status Sex Offender, Protective Custody, STG, Death Row, new Life sentence Inmates are placed based on their medical and/or mental health needs Corridor vs. Non-corridor 10

Mental Health Programming Outpatient Currently 10,292 are receiving outpatient treatment Residential Currently 404 are receiving residential treatment Inpatient Currently 67 are receiving inpatient treatment 11

Mental Health Programming - Outpatient Inmates are routinely seen based on their acuity A = a minimum of every 30 days by a clinician and 90 days by a provider if on medications B = a minimum of every 90 days by a clinician and every 90-180 days by a provider C = a minimum of every 180 days by a provider D = a minimum of every 90 days by a clinician for at least 6 months until removed from the MH caseload Services include: Psychotherapy Psycho-educational programming Psychopharmacology 12

Mental Health Programming - Residential Inmates are routinely seen both individually and in a group setting A minimum of one individual session every 30 days by a licensed mental health clinician A minimum of weekly psychotherapy / psycho-education A minimum of every 90 days by a psychiatric provider if they are on medication Residential Program are at the Medium, Close, and Maximum custody levels 13

Mental Health Programming Residential (cont.) Medium Custody Men s Treatment Unit / Aspen capacity is 150 Women s Treatment Unit capacity is 24 They participate in a large variety of mental health programming including individual and group therapy 14

Mental Health Programming Residential (cont.) Close Custody BEHAVIORAL HEALTH UNIT (BHU) Tucson Complex Bed capacity is 81, but due to the acuity level of the inmates it is often not filled to capacity Population: Male, general population, typically severely mentally ill inmates Inmates are encouraged to participate in education as their classification allows 15

Mental Health Programming Residential (cont.) Close Custody CB1 Behavioral Health Program Florence Complex 120 bed capacity; single occupancy cells; open bar setting Screened by both mental health and operations staff prior to placement in to this program 3 Steps that include incentives for pro-social behaviors Many jobs are provided for the inmates in Step 2 and Step 3 Group recreation, group therapy, group dining, and contact visits Encouraged to participate in educational programming 16

17

Mental Health Programming Residential (cont.) Maximum Custody The Kasson Mental Health Program Florence Complex 64 Bed occupancy; single cell; solid cell front with large windows top and bottom Inmates who have limited coping skills and are more acutely symptomatic Inmates progress through the steps based on their appropriate behavior and participation in programs Progression is discussed during weekly treatment team meetings and agreed upon by the panel 18

Kasson Wing 1 Kasson Wing 1 Able Pod 19

Mental Health Programming Residential (cont.) Maximum Custody Behavioral Management Unit (BMU) Eyman Complex 30 Bed capacity; single cell; expanded metal cell fronts Inmates with severe Personality Disorders (significant self harming events for attention rather than due to suicidal thoughts) Mental Health conduct monthly individual and weekly group counseling sessions 3 Step program developed to encourage positive coping skills and increased positive socialization 20

21

Mental Health Programming Residential (cont.) Maximum Custody Special Management Area Perryville Complex 48 Bed capacity; single cell; solid cell front with large windows top and Provided 1:1 therapy and group therapy Eligible Inmates are afforded job opportunities Inmates in Step 2 and 3 are allowed group recreation and group therapy 22

23

Mental Health Programming - Inpatient ASPC PHOENIX Baker Ward Licensed Inpatient Hospital - capacity is 48, but actual bed fill rate is typically much lower due to the acuity of their symptoms Population Type: Male, Any custody level and any classification Housing for Court Order Evaluation Reviews for other complexes 24

Mental Health Programming John Ward Capacity is 32 Inpatient (cont.) ASPC PHOENIX Flamenco Population Type: Male, Protective Custody, No Max King Ward Capacity is 35 Population Type: Male, General Population, No Protective Custody, Max/Close Custody Ida Ward Capacity is 40 Population Type: Male, General Population (lower functioning ability), Max/Close Custody George Ward Capacity is 22 Population Type: Female, General Population & Sex Offenders, and Protective Custody upon Central Office Review, Max/Close Custody 25

Health Services Privatization April 27, 2011: HB 2154 required a new Correctional Health Services Request for Information (RFI) and RFP; removed the original requirement requiring ADC to award a Contract at a cost below the ADC FY 2007-2008 total cost. July 1, 2012: The new contract with Wexford was operational and all services officially transitioned. ADC began monitoring activities. November 09, 2012: Wexford requested termination of contract. March 4, 2013: Corizon began providing inmate health care services. 26

Defining Moment: 2012-2015 In the Parsons v. Ryan litigation, ADC contested challenges to the quality of inmate health services, including medical, mental health, and dental care, being provided by ADC s private vendor, Corizon Healthcare, and to conditions of confinement. The two-year class action litigation process concluded in February 2015, when ADC entered into a Stipulation Agreement with the plaintiffs. The terms of the Stipulation Agreement will be monitored for substantial compliance over a four-year period with a combination of site visits by the plaintiffs counsel and ongoing monitoring by ADC of Corizon s performance on 112 measures. 27

Maximum Custody vs Solitary Confinement Definition from Dictionary.com: the confinement of a prisoner in a cell or other place in which he or she is completely isolated from others. 28

Maximum Custody vs Solitary Confinement Maximum Custody (Restrictive Housing) many of our inmates are double bunked, and often engage in cooperative games or exercise routines. 29

Maximum Custody Tiered Incentive Programming Recreation: Step 1-6 hours of rec in standard enclosure Step 2-7.5 hours of rec with one in 10x10 enclosure per month Step 3 (unrestrained) - 10 hours of rec and all can be in 10x10 enclosure or rec field 30

Maximum Custody Tiered Incentive Programming (cont.) 31

Maximum Custody Tiered Incentive Programming (cont.) Group Programming: Step 1 - Mental Health and other programs in individual enclosures (we recently have begun removing these and using tables / chairs for everyone) Step 2 Mental Health and other programs often in the maximum custody chairs Step 3 (unrestrained) Mental Health and other programs often around a large table Group education and college courses 32

Maximum Custody Tiered Incentive Programming (cont.) 33

Maximum Custody Tiered Incentive Programming (cont.) Employment: Step 1 - No jobs available to inmates at this level Step 2 Allowed to work as a porter or other position with an office present (or another inmate after some time at step 2) Step 3 (unrestrained) Allowed to work in a large group such as the kitchen or yard crew 34

Maximum Custody Tiered Incentive Programming (cont.) No Employment Available 35

Re-Entry RBHA Regional Behavioral Health Authorities Inmates are provided information about services available to them in the community For SMI inmates, prior to release, the RBHA for the county the inmate is releasing to is contacted for a referral to their system. They are set up with their first appointment, or if they are releasing to Central or Southern Arizona, then the RBHA comes into our system and evaluates the inmate for necessary services upon release. Involuntary Treatment If an inmate is in imminent danger to himself or others, or is gravely disabled, then ADC will refer these inmates to Desert Vista for a Court Ordered Evaluation (COE) 36

Re-Entry Continued A Community Corrections Center (CCC) offers structure, supervision, surveillance, substance abuse treatment and cognitive restructuring opportunities to offenders who are in technical violation of their conditions of supervised release and/or who are in need of additional structured support in order to successfully complete community supervision. Provides a continuum of services to facilitate an offender s successful reintegration into society. Builds upon the programs offenders completed while incarcerated. Holds offenders immediately accountable for their negative actions rather than returning them to custody. Allows offenders to build on their successes and strengths rather than repeating the cycle of release and return to custody. 37

Re-Entry Continued From 12/03/2012 through 12/31/2015: 1,195 offenders have been placed in residential program for sanctions. 246 for drug treatment in ITH. 923 homeless offenders were provided with emergency housing; 256 were homeless sex offenders. 1,156 classes and 2,370 groups were held, 1,363 individuals utilized the Day Reporting Programs. 38

Re-Entry Continued All inmates are provided 30 days of their medical and mental health medications on the day of release If they are going out homeless, then they can only release to Phoenix or Tucson ICE Immigration and Customs Enforcement All illegal immigrants are sent to a federal prison prior to their deportations. Information is provided to ICE pertaining to the inmate s current medical treatment and any special accommodations required 39

Recidivism Results Releases/Returns CY 2012 CY 2013 CY 2014 Releases 14,044 14,387 15,068 Inmates returned for a technical violation Inmates returned for a new felony conviction 2,694 (19.2%)1 2,893 (20.6%)1 2,948 (20.5%)2 1,798 (12.5%)2 3,075 (20.4%)3 681 (4.5%)3 Inmates returned 5,587 (39.8%)1 4,746 (33.0%)2 3,756 (24.9%)3 1 - Within 3 years of release 2 - Within 2 years of release 3 - Within 1 year of release 40

41