Peer Review. By: David M. Glaser January 2015

Similar documents
Medical Staff Credentialing, Privileging and Peer Review

LexisNexis (TM) New Jersey Annotated Statutes

Section (1), Stats. Statutory authority: Sections (5) (b), (2) (a), and (1), Stats. Explanation of agency authority:

CURRENT FEDERAL LAWS PROTECTING CONSCIENCE RIGHTS

National Peer Review Corporation

Nebraska pays for telepsychiatry + a separate transmission fee ($.08/minute).

PATIENT ADVOCATE DESIGNATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT NOTICE TO PATIENT

REPRESENTING PHYSICIANS IN FAIR HEARING PROCEEDINGS. By: Theresamarie Mantese and Fatima M. Bolyea Mantese Honigman, P.C.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AGING AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 411 DIVISION 069 LONG TERM CARE ASSESSMENT

PART I - NURSE LICENSURE COMPACT

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 214

term does not include services provided by a religious organization for the purpose of providing services exclusively to clergymen or consumers in a

CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS

Delegated Credentialing A Solution to the Insurer Credentialing Waiting Game?

HOUSE BILL No page 2

Types of Authorized Recipients Probation/Parole Officers or the Department of Corrections

Attachment B ORDINANCE NO. 14-

(4) "Health care power of attorney" means a durable power of attorney executed in accordance with this section.

TIFT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER MEDICAL STAFF POLICIES & PROCEDURES

7.200 DONATION OF UNUSED MEDICATIONS, MEDICAL DEVICES AND MEDICAL SUPPLIES

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 58

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Implementing Patient & Family Engagement: Legal Perspectives. April 9, 2014

1 of 138 DOCUMENTS. NEW JERSEY REGISTER Copyright 2006 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law. 38 N.J.R. 4801(a)

Last updated on April 23, 2017 by Chris Krummey - Managing Attorney-Transactions

Disciplinary Action, Suspension, or Termination

Practice Review Guide April 2015

CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA

Illinois Hospital Report Card Act

Choosing the Correct Corrective Action

Medical Staff Credentialing: Minimizing Liability Arising From Negligent Credentialing and Physician Lawsuits

Emergency Medical Services Regulation. Adopted October 1, 2009

UnitedHealthcare of Insurance Company of New York The Empire Plan. CREDENTIALING and RECREDENTIALING PLAN

COMPARISON OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, VIRGINIA CODE AND VIRGINIA PART C POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE DRAFT

UnitedHealthcare. Credentialing Plan

THE CHILDREN'S COLLABORATIVE (SERVING NORMAN COUNTY FAMILIES) GOVERNANCE AGREEMENT

NC General Statutes - Chapter 143 Article 56 1

PRESCRIPTION MONITORING PROGRAM STATE PROFILES TENNESSEE

How Deemed Status in Lieu Of State Licensing Can Save the State Money

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

MEDICAID ENROLLMENT PACKET

244 CMR: BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN NURSING

2018 Application for a License to Operate a Hospital

Provider Credentialing and Termination

Funded in part through a grant award with the U.S. Small Business Administration

Pre-license Application *NOTICE * THIS APPLICATION WAS REVISED IN APRIL 2013 PLEASE READ CAREFULLY -

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

PATIENT RIGHTS TO ACCESS PERSONAL MEDICAL RECORDS California Health & Safety Code Section

IOWA. Downloaded January 2011

SUBCHAPTER 13. HEALTH CARE SERVICE FIRMS

Telemedicine. Important Information. Telemedicine 5/6/2016. Lauren Prew

2015 Complete Overview of the NCQA Standards Session Code: TU13 Time: 2:30 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Total CE Credits: 1.5 Presenter: Frank Stelling, MEd, MPH

HOUSE ENROLLED ACT No. 1119

SAMPLE CARE COORDINATION AGREEMENT

Minnesota health care price transparency laws and rules

Practice Review Guide

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

907 KAR 15:080. Coverage provisions and requirements regarding outpatient chemical dependency treatment center services.

SENATE BILL No K.S.A , and amendments thereto.

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED APRIL 28, 2014

Case 3:14-cv JWD-RLB Document 1 08/22/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

HEALTH GENERAL PROVISIONS CAREGIVERS CRIMINAL HISTORY SCREENING REQUIREMENTS

Release of Medical Records in Ohio OHIMA. Ohio Revised Code (ORC) HIPAA

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 24, 2018

HEALTH PRACTITIONERS COMPETENCE ASSURANCE ACT 2003 COMPLAINTS INVESTIGATION PROCESS

AMERICAN BOARD OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, INC.

Quick Reference Site-Specific Prescriptive Delegation Statute & Rule 5/22/2010

States that Allow Prescribers and/or Dispensers to Appoint a Delegate to Access the PMP

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO.

HB 254 AN ACT. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

State of Connecticut REGULATION of. Department of Social Services. Payment of Behavioral Health Clinic Services

Application for a License to Operate a Birth Center

AL ZHEIMER S AT TO R N E Y C A RO L W E S S E L S A P R I L,

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

MINNESOTA. Downloaded January 2011

States that Allow Prescribers and/or Dispensers to Appoint a Delegate to Access the PMP

Massachusetts Peer Review Protections: How Do They Apply? May 12, a.m. 12 p.m.

Center for Medicaid, CHIP, and Survey & Certification/Survey & Certification Group

Public Law th Congress An Act

POLICY TITLE: Code of Ethics for Certificated Employees POLICY NO: 442 PAGE 1 of 8

Advance Health Care Directive (CT)

RESIDENT PHYSICIAN AGREEMENT THIS RESIDENT PHYSICIAN AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made by and between Wheaton Franciscan Inc., a Wisconsin nonprofit

Advanced Practice Nurses Authority to Diagnose and Prescribe. Excellence Through Coordinated Patient Care. Copyright protected. information.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE DRH20205-MG-112 (03/24) Short Title: Enact Death With Dignity Act. (Public)

KANSAS STATE BOARD OF NURSING ARTICLES. regulation controls. These articles are not intended to create any rights, contractual or otherwise, for

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AUTHORITIES (NASCSA) MODEL PRESCRIPTION MONITORING PROGRAM (PMP) ACT (2016) COMMENT

American College of Radiology State-by-State Comparison of Physician Self-Referral Laws. See Overviews and Appendices for More Detailed Information.

Scope of Regulation Excerpt from Business and Professions Code Division 2, Chapter 6, Article 2

ASSEMBLY HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY DATED: JUNE 13, 2011

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1628

24 (b) "Boards" means the Board of Medicine and the Board. 27 graduated from an approved program, who is licensed to perform

COLORADO REVISED STATUTES

TELEMEDICINE/TELEHEALTH SERVICES/ VIRTUAL VISITS

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C

IC Chapter 2. Licensure of Hospitals

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION SENATE DRS15110-MGx-29G (01/14) Short Title: HealthCare Cost Reduction & Transparency.

CREDENTIALING PROCEDURES MANUAL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF SOUTH BEND, INC. SOUTH BEND, INDIANA

TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF ORIGINAL

Transcription:

Peer Review By: David M. Glaser dglaser@fredlaw.com 612.492.7143 January 2015

Past Webinars http://www.fredlaw.com/practices industries/health _care/health_law_webinars/ A link is included in your email. If you miss a webinar, it should be posted within a few days. 2

Why Do Peer Review? Bloom County teaches a lot about life. 3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Why Do Peer Review? Bloom County teaches a lot about life. To whom do you owe duties? Patients. Your professionals. OTHER patients/the community? Hospitals/Clinics you work with? Hospitals/Clinics entering relationships with one of your former doctors? Insurers? 12

Why Do Peer Review? Quality is focus. It may facilitate some awkward but necessary conversations. May improve your employment review process. Risk management. 13

What Is the Peer Review Privilege? Critical self-examination privilege/5 th Amendment. Federal law limits claims by the person reviewed. State laws generally focus on claims by patients. Note that there are strict legal technicalities. State law is very, very important, and varies widely. It is often not entirely logical, nor drafted clearly. Note it may be a PROTECTION, not a PRIVILEGE. It may be ILLEGAL to release info. 14

What Is the Peer Review Privilege Protection? Focus is on legal protection, not social protection. The focus on quality, including nonpayment for adverse events, will likely increase the value of candid discussion. 15

Clinics vs. Hospitals Hospitals MUST have a process. Clinics SHOULD have a process. Hospitals have bylaws and Joint Commission obligations. 16

Health Care Quality Improvement Act A federal statute. Focuses on antitrust/anticompetitive concerns. 17

Health Care Entity under HCQIA A hospital that is licensed to provide health care services by the State in which it is located, An entity (including a health maintenance organization or group medical practice) that provides health care services and that follows a formal peer review process for the purpose of furthering quality health care (as determined under regulations of the Secretary), and 18

Health Care Entity under HCQIA A professional society (or committee thereof) of physicians or other licensed health care practitioners that follows a formal peer review process for the purpose of furthering quality health care (as determined under regulations of the Secretary), as long as the society has not within the previous 5 years, been found by FTC/court to have engaged in any anticompetitive practice restricting the practice of licensed health care practitioners. 42 USC 11151 19

Formal Process The regulations (45 CFR 60.3) define Formal peer review process as the conduct of professional review activities through formally adopted written procedures which provide for adequate notice and an opportunity for a hearing. Clinics must decide if they want a hearing. 20

Health Care Quality Improvement Act If a professional review action (as defined on slides 22-23) of a professional review body meets all the standards specified in section 11112(a) of this title, except as provided in subsection (b) of this section (A)the professional review body, (B)any person acting as a member or staff to the body, (C)any person under a contract or other formal agreement with the body, and (D)any person who participates with or assists the body with respect to the action, shall not be liable 21

Health Care Quality Improvement Act in damages under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. The preceding sentence shall not apply to damages under any law of the United States or any State relating to the civil rights of any person or persons, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq. and the Civil Rights Acts, 42 U.S.C. 1981, et seq. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the United States or any Attorney General of a State from bringing an action, including an action under section 15c of title 15, where such an action is otherwise authorized. 22

Action under HCQIA A review action is based on competence/professional conduct but excludes: the physician s association, or lack of association, with a professional society or association, the physician s fees or the physician s advertising or engaging in other competitive acts intended to solicit or retain business, the physician s participation in prepaid group health plans, salaried employment, or any other manner of delivering health services whether on a fee-for-service or other basis, 23

Action under HCQIA a physician s association with, supervision of, delegation of authority to, support for, training of, or participation in a private group practice with, a member or members of a particular class of health care practitioner or professional, or any other matter that does not relate to the competence or professional conduct of a physician. 42 U.S. Code 11151(9) 24

Protection for Those Providing Information to Professional Review Bodies Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person (whether as a witness or otherwise) providing information to a professional review body regarding the competence or professional conduct of a physician shall be held, by reason of having provided such information, to be liable in damages under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) unless such information is false and the person providing it knew that such information was false. 42 USC 11111(a)(2) 25

Protection for Those Providing Information to Professional Review Bodies In general For purposes of the protection set forth in section 11111(a) of this title, a professional review action must be taken (1) in the reasonable belief that the action was in the furtherance of quality health care, (2) after a reasonable effort to obtain the facts of the matter, (3) after adequate notice and hearing procedures are afforded to the physician involved or after such other procedures as are fair to the physician under the circumstances, and 26

Protection for Those Providing Information to Professional Review Bodies (4) in the reasonable belief that the action was warranted by the facts known after such reasonable effort to obtain facts and after meeting the requirement of paragraph (3). A professional review action shall be presumed to have met the preceding standards necessary for the protection set out in section 11111(a) of this title unless the presumption is rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence. 27

State Laws Prevent reviews from being discovered by patients. Typically have highly technical requirements. Generally protect only deliberations and documents created BY the process. Generally allow the reviewed practitioner access to the data. May or may not allow Medical Boards access to data. KS, WI, SD explicitly allow Bd access. 28

This Is Hard Nebraska defines a peer review committee as UR committee, QA committee, performance improvement comm., tissue comm., or other committee established by the governing board of a facility which is a health care provider that does either: 1) conducts professional credentialing or quality review activities involving the competence of, professional conduct of or quality of care provided by a health care provider, including both an individual who provides health care and an entity that provides health care. Neb Rev. Stat. 71-7910 29

This Is Hard Nebraska defines a health care provider as: a facility licensed under the Health Care Facility Licensure Act A health care professional licensed under the Uniform Credentialing Act An organization or association of health care professionals licensed under the Uniform Credentialing Act. Neb Rev. Stat. 71-7907 30

What is a facility in NE? Health care facility, defined. Health care facility means an ambulatory surgical center, an assisted-living facility, a center or group home for the developmentally disabled, a critical access hospital, a general acute hospital, a health clinic, a hospital, an intermediate care facility, an intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded, a long-term care hospital, a mental health center, a nursing facility, a pharmacy, a psychiatric or mental hospital, a public health clinic, a rehabilitation hospital, a skilled nursing facility, or a substance abuse treatment center. Neb Rev. Stat. 71-413. 31

It gets even harder Health clinic does not include (a) a health care practitioner facility (i) unless such facility is an ambulatory surgical center, (ii) unless ten or more abortions, as defined in subdivision (1) of section 28-326, are performed during any one calendar week at such facility, or (iii) unless hemodialysis or labor and delivery services are provided at such Facility.. Neb Rev. Stat. 71-416 32

Choose Your Slide Title: Suggestions include: We re not in Kansas Anymore or You ve Now Entered the Twilight Zone. Health care practitioner facility means the residence, office, or clinic of a practitioner or group of practitioners credentialed under the Uniform Credentialing Act or any distinct part of such residence, office, or clinic. Neb Rev. Stat. 71-414 33

SD Limits Clinic Peer Review to Physicians Peer review committee defined. For the purposes of 36-4-25, 36-4-26.1 and 36-4-43, a peer review committee is one or more persons acting as any committee of a state or local professional association or society, any committee of a licensed health care facility or the medical staff of a licensed health care facility, or any committee comprised of physicians within a medical care foundation, health maintenance organization, preferred provider organization, independent practice association, group medical practice, provider 34

SD Limits Clinic Peer Review to Physicians sponsored organization, or any other organization of physicians formed pursuant to state or federal law, that engages in peer review activity. For the purposes of this section, a peer review committee is also one or more persons acting as an administrative or medical committee, department, section, board of directors, shareholder or corporate member, or audit group, including the medical audit committee, of a licensed health care facility. S.D. Codified Laws 36-4-42. 35

MN a Bit Different "Review organization" means a nonprofit organization acting according to clause (l), a committee as defined under section 144E.32, subdivision 2, or a committee whose membership is limited to professionals, administrative staff, and consumer directors, except where otherwise provided for by state or federal law, and which is established by one or more of the following: a hospital, a clinic, a nursing home, an ambulance service or first responder service regulated under chapter 144E, one or more state or local associations of professionals, an organization of professionals from a particular area or medical institution, a health maintenance organization as defined in chapter 62D,..to gather and review information relating to the care and treatment of patients for the purposes of: Minn. Stat. Ann. 145.61 Subd. 5 36

Iowa: How long have you been a member? 5. "Peer review committee" means one or more persons acting in a peer review capacity who also serve as an officer, director, trustee, agent, or member of any of the following: c. The medical staff of any licensed hospital. f. A health care entity, including but not limited to a group medical practice, that provides health care services and follows a formal peer review process for the purpose of furthering quality health care. 37

Peer Review Investigations Do you wait until there is a problem, or do you do them randomly? When do you use a summary suspension? What is an investigation? Resignation during an investigation may be reportable. Can you use peer review for behavioral issues? Can you use peer review for your hiring process? For evaluating a new employee? 38

Peer Review Investigations When do you tell the subject? Who should do the investigation? State law issues (must it be a licensee?) Competitors/rivals? Subject matter expertise/specialty? 39

Potential Reviewers Another member of the same group. Former partner. Bad Break up? The respected founder of the group. A member of the same system in another state? CPEP or a similar program? 40

Peer Review Investigations What do you tell witnesses? When do you involve counsel? EARLY!! This sounds self serving, but consider the lost hearing. Use CAREFUL counsel. Can the subject involve counsel? One theory: its not a hearing and have free flowing info. Competing theory: fear stymies communication. Bend over backwards to be fair. 41

Wisconsin Describes Good Faith In determining whether a member of the reviewing or evaluating organization or the medical director has acted in good faith under sub. (1g), the court shall consider whether the member or medical director has sought to prevent the health care provider or facility and its counsel from examining the documents and records used in the review or evaluation, 42

Wisconsin Describes Good Faith from presenting witnesses, establishing pertinent facts and circumstances, questioning or refuting testimony and evidence, confronting and cross-examining adverse witnesses or from receiving a copy of the final report or recommendation of the reviewing organization or medical director. Wis. Stat. Ann 146.37(2) 43

Can Peer Review Committees Share Info? A state law question. MN, 145.61 subd 5(p); KS, 65-4915(e), ND 23-34-01(5)(d) clearly allow sharing. WI allows the person authorizing the review to share with the subject s employer. 146.38(3m)(b)(1). Best done committee to committee, not person to person. 44

Incident Reports Some states explicitly protect them: WI -146.38 NE -71-7913 In many states, it is unclear. Best argument if form created by, and sent to, the peer review committee. Treat medical incidents different from slip and falls. 45

Review Your Review Are you being fair? Are you being consistent? Have you treated other practitioners differently? Are your actions in the review consistent? (Hold that thought.) 46

Review Your Review Reporting Obligations State Board NPDB Insurers/ACOs Hospitals (more likely for the Dr. than group.) Foolish consistency vs. foolish inconsistency. 47

Peer Review Quirks Presence of a lawyer may, in some states, render the activity non-peer review. A risk manager having records wasn t peer review in Iowa. Orgovanyi v. Henry County, et.al., No. 0-793 (Iowa Ct. App. 2010) 48

Peer Review Quirks Stetson v. Silverman, 278 Neb. 389 (Neb. 2009) A defendant doctor in a medical malpractice action, sought to prevent the plaintiff from obtaining records from his disciplinary proceeding. The court held that the doctor had no standing to assert privilege under Neb. Rev. Stat. 38-1,106 because the doctor was the subject of the investigation and not the holder of the privilege. Nebraska law was subsequently changed. 49

Peer Review Quirks Phelps v. PIC, 282 Wis.2d 69, 99 (2005), rev d on other grounds, 319 Wis.2d 1(2009) The court held that the peer review privilege did not apply to a letter between chairpersons describing concerns with a 1 st year resident because (1) the chairperson s investigation described in the letter was not initiated at or performed through the hospital s peer review committee and (2) the intent of the letter was for the narrow purpose of reporting problems and concerns about the resident and was not intended for the broader goal of improving the quality of health care at the hospital. Wisconsin law subsequently changed, but.. 50

Who do you tell if You conclude unnecessary services were provided? Patients? Payors? Future employers? The Board? 51

QUESTIONS? David Glaser dglaser@fredlaw.com 612.492.7143 52