Overview of the IMB s. Good Clinical Practice. Deirdre O Regan GCP/Pharmacovigilance. GCP Seminar Dublin, 27 th January 2010.

Similar documents
Commission Guidelines for the implementation of the Clinical Trials Regulation NTA Ethics Oslo

Guidance for the conduct of good clinical practice inspections

Joint Statement on the Application of Good Clinical Practice to Training for Researchers

Quality Assurance in Clinical Research at RM/ICR. GCP Compliance Team, Clinical R&D

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

First inspection of a Legal Representative in the EU by local authority

European Medicines Agency Inspections ANNEX V TO PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA: PHASE I UNITS

Work plan for GCP Inspectors Working Group for 2018

MEDICINES FOR HUMAN USE (CLINICAL TRIALS) REGULATIONS Memorandum of understanding between MHRA, COREC and GTAC

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

Guideline for the notification of serious breaches of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 or the clinical trial protocol

GCP INSPECTORATE GCP INSPECTIONS METRICS REPORT

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

Tomoko OSAWA, Ph.D. Director for GCP Inspection Office of Conformity Audit PMDA, Japan

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Regulatory Inspections

SOP-QA-28 V2. Approver: Prof Maggie Cruickshank, R&D Director Approver: Prof Steve Heys, Head of School

Training components for GCP. inspectors in PMDA. Tomonori Tateishi, MD, PhD Office of Conformity Audit, PMDA

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Version Number: 003. On: September 2017 Review Date: September 2020 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 13

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

New European Union Clinical Trial Regulations

MHRA Findings Dissemination Joint Office Launch Jan Presented by: Carolyn Maloney UHL R&D Manager

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Submission of new substance and IMP data in the extended EudraVigilance Medicinal Product Dictionary (XEVMPD)

Trial Management: Trial Master Files and Investigator Site Files

Remediation, Resolution and Outcomes

Club Phase I & AGAH 3 rd Joint Annual Meeting

Version Number: 004 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Annual report of the Good Clinical Practice Inspectors Working Group 2016

Document Number: 006. Version: 1. Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Heidi Saunders, Senior Portfolio Coordinator

MANAGEMENT OF PROTOCOL AND GCP DEVIATIONS AND VIOLATIONS

I2S2 TRAINING Good Clinical Practice tips. Deirdre Thom Neonatal Nurse Coordinator

Standard Operating Procedure

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 325

Document Title: Investigator Site File. Document Number: 019

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Document Title: Site Selection and Initiation for RFL Sponsored Studies Document Number: 026

Standard Operating Procedure. Essential Documents: Setting Up a Trial Master File. SOP effective: 19 February 2016 Review date: 19 February 2018

PHARMACY, MEDICINES & POISONS BOARD GUIDELINES FOR REVIEW/EVALUATION CLINICAL TRIAL APPLICATIONS FOR VACCINES AND BIOLOGICALS MALAWI

Conducting Monitoring Visits for Investigator-Initiated Trials (IITs)

Adopted by Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee 20 February Adopted by Pharmacovigilance Inspectors Working Group 21 March 2014

Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Common Findings

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

Monitoring Clinical Trials

Document Title: Study Data SOP (CRFs and Source Data)

NCCP Guidance on the Retention and Disposal of Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy (SACT) prescriptions and compounding worksheets.

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

Audits/Inspections Be Prepared for Anything

IDENTIFYING, RECORDING AND REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF MEDICAL DEVICES

GCP: Investigator Responsibilities. Susan Tebbs Nicola Kaganson

EMA & FDA Inspections: Site perspective. Shandukani Research Centre

Patient Registry Initiative- Strategy and Mandate of the Cross-Committee Task Force

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 710. Good Clinical Practice AUDIT AND INSPECTION. NNUH UEA Joint Research Office. Acting Research Services Manager

Marie-Claire Rickard, RG and GCP Manager Jimena Lovos, Quality Assurance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Governance Operations Manager

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process. Competent Authority/-ies (CA)/ For certain types of MDs Ethics committee(s)

The GCP Perspective on Study Monitoring

SOP18b: Standard Operating Procedure for Preparing for External Audit and Inspection

Standard Operating Procedure INVESTIGATOR OVERSIGHT OF RESEARCH. Chief and Principal Investigators of research sponsored and/or hosted by UHBristol

Risk Assessment and Monitoring

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office

Checklist prior to recruiting first patient

JOB DESCRIPTION. 1 year fixed term. Division A Pharmacy. University Hospitals Birmingham. Advanced Clinical Pharmacist Trials.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 715. Principles of Clinical Research Laboratory Practice

FDA Inspection Readiness

SOP16: Standard Operating Procedure for Establishing Sites and Centres - Site Setup

Auditing of Clinical Trials

Research Staff Training

SOP : Quality Assurance Inspections SCOPE RESPONSIBILITIES. APPROVAL AUTHORITY EFFECTIVE DATE May PURPOSE 2.

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

Documenting the Story of a Clinical Trial: Concept to CAPA. Lori T. Gilmartin Gilmartin Consulting LLC

European network of paediatric research (EnprEMA)

Study Guide for Emergency Care Clinicians. (Version /09/2014)

Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

Research & Development Quality Manual

Applicants are reminded that the

European network of paediatric research (Enpr-EMA)

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES. Athena Thomas-Visel. Clinical Quality Consultant QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES

Human Research Ethics Review Policy

Trial set-up, conduct and Trial Master File for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs

Clinical Research Professionals

Site Closedown Checklist for UoL Sponsored CTIMP Studies

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

GCP Inspection by PMDA

Survey of Research Nurse Training and Experience in a Paediatric Clinical Trial Setting

SYSTEMS 2 (L160) A Randomised Phase II trial of standard versus dose escalated radiotherapy in the treatment of pain in malignant pleural mesothelioma

European network of paediatric research (EnprEMA)

Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance

Human Research Governance Review Policy

AUDIT REPORT. Audit of Offi cial Controls in Local Authority Supervised Establishments Cork County Council

Toward Greater Scientific Rigor

ACTIONS/PSOP/001 Version 1.0 Page 2 of 6

Transcription:

Overview of the IMB s Approach to Inspection of Good Clinical Practice GCP Seminar Dublin, 27 th January 2010 Deirdre O Regan GCP/Pharmacovigilance Inspection Manager Slide 1

Introductions/Organisation John Lynch Director of Compliance Anne Hayes Inspection Manager Deirdre O Regan GCP/Pharmacovigilance Inspection Manager Donna McGowan GCP/Pharmacovigilance Inspector Sinéad Curran GCP/Pharmacovigilance Inspector p Slide 2

Agenda Aims of the GCP Seminar Inspector Responsibilities Overview of Legislation and Guidance GCP Inspection References Scheduling GCP Inspections GCP Inspection Process Slide 3

Agenda contd. Classification of Inspection Findings Inspection Follow-up GCP Inspection History Summary of GCP Inspection outcomes 2007, 2008, 2009 Aims of the GCP seminar Slide 4

Aims of the GCP Seminar Focus on investigator site responsibility (Section 4 of ICH GCP) Focus on areas of greatest risk Legislative requirements Expectations t ti Inspection findings Slide 5

Inspector Responsibilities Protection of public health Ensure that all parties involved in a clinical i l trial adhere to relevant legislation l and guidance Slide 6

Overview of Legislation Directive 2001/20/EC Implemented nationally into S.I. 190 of 2004, May 2004 Amended S.I. 878 of 2004, December 2004 Directive 2005/28/EC Implemented nationally into SI 374 of 2006, July 2006 Regulation (EC) No. 1394/2007 Amended S.I. 1 of 2009, January 2009 Guidance Documents Slide 7

Legislation & Guidance Documents EUDRALEX- Volume 10 Guidelines for Clinical Trials The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union contains guidance documents applying to clinical ca trials. Chapter I : Application and Application Form Chapter II : Monitoring and Pharmacovigilance Chapter III : Quality of the Investigational Medicinal Product Chapter IV : Inspections Chapter V : Additional Information Chapter VI : Legislation http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/pharmaceuticals/documents/ eudralex/vol-10/index_en.htm#h2-chapter-ii:-monitoring-andpharmacovigilance Slide 8

Slide 9

GCP Inspection References Clinical trials are inspected against: S.I. 190 2004 (amendment S.I. 878, 2004), SI 374 of 2006, S.I.1 of 2009 Guidelines e.g.: Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guideline (ICH Topic E6, Step 5) CPMP/ICH/135/95 EU Guideline for GMP: Annex 13: Manufacturing of Investigational Medicinal Products (Directive 2003/94/EC) Commission guidelines Study protocol Clinical trial authorisation Slide 10

Scheduling GCP Inspections Current procedure for selection of sites for routine inspection: Risk k Based Trial/sponsor/investigator/subcontractors not previously inspected Geographical spread/therapeutic p area High level of clinical trial activity Slide 11

Scheduling GCP Inspections Who/what can be inspected? All locations where trial related activities are conducted e.g. Sponsor/CRO sites Investigator sites Phase I facility Clinical laboratory sites IMP Manufacturing/packaging sites Slide 12

Scheduling GCP Inspections Types of Inspection: Routine Majority, to standard procedure Follow-up Corrective, preventive actions followed to closure For-cause Suspicion of fraud; the existence of adequate facilities; Clinical trials started without authorisation; Protocol amendments not approved by the IMB and/or Ethics Committee prior to enactment; Inadequate safety reporting; Inappropriate IMP manufacture, importation or management European co-ordinated ordinated by European Medicines Agency Slide 13

GCP Inspection Process Sponsor contacted 4 6 weeks prior to proposed inspection Inspection plan prepared Announcement letter & inspection plan to sponsor, including request for information Approx. 3 days at Investigator site Slide 14

GCP Inspection Process Opening meeting Require q Investigator to be present at opening and closing meetings Tour of facilities Review of clinical trial records SDV of approx. 10% of subjects SAE reporting Slide 15

GCP Inspection Process Searching, thorough & a learning experience!! Notify inspectees of major and critical deficiencies on an ongoing g basis Closing meeting Definition of deficiency classification provided Inspection findings summarised Deficiencies classified as far as possible (Input from IMB experts sometimes required) Questions relating to findings answered Follow-up activities explained Slide 16

Classification of Inspection Findings Critical: Conditions, practices or processes that adversely affect the rights, safety or well being of subjects and/or the quality and integrity of data. Major: Conditions, practices or processes that might adversely affect the rights, safety or well being of subjects and/or the quality and integrity of data. Major observations are serious deficiencies i i and are direct violations of GCP principles Minor: Conditions, practices or processes that would not be expected to adversely affect the rights, safety or well being of subjects and/or the quality and integrity of data. Slide 17

Inspection Follow-up Inspection follow-up re. major/minor deficiencies i i Deficiency Summary Report - Day 15 Report issued - Day 28 Response to inspection report - Day 43 Correspondence, if necessary, Day 44 Day 80 Inspection close out Day 90 Slide 18

Inspection Follow-up Possible actions arising from multiple major/critical deficiencies: i i Deviations reviewed internally with representatives from Compliance and immediately after inspection Recommendations regarding corrective actions/follow-up inspection Possible meeting with sponsor regarding corrective action plan Suspension of clinical trial activities Slide 19

Year GCP Sponsor GCP Inspection History GCP Site GCP Site: Non- Commercial Phase I EMA Total 04 0 4 5 1 1 11 05 1 7 0 0 0 8 06 4 10 1 1 0 16 07 1 8 1 2 2 14 08 0 12 1 0 2 15 09 0 10 6 1 7 24 Total 6 51 14 5 12 88 Slide 20

Summary of GCP Site Inspection Outcomes 2007, 2008, 2009 Critical Deficiencies Major Deficiencies Protocol Compliance 69.6% 19.1% Informed Consent - 19.1% Safety 17.4% 15.6% Slide 21

Aims of the GCP Seminar Focus on areas of greatest risk Legislative requirements, expectations, inspection findings re Protocol Compliance Sinéad Safety.Donna Informed Consent Sinéad IMP Management Deirdre D i d Training & Delegation.Donna Q&A after each presentation. Other queries to compliance@imb.ie Slide 22

Agenda Aims of the GCP Seminar Inspector Responsibilities Overview of Legislation and Guidance GCP Inspection References Scheduling GCP Inspections GCP Inspection Process Slide 23

Agenda contd. Classification of Inspection Findings Inspection Follow-up GCP Inspection History Summary of GCP Inspection outcomes 2007, 2008, 2009 Aims of the GCP seminar Slide 24

Thank you for your attention! Slide 25