EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN BASIC PLAN

Similar documents
BASIC PLAN. Alvin Community College Jurisdiction 01/16

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT BASIC PLAN

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS

BASIC EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

BLINN COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS MANUAL

The City of Live Oak. Texas. Live Oak Fire Department. Office of Emergency Management

ANNEX F. Firefighting. City of Jonestown. F-i. Ver 2.0 Rev 6/13 MP

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

DISASTER RELIEF PLAN Version 1.0

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN. Harrold ISD. Basic Plan Ver /05

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN WHITNEY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Whitney Independent School District 1

Texas A&M University- Texarkana EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE SOUTHERN NEVADA HEALTH DISTRICT EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN BASIC PLAN. February 2008 Reference Number 1-200

ANNEX F FIREFIGHTING

Emergency Operations Plan

Public Safety and Security

DURHAM / DURHAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

ANNEX R SEARCH & RESCUE

Course Law Enforcement II. Unit XVI Emergency Management

City of Santa Monica SEMS/NIMS Multi Hazard Functional Emergency Plan 2013

Duties & Responsibilities of the EMC

University of San Francisco EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ANNEX R EARTHQUAKE & TSUNAMI

Department of Elder Affairs Programs and Services Handbook Chapter 8: Emergency Management and Disaster Preparedness CHAPTER 8

The 2018 edition is under review and will be available in the near future. G.M. Janowski Associate Provost 21-Mar-18

University of Maryland Baltimore Emergency Management Plan Version 1.7

ANNEX G. Law Enforcement STATE OF TEXAS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

4 ESF 4 Firefighting

The Basics of Disaster Response

ESF 13 Public Safety and Security

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, KANSAS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN. ESF13-Public Safety

E S F 8 : Public Health and Medical Servi c e s

Thurston County. Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan

Thurston County. Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. January 2013

Building a Disaster Resilient Community. City of Yakima Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP)

ANNEX G LAW ENFORCEMENT

ESF 14 - Long-Term Community Recovery

STATE EMERGENCY FUNCTION (SEF) 10 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. I. Lead Agency: Colorado Department of Public Safety (CDPS), Colorado State Patrol (CSP).

UNIT 2: ICS FUNDAMENTALS REVIEW

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ Office of Emergency Services

Wilbur Wright College All Hazards Safety and Security Plan

Comprehensive Emergency Management Program

EOC Procedures/Annexes/Checklists

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI December 2012 Rev. 4.2

Kanawha Putnam Emergency Management Plan Functional Annex. (completed by plan authors) Local / County Office of Emergency Management

EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION #6 MASS CARE

WHATCOM COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

MULTI-HAZARD EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLANS

UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

MAHONING COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH MAHONING COUNTY YOUNGSTOWN CITY HEALTH DISTRICT

ANNEX Q HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OIL SPILL RESPONSE

Emergency Management Plan

NATIONAL RESPONSE PLAN I. Introduction

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

ADAMS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

CHATHAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

Emergency Management Plan. Kent State University. Ashtabula East Liverpool Geauga Kent Salem Stark Trumbull Tuscarawas

Mississippi Emergency Support Function #10 Oil and Hazardous Materials

CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN (EOP) An All-Hazard Response And Recovery Guide

On February 28, 2003, President Bush issued Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 (HSPD 5). HSPD 5 directed the Secretary of Homeland Security

National Incident Management System (NIMS) & the Incident Command System (ICS)

Northern Arizona University Emergency Operations Plan 2011

Primary Agency. Support Agencies. I. Introduction. Pacific County Fire District # 1 (PCFD1)

ESF 13 - Public Safety and Security

Yolo Operational Area Oil & Hazardous Materials Response Executive Summary

INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM (ICS)

Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan 2012

THE CITY OF TORONTO EMERGENCY PLAN

Cobb County Emergency Management Agency

3 Roles and Responsibilities

Terrorism Consequence Management

Damage Assessment Standard Operating Guidelines

ESF 4 Firefighting. This ESF annex applies to all agencies and organizations with assigned emergency responsibilities as described in the SuCoEOP.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, KANSAS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN. ESF4-Fire Fighting

Emergency Support Function (ESF) 16 Law Enforcement

Texas Department of Public Safety. Division of Emergency Management

ANNEX Q HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & OIL SPILL RESPONSE

Emergency Operations Plan

DELAWARE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN RISK REDUCTION

Chapter 5 CIVIL DEFENSE*

Figure 1 Cover photo with university log and siren.

LEWIS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Intro to - IS700 National Incident Management System Aka - NIMS

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN (EOP) FOR. Borough of Alburtis. in Lehigh County

ANNEX D RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) ANNEX 1 OF THE KNOX COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

Tampa Bay Catastrophic Plan

February 1, Dear Mr. Chairman:

Mississippi Emergency Support Function #5 Emergency Management Annex

MANUAL OF PROCEDURE I. PURPOSE

ICS POSITIONS & FUNCTIONS

Part 1.3 PHASES OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

EMS Subspecialty Certification Review Course. Mass Casualty Management (4.1.3) Question 8/14/ Mass Casualty Management

This Ordinance shall be known and may be cited and referred to as the Emergency Management Ordinance of the Town of Brandon, Vermont.

ESF 5. Emergency Management

Terrorism Incident Law Enforcement and Investigation Annex. Cooperating Agencies: Coordinating Agency:

Transcription:

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN BASIC PLAN

This page intentionally left blank.

APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER EL PASO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN Basic Plan This emergency management plan is hereby approved. This plan is effective immediately and supersedes all previous editions. President Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Date Associate Dean for Finance and Administration and AVP for Fiscal Affairs Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Date Emergency Management Coordinator Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Date Emergency Management Coordinator Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Date

This page intentionally left blank.

RECORD OF CHANGES Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN Basic Plan Change No. Date of Change Change Entered By Date Entered 01 04/09/2014 02 04/25/2014 03 03/03/2015 Jose R Melchor (Added GGHSON EMEPG Representative; Attachment 8) Jose R Melchor (Added Sr. Director Com. & Mkt. EMEPG Representative; Attachment 8) Jose R Melchor (Revised plan; added President TTUHSCEP, corrected TTUHSC-EP, and updates reflecting current process) 04/09/2014 04/25/2014 03/03/2015

This page intentionally left blank.

TABLE OF CONTENTS TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER EL PASO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN Basic Plan I. AUTHORITY... 1 A. Federal... 1 B. State... 1 C. Local... 1 II. PURPOSE... 2 III. EXPLANATION OF TERMS... 2 A. Acronyms... 2 B. Definitions... 3 IV. SITUATION AND ASSUMPTIONS... 6 A. Situation... 6 B. Assumptions... 7 V. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS... 8 A. Objectives... 8 B. General... 8 C. Operational Guidance... 9 D. Incident Command System (ICS)...11 E. ICS - TTUHSCEP EOC Interface...11 F. State, Federal, and Other Assistance...12 G. Emergency Authorities...13 H. Activities by Phases of Emergency Management. 14 VI. ORGANIZATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES... 16 A. Organization...16 B. Assignment of Responsibilities...17 VII. DIRECTION AND CONTROL... 30 A. General...30 B. Emergency Facilities...32 C. Lines of Succession...34 VIII. READINESS LEVELS... 32 IX. ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT... 34 A. Agreements and Contracts...34 B. Reports...34 C. Records...35

D. Training...36 E. Consumer Protection.36 F. Post-Incident and Exercise Review..37 X. PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE... 37 A. Plan Development...37 B. Distribution of Planning Documents...37 C. Review...37 D. Update...37 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Distribution List...1-1 Attachment 2: References...2-1 Attachment 3: Organization for Emergency Management...3-1 Attachment 4: Emergency Management Functional Responsibilities.4-1 Attachment 5: Annex Assignments...5-1 Attachment 6: Summary of Agreements & Contracts...6-1 Attachment 7: Incident Command System Summary...7-1 Attachment 8: TTUHSCEP Emergency Council...8-1 ANNEXES (distributed under separate cover) Annex A Warning... A-1 Annex B Communications... B-1 Annex C Shelter & Mass Care... C-1 Annex D Radiological Protection (COL Annex)... D-1 Annex E Evacuation... E-1 Annex F Firefighting (COL Annex)... F-1 Annex G Law Enforcement... G-1 Annex H Health & Medical Services... H-1 Annex I Emergency Public Information... I-1 Annex J Recovery... J-1 Annex K Public Works & Engineering... K-1 Annex L Energy & Utilities... L-1 Annex M Resource Management... M-1 Annex N Direction & Control... N-1 Annex O Human Services... O-1 Annex P Prevention and Hazard Mitigation... P-1 Annex Q Hazardous Materials & Oil Spill Response (COL Annex)... Q-1 Annex R Search & Rescue (See COL Annex F Firefighting)... R-1 Annex S Transportation... S-1 Annex T Donations Management... T-1 Annex U Legal... U-1 Annex V Terrorist Incident Response... V-1.

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER EL PASO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN BASIC PLAN I. AUTHORITY A. Federal 1. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief & Emergency Assistance Act, (as amended), 42 U.S.C. 5121 2. Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 USC Chapter 116 3. Emergency Management and Assistance, 44 CFR 4. Hazardous Waste Operations & Emergency Response, 29 CFR 1910.120 5. Homeland Security Act of 2002 6. Homeland Security Presidential Directive. HSPD-5, Management of Domestic Incidents 7. Homeland Security Presidential Directive, HSPD-3, Homeland Security Advisory System 8. National Incident Management System (NIMS) 9. National Response Framework (NRF) 10. National Strategy for Homeland Security, July 2002 11. Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex of the National Response Plan 12. Institutional Security Policies and Crime Statistics, 34 CFR 668.46 B. State 1. Texas Government Code, Chapter 418 (Emergency Management) 2. Texas Government Code, Chapter 421 (Homeland Security) 3. Texas Government Code, Chapter 433 (State of Emergency) 4. Texas Government Code, Chapter 791 (Inter-local Cooperation Contracts) 5. Texas Health & Safety Code, Chapter 778 (Emergency Management Assistance Compact) 6. Executive Order of the Governor Relating to Emergency Management (RP32-01/28/2004) 7. Texas Administrative Code, Title 37, Part 1, Chapter 7 (Division of Emergency Management) 8. State of Texas Emergency Management Plan 9. Texas Education Code, Section 51.217 C. Local 1. El Paso City Ordinance # 009036, dated May 26, 1987; Horizon City Ordinance # 060, dated October 10, 1995; Town of Clint Ordinance 88, dated November 29, 1995; City of Vinton Ordinance 095-919, dated October 3, 1995 2. Commissioner s Court Order #006, dated October 3, 1995 3. Joint Resolution between the County of El Paso and the City of El Paso, dated June 30, 1987 4. Texas Tech University System Board of Regents Resolution, August 2007 1

5. Texas Tech University System, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, and Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Policies and Procedures 6. Inter-local Agreements & Contracts. See the summary in Attachment 6. II. PURPOSE This Basic Plan outlines the approach to emergency operations that will be taken by the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso (TTUHSCEP). This document provides general guidance for emergency management activities and an overview of methods of prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. The plan describes the emergency response organization and assigns responsibilities for various emergency tasks. This plan is intended to provide a framework for more specific functional annexes that describe in greater detail specific responsibilities and responses. The plan applies to all officials, departments, and agencies within the El Paso campuses. The primary audience for the document includes the TTUHSCEP President, TTUHSCEP Vice President for Health Affairs and other TTUHSCEP senior officials, the emergency management staff, the Texas Tech University System Emergency Management Coordinator (TTUSEMC), TTUHSCEP department and agency heads and their senior staff members, leaders of local volunteer organizations that support emergency operations and others who may participate in prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. III. EXPLANATION OF TERMS A. Acronyms AAR After Action Report ARC American Red Cross CEP City of El Paso CEPEOC City of El Paso Emergency Operations Center CFR Code of Federal Regulations DDC Disaster District Committee DHS Department of Homeland Security EMC Emergency Management Coordinator EMEPG Emergency Management Executive Policy Group EOC Emergency Operations Center EPCT El Paso County Texas EPI Emergency Public Information EPMMRS El Paso Metropolitan Medical Response System FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency, an element of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Hazmat Hazardous Material HSPD-3 Homeland Security Presidential Directive 3 HSPD-5 Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 IC Incident Commander ICP Incident Command Post ICS Incident Command System IP Improvement Plan 2

JFO JIC LEPC MACS MOT MOV NIMS NOAA NRF NWS OSHA PIO RACES SOC SOGs TCEQ TDEM TRRN TSA TTUHSC TTUHSCEP TTUHSCEMC TTUHSCEP EMC TTUHSCEP EMEPG TTUHSCEP EOC TTUS TTUSEMC Joint Field Office Joint Information Center Local Emergency Planning Committee Multi-Agency Coordination System Mobile Operations Trailer Mobile Operations Vehicle National Incident Management System National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Response Framework National Weather Service Occupational Health & Safety Administration Public Information Officer Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service State Operations Center Standard Operating Guidelines Texas Commission for Environmental Quality Texas Division of Emergency Management Texas Regional Response Network The Salvation Army Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (Lubbock) Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Texas Tech University Health Science Center Emergency Management Coordinator (Lubbock) Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Emergency Management Coordinator Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Emergency Management Executive Policy Group Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Emergency Operations Center Texas Tech University System Texas Tech University System Emergency Management Coordinator B. Definitions 1. Area Command (Unified Area Command). An organization established (1) to oversee the management of multiple incidents that are each being managed by an ICS organization or (2) to oversee the management of large or multiple incidents to which several Incident Management Teams have been assigned. Sets overall strategy and priorities, allocates critical resources according to priorities, ensures that incidents are properly managed, and ensures that objectives are met and strategies followed. Area Command becomes Unified Area Command when incidents are multijurisdictional. 2. City of El Paso and El Paso County, Texas (CEO and EPCT). For purposes of this plan and its annexes, the City of El Paso and El Paso County, Texas means the incorporated city limits of El Paso, Texas and the unincorporated areas of El Paso County, Texas, respectively. 3

3. Disaster District. Disaster Districts are regional state emergency management organizations mandated by the Executive Order of the Governor relating to Emergency Management whose boundaries parallel those of Highway Patrol Districts and Sub- Districts of the Texas Department of Public Safety. 4. Disaster District Committee. The DDC consists of a Chairperson (the local Highway Patrol captain or command lieutenant) and representatives of the state agencies and volunteer groups represented on the State Emergency Management Council with resources in the district. The DDC Chairperson, supported by committee members, is responsible for identifying, coordinating the use of, committing, and directing state resources within the district to respond to emergencies. 5. Emergency Operations Center. Specially equipped facilities from which government officials exercise direction and control and coordinate necessary resources in an emergency situation. 6. Public Information. Information that is disseminated to the public via the news media before, during, and/or after an emergency or disaster. 7. Emergency Situation. As used in this plan, this term is intended to describe a range of situations, from a minor incident to a catastrophic disaster. It includes the following: a. Incident. An incident is a situation that is limited in scope and potential effects. Characteristics of an incident include: 1) Involves a limited area and/or limited population. 2) Evacuation or in-place sheltering is typically limited to the immediate area of the incident. 3) Warning and campus community instructions are provided in the immediate area, not community-wide. 4) One or two local response agencies or departments acting under an incident commander normally handle incidents. Requests for resource support are normally handled through agency and/or departmental channels. 5) May require limited external assistance from other local response agencies or contractors. 6) For the purposes of the National Response Framework (NRF), incidents include the full range of occurrences that require an emergency response to protect life or property. b. Emergency. An emergency is a situation that is larger in scope and more severe in terms of actual or potential effects than an incident. Characteristics include: 1) Involves a large area, significant population, or important facilities. 4

2) May require implementation of large-scale evacuation or in-place sheltering and implementation of temporary shelter and mass care operations. 3) May require community-wide warning and campus community instructions. 4) Requires a sizable multi-agency response operating under an incident commander. 5) May require some external assistance from other local response agencies, contractors, and limited assistance from state or federal agencies. 6) The Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso Emergency Operations Center (TTUHSCEP EOC) will be activated to provide general guidance and direction, coordinate external support, and provide resource support for the emergency situation. 7) For the purposes of the NRF, an emergency (as defined by the Stafford Act) is any occasion or instance for which, in the determination of the President, Federal assistance is needed to supplement State and local efforts and capabilities to save lives and to protect property and public health and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of catastrophe in any part of the United States. c. Disaster. A disaster involves the occurrence or threat of significant casualties and/or widespread property damage that is beyond the capability of the local government to handle with its organic resources. Characteristics include: 1) Involves a large area, a sizable population, and/or important facilities. 2) May require implementation of large-scale evacuation or in-place sheltering and implementation of temporary shelter and mass care operations. 3) Requires community-wide warning and campus community instructions. 4) Requires a response by all local response agencies operating under one or more incident commanders. 5) Requires significant external assistance from other local response agencies, contractors, and extensive state or federal assistance. 6) The TTUHSCEP EOC will be activated to provide general guidance and direction, provide emergency information to the campus community, coordinate state and federal support, and coordinate resource support for emergency operations. 7) For the purposes of the NRF, a major disaster (as defined by the Stafford Act) is any catastrophe, regardless of the cause, which in the determination of the President causes damage of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant major disaster federal assistance. 5

d. Catastrophic Incident. For the purposes of the NRF, this term is used to describe any natural or manmade occurrence that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, property damage, or disruptions that severely affect the population, infrastructure, environment, economy, national morale, and/or government functions. An occurrence of this magnitude would result in sustained national impacts over prolonged periods of time, and would immediately overwhelm local and state capabilities. All catastrophic incidents are Incidents of National Significance. 8. Hazard Analysis. A document, published separately from this plan that identifies the local hazards that have caused or possess the potential to adversely affect public health and safety, public or private property, or the environment. 9. Hazardous Material (Hazmat). A substance in a quantity or form posing an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and/or property when manufactured, stored, or transported. The substance, by its nature, containment, and reactivity, has the capability for inflicting harm during an accidental occurrence. Is toxic, corrosive, flammable, reactive, an irritant, or a strong sensitizer, and poses a threat to health and the environment when improperly managed. Includes; toxic substances, certain infectious agents, radiological materials, and other related materials such as oil, used oil, petroleum products, and industrial solid waste substances. 10. Incident of National Significance. An actual or potential high-impact event that requires a coordinated and effective response by an appropriate combination of federal, state, local, tribal, nongovernmental, and/or private sector entities in order to save lives and minimize damage, and provide the basis for long-term communication, recovery, and mitigation activities. 11. Inter-local agreements. Arrangements between governments or organizations, either public or private, for reciprocal aid and assistance during emergency situations where the resources of a single jurisdiction or organization are insufficient or inappropriate for the tasks that must be performed to control the situation. Commonly referred to as a mutual aid agreement. 12. Stafford Act. The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act authorizes federal agencies to undertake special measures designed to assist the efforts of states in expediting the rendering of aid, assistance, emergency services, and reconstruction and rehabilitation of areas devastated by disaster. 13. Standard Operating Guidelines. Approved methods for accomplishing a task or set of tasks. SOGs are typically prepared at the department or agency level. IV. SITUATION AND ASSUMPTIONS A. Situation 6

The Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso (TTUHSCEP), the City of El Paso (CEP), and El Paso County, Texas (EPCT) are exposed to many hazards, all of which have the potential for disrupting the community, causing casualties, and damaging or destroying public or private property. A summary of major hazards is provided in Figure 1, on the following page. B. Assumptions 1. TTUHSCEP, the CEP, and EPCT will continue to be exposed to and subject to the impact of those hazards described above as well as lesser hazards and others that may develop in the future. 2. It is possible for a major disaster to occur at any time, and at any place. In many cases, dissemination of warnings to the campus community and implementation of increased readiness measures may be possible. However, some emergency situations occur with little or no warning. Figure 1 HAZARD SUMMARY Likelihood of Estimated Impact on Estimated Impact on Impact Occurrence* Property Business Priority Hazard Type: (See below) Limited Moderate Major Limited Moderate Major Natural Drought HIGHLY LIKELY LIMITED LIMITED 6 Flash Flooding HIGHLY LIKELY MODERATE MAJOR 9 Earthquake OCCASIONAL MODERATE MODERATE 6 Flooding (river or tidal) LIKELY LIMITED MAJOR 7 Hurricane UNLIKELY LIMITED LIMITED 3 Subsidence UNLIKELY LIMITED LIMITED 3 Tornado OCCASIONAL MODERATE LIMITED 5 Wildfire LIKELY LIMITED LIMITED 5 Winter Storm LIKELY MODERATE MODERATE 7 Technological Dam Failure UNLIKELY LIMITED LIMITED 3 Energy/Fuel Shortage LIKELY LIMITED LIMITED 5 Hazmat/Oil Spill (fixed site) LIKELY MODERATE MAJOR 8 Hazmat/Oil Spill (transport) HIGHLY LIKELY MAJOR MAJOR 10 Major Structural Fire OCCASIONAL LIMITED MODERATE 5 Nuclear Facility Incident UNLIKELY LIMITED LIMITED 3 Water System Failure LIKELY MODERATE MODERATE 6 Security Civil Disorder OCCASIONAL LIMITED LIMITED 4 Enemy Military Attack UNLIKELY LIMITED LIMITED 3 Terrorism LIKELY MODERATE MODERATE 7 7

Health Pandemic Outbreak LIKELY LIMITED MAJOR 7 *Likelihood of Occurrence: Unlikely, Occasional, Likely, or Highly Likely 3. Outside assistance will be available in most emergency situations affecting TTUHSCEP, the CEP, and EPCT. Since it takes time to summon external assistance, it is essential to be prepared to carry out the initial emergency response on an independent basis. 4. Proper mitigation actions, such as floodplain management, fire inspections, utilization of NOAA Weather Radio (and other means of severe weather notification), and increased security where needed can prevent or reduce disaster related losses. Detailed emergency planning, training of emergency responders and other personnel, and conducting periodic emergency drills and exercises can improve readiness to manage emergency situations. V. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS A. Objectives The objectives of the TTUHSCEP emergency management program are to provide for the planning and resources necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the members of the TTUHSCEP community and to preserve both public and private property. B. General 1. It is the responsibility of TTUHSCEP, within its power and limitations, to protect public health and safety and preserve property from the effects of hazardous events. TTUHSCEP, the CEP, and EPCT have the primary role in identifying and mitigating hazards, preventing (when possible), preparing for and responding to, and managing the recovery from emergency, disaster, and/or catastrophic situations that affect the community. 2. It is impossible for government to do everything that is required to protect the lives and property of the population. Therefore, members of the community have the responsibility to prepare themselves and their families to cope with emergency situations and manage their affairs and property in ways that will aid in managing emergencies. TTUHSCEP will join with the CEP and EPCT to assist members of the community in carrying out these responsibilities by providing public information and instructions prior to and during emergency situations. 3. By statute, local government is responsible for organizing, training, and equipping local emergency responders and emergency management personnel, providing appropriate emergency facilities, providing suitable warning and communications systems, and for contracting for emergency services. The state and federal governments offer programs that provide some assistance with portions of these responsibilities. 4. To achieve objectives, TTUHSCEP has organized an emergency program that is both integrated (employs the resources of government, organized volunteer groups, and 8

businesses) and comprehensive (addresses prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery). This plan is one element of TTUHSCEP preparedness activities. 5. This plan is based on an all-hazards approach to emergency planning. It addresses general functions that may need to be performed during any emergency situation and is not a collection of plans for specific types of incidents. For example, the warning annex addresses techniques that can be used to warn the campus community during any emergency situation, whatever the cause. 6. Departments and agencies tasked in this plan are expected to develop and keep current standard operating guidelines that describe how emergency tasks will be performed. Departments and agencies are charged with ensuring the training and equipment necessary for an appropriate response are in place. 7. This plan is based on the concept that the emergency functions that must be performed by many departments and agencies generally parallel some of their normal day-to-day functions. To the extent possible, the same personnel and material resources used for day-to-day activities will be employed during emergency situations. Because personnel and equipment resources are limited, some routine functions that do not contribute directly to the emergency may be suspended for the duration of an emergency. Where possible, the personnel, equipment, and supplies that would normally be required for those functions will be redirected to accomplish emergency tasks. However, it must be noted that many of the services provided by TTUHSCEP must continue during the response to the emergency/disaster. 8. Through Texas Tech University System Board of Regents action (August 2007), TTUHSC and TTUHSCEP have adopted the National Incident Management System (NIMS) in accordance with the President s Homeland Security Directive (HSPD)-5. Adoption of NIMS will provide a consistent approach to the effective management of situations involving natural or man-made disasters, or terrorism. NIMS allows TTUHSCEP to integrate response activities using a set of standardized organizational structures designed to improve interoperability between all levels of government, private sector, and nongovernmental organizations. This plan, in accordance with the National Response Framework (NRF), is an integral part of the national effort to prevent, and reduce America s vulnerability to terrorism, major disasters, and other emergencies, and to minimize the damage and recover from attacks, major disasters, and other emergencies that occur. In the event of an Incident of National Significance, as defined in HSPD-5, TTUHSCEP will integrate all operations with all levels of government, private sector, and nongovernmental organizations through the use of NRF coordinating structures, processes, and protocols. C. Operational Guidance TTUHSCEP will employ the six components of the NIMS in all operations, which will provide a standardized framework that facilitates operations in all phases of emergency management (Command and Management, Preparedness, Resource Management, 9

Communications and Information Management, Supporting Technologies, and Ongoing Management and Maintenance). See Attachment 7 for further details on NIMS. 1. Initial Response. Emergency responders are likely to be the first on the scene of an emergency situation. They will normally take charge and remain in charge of the incident until it is resolved or others who have legal authority to do so assume responsibility. They will seek guidance and direction from the TTUHSCEP Administration, local officials, and seek technical assistance from state and federal agencies and industry where appropriate. 2. Implementation of ICS a. The first local emergency responder to arrive at the scene of an emergency situation will implement the Incident Command System (ICS) and serve as the Incident Commander until relieved by a more senior or more qualified individual. The Incident Commander will establish an Incident Command Post (ICP) and provide an assessment of the situation to TTUHSCEP and local officials (if necessary), identify response resources required, and direct the on-scene response from the ICP. b. For some types of emergency situations, a specific incident scene may not exist in the initial response phase and the TTUHC-EP EOC may accomplish initial response actions, such as mobilizing personnel and equipment and issuing precautionary warnings to the campus community. As the potential threat becomes clearer and a specific impact site or sites are identified, an incident command post may be established, and direction and control of the response transitioned to the Incident Commander. There may be times when it is beneficial to request assistance from the CEP. An example would be the use of a Mobile Operations Vehicle (MOV) and/or Mobile Operations Trailer (MOT). 3. Source and Use of Resources. a. Where possible TTUHSCEP will use internal resources, all of which meet the requirements for resource management in accordance with the NIMS, to respond to emergency situations, purchasing supplies and equipment if necessary, and request assistance from the TTUHSC, TTUS, other jurisdictions, organized volunteer groups, or the State of Texas, if internal resources are insufficient or inappropriate. It should be noted that TTUHSCEP is totally dependent on the CEP for Fire Service, Search and Rescue Operations, and Hazardous Material Response(s) and on EPCT for Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Title 4, 418.102 of the Texas Government Code provides that the city and county should be the first channel through which requests for assistance be made when internal resources are exceeded. If additional resources are required, TTUHSCEP will, in coordination with CEP and/or EPCT: 1) Summon those resources available pursuant to standard operating practices and any applicable inter-local agreements. Attachment 6 to this plan summarizes the existing inter-local agreements and identifies the officials authorized to request those resources. 10

2) Summon emergency service resources that have been contracted for. See Attachment 6. 3) Request assistance from volunteer groups trained and active in disaster responses. 4) Request assistance from industry or individuals who have resources needed to respond to the emergency situation. b. When external agencies respond to an emergency situation within the TTUHSCEP jurisdiction, it is expected that they will conform to the guidance and direction provided by the TTUHSCEP incident commander in accordance with the NIMS. D. Incident Command System (ICS) 1. TTUHSCEP intends to employ the Incident Command System (ICS) in managing emergencies. ICS is both a strategy and a set of organizational arrangements for directing and controlling field operations. It is designed to effectively integrate resources from different agencies into a temporary emergency organization at an incident site that can expand and contract with the magnitude of the incident and resources on hand. A summary of ICS is provided in Attachment 7. 2. The incident commander is responsible for carrying out the ICS function of command managing the incident. The four other major management activities that form the basis of ICS are operations, planning, logistics, and finance/administration. For small-scale incidents, the incident commander and one or two individuals may perform all of these functions. For larger incidents, a number of individuals from different departments or agencies may be assigned to separate staff sections charged with those functions. 3. An incident commander using response resources from one or two departments or agencies (e.g. police, fire, EMS) can handle the majority of emergency situations. Departments or agencies participating in this type of incident response will normally obtain support through their own department or agency. 4. In emergency situations where the TTUS, TTUHSC, TTUHSCEP, other jurisdictions, the state, or federal government are providing significant response resources or technical assistance, it is generally desirable to transition from the normal ICS structure to a Unified Command structure. This arrangement helps to ensure that all participating agencies are involved in developing objectives and strategies to respond to the emergency. Attachment 7 provides additional information on Unified and Area Commands. E. ICS TTUHSCEP EOC Interface 1. For major emergencies and disasters, the TTUHSCEP EOC will be activated. When the TTUHSCEP EOC is activated, it is essential to establish a division of responsibilities between the incident command post and the TTUHSCEP EOC as well as the CEPEOC, should it also be activated. A general division of responsibilities is outlined below. It is 11

essential that a precise division of responsibilities be determined for specific emergency operations. 2. The incident commander is generally responsible for field operations, including: a. Isolating the scene. b. Directing and controlling the on-scene response to the emergency situation and managing the emergency resources committed there. c. Warning the population in the area of the incident and providing emergency instructions to them. d. Determining and implementing protective measures (evacuation or in-place sheltering) for the population in the immediate area of the incident and for emergency responders at the scene. e. Implementing traffic control arrangements in and around the incident scene. f. Requesting additional resources from the TTUEOC. 3. The TTUHSCEP EOC is generally responsible for: a. Providing resource support for the incident command operations. b. Issuing campus-wide warnings through the Public Information Officer. c. Issuing instructions and providing information to the general campus community. d. Organizing and implementing large-scale evacuation. e. Organizing and implementing shelter and mass arrangements for evacuees. f. Coordinating traffic control for large-scale evacuations. g. Requesting assistance from the State and other external sources. 4. In some large-scale emergencies or disasters, emergency operations with different objectives may be conducted at geographically separated scenes. In such situations, more than one incident command operation may be established. If this situation occurs, a transition to an Area Command or a Unified Area Command is desirable, and it is imperative that the allocation of resources to specific field operations be coordinated through the specified EOC. F. State, Federal, & Other Assistance 1. State & Federal Assistance 12

a. If TTUHSCEP resources are inadequate to manage an emergency situation, assistance will be requested through TTUS (when Possible) to the CEP and EPCT officials. If local resources are inadequate to manage an emergency situation, assistance will be requested from the State. State assistance furnished to local governments is intended to supplement local resources and not substitute for such resources, including mutual aid resources, equipment purchases or leases, or resources covered by emergency service contracts. As noted previously, assistance should be requested through TTUS (when Possible) to CEP and EPCT before requesting state assistance. b. Requests for state assistance should be made to the Disaster District Committee (DDC) Chairperson, who is located at the Department of Public Safety District Office in El Paso. See Annex M, Resource Management, for a form that can be used to request state assistance. In essence, state emergency assistance to local governments begins at the DDC level and the key person to validate a request for, obtain, and provide that state assistance and support is the DDC Chairperson. A request for state assistance should be made by the TTUHSCEP President through the TTUS Chancellor to the CEP Mayor and EPCT County Judge and may be made by telephone, fax, or teletype. The DDC Chairperson has the authority to utilize all state resources within the district to respond to a request for assistance, with the exception of the National Guard. Use of National Guard resources requires approval by the Governor. c. The Disaster District staff will forward requests for assistance that cannot be satisfied by state resources within the district to the State Operations Center (SOC) in Austin for action. 2. Other Assistance a. If resources required to control an emergency situation are not available within the State, the Governor may request assistance from other states pursuant to a number of interstate compacts or from the federal government through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). b. For major emergencies and disasters for which a United States Presidential declaration has been issued, federal agencies may be mobilized to provide assistance to states and local governments. The National Response Framework (NRF) describes the policies, planning assumptions, concept of operations, and responsibilities of designated federal agencies for various response and recovery functions. The Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex of the NRF addresses the federal response to major incidents involving radioactive materials. c. FEMA has the primary responsibility for coordinating federal disaster assistance. No direct federal assistance is authorized prior to a Presidential emergency or disaster declaration, but FEMA has limited authority to stage initial response resources near the disaster site and activate command and control structures prior to a declaration. The Department of Defense has the authority to commit its resources to save lives 13

prior to an emergency or disaster declaration. See Annex J, Recovery, for additional information on the assistance that may be available during disaster recovery. d. The NRF applies to Stafford and non-stafford Act incidents and is designed to accommodate not only actual incidents, but also the threat of incidents. Therefore, NRF implementation is possible under a greater range of incidents. G. Emergency Authorities 1. Key federal, state, and local legal authorities pertaining to emergency management are listed in Section I of this plan. 2. Texas statutes and the Executive Order of the Governor Relating to Emergency Management provide local government, principally the chief elected official, with a number of powers to control emergency situations. If necessary, TTUHSCEP will use these powers during emergency situations. These powers include: a. Emergency Declaration. Should it become necessary, as in the event of a major riot or major incident of civil disorder, the Chancellor of the TTUS through the CEP Mayor and/or the EPCT County Judge may request the Governor issue an emergency declaration for this jurisdiction and take action to control the situation. Use of the emergency declaration is explained in Annex U, Legal. b. Disaster Declaration. When an emergency situation has caused severe damage, injury, or loss of life or it appears likely to do so, the Chancellor of the TTUS may request that the CEP Mayor and/or the EPCT County Judge issue by executive order or proclamation a declaration of local state of disaster. The Mayor and/or County Judge may subsequently issue orders or proclamations referencing that declaration to invoke certain emergency powers granted the Governor in the Texas Disaster Act on an appropriate local scale in order to cope with the disaster. These powers include: 1) Suspending procedural laws and rules to facilitate a timely response. 2) Using all available resources of government and commandeering private property, subject to compensation, to cope with the disaster. 3) Restricting the movement of people and occupancy of premises. 4) Prohibiting the sale or transportation of certain substances. 5) Implementing price controls. A local disaster declaration activates the recovery and rehabilitation aspects of this plan. A local disaster declaration is required to obtain state and federal disaster recovery assistance. See Annex U, Legal, for further information on disaster declarations and procedures for invoking emergency powers. 14

c. Authority for Evacuations. State law provides a county judge or mayor with the authority to order the evacuation of all or part of the population from a stricken or threatened area within their respective jurisdictions. H. Activities by Phases of Emergency Management 1. This plan addresses emergency actions that are conducted during all four phases of emergency management. a. Prevention TTUHSCEP will conduct prevention activities as an integral part of the emergency management program. Prevention focuses on preventing the human hazard, primarily from potential natural disasters or terrorist (both physical and biological) attacks. Preventive measures are activities designed to provide permanent protection from disasters. Not all disasters, particularly natural disasters, can be prevented, but the risk of loss of life and injury can be mitigated with good evacuation plans, environmental planning, and design standards. Prevention should be a predisaster activity, although prevention may also occur in the aftermath of an emergency situation with the intent of avoiding repetition of the situation. The prevention program is outlined in Annex P, Prevention and Hazard Mitigation. b. Mitigation TTUHSCEP will conduct mitigation activities as an integral part of the emergency management program. Mitigation is intended to eliminate hazards, reduce the probability of hazards causing an emergency situation, or lessen the consequences of unavoidable hazards. Mitigation should be a pre-disaster activity, although mitigation may also occur in the aftermath of an emergency situation with the intent of avoiding repetition of the situation. The mitigation program is outlined in Annex P, Prevention and Hazard Mitigation. c. Preparedness TTUHSCEP will conduct preparedness activities to develop the response capabilities needed in the event of an emergency. Among the preparedness activities included in the emergency management program are: 1) Providing emergency equipment and facilities. 2) Emergency planning, including maintaining this plan, its annexes, and appropriate SOGs, and departmental Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP). 3) Conducting or arranging appropriate training for emergency responders, emergency management personnel, other TTUHSCEP and local officials, and volunteer groups who assist during emergencies. 4) Conducting periodic drills and exercises to test plans and training. 15

d. Response TTUHSCEP will respond to emergency situations effectively and efficiently. The focus of most of this plan and its annexes is on planning for the response to emergencies. Response operations are intended to resolve an emergency situation while minimizing casualties and property damage. Response activities include warning, emergency medical services, firefighting, law enforcement operations, evacuation, shelter and mass care, emergency public information, search and rescue, as well as other associated functions. e. Recovery If a disaster occurs, TTUHSCEP will carry out a recovery program that involves both short-term and long-term efforts. Short-term operations seek to restore vital services to the campus community and provide for the basic needs of that campus community. Long-term recovery focuses on restoring the campus community to its normal state. The federal government, pursuant to the Stafford Act, provides the vast majority of disaster recovery assistance. The recovery process includes assistance to individuals, businesses, and to government and other public institutions. Examples of recovery programs include temporary housing, food distribution, restoration of government services, debris removal, restoration of utilities, disaster mental health services, and reconstruction of damaged roads and bridges. The recovery program is outlined in Annex J, Recovery. VI. ORGANIZATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES A. Organization 1. General Most departments and agencies of local government have emergency functions in addition to their normal day-to-day duties. During emergency situations, normal organizational arrangements are modified to facilitate emergency operations. The TTUHSCEP governance organization for emergencies includes an executive policy group, emergency services, and support services. Attachment 3 depicts the emergency organization. 2. Emergency Management Executive Policy Group 16

The TTUHSCEP Emergency Management Executive Policy Group (EMEPG) provides guidance and direction for emergency management programs and for emergency response and recovery operations. The EMEPG the TTUHSCEP campuses will typically be composed of the TTUHSCEP President, the TTUHSCEP Vice President for Health Affairs and Founding Dean, the TTUHSCEP Associate Academic Dean for Finance and Administration, the TTUHSCEP EMC, the Texas Tech Police Department (TTPD) local commander, the TTUHSCEP General Counsel for the campus and members of the local campus Executive Council as the President may deem necessary. See ATTACHMENT 8 for complete listing. The Executive Policy Group for El Paso includes the EPCT County Judge, Mayors, City Managers, Deputy Chief Administrator, and Emergency Management Coordinator. The El Paso Emergency Management Executive Policy Group (TTUHSCEP EMEPG) may be called on to assist the at the discretion of the President of TTUHSCEP or designee, and the Chancellor of the TTUS as the situation may dictate. The TTUHSCEP EMC may be called on to assist at the discretion of the CEP Mayor and/or the EPCT County Judge. Any request for assistance of this nature should be made through the Chancellor of the TTUS. 3. Emergency Services Emergency Services include the Incident Commander and those departments, agencies, and groups with primary emergency response actions. The incident commander is the person in charge at the scene of an incident and will remain in charge until released or relieved by the appropriate authority. 4. Emergency Support Services This group includes departments and agencies that support and sustain emergency responders and also coordinate emergency assistance provided by organized volunteer organizations, business and industry, and other sources. 5. Volunteer and Other Services This group includes organized volunteer groups and businesses who have agreed to provide certain support for emergency operations. B. Assignment of Responsibilities 1. General For most emergency functions, successful operations require a coordinated effort from a number of departments, agencies, and groups. To facilitate a coordinated effort, elected and appointed officials, departments and agency heads, and other personnel are assigned primary responsibility for planning and coordinating specific emergency 17

functions. Generally, primary responsibility for an emergency function will be assigned to an individual from the department or agency that has legal responsibility for that function or possesses the most appropriate knowledge and skills. Other officials, departments, and agencies may be assigned support responsibilities for specific emergency functions. Attachment 4 summarizes the general emergency responsibilities of TTUHSCEP officials, department heads, and other personnel. 2. The individual having primary responsibility for an emergency function is normally responsible for coordinating preparation of and maintaining that portion of the emergency plan that addresses that function. Plan and annex assignments are outlined in Attachment 5. Listed below are general responsibilities assigned to the Executive Policy Group, Emergency Services, Support Services, and other Support Agencies. Additional specific responsibilities can be found in the functional annexes to this Basic Plan. 3. Executive Policy Group Responsibilities a. The President: 1) Establish objectives and priorities for the emergency management program and provide general policy guidance on the conduct of that program. 2) Monitor the emergency response during disaster situations and provide direction where appropriate. 3) Shall communicate and consult with the Chancellor of the TTUS immediately or as soon as reasonably possible. 4) Will, with the assistance of the Public Information Officer, keep the campus community informed during emergency situations. 5) At the direction of the TTUS Chancellor and with the assistance of the TTUS Vice Chancellor and General Counsel for the TTUS, request that the Mayor of the CEP and/or the EPCT County Judge declare a local state of disaster and/or through the Mayor of the CEP and/or the EPCT County Judge request the Governor declare a state of emergency, or invoke the emergency powers of government when necessary. 6) At the direction of the TTUS Chancellor, request assistance from the CEP and EPCT and/or the State when necessary. 7) Direct activation of the TTUHSCEP EOC. b. The TTUHSCEP EMC will: 1) Implement the policies and decisions of the governing body relating to emergency management. 18

2) Organize the emergency management program and identify personnel, equipment, and facility needs. 3) Assign emergency management program tasks to departments and agencies. 4) Ensure that departments and agencies participate in emergency planning, training, and exercise activities. 5) Coordinate the operational response of local emergency services. 6) Coordinate activation of the TTUHSCEP EOC and supervise its operation. c. The TTUHSCEMC (Lubbock) will: 1) Assist the TTUHSCEP EMC in implementation of the policies and decisions of the governing body relating to emergency management. 2) Assist the TTUHSCEP EMC in organization of the emergency management program and identify personnel, equipment, and facility needs. 3) Assist the TTUHSCEP EMC in the assignment of emergency management program tasks to departments and agencies. 4) Assist the TTUHSCEP EMC in assuring that departments and agencies participate in emergency planning, training, and exercise activities. 5) Assist the TTUHSCEP EMC in coordination of the operational response of local emergency services. 6) Assist the TTUHSC EMC in coordination of activation of the TTUHSC EP EOC and/or the TTUHSC EOC and supervise its operation. During an emergency, the Safety Services Department Coordinator will serve as the contact for the department and maintain the operations of the office until the emergency has been resolved. d. The TTUSEMC (System) will: 1) Serve as the staff advisor to the TTUS Chancellor, the TTUHSCEP President, and TTUHSCEP Emergency Management Coordinator on emergency management matters. May also advise the TTUHSCEP President in the absence of the TTUHSCEP Emergency Management Coordinator. 2) Keep the TTUS Chancellor and the TTUHSC President (in the absence of the TTUHSC Emergency Management Coordinator) appraised of preparedness status and emergency management needs. 19

3) Assist in coordination (as necessary or appropriate) of local planning and preparedness activities with the CEPL and EPCT as well as other appropriate officials and maintain this plan. 4) Arrange appropriate training for local emergency management personnel and emergency responders. 5) Coordinate with the TTUHSCEMC and/or the TTUHSCEP EMC periodic emergency drills and exercises to test the plan and training. 6) Coordinate the activation and management of the TTUHSCEP EOC with the TTUHSCEP President and the TTUHSCEP EMC, develop procedures for its operation, and conduct training for those who staff it. 7) Coordinate activation the TTUHSCEP EOC when required. 8) Perform regular liaison with the state emergency management staff and local emergency management personnel. 4. Common Responsibilities All emergency services and support services will: a. Provide personnel, equipment, and supplies to support emergency operations upon request. b. Develop and maintain SOGs for emergency tasks. c. Provide trained personnel to staff the incident command post and TTUHSCEP EOC and conduct emergency operations. d. Provide current information on emergency resources for inclusion in the Resource List in Appendix 1 to Annex M, Resource Management. e. Report information regarding emergency situations and damage to facilities and equipment to the Incident Commander or the TTUHSCEP EOC and/or the TTUHSCEOC. 5. Emergency Services Responsibilities a. The Incident Commander will: 1) Manage emergency response resources and operations at the incident site command post to resolve the emergency situation. 2) Determine and implement required protective actions for response personnel and the public at an incident site. b. Warning. 20