Figure 1: Heat map showing zip codes and countries of residence for patients in STARR

Similar documents
Nurse Practitioner - Outpatient Lung Transplant (1.0 FTE, Days)

Family Practice Clinic

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Clinical Data acquisition and management. David A. Dorr, MD, MS Data after Dark 1/2016 OHSU

Analysis of VA Health Care Utilization among Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND) Veterans

a. It is very important to link a visit before or during the visit. This will drive billing functionality

HC 1930 HC 1930 ICD-9-CM III/CPT Coding II

Asthma Disease Management Program

Analysis of VA Health Care Utilization Among US Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) Veterans

Quanum Electronic Health Record Frequently Asked Questions

Care360 EHR Frequently Asked Questions

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

ecw Integration PIX, XACML, CCD with Basic Clinical Event Notifications Project Scope Definition

NAME SS# ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP. TELEPHONE (home) (business) Cell SEX M F BIRTH DATE PLACE OFBIRTH RACE ETHNICITY LANGUAGE

Madison Health s EMR Journey

Protocol Feasibility and Operationalization Framework. Beth Harper, BS, MBA. President, Clinical Performance Partners, Inc.

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Quality Data Model (QDM) Style Guide. QDM (version MAT) for Meaningful Use Stage 2

PBGH ANALYSIS. Highlights: Aetna Strengths and Weaknesses

Meaningful Use Stage 1 Guide for 2013

Calibrating your tablet allows you to ensure accuracy as you handwrite on the screen and/or select items on the screen. Prime Clinical Systems, Inc 1

HIE Data: Value Proposition for Payers and Providers

CareCore National & Alliance Provider Training Material

PFF Patient Registry Protocol Version 1.0 date 21 Jan 2016

Health Care Data Sets & Information Support Services at the UMHS

American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Analytics Data Dictionary

during the EHR reporting period.

Patient-Centered Connected Care 2015 Recognition Program Overview. All materials 2016, National Committee for Quality Assurance

Mental Health Care and OpenVista

Mental Health Care and OpenVista

Solution Title Impact on readmission rates of psychiatric patients following pharmacist discharge counseling in a community hospital

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Achieving HIMSS Level 7 Implications for HIM. Children s Health System of Texas

Transitional Care Management Services: New Codes, New Requirements

Outpatient Hospital Facilities

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Using the National Hospital Care Survey (NHCS) to Identify Opioid-Related Hospital Visits

Clinical Integration Data Needs for Assessing a Project

Measure: Patient name. Referring or transitioning healthcare provider's name and office contact information (MIPS eligible clinician only) Procedures

Marie Glynn & Jacqui Curley, Healthcare Pricing Office, Ireland

A complete step by step guide on how to achieve Meaningful Use Core Set Measures in Medgen EHR.

1. What are the requirements for Stage 1 of the HITECH Act for CPOE to qualify for incentive payments?

Admissions and Readmissions Related to Adverse Events, NMCPHC-EDC-TR

Back Office-General Quick Reference Guide. Enter a Home Health Referral

Site/Facility: Area: 1. Communication & Outreach Person(s) Responsible Date Due Complete Comments 1.1. EHR/MU team meetings on a routine basis

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

PCSP 2016 PCMH 2014 Crosswalk

JH-CERSI/FDA Workshop Clinical Trials: Assessing Safety and Efficacy for a Diverse Population

STANFORD HEALTH CARE Medical Staff Rules and Regulations. Last Approval Date: December 2017

Summary of Benefits Full PPO Savings Two-Tier Embedded Deductible 1500/2700/3000

Suicide Among Veterans and Other Americans Office of Suicide Prevention

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Commercial Risk Adjustment (CRA) Enrollee Health Assessment Program. Provider User Guide. Table of Contents

Acute. Proposing Surgical Procedure Orders and Orders. Surgical Procedure Orders and Orders Affiliated. Requesting a Surgical Encounter FIN#:

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Nielsen ICD-9. Healthcare Data

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Title: Climate-HIV Case Study. Author: Keith Roberts

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

In Press at Population Health Management. HEDIS Initiation and Engagement Quality Measures of Substance Use Disorder Care:

Appendix 5. PCSP PCMH 2014 Crosswalk

Sutter Health. Steven Lane, MD, MPH, FAAFP Sutter EHR Ambulatory Physician Director

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

Stanford University Privacy Guidelines Fundraising

Colorado Board of Pharmacy Rules pertaining to Collaborative Practice Agreements

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

The Heart and Vascular Disease Management Program

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Patient Electronic Access Modified Stage 2: Objective 8

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

How to Write a Medical Note for the. Foundations of Doctoring Course and Beyond: Demystifying the Focused (SOAP) Note

Deriving Value from a Health Information Exchange. HIMSS17 DA-CH Community Conference Healthix I New York I February 20, 2017

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Medication Error Reporting Program (MERP) Update. April 2010 *********************************************

MEDICARE CCLF ANALYTICS: MEDICARE ANALYTICS DATA ENGINE (MADE)

1A) National-level Data Examples: Free or Inexpensive NHANES - National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). .

ESRD Network Council Meeting

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

PATIENT'S NAME DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY # HOME PHONE # CELL PHONE # WORK PHONE #

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Databases for Research Use

VISIT NOTES QUIZ. C. Individually select each system, then select the negative box for each item

Neurosurgery Clinic Analysis: Increasing Patient Throughput and Enhancing Patient Experience

2. What is the main similarity between quality assurance and quality improvement?

12057 Jefferson Blvd LA, CA (323)

Lawrence A. Allen, MBA, CPC

EHR Incentives. Profit by using LOGO a certified EHR. EHR vs. EMR. PQRI Incentives. Incentives available

An Analysis of Medicaid Costs for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury While Residing in Maryland Nursing Facilities

Case-Mix Data for Case Ascertainment

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

The HMO provider network is available by clicking on this website address: Plan Provider Directory Search<b/>

Telecare Services 7/19/2017

ALFRED ALINGU, MD INTERNAL MEDICINE

2004 RISK ADJUSTMENT TRAINING FOR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE ORGANIZATIONS SPECIAL SESSIONS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS. Data Validation Special Session I 08/10/04

Population and Sampling Specifications

Electronic Medication Reconciliation and Depart Process Overview Nursing Deck

Transcription:

1 / 5 STARR Data Synopsis We operate STARR, a research data repository with 20 years of fully identified clinical data. STARR includes, but is not limited to, nightly clinical data, Epic Clarity, from both Stanford Health Care (adult hospital) and Stanford Children s health (aka Lucile Packard Children s Hospital). STARR contains not only fully identified and up-to-date (within the last 24-36 hours) Epic data from both SHC and Packard but also fully identified and current imaging data from Radiology as well as some historic clinical data from earlier EMRs that is not present in the current EMR systems This invaluable data repository supports self-service tools for cohort identification ( https://stan.md/2tjulpl ) and chart review ( https://stan.md/2tntinf ). The data in STARR has many fascinating stories to tell. For example, patients come to Stanford from all over the country - indeed, all over the world - since for decades Stanford has been a world-class destination for specialty care. Figure 1: Heat map showing zip codes and countries of residence for patients in STARR As another example, since all clinical encounters have a visit provider, and the provider record contains the provider s clinical speciality, it is possible to ask questions of the data regarding the frequency of visit for providers by speciality.

2 / 5 Figure 2: a frequency map of provider specialties drawn from the provider data in STARR The number of patients seen at Stanford has been climbing since 2012 due to new outpatient clinics. Figure 3: number of patients seen per year since 1997, drawn from STARR And the sheer volume of data collected on these patients has been skyrocketing, from around 1.5M electronic records captured per year to over 11M per year in 2017.

3 / 5 Figure 4: number of encounter records created per year since 1997, drawn from STARR. The spikes in electronic record generation correspond to EMR implementations: in 2005, Packard implemented Cerner, and in 2009 SHC implemented Epic. The data exists in a relational database which can be queried to create custom datasets. STARR comprises some of the most frequently queried types of data: patient, provider, encounter, diagnoses, procedures, pharmacy orders and administration, and lab results. Figure 5: STARR data model Patient information includes demographics (age, sex, race, marital status and so on), allergies, social history (e.g. smoking, alcohol and other substance use patterns), and family disease history.

4 / 5 Care provider information includes their clinical role (e.g. NP, Physician, etc.), their departmental affiliation and in the case of physicians, their clinical specialty. Encounter information includes the encounter type, the patient, the care provider, the department, the date of visit, and whether the visit was considered inpatient or outpatient. Figure 8: patient visit type count by year since 1997 from encounter data in STARR Diagnosis codes are drawn primarily from the billing record but are also available from the clinical problem list, surgery case record, and other clinical sources. They are available both as ICD-9 and ICD-10. Over half the clinical diagnoses pertain to neoplasms, circulatory system disorders, musculoskeletal disorders and endocrine system disorders. Figure 6: Diagnosis comparative frequency by category for clinical billing codes in STARR Procedure information is primarily derived from the billing record as well, represented by CPT codes. It s interesting to see that diagnostic procedures significantly outnumber curative procedures.

5 / 5 Figure 7: Procedure comparative frequency by category for clinical billing codes in STARR Medication orders and medication administration records are documented along with the precise brand name, the dosing amount, and the frequency. All quantitative and some qualitative Lab results are also included in this data lake. Clinical documentation and reports remains a fascinating and rich trove of clinical information; we have included all available metadata on all clinical documents and reports, but the full text of the document or report is considered high risk data, even after anonymization. Scrubbed reports and clinical documents are available upon request to Stanford Medicine researchers with an approved IRB research protocol. There are a few forms of data visible in Epic (e.g. Media Tab entries) that are not in the current data transfer from Hospital to School, but we can facilitate procurement of these datasets if there is a research use case. Please contact Research IT ( http://med.stanford.edu/researchit/ ) for more information. Custom research data extracts will incur a cost, so contact us to get a cost estimate. Many research questions can be answered from the comprehensive anonymized extract known as the STARR Tahoe dataset group. The STARR Tahoe data lake contains de-identified data on 1.5M patients seen at Stanford Hospitals and Clinics and Stanford Children s Hospital since Jan 1st 2000 and is published annually on the Population Health Sciences data portal at https://redivis.com/stanfordphs/starr-tahoe/.