NHS TAYSIDE MORTALITY REVIEW PROGRAMME

Similar documents
This paper provides an update on the the recent national SPSP conference the programme of work for Tissue Viability Acute Adult Care SPSP

This is a high level overview report to update the Board on the Acute Adult Safety Programme consisting of the following sections:

NHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report June 2011 (Data available as at end April 2011)

NHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report October 2011 (Data available as at end August 2011)

April Clinical Governance Corporate Report Narrative

Quality Improvement Strategy Safe care Effective care Excellent patient experience

Together for Health A Delivery Plan for the Critically Ill

Mortality Report Learning from Deaths. Quarter

Learning from adverse events. Learning and improvement summary

Recognise and Rescue: A hospital wide collaboration to improve response to the deteriorating patient at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Healthcare Governance Committee Monday 5 June 2017 at 9.30am Room 2, Training Centre, Ayrshire Central Hospital

Appendix 1 MORTALITY GOVERNANCE POLICY

Scottish Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR)

Date of publication:june Date of inspection visit:18 March 2014

Healthcare Improvement Scotland. NHS Tayside

SUBJECT: CLINICAL GOVERNANCE

Healthcare quality lessons from the best small country in the world

The new CQC approach to hospital inspection. Ann Ford Head of Hospital Inspection (North West) June 2014

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board

Safety Measurement, Monitoring & Strategies

Innovation Series Move Your DotTM. Measuring, Evaluating, and Reducing Hospital Mortality Rates (Part 1)

Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratios

Alison Hunter. Improvement Advisor, Acute Adult Safety Programme. Healthcare Improvement Scotland

MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY

CASE STUDY The Safer Patients Initiative

BOARD CLINICAL GOVERNANCE AND QUALITY UPDATE FEBRUARY 2016

Learning from Deaths Policy A Framework for Identifying, Reporting, Investigating and Learning from Deaths in Care.

Using mortality data to improve the quality and safety of patient care December 2015

CCDM Programme Standards

Policy on Learning from Deaths

SPSP Medicines. Prepared by: NHS Ayrshire and Arran

Unique Identifier: Review Date: November Issue Status: Approved Version No: 1.4 Issue Date: November 2017

Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

Implementation of the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards

Clinical Governance report prepared for NHS Lanarkshire Board Report title Clinical Governance Corporate Report - October 2015

SUBJECT: QUALITY ASSURANCE AND IMPROVEMENT

Percent Unadjusted Inpatient Mortality (NHSL Acute Hospitals) Numerator: Total number of in-hospital deaths

Page 1 of 26. Clinical Governance report prepared for NHS Lanarkshire Board Report title Clinical Governance Corporate Report - November 2014

System enablers practical aspects Chair Lesley Anne Smith

Making Care Better Our progress at a glance

The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust

Alcohol Brief Interventions 2016/17

The aim of this report is to provide the Board with an overview of progress in the areas of:

Status: Information Discussion Assurance Approval. Claire Gorzanski, Head of Clinical Effectiveness

Inpatient, Day case and Outpatient Stage of Treatment Waiting Times

Antimicrobial stewardship in Scotland: quality improvement agenda

Faculty for Quality Improvement Cardiff & Vale UHB and Cardiff University. Maureen Fallon

CLINICAL AND CARE GOVERNANCE STRATEGY

SAFE CARE. Scottish Patient Safety Programme. SPSP Adult Acute

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes

Reducing In-hospital Mortality

Northern Ireland COPD Audit

Evaluation Tool* Clinical Standards ~ March 2010 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease** Services

Using the structured judgement review method

Findings from the 6 th Balance of Care / Continuing Care Census

A safe system framework for recognising and responding to children at risk of deterioration. July 2016

Carol J. Peden BSC, MB ChB, MD, FRCA, FFICM, MPH Royal United Hospital, Bath

M16 Is there a perfect system?

Welsh Government Response to the Report of the National Assembly for Wales Public Accounts Committee Report on Unscheduled Care: Committee Report

THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST NHS SAFETY THERMOMETER

FOREWORD Introduction from the Chief Executive 2 BACKGROUND 3 OUR TRUST VALUES 4 OUR AIMS FOR QUALITY 5 HOW WE MEASURE QUALITY 16

Clinical Governance in NHS Tayside

Utilisation Management

Reducing emergency admissions

NHS Ayrshire and Arran. 1. Which of the following performance frameworks has the most influence on your budget decisions:

Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust End of Life Care Strategy

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes. A guide from NatPaCT

Sepsis Management in Scotland. Calum McGregor Consultant Acute Medicine National Clinical Lead for Acute Care Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Health Care Quality Indicators in the Irish Health System:

NHS Wales Delivery Framework 2011/12 1

Improvement Action Plan Declaration

Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratios, Edmonton, Canada: A Tale of Two Sites Lessons Learned from the UK

Levers Available to Improve Safety

Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: Current practice and problems - and a possible solution. Zoë Fritz

National COPD Audit Programme

Findings from the Balance of Care / Continuing Care Census

Public health guideline Published: 11 November 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/ph36

TRUST CORPORATE POLICY RESPONDING TO DEATHS

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated September 2007

NHS Clinical Governance Annual Report 2010/2011

Learning from Deaths Policy

NHSScotland National Catering and Nutritional Services Specification: Half Yearly Compliance Report. Results for July Dec 2016

Findings from the Balance of Care / NHS Continuing Health Care Census

Learning from the Deaths of Patients in our Care Policy

Improving Patient Outcomes Strategy

Prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections

Alcohol Brief Interventions 2015/16

Risk Assessment & Safety Planning Driver Diagram Phase Two. The Scottish Patient Safety Programme is co-ordinated by Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Inpatient, Day case and Outpatient Stage of Treatment Waiting Times

Quality and Efficiency Support Team (QuEST) Directorate for Health Workforce and Performance

PAHT strategy for End of Life Care for adults

A Step-by-Step Guide to Tackling your Challenges

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board

The aim of this report is to provide the Borders NHS Board with an overview of progress in the areas of Safe, Effective and Person Centred Care.

Redesign of Front Door

Quality Indicators for Primary Care Out-of-Hours Services. July Evidence

Learning from Deaths Policy LISTEN LEARN ACT TO IMPROVE

Data, analysis and evidence

Sepsis Collaborative May 2015 Report

Delivering on A Promise to Learn A Commitment to Act. The National Patient Safety Collaborative learning event

Transcription:

NHS TAYSIDE MORTALITY REVIEW PROGRAMME Aim Primary Drivers Processes, Rules of Conduct, Structure MEASUREMENT Secondary Drivers Components, Activities Understand how mortality rates/ratios are measured Develop local team reviews Develop comparison indicators Address recording, coding and data quality issues Clearly communicate evidence about appropriate use and acknowledge limitations Reduce mortality rate by 15% by December 2012 EVALUATION RELIABLE CARE PROCESSSES REPORTING Identify key areas for improvement using the 3 x 2 matrix and Global Trigger Tools o evidence of adverse events o evidence of planning failures o evidence of miscommunication Learn from other organisation s mortality models Understand key aspects of local palliative care services Deliver reliable evidenced based care designed to reduce mortality (SPSP five workstreams) Learn from other organisation s findings, e.g. Ayrshire & Arran : unreliable and variable care, failure to rescue, infection and falls, DNACPR, clinical escalation Consider national recommendation : failure to rescue and prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, sepsis bundle Appropriate referral/information from primary to secondary care Monthly reporting to the local mortality review team Develop Terms of Reference for NHS Tayside Mortality Review Team Ensure transparency of methodology Develop appropriate presentation, publication and practical dissemination of results Meet needs of different audiences in relation to interpretation, use and context ( public, NHS Tayside Board, Chief Executive, Medical Director/Nurse Director, Executive Management Team, Healthcare Professionals)

Understand how mortality rates/ratios are measured Develop local team reviews Develop companion indicators Address recording, coding and data quality issues Clearly communicate evidence about appropriate use and acknowledge limitations NB: Mortality is an important system level quality indicator, and is an essential tool for hospitals seeking to understand and reduce serious adverse outcomes of inpatient care. The NHS Tayside Mortality Review Group will use Hospital Standardised Mortality Rates (HSMR) and raw mortality data to help shine a light on potential areas for further analysis or investigation. This will be conducted in order to understand the underlying local context, drivers and factors affecting mortality figures. The group will : Develop comparison indicators to prevent undue focus on one indicator in isolation. Recognise there is no gold standard or single indicator which can measure good or poor quality care. Use data to compliment, not replace local mortality monitoring Engage with NHS Tayside clinicians to map existing local team mortality review processes. Understand and address the issues relating to recording and coding of data, e.g. palliative care coding. Closer engagement with ISD and CHKS in relation to coding, recording and data quantity. Mortality is an important system level quality indicator and is an essential tool for hospitals seeking to understand and reduce serious adverse outcomes of inpatient care. NB: Death rates make effective outcome measures for a number of reasons: death is a definite, unique event (unlike morbidity, which is continuous and difficult to measure consistently) Generally, HSMR closely mirrors the raw mortality rate over time, and provides a reasonable real-time proxy for the HSMR which is currently released quarterly.

Identify key areas for improvement using the 2 x 2 matrix and Global Trigger Tools o evidence of adverse events o evidence of planning failures o evidence of miscommunication Learn from other organisation s mortality models Understand key aspects of local palliative care services Measurement of mortality should be followed by analysis of what the rate means and what factors contribute to this and identify and implement system level changes that can reduce mortality. The evaluation/review process will include : Development of a robust process to regularly review 50 consecutive patients who died within acute inpatient settings. Use the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Hospital Mortality Review Tool for this process. Use the information to determine what percentage of patients who died fell into each of four categories : 1. Patients admitted to ICU for comfort care only, suggesting overuse of ICU beds and corresponding flow issues in the ICU. 2. Patients admitted to non-icu beds for comfort care only may also indicate inadequate hospice or other end of life care resources in the community. Working in partnership with the CHPs is critical in exploring and addressing these issues. 3. Patients admitted for care in the ICU represents the potential for applying evidence-based care reliably, e.g. ventilator bundle, multidisciplinary team daily goals/rounds 4. Suggests since the outcome is death, these patients were in fact high risk and possible not rescued appropriately. 5. Using IHI s Global Trigger Tool, perform a more comprehensive review of the charts of patients from Box 3 and 4. 6. Identify improvement projects from the above, e.g. identifying high risk patients in admission, standardise patient handover processes, configuration of local palliative care services. Explore and learn from other organisation s mortality review processes that have successfully reduced mortality rates Ayrshire & Arran, Wales (confirm trust)

Deliver reliable evidenced based care designed to reduce mortality (SPSP five workstreams) Learn from other organisation s findings, e.g. Ayrshire & Arran : unreliable and variable care, failure to rescue, infection and falls, DNACPR, clinical escalation Consider national recommendation : failure to rescue and prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, sepsis bundle The evaluation of data will inform and refine existing pilot testing and implementation of evidence-based SPSP interventions designed to reduce mortality. Reduce healthcare associated infection Reduce adverse surgical incidents Reduce adverse drug events Improve critical care outcomes Improve organisational and leadership culture on safety In addition, NHS Tayside will learn from other organisations including recent findings by NHS Ayrshire & Arran : Unreliable and variable care Failure to rescue Infection and falls DNA CPR Clinical escalation ICU and HDU success stories locally and nationally Glasgow and Clyde ICU Mortality Reduction, ALOS reduction, potential savings in waste, variation and harm.

Monthly reporting to the local mortality review team Develop Terms of Reference for NHS Tayside Mortality Review Team Ensure transparency of methodology Develop appropriate presentation, publication and practical dissemination of results Meet needs of different audiences in relation to interpretation, use and context ( public, NHS Tayside Board, Chief Executive, Medical Director/Nurse Director, Executive Management Team, Healthcare Professionals) Recent drivers in improving patient safety and quality have led to references to mortality figures which have not always been accurate. NHS Tayside aims to have the monitoring and reporting of mortality established as good practice. It is important therefore to establish clear communications and guidance about the appropriate use of this data and its limitations clearly acknowledged. Potential reporting of this data to different groups will require : Engage with the PFPI team to ensure relevant information is provided to patients and public to give assurance that NHS Tayside is using information to understand it s systems and make changes to improve the quality of care it delivers. Reduce the inappropriate decisions made based on mortality such as the complexity of interpretating the data, coding etc. Develop a system for boards to monitor their mortality rates and actively seek to understand variances. Ensuring that NHS Tayside Board looks at this as part of a dashboard of more detailed indicators. Use by the Medical and Nurse Director as a potential highlighter of underlying problems which require further investigation. To ensure frontline staff are aware and understand the mortality figures/trends/findings as part of the clinical governance arrangements. Develop Terms of Reference for the NHS Tayside Mortality Review Group.