UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND

Similar documents
UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND. Proposal Submission

UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND

CAPT Tim Kelly Program Executive Office

UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND SBIR FY11.1 Proposal Submission

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Global EOD Symposium & Exhibition

Revision of DoD Design Criteria Standard: Noise Limits (MIL-STD-1474) Award Winner: ARL Team

UNCLASSIFIED. RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST (Dollars in Millions) FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Cost to Complete

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: SOF Soldier Protection and Survival Systems

SERIES 1300 DIRECTOR, DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (DDR&E) DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (NC )

Military Radar Applications

An Overview. HEMS Harsh Environment Mass Spectrometry Symposium Sarasota, Florida September 2005

Possible Business Opportunities Within The SOF Weapons Program

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE BB / SOF Visual Augmentation, Lasers and Sensor Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FUNCTIONAL AND PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION AUDITS OF THE ARMY PALADIN PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Michael Caccuitto DoD SBIR/STTR Program Administrator

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) IMPACT TEST PROCEDURES

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.

We provide innovative solutions that protect and save lives.

FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TEST (FCT) PE D FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Own the fight forward, build Airmen in a lethal and relevant force, and foster a thriving Air Commando family

DOD RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM

FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)

Mr. James Hondo Geurts Deputy Director for Acquisition United States Special Operations Command

theater. Most airdrop operations will support a division deployed close to the FLOT.

Missile Defense Agency Advanced Research Overview Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Joint Test & Evaluation Program

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION DIRECTORATE OVERVIEW SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE WORKING GROUP 22 SEPTEMBER 2016

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #100

Ontario School District 8C

GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS)

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)

CRS Report for Congress

COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO

COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

FY19 Warfighting Lab Incentive Fund Project Proposal Background and Instructions

An honored tradition of service to the military

ANDREW J. HIGGINS, EUGENE M. STONER, AND DONALD ROEBLING AWARDS FOR ACQUISITION INNOVATION AND EXCELLENCE

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO

DOING BUSINESS WITH USSOCOM

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #211

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Inspector General FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SPS-TA THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT AND WIDE-BODY AIRCRAFT.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

STATEMENT OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL MICHAEL W. WOOLEY, U.S. AIR FORCE COMMANDER AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT (WMSA&IS)

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL QUICK-REACTION REPORT ON THE PROCUREMENT OF THE ARMY UGHT AND SPECIAL DIVISION INTERIM SENSOR. y.vsavavav.v.

Navy SBIR/STTR Programs

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

LGT FR 101. ** Unofficial Courtesy Translation **

Charter United States Army Science Board

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Project Manager Soldier Weapons Ammunition Programs

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62

UNCLASSIFIED OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Air Defense System Solutions.

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

Military Airframe, Land & Sea Based Applications for Titanium

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

Special Program Announcement for 2013 Office of Naval Research. Ground-Based Air Defense Directed Energy On-The-Move

United States Special Operations Command. Science and Technology

Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. DoD Personal Property Shipment and Storage Program

Transcription:

UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND Proposal Submission The United States Operations Command s (USSOCOM) mission includes developing and acquiring unique special operations forces (SOF) equipment, material, supplies and services. Desired SOF operational characteristics for systems, equipment and supplies include: lightweight and micro-sized; reduced signature /low observable; built-in survivability; modular, rugged, reliable, maintainable and simplistic; operable in extremes temperature environments; water depth and atmosphere pressure proof; transportable by aircraft, ship and submarine, and deplorable by airdrop; LLPI/LPD jam resistant C3I, electronic warfare capable of disruption and deception; near real-time surveillance, intelligence and mission planning; highly lethal and destructive; low energy/power requirements; and compatible with conventional force systems. USSOCOM is seeking small businesses with a strong research and development capability and an understanding of the SOF operational characteristics. The following topics represent a portion of the problems encountered by SOF in fulfilling its mission. USSOCOM invites the small business community to send proposals (original plus 3 copies) directly to the following address: United States Special Operations Command Attn: SOAL-KB/SBIR Program, Topic No. SOCOM 99-00 7701 Tampa Point Blvd. MacDill Air Force Base, Florida 33621-5316 Inquires of a general nature or questions concerning the administration of the SBIR program should be addressed to : United States Special Operations Command Attn: SOSB/ Ms. Karen L. Pera 7701 Tampa Point Blvd. MacDill Air Force Base, Florida 33621-5316 Tel (813) 840-5514 Fax (813) 840-5481 E Mail perak@socom.mil USSOCOM has identified these 3 technical topics for the FY 99.1 solicitation. Proposals will only be accepted for these 3 topics. Topics were initiated by the USSOCOM technical offices responsible for the research and development in these specific areas. The same office is responsible for the technical evaluation of the proposals. Proposal evaluation factors are listed below. Each proposal must address each factor in order to be considered for an award. Scientific and technical information assistance may be requested by using the DTIC SBIR Interactive Technical Information System (SITIS). Firms are encouraged to submit a proposal with an optional task which would be performed during the period between Phase I completion and Phase II contract award. The optional task provides the opportunity to reduce the gap between Phase I and II funding. The maximum amount of SBIR funding used for an USSOCOM Phase I award is $100,000. Proposals that include the option task shall not exceed $70,000 for Phase I and $30,000 for Phase I Option. Options must be submitted with the basic Phase I proposal and will not be included in the basic Phase I proposal page limitation. The basic Phase I proposal shall be evaluated exclusive of the option task and must be proposed and priced separately. The option portion of the proposal shall not exceed 10 pages, not exceed $30,000, not exceed three months in duration, and will be evaluated using the same evaluation criteria as Phase I proposals. The transition option work shall be included as an option in the Phase I contract and evaluated for USSOCOM unilateral exercise at any time after Phase I award through the conclusion of the basic Phase I contract. The maximum time frame for a Phase I with or without option is 6 months. Exercise of any option shall be at the sole discretion of USSOCOM and shall not obligate USSOCOM to make a Phase II award. SOCOM 1

Evaluation Criteria - Phase I & II 1) The soundness, technical merit, and innovation of the proposed approach and its incremental progress toward topic or subtopic solution. 2) The qualifications of the proposed principal/key investigators supporting staff, and consultants. Qualifications include not only the ability to perform the research and development but also the ability to commercialize the results. 3) The potential for commercial (Government or private sector) application and the benefits expected to accrue from this commercialization. Selection of proposals for funding is based upon technical merit and the evaluation criteria included in this solicitation. As funding is limited, USSOCOM will select and fund only those proposals considered to be superior in overall technical quality and most critical. USSOCOM may fund more than one proposal in a specific topic area if the technical quality of the proposals are deemed superior, or it may fund no proposals in a topic area. USSOCOM also encourages contractors to participate in the SBIR Fast Track program as described in the DOD 99.1 Solicitation. Proposing Options in the initial proposal will not prevent a contractor from participating in the Fast Track Program, however, the total USSOCOM funds for a Phase I, options, and the Fast Track funding will not exceed $140,000. It is anticipated the vast majority of Fast Track proposals will receive interim funding between Phases I and II, and that the percentage of Phase I Fast Track projects that are selected for Phase II awards should be significantly higher that the overall percentage of Phase I projects that are selected for Phase II. USSOCOM offers information on the Internet about its SBIR program at http://www.socom. mil SOCOM 2

USSOCOM FY 99.1 SBIR TOPIC INDEX Materials, Processes and Structures SOCOM 99-001 High Speed Composite Waterjet Propulsion Systems Clothing, Textiles and Food SOCOM 99-002 Advanced Technology Exposure Suit (ATES) Conventional Weapons SOCOM 99-003 Remote Sighting System for Weapons SOCOM 3

USSOCOM FY 99.1 TOPIC DESCRIPTIONS SOCOM 99-001 TITLE: High Speed Composite Waterjet Propulsion Systems TECHNOLOGY AREA: Materials, Processes and Structures OBJECTIVE: The development and production of a domestic high efficiency, mixed flow, composite waterjets. These boat propulsion systems would represent the only mid-sized or large high speed waterjets made in America, and the only high speed waterjets available worldwide constructed of composite materials. DESCRIPTION: Waterjets presently available worldwide are constructed of aluminum, whereas, high speed boats are generally constructed from composites. Typically, the waterjets are of aluminum construction, which imposes weight, cost, and technical problems when interfacing into the composite craft. Additionally, there are presently no domestic manufacturers of these propulsion systems for high speed water craft. Forming the inlet section (scoop injector) of the waterjet using composite material as part of the lay-up of a composite hull could significantly reduce the weight, cost, and technical difficulty of interfacing waterjets and composite craft. The use of integral composite intakes in composite vessels would eliminate mechanical fastening and structural and material discontinuities in composite hull bottoms, while offering weight and maintenance savings. There is a market, both military and commercial, for a high speed, lightweight, high efficiency, corrosion resistant propulsion system, which will offer designers and builders of high speed craft a cutting edge, domestic, non-developmental, and proven propulsion system. PHASE I: Build and test a prototype composite jet unit and investigate the predicted impact of installation of the units on the 11 meter (m) military rigid hull inflatable boat (RIB). PHASE II: Based on Government acceptance of the prototype design, construct and install two units in an 11M RIB test craft, and document the weight savings and performance impact. Provide a report including performance, weight, funding, maintenance, scheduling and logistical impact of the units versus the aluminum counterparts currently used. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: These propulsion systems can be considered as an alternate propulsion system for composite propeller driven craft operating in the 35 to 60 knot speed range, and as an alternate for all aluminum waterjet installations. The low cost of manufacture, compared to forming or casting aluminum, and the ease of installation by molding the intakes into the hull, will reduce the price of these propulsion systems and allow pleasure craft builders to offer larger waterjet propelled craft at a competitive price to propeller systems. SOCOM 99-002 TITLE: Advanced Technology Exposure Suit (ATES) TECHNOLOGY AREA: Clothing, Textiles and Food OBJECTIVE: Develop an advanced exposure suit, wetsuit, or new components for existing systems to provide military forces with a garment capable of transitioning from water/underwater environments directly into extended wear in an operational environment. DESCRIPTION: Operations in extreme weather environments combined with water operations create a need for an advanced wetsuit-like garment system capable of extended wear in and out of the water. The system should provide environmental protection to a submerged diver for periods of up to 8 hours, and then provide environmental protection for land operations for periods of up to 5 days. The system should allow for multiple and uninterrupted transitions between land and underwater environments. The system should address total body SOCOM 4

environmental protection, while providing for maximum body movement so as not to impede diving, swimming, and land combat operations. The system should be self-contained, and have no external power requirements. PHASE I: Investigate and present to the Government potential materials and design concepts suitable for ATES. Based on Government guidance, design, fabricate, and conduct laboratory-scale testing of a prototype ATES. PHASE II: Based on the Phase I results, refine and develop the final ATES design. Fabricate and test prototypes using Government provided test profiles. Following Government review and comment on the prototype design and test results, modify and refurbish test prototypes and submit to the Government for operational assessment. Make final design changes based on Government input following the operational assessment. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: The ATES would have application for recreational sports enthusiasts (e.g., tri/bi-athletes, personal watercraft operators, divers, and surfers). SOCOM 99-003 TITLE: Remote Sighting System for Weapons TECHNOLOGY AREA: Conventional Weapons OBJECTIVE: Develop an advanced video-based sighting system that interfaces with standard small arms to provide remote sighting capabilities for low-visibility/obstructed view targeting environments. DESCRIPTION: The ability to sight small arms accurately in situations with obstructed views and low-visibility would significantly enhance the safety and effectiveness of ground troops. This is particularly true for urban and low-intensity situations where operation from cover or concealment markedly reduce the threat to the operator. A system is envisioned that combines video images and weapons sighting into one remote display (e.g. head mounted), and operates effectively in low-visibility conditions. Low-powered illuminator, digital sensor, display, and processing technologies are presently available to support this requirement. A system should be developed that integrates these technologies, using low-cost components, to provide the desired capability. Quick assembly, disassembly, and adaptability (i.e., mounting and sight calibration) to a variety of weapons are essential. The system must be able to withstand the rigors of combat operations, to include airdrop and diving operations to 66 feet sea water. The system should be designed in a modular and open system fashion to provide for easy upgrades as the various components are improved. PHASE I: Design and fabricate a prototype system, and demonstrate its capabilities. It is critical here to demonstrate operational feasibility in terms of performance, power requirements, configuration, survivability, and effective interface with representative weapons and the operator. PHASE II: Refine design using the results of the Phase I investigation, and fabricate and test prototypes. Following Government review and comment on prototype design and test results, modify and refurbish test prototypes and submit to the Government for operational assessment. Make final design changes based on Government input following operational assessment. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: The remote sighting system would have application to enhance the safety and effectiveness of military operators and law enforcement personnel. Additional applications include sensing/sighting systems for robots and security systems. To increase the system s utility and applicability, it could be further designed to provide situational awareness inputs to tactical C4I elements. SOCOM 5