I-15 Corridor System Master Plan San Diego, California to Utah/Idaho border

Similar documents
Metrolink Budget for FY /Additional Service on the Antelope Valley Line

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

Project Selection Advisory Council

Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

Public Participation Process

CURRICULUM VITAE. Graduated High School at Apple Valley High School, Apple Valley, California 1982.

Project Activity Status Report

Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Advisory Group

SUBJECT: REGIONAL RAlL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING BENCH AND REGIONAL RAlL UPDATE. INITIATE PROCESS TO ESTABLISH A REGIONAL RAlL BENCH

Expediting Project Delivery Webinar - Streamlining Decision Making in Project Delivery

Met r 0 Met"'fKK'ibn Transportation Authority

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

NBKRC Mid-Year Bankruptcy Filings Report. (July 2013)

A. Amend the FY LACMTA Budget to add $3,000,000 from Measure R 3% Commuter Rail funds for the Rancho Vista Grade Separation Project

Regional Prioritization Priorities and Process

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

John Spain, Executive Vice President Baton Rouge Area Foundation Karen Parsons AICP, Principal Planner - New Orleans Regional Planning Commission

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

WINSTON-SALEM URBAN AREA MPO EXPLAINED

Transportation Planning & Investment in Urban North Carolina

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Regional Transportation Plan & Sustainable Communities Strategy. Public Participation Plan

Maritime Administration Update. January 14, 2016 Captain Bob Loken Director PNW, Alaska, Guam, Hawaii Gateways

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

ATTACHMENT G-1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE CONSISTENCY SELF-CERTIFICATION FORM

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement for Construction of the Placentia Avenue Railroad Grade Separation Project.

2016 DOT Discretionary Grants

Open House Round 2. State Rail Plan. A Collaborative Vision for Transportation

Western Regional Partnership Overview

SOUTHERN NEVADA HEALTH DISTRICT. Classification Plan Recommendations

Long Range Transportation Plan

The New Incrementalism: Building and Financing US High-Speed Rail

Nevada Department of Transportation Traffic Operations Policy Memorandum Traffic Signal Warrant Approval Process

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY ?/2W/(T. Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal

MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP AGENDA

Local Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

State Project No. XXXXXX City Project No. c401807

Economic Development Services Join Us On the Road to Success

ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process

The following is a summary of the Minutes taken from the NUCP meeting and is not a detailed verbatim transcription of the Minutes.

Florida Transportation Commission. December 5, 2012

Aquidneck Island Transportation Study Public Participation Work Plan. July 6, 2009

City of San Diego Master Plans for the Montgomery-Gibbs Executive and Brown Field Airports Public Involvement Plan

Denver s Lessons Learned in Developing Transit Initiatives

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Section 130 Program Overview and Update. James (Jim) Dahlem FHWA Office of Safety Washington, DC

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1

SECTION II. Collection and Analysis of Metro Contract Data

The House and Senate overwhelmingly approved the legislation. The vote in the Senate was 91-7 and in the House of Representatives.

9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs

Utah Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

OF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Program Management Plan

University of Alaska Fairbanks

MEETING NOTES. Agenda Items and Highlights. Background on selection of Steering Committee members/processes/tribal participation:

Chris Bridges CYMPO Administrator

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

Organization Clark County Department of Public Works (DUNS No / CCR 3VNR8) 500 South Grand Central Parkway Las Vegas Nevada,

Mark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH

DIRECTOR S REPORT TRANSPORTATION BOARD SEPTEMBER 10, 2018

An Overview of National Transportation Research

Innovative Project Finance

Transfer Report: 2-Year Institutions

Pioneer Accountable Care Organization Model: General Fact Sheet May 22, 2012

BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Partnership Financing: Improving Transportation Through Public Private Partnerships

8. Coordination and Consultation

TRANSPORTATION. Roles and Responsibilities

Alternative Funding and Financing Mechanisms for Rail Projects: Summary and Relevance for Intercity Passenger Rail (NCRRP 07-01)

L-r 2. NYE COUNTY AGENDA INFORMATION FORM lxi Action Presentation II Presentation & Action. &_i, 4. IXI No financial impact.

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Public and Agency Involvement. 8.1 Scoping Meetings and Noticing. Chapter 8

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016)

Director of Transportation Planning

DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

Bruce Goff, Barb Giacomini, Noah Stewart, and Larry Dean Anteon Corporation San Diego, CA USA.

t J{li Northwestern Indiana

Nevada Commission on Economic Development NVEnergy Rural Nevada Development Corporation Wells Fargo

NTC Program Progress Performance Report (PPPR) Information Form

Funding Safe Routes to School in California

Kristen Keener Busby, AICP

ADOT Transportation Planning and Programming Guidebook for Tribal Governments

Greater Yuma EDC Mission Statement: Greater Yuma EDC Vision Statement:

Tuesday, February 26, :00 A.M. Physical Location: Reno Tahoe International Airport, River Room 2001 E. Plumb Lane, Reno, NV 89502

Per Capita Personal Income (*GDP/Population) This is often used as a standard of living measurement: $41,889

CFLHD Organizational and Program Overview FEDERAL LAND ACCESS PROGRAM (FLAP) 55 th ACE Annual Conference

Results from the 2009 Alumni Attitude Study. TAMU Corpus. Presented by:

AGENDA. Regional Transportation Council Thursday, September 13, 2018 North Central Texas Council of Governments

DESERT SOUTHWEST COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT

Conference Call: Phone Number: (567) Passcode: 34897

SUNIGA/LEMAY MULTI-MODAL AND FREIGHT CONNECTIVITY PROJECT

FTA and Tribal Transit Program Past, Present, and Future

NEWS: Senate Committee Approves FY2019 Transportation, HUD Appropriations Bill 1 message

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

In-Step, In Line, On Time. Robert F. Tally Jr. FHWA Indiana Division Administrator Monday, November 16, 2009

Transcription:

Breakout Group 3: Collaboration for Integrated Planning: Forming Effective Partnerships I-15 Corridor System Master Plan San Diego, California to Utah/Idaho border 1

The Beginning of the Partnership The partnership began with a coalition of Western State DOTs from California, Nevada, Arizona and Utah who will continue to lead our transportation infrastructure delivery for decades to come. 2

The Vision The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan will: Define a multi-decade multimodal transportation system Provide a prioritized program of projects that make up the system Create a governance structure and implementation strategy to sustain and improve this system This vision is defined by a regional partnership between government and private interests in Nevada, California, Arizona, and Utah the I-15 Mobility Alliance This vision is sustained by a unified alliance focused on I-15 s long term regional and global competitiveness 3

4 The Corridor

What did we set out to accomplish? Mobility Multimodal corridor that significantly increases mobility of people and goods through highways, freight rail, transit and high-speed passenger rail Sustainability Accommodate potential future shifts in, and sustainability of, travel patterns, mode choice, population, and technology Adaptability Incorporate advanced technologies for the transport of energy, data and communications 5

What we actually accomplished Created an Alliance with 72 member agencies (over 450 folks) collaborating/cooperating like never before Identified 27 Immediate Projects of Inter-regional Significance ENDORSED unanimously Created a searchable GIS database of regional data and project information using UDOT s UPlan platform Created 16 mode and topicspecific Technical Reports Published in Engineering News Record Prioritized 10 years worth of projects by impact to interregional mobility and time stratified 40+ years of needs along the corridor Endorsed 4 TIGER 3 Grant applications (3 in CA and 1 in AZ) Jointly submitted a Multistate Corridor Operations and Management Federal Grant proposal Developed the Master Plan 6 6

Who was invited to the table? EVERYONE! State DOT s MPO s/transportation Agencies/Authorities Cities/Counties Resource Agencies Private Industry Non profits Academics Economic Development/Commerce 7

Who came to the Table Federal Highway Administration State Departments of Transportation Arizona Department of Transportation California Department of Transportation Nevada Department of Transportation Utah Department of Transportation Transportation/Transit Authorities Bear River Association of Governments Five County Association of Governments Mountainland Association of Governments Northern Arizona Council of Governments Orange County Transportation Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission RTC of Southern Nevada Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation San Bernardino Association of Governments San Diego Association of Governments Southern California Association of Governments Wasatch Front Regional Council LA County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Utah Transit Authority Resource Agencies Arizona Game and Fish Department Bureau of Land Management National Park Service Nevada Division of State Parks Nevada State Office of Energy US Army Corps of Engineers Cities & Counties City of Fontana City of Henderson City of Las Vegas City of Layton City of North Las Vegas City of Ontario City of Orem City of South Salt Lake Clark County Department of Aviation Clark County Public Works County of San Bernardino 8

Who came to the Table (cont.) California High Speed Rail Authority BNSF Railway California Trucking Association Economic Development Corporation of Utah Envision Utah Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority NV Energy Port of Long Beach Salt Lake City Chamber of Commerce Southwest Airlines The Toll Roads Union Pacific Railroad Utah Trucking Association 9

How did we keep them? Value their time & input Limit their commitment Keep them informed & respond quickly Ownership of the process Partners Understand (& respect) partners goals & priorities align with regional goals Credible & transparent process that partners help create Celebrate success Focus on common interests Funding Operations/ITS Goods Movement Sustainability Be flexible and open to partners needs 10

Flexible I-15 Mobility Alliance Structure USDOT (FHWA, FTA, FRA, FAA) Review and approve federal funding requests Executive Board (ADOT, Caltrans, NDOT, UDOT) Executive Operations Committee Guidance and approval of all matters Sign MOUs and agreements Endorse Master Plan and regional projects Recommend all matters to Executive Board Provide clarification and amplification on Executive Board guidance to other committees Steering Committee Develop and recommend vision and strategies for Master Plan Prioritize regional projects Review technical reports and analyses Review and incorporate public input Consultant Team Technical consultant Facilitation Document preparation Technical & Planning Committees Provide technical data, assessments, and evaluations Identify issues of importance Initial review of work products Public Identify issues of concern Provide input on Master Plan elements Decision Maker Recommende r 11 Contributor

How did it improve the outcomes? By creating buy-in to the vision, process, and benefits of this effort, we were able to: Garner broad support for individual projects along the corridor Agreement on corridor-wide initiatives to move forward. Interest and support for sustaining the Alliance commitment of $ & time 12

Focus on Common Interests: Create Future Opportunities Together Deliver the I-15 Dynamic Mobility Project Link traffic management centers along the entire corridor Provide real-time traveler information via web, message boards, mobile devices, etc. Create a sustainable institutional structure for the Alliance Improve and enhance the I-15 Corridor System Master Plan through partner and stakeholder input 13

Project Information / Contacts For more information visit www.i15alliance.org Or contact me: Sondra Rosenberg, PTP NDOT Project Manager Office: (775) 888-7241 Mobile: (775) 443-5869 Email: SRosenberg@dot.state.nv.us Questions? 14