Impact of Combat Duty in Iraq and Afghanistan on Family Functioning: Findings from the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Land Combat Study

Similar documents
Battlemind Training: Building Soldier Resiliency

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Prevalence and Screening of Mental Health Problems Among U.S. Combat Soldiers Pre- and Post- Deployment

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Re-Engineering Healthcare Integration Programs (REHIP)

Soldier Attitudes toward Mental Health Screening and Seeking Care upon Return from Combat

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Wildland Fire Assistance

TITLE: Spouses/Family Members of Service Members at Risk for PTSD or Suicide. Fairfax, VA 22030

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Veterans Medical Research Foundation San Diego, CA 92161

The Millennium Cohort Study

journal of medicine The new england Combat Duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mental Health Problems, and Barriers to Care abstract

Mental Health Advisory Team 9 (MHAT 9) Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) 2013 Afghanistan. 10 October 2013

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Expanding Access to Help for Veterans in Crisis: The Veterans Online Self-Check Quiz & the Interactive Screening Program

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Air Education and Training Command

Summary of Key Findings from the Mental Health Advisory Team 6 (MHAT 6): OEF and OIF

Preliminary Findings from a Michigan State University/Michigan National Guard Study of Returning Veterans and their Families

Experience and Consequences on the Deployments of the Medical Services of the German Army in Foreign Countries Surgical Aspects

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Medical Requirements and Deployments

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Effects of Iraq/Afghanistan Deployments on PTSD Diagnoses for Still Active Personnel in All Four Services

Soldier Attitudes toward Mental Health Screening and Seeking Care upon Return from Combat

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Report No. D April 9, Training Requirements for U.S. Ground Forces Deploying in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom

U.S. Army Reserve Base Realignment & Closure (BRAC) Sustainable Design & Construction in Action

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Veterans Benefits: Federal Employment Assistance

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

Progress Report: Effects from Combat Stress Upon Reintegration for Citizen Soldiers and on Psycholo gical

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Air Education and Training Command

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

WHEN JOHNNY COMES MARCHING HOME

The U.S. military has successfully completed hundreds of Relief-in-Place and Transfers of

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

MINISTERIAL SUBMISSION

TITLE: The impact of surgical timing in acute traumatic spinal cord injury

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

APNA 28th Annual Conference Session 2034: October 23, 2014

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Military Wives Matter

GAO. FEDERAL RECOVERY COORDINATION PROGRAM Enrollment, Staffing, and Care Coordination Pose Significant Challenges

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Health Surveillance among Dutch Military Personnel during the United Nations Mission in Eritrea and Ethiopia

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Information Technology

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

On 10 July 2008, the Training and Readiness Authority

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

at the Missile Defense Agency

Self-Reported Combat Stress among Troops Deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: An Epidemiological Study

Report Documentation Page

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

Navy Recruiting and Applicant Attraction:

In 2007, the United States Army Reserve completed its

USMC Expeditionary Energy

Transcription:

Impact of Combat Duty in Iraq and Afghanistan on Family Functioning: Findings from the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Land Combat Study Charles W. Hoge, MD, COL, MC, U.S. Army Director, Division of Psychiatry and Neurosciences Walter Reed Army Institute of Research 503 Robert Grant Ave, Silver Spring, MD USA 20307 Phone: 301-319-9342, FAX: 301-319-9484 charles.hoge@na.amedd.army.mil Nationality: U.S. Carl A. Castro, Ph.D., LTC Principal Investigator Department of Military Psychiatry Walter Reed Army Institute of Research 503 Robert Grant Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20307 Phone: 301-319-7105; FAX: 301-319-9484 Email POC: carl.castro@na.amedd.army.mil Nationality: U.S. Karen M. Eaton, M.S. Department of Military Psychiatry Walter Reed Army Institute of Research 503 Robert Grant Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20307 Phone: 301-319-7147; FAX: 301-319-9484 Email POC: karen.eaton@na.amedd.army.mil Nationality: U.S. The view expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Medical Research and Materiel Command, the U.S. Army, or U.S. Department of Defense. Classification: Unclassified, approved for public release Paper submitted for Human Factors and Medicine Panel Symposium (HFM-134) on Human Dimensions in Military Operations. Military Leaders Strategies for Addressing Stress and Psychological Support. ABSTRACT Background. Previous research has demonstrated a strong link between combat duty and social and family dysfunction. However, most studies of the impact of combat on military families have not been conducted proximal to the time of deployments, and there are many research gaps in understanding the full impact of combat deployment. The current war in Iraq and Afghanistan pose unique stresses on military families. Methods. Over 25,000 surveys have been obtained from U.S. Soldiers and Marines before deployment, during deployment, and up to one year post-deployment. Approximately 40% of these service members are married. In addition, surveys have been collected from military spouses. Outcomes of this analysis included marital satisfaction, divorce, and family violence. Hoge, C.W.; Castro, C.A.; Eaton, K.M. (2006) Impact of Combat Duty in Iraq and Afghanistan on Family Functioning: Findings from the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Land Combat Study. In Human Dimensions in Military Operations Military Leaders Strategies for Addressing Stress and Psychological Support (pp. 5-1 5-6). Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-HFM-134, Paper 5. Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: RTO. Available from: http://www.rto.nato.int/abstracts.asp. RTO-MP-HFM-134 5-1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 01 APR 2006 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Impact of Combat Duty in Iraq and Afghanistan on Family Functioning: Findings from the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Land Combat Study 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Walter Reed Army Institute of Research 503 Robert Grant Ave, Silver Spring, MD USA 20307 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM001955. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 6 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Results. Combat duty in Iraq was significantly associated with decreased marital satisfaction, increased intention to divorce, and increased spouse abuse, particularly at the 12-month post-deployment time point. Data from spouse surveys indicated that spouses experience similar rates of depression as Soldiers, but access mental health care at a higher rate. An important finding was that military spouses often rely on primary care for mental health services. Conclusions. Combat duty in Iraq has significant impact on military families. Recommendations for improving services to family members will be presented. INTRODUCTION Military families face unique stresses related to the frequent family separations, mobile lifestyle, separation from extended family, concern about soldiers safety during deployment to a combat-zone, and the demands of single parenting during separations (Ursano, Holloway, Jones, Rodriguez, & Belenky, 1987; Black, 1993; Paulus, Nagar, Larey & Camacho, 1996; Rosen & Moghadam, 1988; Martin & Ickovics, 1987). All of these stressors may have an adverse effect on the physical and mental health of the military spouse. Research has shown that the health and well being of military families is important to the family as well as to the operational unit. Spouses and children may exhibit greater symptoms of depression or anxiety, and health care utilization rates may increase during separations (Knapp & Newman, 1993; McNulty, 2003; Rosen, 1996; Black 1993; Ursano, Holloway, Jones, Rodriguez, & Belenky, 1987; Kelley, 1994). Spouses who perceive the military lifestyle to be stressful show less overall psychological well-being (Knapp & Newman, 1993). Soldiers with dissatisfied spouses are more likely to leave the military upon completion of their service contract (Bruce & Burch, 1989; Rosen & Durand, 1995; Griffith, Doering, & Mahoney, 1986 as referenced in Klein, Tatone, & Lindsay, 2001, Drummet, Coleman, & Cable, 2003). A recent study investigated the prevalence rates of mental health problems among Soldiers, as well as barriers to and the stigma associated with seeking care for these problems (Hoge, Castro, Messer, McGurk, Cotting, & Koffman, 2004). It showed that Soldiers deployed to Iraq and/or Afghanistan had higher rates of mental health problems (major depression, PTSD, alcohol misuse) than before deployment. Among Soldiers who screened positive for a mental health problem, only a small percentage (23-40%) received professional help from a mental health professional, chaplain, or primary care professional. Concerns about stigma were highest among the Soldiers who were in the most need of help from mental health services. The deployment related mental health problems among Soldiers raises questions as to how military spouses are handling the stresses of deployment, family separation and reunion during the current war in Iraq and Afghanistan. The purpose of this study is to 1) determine the prevalence of mental health problems in military spouses, 2) determine the proportion of spouses with mental health concerns who are not receiving services, and 3) identify perceived barriers to mental health care. METHODS Since January 2003, the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) has been conducting the Land Combat Study to assess the impact of current military operations in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)-Afghanistan on the health and wellbeing of soldiers and family members (Hoge, et. al., 2004). This study involves cross-sectional design methods using anonymous surveys administered with informed consent under an approved research protocol. The study has focused on combat operational units, and over 25,000 surveys have been collected to date. Soldiers from multiple brigade combat teams, both Active Component and National Guard, as well as members of Marine Expeditionary Forces 5-2 RTO-MP-HFM-134

deploying to OIF and OEF have been surveyed before deployment, and / or after returning from deployment. Post-deployment assessments have been conducted at 3-4 months, 6 months, and 12 months after returning from deployment. The surveys include questions about deployment stressors, combat experiences, and unit climate variables such as cohesion and morale. Depression, anxiety, and PTSD are measured using validated self-administered checklists. Other outcomes include alcohol use, aggression, and family functioning. Participants & Procedures In addition to the surveys among soldiers and marines, surveys have also been administered to a sample of spouses at one large military installation in the Eastern United States. Spouses of soldiers from operational units included in the Land Combat Study were approached at two on-post primary health care clinics (the source of primary care for all soldiers, spouses, and children in the operational units) and at a battalion level Family Readiness Group (FRG) meeting. A total of 1,828 surveys were distributed, 1,707 spouses signed consent forms, and 940 spouses returned completed surveys (55%). The majority (566, 60%) of the surveys were completed while the participants were waiting in the primary care clinic. Three hundred thirty-one (331, 35%) participants mailed back their completed surveys. Forty-three (43, 5%) surveys were completed at the FRG meeting. The surveys from spouses were compared with similar surveys from 587 married Soldiers from the same units. Description of Survey Spouses were asked if they were currently experiencing a stress, emotional, alcohol or family problem, and if they were currently interested in receiving help for that problem. Major depression and generalized anxiety were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) (Spitzer, et al. 1999; Lowe, et al., 2004; Henkel, et al., 2003). Questions measuring alcohol use were obtained using the Two Item Conjoint Screen (TICS) (Brown, Leonard, Saunders, & Papasouliotis, 2001). Participants were asked about their use of mental health services, to include mental health services provided by the primary health professionals, specialty mental health services, or pastoral counselling at either a military or civilian facility. SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS Among soldiers surveyed before and after deployment, deployment to Iraq appeared to be associated with decreased marital satisfaction, increased intention to divorce, and increased self-reported spouse abuse, particularly at the 12-month post-deployment time point. Among 940 spouses surveyed at one time point, 74 (7.9%) screened positive for either major depression or generalized anxiety disorder and reported impairment in work or interpersonal functioning, a rate very similar to the rate among married Soldiers (49/587, 8.3%); 4.3% of spouses reported having used alcohol more than they had intended in the past four weeks, compared with 18.0% of married soldiers, and 3.0% of spouses indicated that they felt they wanted or needed to cut down on their drinking, compared with 9.2% of married soldiers. Out of the 940 spouses, 155 (16.9%) reported that they were currently experiencing a moderate to severe emotional, alcohol, or family problem, compared to 76 (13.3%) of married soldiers. Additionally, 176 (19.3%) spouses reported that they were currently interested in receiving help for an emotional, alcohol or family problem, compared to only 54 (9.7%) of married soldiers. One hundred ninety-seven (197, 21.7%) spouses reported that the stress or emotional problems impacted negatively on the quality of their work or other activities, compared to 35 (6.2%) of married soldiers. Spouses who screened positive for mental health problems were about three times more likely to seek care than married soldiers who screened positive for mental health problems (Table 1). The most common source of mental health services utilized by spouses was actually the primary care physician at the military health RTO-MP-HFM-134 5-3

care clinic, rather than mental health professionals. This is most likely due to the convenience of seeing an on-post primary care physician for care, and the limited availability of specialty mental health services on post for spouses. Spouses who screened positive for depression or anxiety were much less likely to endorse barriers to care, including stigma, than married soldiers who screened positive for mental health problems, except for the cost of care and knowing where to get help (Table 2). The most commonly reported barrier was difficulty getting time off work or childcare problems. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Overall, 8% of the military spouses in this sample screened positive for major depression or generalized anxiety disorder, which is very similar to rates among married soldiers. Although rates of depression and anxiety were similar, spouses were more likely than soldiers to report that stress or emotional problems were having a significant effect on their lives, and they were more likely to report interest in receiving help. Spouses who screened positive for mental health problems were more likely to seek mental health care and reported less barriers to care and less stigma than married soldiers who screened positive for mental health problems. One of the important findings was the reliance on primary care professionals for mental health services. This was likely due to limited availability of specialty mental health services on post. If the primary care physician is the primary point of entry for spouses receiving mental health care, it is necessary to ensure that resources are available within the primary care system to facilitate mental health care treatment. It is important to assure that adequate specialty mental health services are available to spouses on military installations. Military General Medical Doctor Civilian General Medical Doctor Table 1: Health Care Utilization for stress, emotional, alcohol, or family problem Military Mental Health Professional Civilian Mental Health Professional Spouses Who Screened Positive for Mental Health Problem (n=74) n, (%) Married Soldiers Who Screened Positive for Mental Health Problem (n=49) n, (%) 31 (43.7%) 2 (4.2%) 11 (15.1%) 1 (2.1%) 12 (16.4%) 4 (8.5%) 23 (31.9%) 1 (2.1%) Military Chaplain 16 (22.5%) 6 (12.5%) Civilian Clergy 10 (13.9%) 1 (2.2%) Any Utilization 50 (68.5%) 9 (18.4%) 5-4 RTO-MP-HFM-134

Barrier Table 2: Perceived Barriers to Care Spouses Who Screened Positive for Mental Health Problem (n=74) Married Soldiers Who Screened Positive for Mental Health Problem (n=49) n (%) n (%) I don t trust mental health professionals 8 (11.1%) 15 (31.2%) I don t know where to get help 15 (20.6%) 8 (17.0%) I don t have adequate transportation 7 (9.8%) 7 (14.6%) It is difficult to schedule an appointment 19 (26.0%) 16 (34.1%) There would be difficulty getting time off work or childcare for treatment 31 (43.1%) 29 (61.7%) Mental health care costs too much money 19 (26.0%) 7 (14.9%) It would be too embarrassing 15 (20.5%) 22 (46.8%) It would harm my spouse s career 15 (20.5%) N/A It would harm my career 3 (4.1%) 27 (56.2%) I would be seen as weak 16 (22.3%) 37 (77.1%) Mental health care doesn t work 7 (9.5%) 10 (21.3%) REFERENCES Black, W.G. (1993). Military-induced family separation: A stress reduction intervention. Social Work,38 (3), 273-280. Brown, R.L., Leonard, T., Saunders, L.A., & Papasouliotis, O. (2001). A two-item conjoint screen for alcohol and other drug problems. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 14, (2), 95-106. Bruce, R.A., & Burch, R.L. (1989). Officer career development: modeling married aviator retention. Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, San Diego, CA., ADA210081. Drummet, A.R., Coleman, M., & Cable, S. (2003). Military families under stress: Implications for family life education. Family Relations, 52 (3), 279-287. Griffith, J.C., Doering, Z.D., & Mahoney, R.S. (1986). Description of spouses of officers and enlisted personnel in the U.S. Armed Forces, Arlington VA: Defense Manpower Data Center. Henkel, V., Mergl, R., Kohnene, R., Maier, W., Moller, H.J., & Hegerl, U. (2003). Identifying depressing in primary care: a comparison of different methods in a prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 326, 200-201. Hoge, C.W., Castro, C.A., Messer, S.M., McGurk, D., Cotting, D.I., & Koffman, R.L. (2004). Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 351 (1), 13-22. RTO-MP-HFM-134 5-5

Kelley, M.L. (1994). The effects of military-induced separation on family factors and child behavior. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 64 (1), 103-111. Klein, H.A., Tatone, C.L., & Lindsay, N.B. (2001). Correlates of life satisfaction among military wives. The Journal of Psychology, 123 (5), 465-475. Knapp, T.S., & Newman, S.J. (1993). Variables related to the psychological well being of Army wives during the stress of an extended military separation. Military Medicine, 158 (2), 77-80. Lowe, B., Spitzer, R.L., Grafe, K., et al. (2004). Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorder and physicians diagnoses. Journal of Affective Disorders, 8, 131-140. Martin, J.A., & Ickovics, J.R. (1987). The effects of stress on the psychological well-being of Army wives: Initial findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Human Stress, 13 (3), 108-115. McNulty, P.A.F. (2003). Does deployment impact the health care use of military families station in Okinawa, Japan? Military Medicine, 168, 465-470. Paulus, P.B., Nagar, D., Larey, T.S., & Camacho, L.M. (1996). Environmental, lifestyle, and psychological factors in the health and well-being of military families. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2053-2075. Rosen, L.N. (1996). Life events and symptomatic recovery of Army spouses following Operation Desert Storm. Behavioral Medicine, 21 (3), 131-139. Rosen, L.N., & Durand, D.B. (1995). The family factor and retention among married soldiers deployed in Operation Desert Storm. Military Psychology, 7 (4), 221-234. Rosen, L.N., & Moghadam, L.Z. (1988). Social support, family separation, and well-being among military wives. Behavioral Medicine,14 (2), 64-70. Spitzer, R.L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J.B.W. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report versions of PRIME-MD: The PHQ Primary Care Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282 (18), 1737-1744. Ursano, R.J., Holloway, H.C., Jones, D.R., Rodriguez, A.R., & Belenky, G.L. (1989). Psychiatric care in the military community: family and military stressors. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40 (12), 1284-1289. 5-6 RTO-MP-HFM-134