SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS, Donald J. Cymrot

CRM 86-73/August 986 SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS, 978-98 Donald J. Cymrot CNA CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES Ford Avenue Post Office Box 668 Alexandria, Virginia 3-68

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. Copyright CNA Corporation/Scanned October 3 Work conducted under contract N-83-C-75. This Research Memorandum represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE a. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION Unclassified a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY b. DECLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) b. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS 3. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY OF REPORT APPROVED FOB PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. 5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) CRM 86-73 6a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Center for Naval Analyses 6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) Ford Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 3-68 8a. NAME OF FUNDING/ORGANIZATION Office of Naval Research 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL (If applicable) CNA 8b. OFFICE SYMBOL (If applicable) ONR 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OP-) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) Navy Department Washington, D.C. 35-9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER N-83-C-75 8c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 8 North Quincy Street Arlington, Virginia 7. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS PROGRAM PROJECT ELEMENT NO. NO. 655N R8 TASK NO. WORK UNIT ACCESSION NO.. TITLE (Include Security Classification) Survival Rates of Prior-Service Recruits, 978-98. PERSONALAUTHOR(S) Donald J. Cymrot 3a. TYPE OF REPORT Final 3b. TIME COVERED FROM TO. DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) August 986 5. PAGE COUNT 8 6. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION 7. COSATI CODES FIELD 5 GROUP 9 SUB-GROUP 8. SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number) Attrition, Careers, Characteristics, Data base, Data sets, EMR (Enlisted Master Record), LOS (length of service), Naval personnel, Personnel selection, Recruiting, Recruits, Retention (general), SCREEN (Success Chances for Recruits Entering the Navy), Survival (personnel), Tables (data), Veterans (military personnel) 9. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number) This research memorandum examines the survival rates of prior-service Navy personnel from FY 978 through FY 98. Survival rates for this group of recruits (i.e., at what rate and for how long they remain in the Navy) depend primarily on the paygrade at enlistment. The analysis shows a sharp distinction between El-to-E3 enlistees and E-to-E7 enlistees, with the latter group having the higher rates. It also examines other factors influencing survival rates including age, education level, enlistment program, and previous military experience.. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT D UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED [x] SAME AS RPT. D DTIC USERS. ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION Unclassified a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL b. TELEPHONE (Include Area Code) c OFFICE SYMBOL DD FORM 73,8 MAR 83 APR edition may be used until exhausted. All other editions are obsolete. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE

A Division of ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^B CNA Hudson Institute CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES Ford Avenue Post Office Box 668 Alexandria, Virginia 3-68 (73) 8-8 October 986 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION LIST Subj: Center for Naval Analyses Research Memorandum 86-73 Encl: () CNA Research Memorandum 86-73, "Survival Rates of Prior-Service Recruits, 978-98," August 986. Enclosure () is forwarded as a matter of possible interest.. This research memorandum reports on the construction of and findings from an interactive, historical data base for recruit survival rates. The FY 978-98 data base includes accession and monthly survival information for prior-service recruits by accession program, pay grade, age and length of service at entry, age, sex, educational category and year of entry. This memorandum complements the work reported in CNA Research Memorandum 86-5 on non-prior-service recruits. Robert F. Lockman Director Manpower Program Distribution List: Reverse Page

Subj: Center for Naval Analyses Research Memorandum 86-73 Distribution List SNDL Al DASN - MANPOWER E3D CNR FF38 USNA Attn: Nimitz Library FF NAVPGSCOL FF NAVWARCOL FJA COMNAVMILPERSCOM FJB COMNAVCRUITCOM FKQ6D NAVPERSRANDCEN FT CNET OPNAV OP-9 OP-9R OP-9 OP-9 OP-9D OP- OP-IB OP-B3 OP-B7 OP- OP- OP-3 OP-35 OP- OP-5 OP-6 OP-9 OP-39 OP-5 9

CRM 86-73/August 986 SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS, 978-98 Donald J. Cymrot Naval Planning, Manpower, and Logistics Division A Division of ^^^^^^F^^J CNA Hudson Institute CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES Ford Avenue Post Office Box 668 Alexandria, Virginia 3-68

ABSTRACT This research memorandum examines the survival rates of prior-service Navy personnel from FY 978 through FY 98. Survival rates for this group of recruits (i.e., at what rate and for how long they remain in the Navy) depend primarily on the paygrade at enlistment. The analysis shows a sharp distinction between El-to-E3 enlistees and E-to-E7 enlistees, with the latter group having the higher rates. It also examines other factors influencing survival rates including age, education level, enlistment program, and previous military experience.

TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations... List of Tables... v vii Introduction... The Prior-Service Data Base... 3 SCREEN Tables... 6 Summary Tables... 6 Paygrade at Entry... Age at Entry... LOS at Entry... 6 Other Factors Affecting Survival Rates... 8 Enlistment Programs... 8 Other Characteristics... Trends Over Time... Prior-Service vs.non-prior-service Recruits... Conclusions and Recommendations... 7 References... 3 Appendix A: Constructing a SCREEN Table... A- - A-3 Appendix B: 978 Prior-Service-Recruit Cohorts: - to 8-Month Survival Rates... B-l - B- in

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Survival Rates of Prior-Service Recruits by Paygrade at Entry... 3 Survival Rates of Prior-Service Recruits by Age at Entry... 3 3 Survival Rates of Prior-Service Recruits by Paygrade and Age at Entry... Survival Rates of Prior-Service Recruits by LOS at Entry.. 6 5 Survival Rates for Prior-Service Recruits by Paygrade and LOS at Entry... 7 6 Survival Rates for Prior-Service Recruits by Previous Service Experience... 9 7 Survival Rates for Prior-Service Recruits by Type of Entry Program... 8 Survival Rates of Prior-Service Recruits by Sex... 9 Survival Rates of Prior-Service Recruits by Education Category... 9-Month Survival Rates of Prior-Service Recruits by Year of Entry... 3 Survival Rates of Prior-Service and Non-Prior-Service Recruits, 978-983...... 5 Survival Rates for Prior-Service Recruits by Paygrade and Non-Prior-Service Recruits... 5 3 Survival Rates of Prior-Service and Non-Prior-Service Recruits (Excluding 3-Year-Obligor Recruits)... 6

LIST OF TABLES Description of Prior-Service Data, 978-98... 5 Summary Table: All Prior-Service Recruits, 978-98... 7 3 -Month Survival Rates for Prior-Service Recruits Entering 978-98... 8 -Month Survival Rates for Prior-Service Recruits Entering 978-98... 9 5 36-Month Survival Rates for Prior-Service Recruits Entering 978-98... 6 8-Month Survival Rates for Prior-Service Recruits Entering 978-98... vn

INTRODUCTION The size of the pool of potential recruits available to the Navy will decline through 993. The number of l7-to- year olds, which is currently 9. million, will decline to about 8. million by 993 and then increase [l]. In addition, improvements in the private sector of the economy could lead to increased competition for young workers. At the same time, desired endstrength for the Navy is projected to increase. Given these trends, the Navy may have increased difficulty attracting enough recruits, and it may be forced to exploit more fully other sources of personnel. Among the potential alternatives are prior-service personnel. Recruiting prior-service personnel has both its advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are their military experience and their training in military occupations, both of which are costly to provide for many new recruits. By recruiting prior-service personnel, the Navy may avoid some of these costs. The disadvantages are their small numbers and their potential reluctance to reenter an occupation they once left. Another factor, which could be an advantage or a disadvantage, is the retention record of prior-service personnel. Recruits are not worth much to the Navy if they quit shortly after enlisting. In considering the value of prior-service recruits, it is important to examine at what rate and for how long they remain in the Navy. CNA has pioneered research on retention in the Navy with its work on survival rates of non-prior-service personnel. This work began with analyses of the 973 and 977 entry cohorts and the construction of tables showing Success Chances for Recruits Entering the Navy (SCREEN) [3 and ]. A SCREEN table estimates the probability that a recruit with a specific set In 985, there were about.3 million post-vietnam era veterans from all services under age 3 [], only a fraction of whom would even be eligible to enlist.

of characteristics remains in the Navy for at least year. The Navy Recruiting Command uses the SCREEN score as part of one of its eligibility standards. All non-prior-service males are assigned a SCREEN score, and only those with an estimated -year survival probability of 7 percent or more are permitted to enlist. Male veterans from the Navy with previously attained paygrades of El to E3 and all male veterans from other services are also subject to the same SCREEN test. This analysis continues some recent work done at CNA to reevaluate and update SCREEN methodology. In the initial phase of this project, CNA developed a capacity to examine the survival rates for both non-prior-service and prior-service individuals from 978 through 98 [5 and 6]. Using the newly developed data set, this analysis determines the survival rates of the prior-service recruits by various characteristics and compares them with those for non-prior-service recruits. The purpose of this work is to identify certain characteristics of prior-service recruits that appear to be associated with high chance of survival in the Navy. It may permit the Navy to refine recruiting standards for prior-service recruits that will help it meet and maintain its endstrength goals. lr The three personal characteristics are education, age, and mental group as determined by the score on the Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT). Unlike some other recruiting standards, there are no waivers to the SCREEN test.

THE PRIOR-SERVICE DATA BASE The data for this study come from the longitudinal Enlisted Master Record (EMR) constructed at CNA. The longitudinal EMR was created by merging three data sources-the quarterly Enlisted Master Records, the Personalized Recruiting for Immediate and Delayed Entry (PRIDE), and the System Consolidation for Accession and Training (SCAT). These three data sets are combined to follow the career of personnel between 978 and 98. The data base includes the 53,73 prior-service recruits who entered the Navy between 978 and 98. This number is about percent of the number of non-prior-service recruits during the same period. With a longitudinal data set, an individual's career can be followed over time to see how long he remains in the Navy after accession. From this information for an entire cohort of recruits, the proportion of personnel who remain in the Navy for a specified period can be calculated; this proportion is called the survival rate. For example, if, recruits enter the Navy in October, 978, and 5 leave by the beginning of October, 979, the -month survival rate is.95. Prior-service recruits can be classified in a number of ways or enter through a variety of programs. 3 A recruit may be a Navy veteran (NAVET) or a veteran from another service (OSVET). Some OSVETs are required to go through the recruit training course (RTC), but others are not. Recruits may have continuous service (CS), which means the separation from See [] for a detailed description of the procedure used in merging these data sets. The survival rate is not a probability. It is looking backward into a certain past instead of forward into an uncertain future. In some cases, the terms "survival rates" and "survival probabilities" are used interchangeably. Strictly speaking, they are not interchangeable, but survival rates are often used as estimates for probabilities. When the number of observations is large enough, the survival rates may provide a reasonable estimate. 3 The details of the definitions and rules governing enlistment of prior-service personnel are spelled out in [7, chapter 5.] This group includes recruits who have been seperated from the service for years or more and recruits who enter into paygrades E3 or below.

the armed services is less than 9 days, or broken service (BS), the separation is greater than 9 days. With continuous service, the recruit is given longevity credit from his previous service for paygrade and sea duty determinations. Upon reentering the service, the recruit may be guaranteed a stationing in a particular location under the PRISE I program or may be guaranteed schooling under the PRISE II program. In the RESCORE program, the recruit switches from an overmanned rating to an undermanned one. The prior-service data set contains ten different combinations of programs and experiences under which prior-service recruits may enter the Navy. Table shows the percentage of recruits entering under each. The largest groups are the NAVETs, both continuous and broken service, and the PRISE I program. Among the OSVETs, the PRISE II program is the largest. Table also shows the distribution of the prior-service recruits by paygrade at time of reentry, previous length of military service (LOS), age at time of reentry, sex, and education by high school degree category. Most recruits reenter at the E or E5 level and have to years of service, which indicates that they completed one term before initially leaving the service. Not surprisingly, these recruits are older than the typical non-prior-service recruit. In some crucial ratings, the separation must be less than 8 days. The trend over time has been to shift from OSVETs to NAVETs. In 978, when only about, prior-service personnel were recruited, over five of every six recruits were OSVETs. In 98, which was the peak of prior-service recruiting during this period (about 3,), only one in four was an OSVET.

TABLE DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR-SERVICE DATA 978-98 Variable Percent Variable Percent Enlistment Program Paygrades NAVET CS NAVET BS NAV/OSVET PRISE I NAVET PRISE II RESCORE CS RESCORE BS OSVET BS OSVET PRISE II OSVET (No RTC) Other..7 7.7.8. 3.6 5.9 6. 3.6. El E E3 E E5 E6 E7+.3 5.7.8 3. 3.8 6..9 Sex Male Females Education HS degree Non-HS degree 95.3.7 7.9 5. Age 6-3 3+ Previous LOS - 5-8 9-3+ 5. 8. 8. 8.6 65.7 3.8 8.3.

SCREEN TABLES Established methodology is to characterize the survival rates of a group of recruits by means of a SCREEN table. An interactive program that calculates the elements of a SCREEN table from the prior-service data set has been written and is available at CNA. The program allows the user to choose subgroups of the data set and calculate the survival rates for subgroups with different characteristics. Appendix A shows the operation of this program. SUMMARY TABLES Table shows a SCREEN table that summarizes the results for the entire prior-service data set. This table shows the 6-month survival rate, which is the maximum length of time information is available for recruits entering in 98. The 9-month survival rates for prior-service recruits is generally quite high. The survival rate for all recruits over the entire period is 97 percent. Within this aggregate figure, there is some variation across different groups. Most notable among these is the higher survival rate for recruits entering at paygrades E and above. Across the upper paygrades, there is little variation in the survival rates, but in the lower paygrades, there is some variation. The survival rate for E entrants is higher than that for either El or E3 entrants. Within the lower paygrades, neither age nor experience seems to have a consistent effect on survival rates. At El, for example, younger recruits are more likely to drop out, but at E3, older recruits are more likely to drop out. Also, the small number of observations in some cells makes it difficult to draw a conclusion about trends. The effect of various components of the SCREEN table can be examined in more detail. Tables 3 through 6 show the SCREEN tables for -, -, 36-, and 8- month survival rates, respectively. Because the data cover only the period through June of 985, the longer survival rates cannot be A similar program using the non-prior-service data set is also available [6].

TABLE SUMMARY TABLE: ALL PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS, 978-98 PG PG PG 3 PG PG 5 PG 6 PG 7+ Age 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 389 57 5 7 5 97 3 3 793 7 88 8 5 586 57 79 36 7 5 6 7358 79 37 68 8 7 3 8 379 recruits and fraction who survive to 6 months LOS - LOS 5-8 LOS 9- LOS 3+ 735 99 788 353.7.86.9.9.8.96.95.9.93.95.95.9.8.7.86..99.99.99.99....99........9.9.93.97.96.95.96 3 8 5 73 88 88 36 6 3 6 5 88 9 5 387 65 355 8 968 5 889 99 6 737 363 6 3 7 579 96 7......99.98..99..9.8.7.83..99.99.99.99..99.99.99.99...........99.98.98.98 3 9 3 3 5 8 8 83 3 9 3 535 39 75 88 8 5 6 8 38 8 6 535 98 998 356 63...89.9..93.9..8.6.7..99.99.99..9.98.99.99..98.99..99.......98.99.98.98 3 3 8 8 9 96 3 7 8 6 6 7 56 67 6 5 5.....56.56...98.98...98.98..88..98.98...95.96..9..97.97 389 6 76 7 9 5 3 57 39 76 33 6 767 638 56 835 879 75 63 79 93 63 875 76 7 63 899 35 86 76 369 57 7 79 577 987 9969 5373.7.87.9.95.83.96.96.93.95.95.95.9.8.7.86..99.99.99.99..99.99.99.99.........98.99.93.98.97.97.97

TABLE 3 -MONTH SURVIVAL RATES FOR PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS ENTERING 978-983 PG Age 6-3 378 58 39 7 recruits and fraction who survive to Months LOS - LOS 5-8 LOS 9- LOS 3+.55.78.83.9.7 7 6 67..96..99 3 8...88.9.. 378 576 68 7 9.55.79.85.93.73 PG 6-3 897 39 38 73.9.89.8.86.9 85 86 36..93.9.89.93 3 5 8..8.83.. 9 79 7 57 95.9.9.86.86.9 PG 3 6-3 658 655 36 66 85.9.8.69.58.78 88 36 38 788..8.69.55.7 7 8 8..7.8.57 8 8.5.5 66 9 3 7 579.9.83.69.56.77 oo PG 6-3 3+ 8 6399 9 396.99.97.98.98.98 7 99 3 58 759..97.98.97.98 8 59..97.97.97 9 93...99.99 89 7395 359 39 56.99.97.98.97.98 PG 5 6-3 5 66 853 3 99.99.99.99.99.99 6 675 656 769 6..99.98.99.98 333 3 758..9.96.97.97 33 5...96.96 69 89 385 6 96.99.99.98.98.99 PG 6 6-3 8 68 6 7 356....99. 6 9 686 35..... 7 5 95 8 87..98.99.99.99 8 9 53 58..88..97.97 6 589 65 77 83...99.99.99 PG 7+ 6-3 9... 99 59.... 7 55 35 59....99.99 6 36 6...9.9 75 36 539 977....97.98 6-3 575 966 6687 38 38.88.95.93.93.9 39 7 73 5 95..98.96.96.97 95 87 9 3..98.97.96.97 6 9 993 9..9..96.96 65 339 37 96 8383.88.95.95.95.95

PG PG PG 3 PG PG 5 PG 6 PG 7+ Age 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 TABLE -MONTH SURVIVAL RATES FOR PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS ENTERING 978-98 357 97 3 6 3 8 78 3 95 76 588 98 98 8 3 537 5 37 9597 3 979 373 8 7693 8 337 393 6 98 9 3 586 569 379 7 recruits and fraction who survive to Months LOS - LOS 5-8 LOS 9- LOS 3+.33.59.63.78.5.75.69.63.56.7.79.65.8..6.95.93.95.9.93.98.98.97.96.97....99.....75.88.86.88.86 3 3 58 8 78 3 96 3 98 8 65 7 8 7 8 39 9 9 66 3 7 95 83 639 65 98 59 98 9 336 377 6 998.83.9.9.88..73.67.68.7..65.5.33.53..93.95.9.9..96.9.9.95...99.99.99......9.9.9.93 3 8 3 5 8 35 7 8 9 57 55 5 3 586 7 7 78 9 7 6 5 9 89 55 799 33...88.9.67.67.67.9..3..9.95.9..8.93.9.93...97.98.98...99..99..97.95.9.9 6 6 8 86 3 9 96 8 8 5 6 6 7 89 863...5.5.....99.99...86.86..88..9.9..83.88.88..9.9.9.9 357 5 57 68 3 85 358 383 6 69 59 533 6 98 3 66 37 59 57 33 6 767 95 396 3 37 68 6 73 7 35 99 9 3 97 888 83 588.33.6.68.8.5.76.69.6.6.7.79.65.8..59.95.93.95.93.9.98.97.96.95.96...99.98.99...99.95.97.75.89.89.9.88

PG PG PG 3 PG PG 5 PG 6 PG 7+ Age 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 3+ 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 TABLE 5 36-MONTH SURVIVAL RATES FOR PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS ENTERING 978-98 38 38 769 39 9 3 7 63 7 58 668 35 96 8 39 85 9 69 77 8 89 83 7 857 57 3 5 9 5 6 393 87 8673 recruits and fraction who survive to 36 Months LOS - LOS 5-8 LOS 9- LOS 3+..36..63.3.5..3.33..58.3..3.3.83.8.83.8.8.9.89.86.9.89..99.99.99.99....58.7.7.8.7 3 6 6 59 8 53 3 89 6 57 739 38 6 65 59 5 79 7 6 696 557 88 3 73 55 6 3 395 6 66.5.56.8.63..53.36.5.8..35.5..7.83.8.87.83.8.5.88.85.87.86..99.97.98.98..99..99.9.85.8.86.8 3 8 9 56 79 5 7 363 8 36 6 9 6 5 98 6 85 9 39..67.88.83.5.67.6.3...75.89.9.9..75.86.88.87..9.96.97.96..96.98.98.98..89.9.9.9 66 68 3 63 67 8 6 8 99 56 6 6 585 6...36.36..9.93..73.73..88.83.89.89...85.86..88.83.86.86 38 39 3 6 8 3 96 93 8 88 9 73 9 6 398 9 6 77 5 8983 8 35 55 99 699 9 53 5 866 867 6 76 758 8 577 73 639 777..37..7.36.5..35..3.59.3.3.8.33.83.8.8.8.8.89.89.85.89.88..99.97.97.97..98.99.93.96,58.7.77.85.76

PG PG PG 3 PG PG 5 PG 6 PG 7+ Age 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 TABLE 6 8-MONTH SURVIVAL RATES FOR PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS ENTERING 978-98 5 36 69 3 6 9 59 37 97 56 985 5 86 75 8 83 55 3 36 33 377 3 678 3 33 3 385 85 8 9 8 5735 85 7 97.3.8.35.35.5..7.8.6.9.5.6.3.3.7.77.73.79.7.75.83.8.77.88.83..97.99.97.97....5.6.6.78.65 recruits and fraction who LOS 5-8 9 5 8 3 37 95 73 36 6 73 96 57 965 8 7 396 98 5 35 6 6 3 7 35 7 99 3 9 6 33.75.56.8.67...7.5.33..5.5.8.9..73.8.7.78.8.76.8.8..9.93.95.9...98.99..77.75.8.78 survive to 8 Months LOS 9- LOS 3+ 3 7 7 9 38 53 97 39 7 58 9 9 39 7 36 577 96 5 7 73 83 353..33.57.55.5.3...5.8..85.89.87.7.78.78.78..87.93.95.9.96..96.97..88.87.87.87 5 5 3 36 39 8 5 8 5 7 3 363...9.9..9.9..58.6.75..8.8...77.79.87..76.77 5 8 9 3 553 76 7 58 59 565 35 97 77 75 638 96 586 36 53 77 593 3859 686 539 35 586 5 36 35 86 89 683 38 6 67.3.9.37.5.7.5.7..33.3.5.6.3..6.77.73.8.75.76.83.8.76.85.8..95.9.9.9.98..9.9.5.65.69.8.7

determined for the more recent cohorts. These tables include the maximum number of observations available at each survival point. All recruits who entered in 983 or earlier are included at the -month survival point, all who entered in 98 or earlier are included at the -month survival point, and so on. PAYGRADE AT ENTRY Some of the trends in these data are best illustrated by means of a figure. Figure shows the survival rates over time by paygrade at the time of entry. The figure provides some confirmation for the trend shown in table using 6-month survival rates. There appears to be a significant difference between the survival rates for the El-to-E3 group and the E-to-E7 group. The figure shows a decrease in the differences within the El-to-E3 group and an increase of the differences within the E-to-E7 group. The differences within the groups are dwarfed, however, by the differences across the groups. Personnel returning at the petty officer paygrades (i.e., E to E7) are much more likely to stay in the Navy than those returning at apprentice paygrades (i.e., El to E3) over the entire -year period. AGE AT ENTRY Figure shows the difference in survival rates of prior-service recruits through 8 months by age at entry for four age categories. The figure indicates a direct relationship between age and survival rates that grows over time. The youngest group has the lowest survival rates in all cases. The size of the differences among age groups is smaller than the size of the An alternative approach is to exclude anyone with less than 8 months of potential service, which would exclude all entrants after 98. There is little difference between these two approaches, which is illustrated in appendix B. This paygrade is not necessarily the same as the paygrade at the time of discharge from the prior term of service.

8 c a> u w. ) a 6 o ) ac I 36 J 8 LOS (months) FIG. : SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY PAYGRADE AT ENTRY 8 3+ a> u 6 I u <B a: I LOS (months) 36 _J 8 FIG. : SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY AGE AT ENTRY 3

differences between the lower and higher paygrades. Part of the difference in age-group survival rates is due to the fact that the younger recruits are more likely than the older ones to fall within the apprentice paygrades. Most of the differences in the age groups can be attributed to differences in the distribution of paygrade groups. This point is illustrated in figure 3. The difference between E3 and E recruits is much larger than the difference between age -to-5 and 6-to-3 recruits. Although there is little difference across age groups among the Es, there are some differences among E3s. In both cases, however, the survival rates for E3s are considerably below those for Es. E 6-3 c O) o l_ <u Q. 8 6 E3 o> CC 6-3 I 36 8 LOS (months) FIG. 3: SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY PAYGRADE AND AGE AT ENTRY The lack of a clear effect of age on survival rates for prior-service recruits is in sharp contrast to the effect for non-prior-service recruits. There is a monotonic relationship between age and survival among these recruits-the

younger the recruit, the more likely the recruit remains in the Navy beyond a year. This relationship does not exist for prior-service recruits, which is significant because OSVETs are subject to the same SCREEN test as non-prior-service recruits, and the SCREEN test includes age as one of the factors considered. Some OSVETs may be excluded from the Navy because of the age criteria, even though the age effects for prior-service recruits are quite different from those suggested in the SCREEN table. For example, consider a 5-year-old high school diploma graduate with an AFQT score of 8 and a -year-old in the same education and mental groups. The 5-year-old gets a SCREEN score of 69 and so would not be permitted to enlist; the -year-old gets a score of 75 and would be permitted to enlist, even though the -year survival rate for FY 978 through 983 was higher for 5-year-olds than for -year-olds. 5

LOS AT ENTRY Figure shows the path of survival rates through 8 months by LOS at time of entry. The differences across LOS groups is quite narrow at months, but it grows over time.. The LOS - group has the lowest survival rates, and the LOS 9- group has the highest survival rates. Once again, the differences between age groups is considerably smaller than the differences between low and high paygrades. Much of the difference across LOS groups is surely attributable to differences in paygrade. Figure 5 shows the difference between E3 and E survival rates within LOS categories. The difference between paygrade groups is much larger than the difference between LOS groups. 8 9- ) u O) Q. 6 U Ol QC I 36 8 LOS (months) FIG. : SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY LOS AT ENTRY 6

LOS 5-8 8 c ) 6 ~ ' _uo) CC LOS - I LOS (months) 36 8 FIG. 5: SURVIVAL RATES FOR PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY PAYGRADE AND LOS AT ENTRY 7

OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING SURVIVAL RATES This section extends the analysis of the characteristics that affect survival rates of prior-service recruits. In the previous section, the concept of a SCREEN table was introduced, and variations in survival rates according to characteristics on the SCREEN table were discussed. This section disaggregates the prior-service data set to examine the effects of enlistment program, sex, education, and year of entry. ENLISTMENT PROGRAMS The data on enlistment programs can be examined in several ways. For example, each program could be looked at separately, but the problem with this approach is that there are only a few hundred observations in some of the programs. With such a small number of observations, there can be little confidence in the results being representative of a meaningful trend. Rather than a complete disaggregation into individual programs, two groups of programs are investigated. Programs are grouped as NAVET or OS VET and as continuous service, broken service, or a PRISE program. Figure 6 shows the breakdown between NAVET and OSVET recruits. One problem with this grouping is how to handle the PRISE I and Other categories. The Navy data do not distinguish between NAVETs and OS- VETs for these two programs, and figure 6 excludes both of these categories. If they were to be included, they would likely fall into the NAVETs category because most of these recruits are Navy veterans. Their inclusion has only a minor effect on the shape of the NAVETs line; it is almost identical for the first years and several percentage points higher for the last years. In figure 6, the NAVETs line is above the OSVETs line, but the two lines are roughly parallel. This result implies that differences in NAVET and OS- VET survival occur in the first year of service. Among those who survive the first year, the survival rate through the fourth year is approximately 8

the same. NAVET 8 c o V> 6 OSVET & <u OC I 36 8 LOS (months) FIG. 6: SURVIVAL RATES FOR PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY PREVIOUS SERVICE EXPERIENCE Figure 7 divides the entry programs into three groups: those specifying continuous service, those specifying broken service, and the PRISE programs. With this specification, there is no overlap of programs, and all recruits (with the exception of the non-prior-service category) are classified. The survival rates of these groups are similar in the first years of service, but in the third year, there is a relatively large decrease in the survival rate of those with broken service. This one-time drop may be related This result is not surprising. Both NAVETs and OSVETs have experienced the rigors of military life, and so it is likely that the distribution of tastes for military service is very similar for the two groups. OSVETs, however, have not had experiences that may be peculiar to the Navy. During the first year of Navy service, OSVETs are more likely to find the Navy experience not to their liking (e.g., getting seasick), but after this initial screening, their experiences are similar. 9

to end-of-contract reenlistment. Many of the broken-service recruits had a -year obligation, and when this obligation ended, there was a jump in attrition. In the PRISE programs, the initial obligation is at least years. If a larger percent of the continuous-service recruits are also in for years or more, this could explain the differences across programs. i cs 8 c ) S 6 a BS o ) cc. 36 8 LOS (months) FIG. 7: SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY TYPE OF ENTRY PROGRAM OTHER CHARACTERISTICS Figures 8 and 9 show the effect of sex and education on the survival rates. First, there appears to be little difference between the survival rates of males and females. Second, education is defined as a categorical variable: high school graduates and non-high school graduates. Survival rates for high school graduates are consistently higher than those for non-high

school graduates. This trend is consistent with the considerable evidence for non-prior-service recruits. The effect of education might appear stronger if a differentiation could be made between high school degree graduates and general equivalency degree graduates (GEDs). Among non-prior-service recruits, the survival rates for GEDs tend to be close to that for non-high school graduates, and the rates for degree graduates are considerably higher than for these two groups. The prior-service data program does not permit the exploration of this issue. 8 I 6 oc I 36 8 LOS (months) FIG. 8: SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY SEX

High school graduates 8 c <o Non-high school graduates o CC 36 8 LOS (months) FIG. 9: SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY EDUCATION CATEGORY TRENDS OVER TIME Figure shows survival rates at 9 and months for the years 978 through 983. The 9- and -month survival rates were chosen to maximize the number of observations used for this comparison. The line through both bars for each year shows the percent of El-to-E3 recruits in that year. Both the 9- and -month survival rates were lower for 978 than for the other years, but in that year the percent of El-to-E3 recruits was approximately twice as high as in the other years. Because El-to-E3 attrition is higher than attrition for higher paygrades, it is not surprising that the overall survival rate is lower. The further drop in El-to-E3 attrition between 98 and 983 is associated with a slight increase (l percentage point) in both

survival rates. c 8 8 6 9 months months Percent entered E-E3 u O) DC 978 979 98 98 98 983 Year FIG. : 9-MONTH SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY YEAR OF ENTRY 3

PRIOR VS. NON-PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS If the prior-service pool for recruits is considered an alternative to the non-prior-service pool, it is useful to compare the survival rates of the two groups. Such a comparison provides insights into the relative effort required to maintain the different types of recruits in service for a particular length of time. Prior-service recruits may have either a better or worse survival record than non-prior-service recruits. On the one hand, prior-service personnel have an understanding of the rigors of military life from their previous experience; consequently, they may be less likely to be unpleasantly surprised by the nature of their assignments. On the other hand, these recruits have already decided to leave the military once, and doing it again may be easier. Figure compares the -month through 8-month survival rates for prior-service and non-prior-service recruits who entered the Navy between 978 and 983.* The line for prior-service recruits is above that for nonprior service recruits at each of the years of service. The largest differences are at the end of the first and fourth years. After year, the difference in the survival rates is 8 percent. At and 3 years, the lines are close to parallel, which indicates that attrition during this period is about equal, but in the fourth year, non-prior-service attrition increases, and the gap between the two is 5 percentage points. Figure distinguishes between prior-service recruits in El-to-E3 and E-to-E7 paygrades. The line for non-prior-service personnel falls between the two prior-service categories. E-to-E7 recruits have the best survival rates and El to E3s the poorest. x The information for the non-prior-service recruits is available from the SCREEN program described in 6].

Prior service 8 c 8 a> a 6 Non-prior service u a> a: I 36 8 LOS (months) FIG. : SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE AND NON-PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS, 978-983 8 Prior service, E-E7 ' -. Non-prior service 8 6 DC \ 36 8 LOS (months) FIG. : SURVIVAL RATES FOR PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS BY PAYGRADE AND NON-PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS 5

The increase in attrition for non-prior-service recruits after 3 years of service that is shown in figure can be explained by the type of nonprior-service entry program. Among the non-prior-service entry programs are the Active Mariner (AM) and the Apprenticeship Training Program (ATP), which have a 3-year obligation. The combined survival probability for these two programs at 8 months is 5 percent. If these two programs are eliminated from the non-prior-service grouping (figure 3), the survival lines are roughly parallel. Although prior-service recruits have a higher survival rate overall after the first year, the attrition rate for prior-service and non-prior-service recruits is roughly the same. Attrition in the first year may be higher among non-prior-service personnel because they have more of an adjustment to military life. This adjustment is probably the biggest reason for the difference in early attrition. Prior service 8 S 6 All but AMsand ATPs 8 < cc 36 8 LOS (months) FIG. 3: SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE AND NON-PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS (EXCLUDING 3-YEAR-OBLIGOR RECRUITS) 6

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This memorandum summarizes the survival data for prior-service recruits between FY 978 through FY 98. These data are available on an interactive basis at CNA. The interactive program constructs tables that allow the user to study the survival rates of recruits with specific characteristics. The data provide a number of interesting insights into the value of prior-service recruits and serve as a basis for making several recommendations. The paygrade at the time of reentry is the best characteristic available for screening recruits on the basis of survival probabilities. Recruits who enter at the E-to-E7 paygrades have a 8-month survival rate of 8 percent; those who enter at the El-to-E3 paygrades have a 8-month survival rate of 7 percent. Much of the variation in survival rates by other characteristics such as age at reentry or length of service at reentry apparently can be explained in terms of variation in the proportion of El-to-E3 paygrades within a category. This distinction between El-to-E3 and E-to-E7 recruits is particularly interesting because the rules for recruiting priorservice personnel already distinguish between these two groups. It is more difficult, and in some cases impossible, for El-to-E3 personnel to enlist. In spite of these rules, the survival rates are still relatively low for the El to E3s. The pattern of survival rates for prior-service personnel is different from that for non-prior-service personnel. The difference is most evident in the effect of age on survival rates. For non-prior-service personnel there is an inverse relationship between survival rates and age, i.e., younger recruits are more likely to remain in the Navy than older recruits. This pattern does not exist for prior-service personnel. This difference is significant from a policy standpoint because the non-prior-service SCREEN table is used to J The term "apparently" is used because these observations are made without benefit of multivariate analysis. See [7] for details. 7

evaluate OSVETs. Given this difference, it is apparent that the SCREEN table currently in use provides poor estimates of the of survival probabilities for certain groups of OSVETs. The survival rate for prior-service recruits is higher than that for nonprior-service recruits. Most of the difference between these two groups occurs in the first year of service when the survival rate for prior-service recruits is 8 points higher. This difference implies that to keep personnel through years of service, it is necessary to find 6 recruits without prior service, but only 3 with prior service. In addition to the smaller number of recruits needed initially, prior-service recruits are also likely to cost less because of the relatively low levels of training they require. Another advantage of this group is that it takes less time to have a trained person ready for productive duty from among the prior-service pool. Although recruiting prior-service personnel into petty officer ranks is cost effective for the Navy, there are some limitations and problems in using this pool. First, the size of the pool is limited by the extent of past attrition. As retention rates increase, the size of the pool will shrink. Second, recruiting prior-service personnel may be quite difficult. At some point these people decided that civilian life is preferable to military life. Whether the reason for this decision was economic or personal, recruiters may have to overcome obstacles. Third, although there are some opportunities to retrain experienced personnel through the RESCORE program, recruiters are constrained in their recruitment of prior-service personnel by the specific petty officer needs of the Navy. In other words, the Navy may not need the specific skills of some of the prior-service personnel who are willing to enlist. Fourth, short-run budgetary constraints may make recruiting petty officers too costly. Recruiting goals for prior-service personnel serve as a basis for recruiters' activities. The budgetary cost to Recruiting Command The availability of prior-service recruits, in some cases shortly after they initially decided to leave the Navy, may indicate a failure in the personnel retention system. It is likely to be cheaper to keep people in the Navy in the first place than to let them leave and then return. Nonetheless, in some cases, people do change their minds, and in others, the needs of the Navy change over time. 8

of an E in the first year is greater than the cost of a non-prior-service recruit. Recruiters may be constrained in seeking additional prior-service personnel by these goals. Although the goal setters may be responding rationally to their own budget constraint, such decisions are not rational from the perspective of the Navy. The cost of an E (with the possible exception of a RESCORE recruit) is less than the cost of the El because the E is already trained. In addition, if survival rates and differences in productivity are factored in, the advantage for more senior personnel is even greater. In many cases, the Navy would be better off in the long run if it provided some flexibility in setting recruiting budgets. Some consideration should be given to developing a contingency fund to allow for increasing the recruiting budget to enable the recruitment of all qualified prior-service personnel available. This analysis serves as a basis for three recommendations about recruiting prior-service personnel. Recruiting prior-service personnel into paygrades E and above should be encouraged and expanded. The regulations that discourage recruiting these personnel into paygrades El through E3 should be maintained and even strengthened. The practice of using the non-prior-service SCREEN tables to determine the eligibility of OSVETs should be discontinued. A new SCREEN table based upon the survival experiences of OSVETs should be created. 9

REFERENCES l] Lockman, Robert F. and Quester, Aline O., "Forewarned is Forearmed," Proceedings, U.S. Naval Institute (Feb 98): 6-9 [] U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States 986, 986 [3] CNA Study 68, Chances of Surviving the First Year of Service: A New Technique for Use in Making Recruiting Policy and Screening Applicants for the Navy, by Robert F. Lockman, Nov 975 [] CNA Research Contribution 5, A New Look at Success Chances of Recruits Entering the Navy (SCREEN), by Robert F. Lockman and Philip M. Lurie, Feb 98 [5] CNA Research Memorandum 86-3, Non-Prior-Service Accession Data Set: FY 978-FY 98, by George R. Corliss, Jan 986 [6] CNA Research Memorandum 86-5, SCREEN Tables for Non-Prior- Service Accessions for FY 978-98, by Aline Quester, Mar 986 [7] Navy Recruiting Command, COMNAVCRUITCOM Instruction 3.8B, Navy Recruiting Manual Enlisted, (Feb 85) 3

APPENDIX A CONSTRUCTING A SCREEN TABLE This appendix shows the computer commands needed to construct a SCREEN table for prior-service recruits. The process is similar to that explained in [] of the main text for constructing a SCREEN table for nonprior-service recruits; however, this version of the program has some different options. The program itself is available in CNA9:[CORLISSG.DEP. EMR.PRIORJMAKE JIEPORT. Once it is copied into the user's workspace, the program is implemented by typing responses indicated in boldface type. ENTER SELECTION FOR REPORT YEAR SELECTION - Year 78 - Year 79 3 - Year 8 - Year 8 5 - Year 8 6 - Year 83 7 - Year 8 How many years would you like to select? (9 for all): Enter first year selection: 6 Enter second year selection: 7 A-l

SEX SELECTION - Male - Female 9 - Combined Enter the sex you want: 9 PROGRAM SELECTION - NON-PRIOR-SERVICE - NAVET CONTINUOUS SERVICE - NAVET BROKEN SERVICE 3 - NAVET/OSVET PRISE I - NAVET PRISE II 5 - RESCORE CONTINUOUS SERVICE 6 - RESCORE BROKEN SERVICE 7 - OSVET BROKEN SERVICE 8 - OSVET PRISE II 9 - OSVET BROKEN SERVICE (NO RTC) How many programs would you like to select? ( for all): Enter first program selection EDUCATION SELECTION - Non-HS Graduates - HS Graduates 9 - Combined A-

Enter EDUCATION selection: 9 SURVIVAL MONTH SELECTION Valid entries are from to 9 Enter survival months: 9 Your report can be found at REPORT.DAT Would you like to produce another report (Y or N)? N This program does not produce a hard copy of the report. The report is sent to the current directory. A hard copy may be produced by using a print command at the dollar sign prompt (i.e., PRINT REPORT.DAT). A-3

PG PG PG 3 PG DO ~ PG 5 PG 6 PG 7+ Age 6-3 6-3 3+ 6-3 3+ 6-3 3+ 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 5 36 69 3 6 9 59 37 97 56 985 5 86 75 8 83 55 3 36 33 377 3 678 3 33 3 385 85 TABLE B- -MONTH SURVIVAL RATES FOR ALL RECRUITS ENTERING 978-98 recruits and fraction who survive to months LOS - LOS 5-8 LOS 9- LOS 3+ 8 9 8 5735 85 7 97.69.8.9.9.8.9.87.77.88.86.9.79.6.63.7.99.98.98.9.98..99.99.99.99.........9.9.89.95.93 9 5 8 3 37 95 73 36 6 73 96 57 965 8 7 396 98 5 35 6 6 3 7 35 7 99 3 9 6 33..89..9..9.95.9.93..7.6.53.63..98.99.98.99.98.97.99.98....99.......97.9.96.96 3 7 7 9 38 53 97 39 7 58 9 9 39 7 36 577 96 5 7 73 83 353...86.9..86.89..86.39.53..99.99.99.86.97.95.95...99.99.99...99...99.98.96.97 5 5 3 36 39 8 5 8 5 7 3 363.....5.5....9.9.88..9.9...95.95.93..9.9 5 8 9 3 553 76 7 58 59 565 35 97 77 75 638 96 586 36 53 77 593 3859 686 539 35 586 5 36 35 86 89 683 38 6 67.69.85.9.93.8.9.87.8.89.87.9.78.6.58.7.99.98.98.96.98..99.98.99.99....99.99...98.99.9.9.9.95.9

TABLE 8- -MONTH SURVIVAL RATES FOR ALL RECRUITS ENTERING 978-98 PG Age 6-3 3+ 5 36 69 3 6 recruits and fraction who survive to months LOS - LOS 5-8 LOS 9- LOS 3+..6.75.87.6 9 5 8..89.8.89 3 7...86.9.. 5 8 9..65.78.86.6 PG 6-3 9 59 37 97.73.7.55.57.68 3 37 95..7.68.8.7 7 9..86.89.. 3 553 76 7.73.7.59.67.69 CO PG 3 PG 6-3 6-3 56 985 5 86 75 8 83 55 3.8.6..5.59.97.9.95.87.9 73 36 6 73 96 57 965..6.3.37.7..9.97.9.95 38 53 97 39.57.6.6..95.96.96 5 5.36.36..98.98 58 59 565 35 97 77 75 638 96 586.8.6..3.56.97.9.96.9.9 PG 5 6-3 36 33 377 3 678..97.95.96.97 8 7 396 98.93.9.9.9 7 58 9 9.7.9.9.9 3 36 39..78.79 36 53 77 593 3859..96.9.95.95 PG 6 6-3 3 33 3 385 85...99.99. 5 35 6 6 3....99.99 39 7 36 577...97.98.98 8 5.88..9.9 686 539 35 586...99.98.99 PG 7+ 6-3 8 9... 7 35 7 99.... 96 5 7...99. 8...88.89 5 36 35 86...96.97 6-3 8 5735 85 7 97.78.86.8.9.85 3 9 6 33..9.9.93.9 73 83 353..96.95.93.9 5 7 3 363.93..88.88 89 683 38 6 67.78.87.86.9.88

TABLE B-3 36-MONTH SURVIVAL RATES TOR ALL RECRUITS ENTERING 978-98 PG Age 6-3 5 36 69 3 6 recruits and fraction who survive to 36 months LOS - LOS 5-8 LOS 9- LOS 3+.7..5.68. 9 5 8..78.8.83 3 7..67.86.8.. 5 8 9.7..57.73.3 PG PG 3 6-3 6-3 9 59 37 97 56 985 5 86.5.37.3.38.38.6.3.7.37.33 3 37 95 73 36 6 73..53.3.6.7..6.8.. 7 9 38 53.5.7.67....36.36 3 553 76 7 58 59 565 35 97.53.38..7.39.6.3.7.3.3 CO to PG 6-3 3+ 75 8 83 55 3.8.79.8.78.8 96 57 965..79.89.83.85 97 39..9.9.9 5 5..96.96 77 75 638 96 586.8.79.85.8.8 PG 5 PG 6 6-3 6-3 36 33 377 3 678 3 33 3 385 85.9.85.8.9.88..99.99.99.99 8 7 396 98 5 35 6 6 3.85.8.89.85..98.96.98.97 7 58 9 9 39 7 36 577.7.8.87.85..9.95.97.96 3 36 39 8 5..67.69.88..85.86 36 53 77 593 3859 686 539 35 586.9.85.8.9.87..98.96.97.97 PG 7+ 6-3 8 9... 7 35 7 99.... 96 5 7.96..97.98 8...85.86 5 36 35 86.98..9.96 6-3 8 5735 85 7 97.6.68.67.8.7 3 9 6 33..8.79.88.83 73 83 353..9.9.9.9 5 7 3 363.93..83.8 89 683 38 6 67.6.7.73.86.75

TABLE B- 8-MONTH SURVIVAL RATES FOR ALL RECRUITS ENTERING 978-98 PG Age 6-3 5 36 69 3 6 LOS -.3.8.35.35.5 recruits and fraction who survive to 8 months LOS 5-8 LOS 9- LOS 3+ 9 5 8.75.56.8.67 3 7..33.57.55.. 5 8 9.3.9.37.5.7 PG 6-3 9 59 37 97..7.8.6.9 3 37 95...7.5.33 7 9.5.3. 3 553 76 7.5.7..33.3 PG 3 6-3 56 985 5 86.5.6.3.3.7 73 36 6 73..5.5.8.9 38 53..5.8.9.9 58 59 565 35 97.5.6.3..6 CO PG 6-3 75 8 83 55 3.77.73.79.7.75 96 57 965..73.8.7.78 97 39..85.89.87 5 5..9.9 77 75 638 96 586.77.73.8.75.76 PG 5 6-3 36 33 377 3 678.83.8.77.88.83 8 7 396 98.8.76.8.8 7 58 9 9.7.78.78.78 3 36 39..58.6 36 53 77 593 3859.83.8.76.85.8 PG 6 6-3 3 33 3 385 85..97.99.97.97 5 35 6 6 3..9.93.95.9 39 7 36 577..87.93.95.9 8 5.75..8.8 686 539 35 586..95.9.9.9 PG 7+ 6-3 8 9... 7 35 7 99...98.99 96 5 7.96..96.97 8...77.79 5 36 35 86.98..9.9 6-3 8 5735 85 7 97.5.6.6.78.65 3 9 6 33..77.75.8.78 73 83 353..88.87.87.87 5 7 3 363.87..76.77 89 683 38 6 67.5.65.69.8.7