US Army TARDEC Ground Vehicle Mobility: Dynamics Modeling, Simulation, & Research

Similar documents
DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Impact of Corrosion on Ground Vehicles: Program Review, Issues and Solutions

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Wildland Fire Assistance

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

Expeditionary Basecamp Passive

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

User Manual and Source Code for a LAMMPS Implementation of Constant Energy Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD-E)

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

Improving Safety of Demil Operations Through Automation. Mark M. Zaugg July 14, 2010

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

NORAD CONUS Fighter Basing

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014


Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

USCG Aviation Corrosion Program ASETSDefense

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

~ NATO STANDARDIZATION ~ 60 YEARS of NORMATIVE SUCCESS. NATO Standardization Agency

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

Report Documentation Page

MK 83 WARHEAD EFFECTIVENESS TESTS

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

Transcription:

US Army TARDEC Ground Vehicle Mobility: Dynamics Modeling, Simulation, & Research P. Jayakumar @ JPL 24 Oct 2011 : Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 03 NOV 2011 2. REPORT TYPE Briefing Charts 3. DATES COVERED 03-11-2011 to 03-11-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE US ARMY TARDEC GROUND VEHICLE MOBILITY: DYNAMICS MODELING, SIMULATION, AND RESEARCH 6. AUTHOR(S) Paramsothy Jayakumar 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army TARDEC,6501 E.11 Mile Rd,Warren,MI,48397-5000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army TARDEC, 6501 E.11 Mile Rd, Warren, MI, 48397-5000 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER #22390 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) TARDEC 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) #22390 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, mobility, and robotics section. Briefing to the jet propulsion lab. 14. ABSTRACT N/A 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 21 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

TARDEC Modeling, Simulation, & Analysis System Level Analysis Mobility / Automotive Performance Analysis Blast / Crash / Ballistic Analysis MRAP Example l Thermal / Signature / Aerodynamic Analysis D Durability / Reliability Analysis i~.._fl - - r I ~!I (.' I...=....=. - - High Performance.ormance Computing t ::J Infrastructure TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

What We Do Life Cycle Modeling & Simulation Support Acquisition Support Construct Virtual Technology Demonstrators Develop automotive performance requirements Write M&S content of the Request For Proposal Participate in the Source Selection Evaluation Board Field System Support Configuration changes Waiver requests Safe Use Range of Operation Field failures Research Internal and External

Platforms Supported ASV MRAP FMTV FTTS GCV JLTV HMMWV M2 M915 Small Robot APD

Mobility Events Vehicle stability Ride quality Durability Steerability Obstacle maneuverability Design sensitivities Multi-Body Vehicle Dynamics

Side Slope Stability l w~ J TiltT able-standard.wmv TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

NATO Double Lane Change Stability tan16700:1-frontview.wmv A 4 A5 A6 y l.:2:... WUI ilo +- 0.::2:5 M A l A 3 ~ 1.1 x W i i!lt JL + U.25 M R4.., f I'J.A8 A9 "".:t.!l M f k_ J. L l '-YillU.. -+ O..:!e M B l B 2 B.3 B7 ~ B!> <l J.!JM -{>c;] -----t;><) -- =M 1><1 Lc~ +-:2:-4M l><l--.16 M I> SeeD. 1 Soctilta-4 ~---3 SecU.a 5 A ll \V1.dth. dunenmo n~; 1fll'ler cone e t.o.nn.e.- cone e d ' TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

Durability ah32big.wmv TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

Durability FE-Based Vehicle Dynamics OPSEC_SegmentedTrack.avi TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

Braking Distance l w~ J Brake-LSAC -40m ph. wmv TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

Trench Crossing Click on the image TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

Water/Fuel Transport Fluid-Structure Interaction OPSEC_ T ankert ruck_lanechange.avi TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

Robotic Vehicle Step Climbing Stair Climbing of a Small Robot

t t di x p1 i x p2 i Finite-Element vs. MBD Solution Joint Force Comparison

t t di x p1 i x p2 i Finite-Element vs. MBD Solution Manipulator Force Comparison 1500 1000 Base_ForceX_FE Base_ForceX_MBD Base Force X (N) 500 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-500 -1000-1500 -2000 Time (sec.) 1500 Base Force Y (N) 1000 500 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-500 -1000-1500 BaseForceY_FE BaseForceY_MBD -2000 Time (sec.)

Parallel Processing on GPU M113 Click on the image

Nonlinear Structure within MBD ANCF Finite Elements Tracked Vehicle Click on the image T Mrr Mrf 0 0 Cqr Q r r T M M 0 0 C q q f Q fr ff f f aa T s C q Cq C λ Q q Cs 0 c 0 0 M 0 C 0 0 0 0 C r f a T q a q q a Q a s 0 Integrates rigid motion (r) flexible deformation (f) very flexible deformation (a)

Small Robot Terramechanics TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

Integration of Autonomy into MBD \ / I l.-- TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.

Integration of Autonomy into MBD Z-Position [m] 2 0-2 -4-6 -8 Path from Overhead Trajectory differences High Fidelity Simplified Predefined Unobstructed -10 Predefined path -12 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 X-Position [m] Motor Torque 60 40 Motor torque differences Left Torque [N-m] 20 0-20 Autonomous operation High Fidelity -40 Simplified Predefined -60 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time [s]

Off-Road Soft-Soil Tire Model TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN. WARFIGHTER FOCUSED.