Rehabilitative Services for Persons with Mental Illness (RSPMI)

Similar documents
Inspection of Care for Independently Licensed Practitioners. [August 2018]

Arkansas Provider E-News

Provider enews WELCOME TO VALUEOPTIONS. September 2012

Bi-Annual Stakeholder Meeting May 12, 2014

Results of February 2012 Survey on Medicaid Funded Long Term Services and Supports. Assessments, Reassessments and Care Plans

Purpose. Background. Frequency and Scheduling of Post Payment Reviews

Bi-annual Stakeholder Meeting. May 8, 2013

ValueOptions - Arkansas Frequently Asked Questions

RSPMI Quarterly Training. Presented by: ValueOptions /DMS/DBHS/HP

This policy shall apply to all directly-operated and contract network providers of the MCCMH Board.

Child Care Program (Licensed Daycare)

Financial Assistance/Sliding Fee Scale Policy Page 1 of 6. Financial Assistance/Sliding Fee Scale Policy

Complainants may formally appeal any Ombudsman action as described below. All appeals to the division shall be sent to: Appeals Process

Audits, Administrative Reviews, & Serious Deficiencies

Presented by: ValueOptions /DMS/DBHS/HP

Proposed Fraud & Abuse Rule Implementing ACA Provisions. Ivy Baer October 26, 2010

The QIS was designed to achieve several objectives:

Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid Integrity Program

FINAL AUDIT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ARRA IMPLEMENTATION FEBRUARY 14, 2009 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2010

Request for Proposal Crisis Intervention Services

Health Share/Tuality Health Alliance Policy X-11. Subject: Practitioner Restriction, Suspension, or Termination (Page 1 of 6)

Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency Mental Health Plan Quality Management Work Plan. Introduction

King County Regional Support Network

COMPLIANCE MONITORING CHECKLIST

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF Behavioral Wellness A System of Care and Recovery

Delegation Oversight 2016 Audit Tool Credentialing and Recredentialing

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AGING AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 411 DIVISION 069 LONG TERM CARE ASSESSMENT

Child Care Assistance Provider Agreement

DIA COMPLIANCE OVERVIEW FOR HOME HEALTH AGENCIES

FLORIDA DID NOT ALWAYS VERIFY CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Agency for Health Care Administration

Arkansas Department of Human Services

Okla. Admin. Code 340: : Purpose. Okla. Admin. Code 340: : Definitions [REVOKED] Okla. Admin.

Provider Service Expectations Personal Emergency Response System (PERS) SPC Provider Subcontract Agreement Appendix N

Iowa Department of Human Services

Disabled & Elderly Health Programs Group. August 9, 2016

SBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Opening: Social Worker Family & Children Services Department: Human Services

Comprehensive Child and Family Assessment & Wrap-Around CCFA/WA Fiscal Year 2013

Butte County Department of Behavioral Health

Provider enews WELCOME TO VALUEOPTIONS. May 2012

OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAMS BULLETIN

Page 1 of 6 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

State of Montana. Department of Public Health and Human Services CHILDREN S MENTAL HEALTH BUREAU PROVIDER MANUAL AND CLINICAL GUIDELINES

PURPOSE CONTACT. DHS Financial Operations Division (651) or or fax (651) SIGNED

Provider Manual 2016

Chapter 5 BRIEFINGS AND VOUCHER ISSUANCE

A.A.C. T. 6, Ch. 5, Art. 50, Refs & Annos A.A.C. R R Definitions

Subgrantee Monitoring and Risk Assessment Principles. Leslie O Reilly, VOCA Program Specialist

Compliance Program. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. and Its Affiliated Companies

Scope of Service Personal Emergency Response System (PERS)

Scope of Service Home Delivered Meals

Illinois Department of Public Health Critical Access Hospital Program Certification Process Preparation

Provider Handbook Supplement for CalOptima

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. June 7, 2016 BPC #

Provider Rights. As a network provider, you have the right to:

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

POLICY SUBJECT: POLICY:

Residential Treatment Services Manual 6/30/2017. Utilization Review and Control UTILIZATION REVIEW AND CONTROL CHAPTER VI. Page. Chapter.

OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES NEW YORK CITY DAY CARE COMPLAINTS. Report 2005-S-40 OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER

Tehama County Health Services Agency Mental Health Division Quality Improvement Program

PACAH 2018 SPRING CONFERENCE April 26, 2018

Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process

Inpatient IOC Checklist Clinical Record Review

Section VII Provider Dispute/Appeal Procedures; Member Complaints, Grievances, and Fair Hearings

Understanding Your Quality Measures. Craig Bettles Data Visualization Manager Consonus Healthcare

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR CALIBRATION LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

SITE VISIT AGENDA Version

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR TESTING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

CARE1ST HEALTH PLAN POLICY & PROCEDURE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

REGULATION, ACCREDITATION, AND PAYMENT PRACTICE GROUP (June, July, August 2004)

TRENDING IN THE JOINT COMMISSION

Chapter 11 Section 3. Hospice Reimbursement - Conditions For Coverage

AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTER QUALITY REPORTING (ASCQR) PROGRAM REFERENCE CHECKLIST

Iowa PASRR for Providers. A brief introduction to

PREA AUDIT: AUDITOR S SUMMARY REPORT 1 COMMUNITY CONFINEMENT FACILITIES

A SUMMARY OF MEDICAID REQUIREMENTS AND RELATED COA STANDARDS

Outpatient Behavioral Health Services (OBH)-General Information

NURSING FACILITY ASSESSMENTS

OPERATING DEPARTMENT WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD MUSEUM

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group

Substitute Care of Children 65C-13

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

IMPORTANT NOTICE PLEASE READ CAREFULLY SENT VIA FEDEX AND INTERNET (Receipt of this notice is presumed to be May 7, 2018 date notice ed)

Credentialing Standards

The Act, which amends the Small Business Act ([15 USC 654} 15 U.S.C. 654 et seq.), is intended to:

2014 Interpretive Guidelines for 2013 Review Nutrition programs (C1, C2 & NSIP meals)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Iowa PASRR Onsite Provider Training 10/18/ /21/2016

Chapter 18 Section 12. Department Of Defense (DoD) TRICARE Demonstration Project for the Philippines

Chapter 19 Section 3. Privacy And Security Of Protected Health Information (PHI)

Annual Quality Improvement Report: The Nursing Home Survey Process REPORT TO THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2014

Local Service Area Plan Appendix D.2

Arkansas Organized Care Model

DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC. Medical Staff Bylaws

HSQF Scheme HUMAN SERVICES SCHEME PART 2 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BODIES CERTIFYING HUMAN SERVICES IN QUEENSLAND. Issue 6, 21 November 2017

College of American Pathologists 325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois Advancing Excellence

Policy Subject Index Number Section Subsection Category Contact Last Revised References Applicable To Detail MISSION STATEMENT: OVERVIEW:

DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAMS BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

Scope of Service Transportation (Specialized Transportation)

Transcription:

TOC required 228.300 Record Reviews XX-XX-XX The Division of Medical Services (DMS) of the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) has contracted with, ValueOptions, to perform on-site inspections of care (IOC) and retrospective reviews of outpatient mental health services provided by RSPMI providers. View or print ValueOptions contact information. The reviews are conducted by licensed mental health professionals and are based on applicable federal and state laws, rules and professionally recognized standards of care. 228.311 Purpose of the Review XX-XX-XX The on-site inspections of care of RSPMI providers are intended to: A. Promote RSPMI services being provided in compliance with federal and state laws, rules and professionally recognized standards of care; B. Identify and clearly define areas of deficiency where the provision of services is not in compliance with federal and state laws, rules and professionally recognized standards of care; C. Require provider facilities to develop and implement appropriate corrective action plans to remediate all deficiencies identified; D. Provide accountability that corrective action plans are implemented; and E. Determine the effectiveness of corrective action plans implemented. The review process, procedures and scoring methodology are outlined in detail on the contractor s website: http://arkansas.valueoptions.com. 228.313 Information Available Upon Arrival of the IOC Team XX-XX-XX The provider shall make the following available to the IOC Team upon arrival at the site: A. Medical records of Arkansas Medicaid beneficiaries who are identified by the reviewer; B. One or more knowledgeable administrative staff member(s) to assist the team; C. The opportunity to assess direct patient care in a manner least disruptive to the actual provision of care; D. Staff personnel records, complete with hire dates, dates of credentialing and copies of current licenses, credentials, criminal background checks, and similar or related records; E. Written policies, procedures and quality assurance committee minutes; F. Clinical Administration, Clinical Services, Quality Assurance, Quality improvement, Utilization Review and Credentialing; G. Program descriptions, manuals, schedules, staffing plans and evaluation studies; H. YOQ Documentation; and I. If identified as necessary, additional documents as requested by a provider s individual licensing board, child maltreatment checks, and adult maltreatment checks.

228.314 Cases Chosen for Review XX-XX-XX Cases are chosen by a statistically valid random sample case selection procedure. The review period shall be specified in the provider notification letter. The list of cases to be reviewed shall be given to the provider upon arrival or chosen by the IOC Team from a list for the provider site. The components of the records required for review include: A. All required assessments, including SED/SMI Certifications where applicable; B. Master treatment plan and periodic reviews of master treatment plan; C. Progress notes, including physician notes; D. Physician orders and lab results; and E. Copies of records. The reviewer shall retain a copy of any record reviewed. 228.316 Beneficiary/Family Interviews XX-XX-XX The provider is required to arrange interviews of Medicaid beneficiaries and family members as requested by the IOC team, preferably with the beneficiaries whose records are selected for review. If a beneficiary whose records are chose for review is not available, interviews shall be conducted with a beneficiary on-site whose records are not scheduled for review. Beneficiaries/Family members may be interviewed on site, by telephone, or both. 228.318 Written Reports and Follow-Up Procedures XX-XX-XX The contractor shall provide a written report of the IOC team s findings to the provider, DMS Behavioral Health Unit and DMS Program Integrity Unit within 14 calendar days from the last day of onsite inspection. The written report shall include a review score and shall clearly identify any area of deficiency and required submission of a corrective action plan. Review Procedures Each IOC review shall include use of the following review checklist, available at http://arkansas.valueoptions.com/ Clinical Record Review Checklist: Review of the beneficiaries records (individual charts including evaluations, treatment plan, provider documentation, medical charts, etc.). A. Color Classification The IOC reviews rely on the following rating system to establish provider scores: 1. : a. Safety risk to beneficiary, b. Medical Necessity is not established; 2. : Findings related to quality or process of care; 3. : Findings related to technical or regulatory compliance; For the Clinical Record Review Checklist, the color of each element in which there is a finding is recorded and tabulated. Each provider shall be scored based upon the number of tabulated occurrences. Each provider site that is reviewed shall receive a Clinical Record Review rating.

DMS will publish the report on the utilization review agency s website, http://arkansas.valueoptions.com/. A rating of reflects substantial compliance with federal and state laws, rules and professionally recognized standards of care. If any provider s rating is,, or, the monthly meeting work group may recommend one or more actions as provided in Section 228.322: i. All IOC reviews are subject to policy regarding Administrative Remedies and Sanctions (Section 150.000), Administrative Reconsideration and Appeals (Section 160.00) and Provider Due Process (Section 190.000). 228.319 Scoring Methodology XX-XX-XX A. Scoring Methodology Clinical Record Review Checklist 1. Each case reviewed is rated using element color classifications. Color Classification Rule Two or more applicable elements with a deficiency OR one applicable element with a deficiency and more than 50% of applicable elements with a deficiency. One applicable element with a deficiency and 50% or less of applicable elements with a deficiency OR no applicable elements with a deficiency and 50% or more applicable elements with a deficiency No applicable elements with a deficiency and less than 50% of applicable elements with a deficiency and 50% or more of applicable elements with a deficiency No applicable elements with a deficiency and less than 50% of applicable elements with a deficiency and less than 50% of applicable elements with a deficiency 2. Sampling for Clinical Record Review Checklist a) Review a random sample of 20 cases. b) Calculate and assign Clinical Record Review Rating according to the following chart [Scoring for Clinical Record Review Checklist] 3. Scoring for Clinical Record Review Checklist Clinical Record Review Rating Rating Description Rule Presence of an issue related to safety or potential risk to beneficiary or medical necessity unable to be determined Moderate range of findings; possible process or quality of care concerns One or more cases No cases; 10 or more cases

Rating Description Rule Mild range of findings; possible regulatory concerns No cases; all other results (i.e. not, or ) Minimal range of findings; no significant concerns No cases; 19 or more cases If provider has fewer than 20 open cases, all cases shall be reviewed and categorization shall be made on the basis of the actual proportion, according to the following table. Color Classification Rule One or more cases At least 30% of cases are ; no cases Fewer than 30% of cases are and fewer than 75% of cases are ; no cases At least 75% of cases are ; no cases 228.320 DMS/DBHS Work Group Reports and Recommendations XX-XX-XX The DMS/DBHS Work Group (comprised of representative from the Behavioral Health Unit, the Program Integrity Unit, the Division of Behavioral Health Services, the Office of Quality Assurance, the utilization review agency, as well as other units or divisions as required) will meet monthly to discuss IOC reports. When warranted by the IOC results, the DMS/DBHS Work Group shall recommend to the DHS Onsite Facility Monitoring Group one or more actions in Section 228.322. Recommendations shall be in writing and shall include supporting documentation. If a RED rating related to safety or potential risk to beneficiary or others is issued, the utilization review agency shall immediately report this to the DMS Director (or the Director s designee). 228.321 Corrective Action Plans XX-XX-XX The provider is required to submit a Corrective Action Plan designed to rectify any area of deficiency noted in the written report of the IOC. The Corrective Action Plan must be submitted to the contracted utilization review agency within 30 calendar days of the date of the written report. The contractor shall review the Corrective Action Plan and forward it, with recommendations, to the DMS Behavioral Health Unit, the DMS Program Integrity Unit and Division of Behavioral Health Services. After acceptance of the Corrective Action Plan, the utilization review agency will monitor the implementation and effectiveness of the Corrective Action Plan via on-site review. DMS (and/or its contractor(s)) may also conduct a desk review of beneficiary s records. The desk review will be site-specific and not by organization. If it is determined that the provider has failed to meet the conditions of participation, DMS will determine if sanctions are warranted. 228.322 Actions XX-XX-XX Actions that may be taken following an Inspection of Care review include, but are not limited to: A. Decertification of any beneficiary determined to not meet medical necessity criteria for outpatient mental health services

B. Decertification of any provider determined to be noncompliant with the Division of Behavioral Health Services provider certification rules C. On-site monitoring by the utilization review agency to verify the implementation and effectiveness of corrective actions; D. The contractor may recommend, and DMS may require follow-up inspections of care and/or desk reviews. Follow-up inspections may review the issues addressed by the Corrective Action Plans or may be a complete re-inspection of care, at the sole discretion of the Division of Medical Services; E. Review and revision of the Corrective Action Plan; F. Review by the DMS Program Integrity Unit; G. Formulation of an emergency transition plan for beneficiaries including those in custody of DCFS and DYS; H. Suspension of provider referrals; I. Placement in high priority monitoring; J. Mandatory staff training by the utilization review agency; K. Provider requirement for one of the following staff members to attend a DMS/DBHS monthly work group meeting: Clinical Director/Designee (at least a master s level mental health professional) or Executive Officer; L. Any sanctions identified in Section 152.000.