NHS 111 Clinical Governance Information Pack

Similar documents
NHS East and North Hertfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group. Quality Committee. Terms of Reference Version 4.0

NHS 111 Service Specification

Front Door Streaming to Primary Care Hub Pilot DRAFT GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK.

OFFICIAL. Commissioning a Functionally Integrated Urgent Care Access, Treatment and Clinical Advice Service

Kingston Clinical Commissioning Group. NHS 111 Service Specification

Vision 3. The Strategy 6. Contracts 12. Governance and Reporting 12. Conclusion 14. BCCG 2020 Strategy 15

November NHS Rushcliffe CCG Assurance Framework

Quality Accounts: Corroborative Statements from Commissioning Groups. Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre - Corroborative Statement

COMMISSIONING FOR QUALITY FRAMEWORK

Learning from Deaths Policy

NHS Pathways and Directory of Services

NHS England (London) Assurance of the BEH Clinical Strategy

Joint framework: Commissioning and regulating together

NHS ENGLAND BOARD PAPER

Sponsoring director: Purpose: Decision Assurance For information Disclosable X Non-disclosable

A meeting of NHS Bromley CCG Governing Body 25 May 2017

Quality and Safety Committee Terms of Reference

QUALITY COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference

NHS 111 specification

TRUST BOARD, 26 NOVEMBER 2009 LEARNING FROM THE CQC INVESTIGATION INTO WEST LONDON MENTAL HEALTH NHS TRUST (WLMHT)

NHS 111 urgent care service

Quality and Governance Committee. Terms of Reference

Utilisation Management

Methods: Commissioning through Evaluation

GOVERNING BODY REPORT

service users greater clarity on what to expect from services

High level guidance to support a shared view of quality in general practice

QUALITY STRATEGY

NHS England (South) Surge Management Framework

Appendix 1: Integrated Urgent Care Service Update. 1. Purpose

NHS and independent ambulance services

Central Alerting System (CAS) Policy

Patient Experience Strategy

NHS 111 in Northamptonshire. Practice Manager Pack

Any Qualified Provider: your questions answered

NHS England London Southside 4th Floor 105 Victoria Street London SW1E 6QT. 24 th July Dear Daniel, Fiona and Louise. Re: CCG Annual Assurance

OFFICIAL. Integrated Urgent Care Key Performance Indicators and Quality Standards Page 1 of 20

Internal Audit. Health and Safety Governance. November Report Assessment

Looked After Children Annual Report

SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TO THE TRUST BOARD HELD ON 18 NOVEMBER 2015

Direct Commissioning Assurance Framework. England

Yorkshire and Humber Integrated Urgent Care: Service Development and Procurement

Emergency admissions to hospital: managing the demand

Learning from Deaths Framework Policy

BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Sue Watkinson Chief Operating Officer

RTT Assurance Paper. 1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Waiting List Management for Elective Care. a. Planning

Reducing Risk: Mental health team discussion framework May Contents

Approve Ratify For Discussion For Information

Hospital Discharge and Transfer Guidance. Choice, Responsiveness, Integration & Shared Care

Job Description and Person Specification

Quality Strategy. CCG Executive, Quality Safety and Risk Committee Approved by Date Issued July Head of Clinical Quality & Patient Safety

2017/ /19. Summary Operational Plan

Adult Social Care Assessment & care management In-house care services

PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes

Learning from Deaths Policy

Fast Track Pathway Tool for NHS Continuing Healthcare

This paper explains the way in which part of the system is changing to become clearer and more accessible, beginning with NHS 111.

Visit to Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust

You said We did. Care Closer to home Acute and Community Care services. Commissioning Intentions Engagement for 2017/18

Delivering an Integrated Urgent Care Service

Mental Health URGENT CARE AND ASSESSMENT Business Case. CCG Summary paper

CLINICAL AND CARE GOVERNANCE STRATEGY

James Blythe, Director of Commissioning and Strategy. Agenda item: 09 Attachment: 04

Adult and Community Services Overview Committee

Shaping the best mental health care in Manchester

Strategic Risk Report 1 March 2018

Integrated Urgent Care Procurement in North West London

: Geraint Davies, Director of Commercial Services

5. Does this paper provide evidence of assurance against the Governing Body Assurance Framework?

Surge Management. Prepared by NEAS Resilience,

JOB DESCRIPTION. Pharmacy Technician

Dorset Health Scrutiny Committee

DIAGNOSTIC CLINICAL TESTS AND SCREENING PROCEDURES MANAGEMENT POLICY

Strategic Risk Report 4 July 2016

Initiation of Warfarin for patients not registered with Provider Practice

Learning from Deaths Policy A Framework for Identifying, Reporting, Investigating and Learning from Deaths in Care.

Mortality Policy. Learning from Deaths

Prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections

Primary Care Quality Assurance Framework (Medical Services)

Safeguarding Vulnerable People Annual Report

Enhanced service specification. Avoiding unplanned admissions: proactive case finding and patient review for vulnerable people

Performance and Quality Committee

HEALTHCARE INSPECTORATE WALES SAFEGUARDING AND PROTECTING CHILDREN IN WALES:

A. Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN)

BOARD PAPER - NHS ENGLAND

Response to recommendations made in the Independent review into Liverpool Community Health NHS Trust

Transforming Primary Care

Sussex Integrated Urgent Care Transformation Soft Market Testing Wednesday 26 th July 2017

Delivering the Five Year Forward View. through Business Intelligence

MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY

GATEWAY ASSESSMENT SERVICE: SERVICE SPECIFICATION

Specialised Services: CPL-008 Referral Management Policy

BOARD PAPER - NHS ENGLAND. Title: Board Assurance Framework (incorporating the organisation s strategic risks)

JOB DESCRIPTION. 1. Post Title SENIOR CARE TEAM LEADER: FAMILY SUPPORT. 2. Grade CHSW Salary Scale Points 32 to 36 inclusive

Job Description. CNS Clinical Lead

ADASS Safeguarding Adults Policy Network. Guidance. June 2016

Strategic Risk Report 12 September 2016

Sunderland Urgent Care: Frequently asked questions

Safeguarding Adults Policy

Transcription:

NHS 111 Clinical Governance Information Pack This pack is designed to help you develop your local NHS 111 clinical governance framework and explain how it fits in to the wider context. It takes you through the steps required and what you need to consider in order to prepare for the Department of Health clinical governance review process. Version 1.1 - August 2012

NHS 111 clinical governance principles Inclusive - all partners are involved Thorough - Call reviews - Whole patient pathway - Regular data monitoring NHS 111 clinical governance is Clinical Leadership - Local GPs taking leadership roles - Responsible for responding quickly to feedback on 111 Patient-focussed - Embraces the views of the patient - Acts with speed to address issues

NHS 111 clinical governance principles NOT a paper exercise - Instead we have a face to face review with DH - There are regular meetings with all parties NOT a collection of existing policies - NHS 111 is viewed as a complete, new service NHS 111 clinical governance is NOT management-led - NHS 111 integrates with contract monitoring, but it s not owned by managers NOT something that fizzles out over time - Regular meetings will continue once live - Clinical leadership remains key

The National NHS 111 CG framework Local CG Group - Chaired by local GP - Wide stakeholder representation - Considers all feedback to the service - Undertakes call reviews - Responsible for investigating incidents - Monitors service delivery data to assess clinical risk Reports to Regional CG Group - Chaired by regional clinical governance lead - Every Local CG group represented - Receives regular reports from Local CG Groups - Shares learning and identifies key themes - Reports back from the national group - Identifies issues to be escalated to national group Reports to National CG Group - Oversees the governance of 111 and shares best practice - Acts as a link to the 111 national programme board - Evaluates performance / issues within each region - Provides solutions to common problems emerging - Platform for issuing new guidance on 111 - Links to NHS Pathways to improve service and provide feedback - Networking with other areas / regions across the country

Where to start Get your local group established Get to know your local NHS 111 model Understand how the patient flows through the service Get to know NHS Pathways and how it works Create a response matrix based on the outcome of the analysis Think about what could go wrong 5 steps of the patient pathway Explore how this links to the DoS to direct to the appropriate service Test NHS Pathways with your own scenarios to see what happens Establish how existing systems can support the process (SUI etc) Start to build your clinical governance documentation Continually check your document against the checklist Submit documentation two weeks before the face to face review

Establishing a local clinical governance group 111 clinical lead (chair) Lay representative Commissioners LMC 111 clinical governance 111 provider Local GPs Ambulance Trust Community and mental health services providers Local acute trusts

Understanding how patients flow through service How the patient demographics will be captured How life threatening situations are identified and dealt with by the service How patients with identified specialist needs will be dealt with by the service How the patient is taken through the NHS Pathways assessment and how a disposition is reached How the DoS will be interrogated and how the patient will be referred to the right service

Five stages of the patient journey through 111 1. Initial telephone access to the local 111 service 2. Getting through to an adviser in the local 111 service 3. The assessment of the caller s needs (whether by an adviser or a clinician) 4. The outcome of that assessment (whether advice or onward referral to another service) 5. The quality of the handover from the NHS 111 service to another service where the caller is referred onwards to a partner provider organisation

Questions to ask about each stage Clinical issues Operational issues Communication issues Serious untoward incidents What could the problem be? How will you know there s a problem? Scenarios Reporting gateways Professional feedback Patient feedback Who needs to be told? How will they be told? How quickly do they need to know? What info they need 111 service response What happens next? Escalation thresholds Capturing lessons Continual improvement

Response matrix to capture How quickly the clinical lead will be told The individual responsible for going back to the person that raised the issue Maximum length of time that will elapse before an appropriate response is prepared How serious incidents will be handled differently Links between clinical and operational issues and responses

Creating your clinical governance submission Small group of authors Write content Make amendments Own distribution To include the 111 clinical lead Reviewers Clinical governance group Information governance Sign off 111 clinical lead Project SRO CCGs Clinical governance group

Submission pack must contain: Letter from the SRO The analysis of the 5 stages of the patient journey The manner in which the approach to clinical governance was developed Detailed description of the clinical governance regime Resilience Clinical engagement Feedback from healthcare professionals Clinical data Staff and patient experience of the service Clinical decision support software and directory of services Call advisers and nurses who work in the NHS 111 call centre Fulfilling the statutory duties set out in the 111 service specification

Developing your approach to clinical governance Needs to tell the local story How did you develop your approach? Who was involved individuals and stakeholders? How will their ongoing involvement in governance of the service be maintained? How was the scope of the governance group defined? What did you learn along the way and how was that learning acted upon? How did you establish a clear and distinctive identity for the effective clinical governance of this new service?

Description of the clinical governance of 111 Needs to be a very detailed description Clearly defined roles of the clinical lead and clinical governance group Composition of the clinical governance group and terms of reference Clear lines of reporting and accountability within NHS 111 and with partner organisations that NHS 111 refers patients to Clarity on who holds the final responsibility for safe governance of the service Analysis of the way serious and adverse incidents and complaints will be handled How issues will be investigated to ensure shared learning across all partner organisations

Resilience Needs to describe how integrity of the service will be maintained Robust resilience plans that have been put in place to cover the whole of the NHS 111 service (potentially multiple providers) Reporting and responding to issues that arise How the clinical governance group will review whether patient safety has been compromised How the clinical governance group will review whether patient experience has been compromised Responsibility for the development of mitigating action plans where issues arise to safeguard safety and experience The resilience of the clinical governance regime

Clinical engagement Needs to demonstrate effective and meaningful engagement The range of clinicians in the local health community engaged in the development of 111 The range of clinicians and other stakeholders engaged in the review of the 5 stages of the patient pathway Engagement activities undertaken and outcomes Engagement activities planned How engagement will be strengthened once service goes live

Feedback from healthcare professionals Needs to explain how will you encourage healthcare professionals to offer feedback Mechanisms put in place to enable feedback e.g. 111 feedback form How the feedback will be used How will the service respond to those that have raised issues relating to the quality of the service? Who has responsibility for the feedback (clinical and operational issues)? Who will respond to the feedback? How will healthcare professionals be encouraged to offer more feedback in the future how will they know it was worth doing? How will you ensure all feedback, what ever form it takes, is responded to in a timely and credible way? How feedback will be encouraged in the early days of the service

Clinical data How will you use clinical data What data will you require from your NHS 111 provider? Review the minimum data set and decide whether it is sufficient for the needs of the clinical governance group What data will you require from partner organisations who receive referrals from the NHS 111 service? How will the data be reported to the clinical governance group? How frequently will the data be reported to the clinical governance group? How will you ensure an appropriate mix of process and outcome data? How will you review the range of data the group receives and identify gaps?

Staff and patient experience of the service Needs to explain how will you gather and use soft and hard intelligence How will you explore patient experience of the service? How regularly will you ask patients what they think of the service? How will you explore staff experience of the service? How regularly will you ask staff what they think of the service? How will you use this information? How will it be reported to the clinical governance group and other stakeholders? How feedback will be gathered in the very early days of the service to inform development How you will capture the ideas staff have for improving the service

Clinical decision support system and DoS Needs to explain assurance mechanism used How did you assure yourselves of the clinical decision support system and the clinical governance of the system? How was the DoS populated? How will you ensure the DoS is kept up to date? What clinical and operational sign off process did you use to ensure accurate information loaded in to the DoS? How will problems with the clinical decision support system and DoS be identified and reported? Whose responsibility is it to address any issues identified?

Call advisers and clinicians who work on NHS 111 Needs to explain the process you have gone through with the NHS 111 provider to assure yourselves of quality of service delivery How have you assured yourselves about the quality of recruitment, selection and training of all the staff? How have you assured yourselves of the numbers and skill mix of the staff needed to deliver capacity? How has the service profiled expected activity levels e.g. bank holidays and weekends How will you audit staff and address any issues identified? How will ongoing professional training and development be supported?

Fulfilling the 111 service specification Needs to explain how the service will ensure compliance with the statutory duties set out in section 7 of the NHS 111 service specification The protection and retention of information Safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children Safely managing repeat callers to the service Data sharing with the Health Protection Agency Care Quality Commission registration The safe management of callers who contact the NHS 111 service three times or more within a four day period

What happens next? Document submission Papers collated Signed off by clinical governance team, 111 clinical lead, SRO and CCGs Emailed to Nicholas Reeves (nicholasreeves@gmail.com), cc to SHA Face to face review Nicholas Reeves and one of the regional clinical leads (Dr Noble or Dr Livingstone) undertake review Discusses the local approach and any questions prompted by the papers DH sign off process Report on review and recommendations sent from Nicholas Reeves to Prof Matthew Cooke, National Clinical Director for Urgent and Emergency Care Reviews whether governance arrangements are appropriate and safe If they are, confirms that the service can go live. If not, makes recommendations

Ongoing clinical leadership and involvement Testing Clinical leads assist with testing to ensure confidence in the system Any areas of concern identified through testing are reported to clinical lead to establish clinical risk Soft Launch Notification of issues and responsibility for investigations Daily SitRep calls and data monitoring Call reviews Regular clinical governance group meetings (weekly) Responding to feedback from patients, the public and healthcare colleagues Public Launch Notification of issues and responsibility for investigations Visible clinical leadership Call reviews Responding to feedback from patients, the public and healthcare colleagues Regular clinical governance group meetings (monthly)