PE NUMBER: 11122F PE TITLE: AIR LAUNCHED CRUISE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Cost ($ in Millions) 4797 Total Program Element (PE) Cost Flight Testing & Navigation 23 Actual 19.4 24 25 26 2.238 27 3.693 28 5.718 29.387 Cost to Complete 19.4 2.238 3.693 5.718.387 Total 94.7 94.7 A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The AGM-86B, Air Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM), is a subsonic, air-to-surface strategic nuclear missile, operational since 1982. Armed with a W-8 warhead, it is designed to evade air and ground-based defenses in order to strike targets at any location within any enemy's territory. The ALCM is designed for B-52H internal and external carriage. A Service Life Extension Plan (SLEP) was developed to meet an AF Long Range Plan requirement to extend ALCM Service Life to 3. The results of Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) studies identified system components that cannot be sustained beyond the standard service life. The current system is experiencing obsolescence of parts/components. Missile components and support equipment are becoming non-supportable. Service Life Extension of this critical weapon is essential to meet Air Combat Command (ACC) and United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) commitments (also known as OPLAN 844). Initial SLEP assessment required the development and acquisition of new Conventional Air Launched Cruise Missile (CALCM)/ALCM Test Instrumentation Kit (CATIK) flight test payload doors, replacement of the current navigation system, and replacement of Operational Test & Evaluation (OT&E) hardware and software. CATIK commenced in based on the AF decision to maintain this weapon system beyond its current design life. Previous payload doors were purchased to support the original service life only. CATIK development efforts are driven by depleting test assets, parts obsolescence, Range Command Council 319 (RCC-319) safety requirements and re-certification of the Flight Termination System. Five CATIK RDT&E test articles will be developed to support Developmental Test & Evaluation (DT&E) flight tests. The five test articles will be used to conduct one ALCM Operational Test Launch, one ALCM Joint Test Assembly (JTA) integration test to ensure compatibility with the warhead package, one CALCM Operational Test Launch, one Captive Carry and a backup test asset. CATIK payload doors, containing range transponder and battery, are required to be replaced due to depleting test assets to continue flight tests beyond 6. The new CATIK payload doors will provide an inventory of test assets for continued flight testing through 16, based on current flight test requirements. W-8 LEP (current interface) - CATIK will be designed to a JTA-R1. If the W-8 LEP program changes interface, CATIK will require modification and additional funding/schedule. The CATIK payload door is a critical component for determining Weapon System Reliability (WSR) and for supporting the W-8 Life Extension Program (LEP) (current interface). Operational Test & Evaluation (OT&E) hardware and software replacement will occur concurrently with the CATIK development effort. 4 EMD efforts consist of qualification tests of the CATIK doors. Individual component qualification will have already been completed at the subvendors. 5 EMD R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-2 of 119-11 1219 Exhibit R-2 (PE 11122F)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification efforts is flight tests finishing up with the flight test report 6. Contract period of performance ends April 6. INE - The original ALCM Inertial Navigation Element (INE) service life design expired in 1996. The AF took action to study the INE components and determine which components were expected to become increasingly difficult to maintain or support. The completed studies indicate the ALCM INE failure rate has remained constant over the past 1 yrs and the INE is sustainable to 23 with software modifications and Sub-Terminal Map Upgrades, hardware cannibalization and depot support/test equipment replacement. The Sub-Terminal map software upgrade will help maintain the credibility of the ALCM threat for the remainder of its service life. Cruise Missile Functional Ground Testing (FGT) is required to provide the capability to non-destructively accomplish functional flight simulation of a full-up missile flight profile on the ground to obtain additional reliability data. This capability will provide critical reliability data without the costs of flight test missions and will also retain the missiles in the inventory. This effort will develop the software and hardware for an existing test facility for accomplishment of the ground tests. The Big Crow Alternative development effort will produce a telemetry relay system mounted in B-52H wings. The Big Crow aircraft are used for Air Force flight testing and ensure continued Air Force conventional and nuclear cruise missile flight test capability at all times. Currently, two Big Crow aircraft provide a telemetry gathering capability for Army, Navy and Air Force requirements. The Big Crow aircraft perform a classified wartime mission, which takes precedence over Air Force cruise missile flight tests. This effort will design, develop, produce and test two aircraft systems (2 Pylons each) worth of equipment to ensure Air Force cruise missile flight testing/telemetry gathering capability when Big Crow is unavailable. The Pylons produced in the development effort will remain operational at the conclusion of the test effort. The W-8 LEP replaces warhead components to extend its service life. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is responsible for most of the refurbishment costs associated with the W-8 warhead. The Air Force is responsible for funding ALCM W-8 integration. Integration includes evaluation of interface control changes as part of the Initial Concept Design (ICD), missile testing, and logistics requirements necessary to support a First Production Unit (FPU) delivery of 28. These programs are in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development, due to efforts supporting a fielded, post Milestone III operational weapon system. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) 23 2.513 19.4-1.113 -.217 -.226 Previous President's Budget Current PBR/President's Budget Total Adjustments Congressional Program Reductions Congressional Rescissions Congressional Increases Reprogrammings SBIR/STTR Transfer Significant Program Changes: 24 29.84 -.338 -.85 -.253 25 -.67 R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-3 of 119-11 122 Exhibit R-2 (PE 11122F)
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification Cost ($ in Millions) 4797 Flight Testing & Navigation Quantity of RDT&E Articles 23 Actual 24 25 26 27 28 29 Cost to Complete 19.4 2.238 3.693 5.718.387 Total 94.7 A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The AGM-86B, Air Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM), is a subsonic, air-to-surface strategic nuclear missile, operational since 1982. Armed with a W-8 warhead, it is designed to evade air and ground-based defenses in order to strike targets at any location within any enemy's territory. The ALCM is designed for B-52H internal and external carriage. A Service Life Extension Plan (SLEP) was developed to meet an AF Long Range Plan requirement to extend ALCM Service Life to 3. The results of Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) studies identified system components that cannot be sustained beyond the standard service life. The current system is experiencing obsolescence of parts/components. Missile components and support equipment are becoming non-supportable. Service Life Extension of this critical weapon is essential to meet Air Combat Command (ACC) and United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) commitments (also known as OPLAN 844). Initial SLEP assessment required the development and acquisition of new Conventional Air Launched Cruise Missile (CALCM)/ALCM Test Instrumentation Kit (CATIK) flight test payload doors, replacement of the current navigation system, and replacement of Operational Test & Evaluation (OT&E) hardware and software. CATIK commenced in based on the AF decision to maintain this weapon system beyond its current design life. Previous payload doors were purchased to support the original service life only. CATIK development efforts are driven by depleting test assets, parts obsolescence, Range Command Council 319 (RCC-319) safety requirements and re-certification of the Flight Termination System. Five CATIK RDT&E test articles will be developed to support Developmental Test & Evaluation (DT&E) flight tests. The five test articles will be used to conduct one ALCM Operational Test Launch, one ALCM Joint Test Assembly (JTA) integration test to ensure compatibility with the warhead package, one CALCM Operational Test Launch, one Captive Carry and a backup test asset. CATIK payload doors, containing range transponder and battery, are required to be replaced due to depleting test assets to continue flight tests beyond 6. The new CATIK payload doors will provide an inventory of test assets for continued flight testing through 16, based on current flight test requirements. W-8 LEP (current interface) - CATIK will be designed to a JTA-R1. If the W-8 LEP program changes interface, CATIK will require modification and additional funding/schedule. The CATIK payload door is a critical component for determining Weapon System Reliability (WSR) and for supporting the W-8 Life Extension Program (LEP) (current interface). Operational Test & Evaluation (OT&E) hardware and software replacement will occur concurrently with the CATIK development effort. 4 EMD efforts consist of qualification tests of the CATIK doors. Individual component qualification will have already been completed at the subvendors. 5 EMD efforts is flight tests finishing up with the flight test report 6. Contract period of performance ends April 6. R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-4 of 119-11 1221 Exhibit R-2a (PE 11122F)
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification INE - The original ALCM Inertial Navigation Element (INE) service life design expired in 1996. The AF took action to study the INE components and determine which components were expected to become increasingly difficult to maintain or support. The completed studies indicate the ALCM INE failure rate has remained constant over the past 1 yrs and the INE is sustainable to 23 with software modifications and Sub-Terminal Map Upgrades, hardware cannibalization and depot support/test equipment replacement. The Sub-Terminal map software upgrade will help maintain the credibility of the ALCM threat for the remainder of its service life. Cruise Missile Functional Ground Testing (FGT) is required to provide the capability to non-destructively accomplish functional flight simulation of a full-up missile flight profile on the ground to obtain additional reliability data. This capability will provide critical reliability data without the costs of flight test missions and will also retain the missiles in the inventory. This effort will develop the software and hardware for an existing test facility for accomplishment of the ground tests. The Big Crow Alternative development effort will produce a telemetry relay system mounted in B-52H wings. The Big Crow aircraft are used for Air Force flight testing and ensure continued Air Force conventional and nuclear cruise missile flight test capability at all times. Currently, two Big Crow aircraft provide a telemetry gathering capability for Army, Navy and Air Force requirements. The Big Crow aircraft perform a classified wartime mission, which takes precedence over Air Force cruise missile flight tests. This effort will design, develop, produce and test two aircraft systems (2 Pylons each) worth of equipment to ensure Air Force cruise missile flight testing/telemetry gathering capability when Big Crow is unavailable. The Pylons produced in the development effort will remain operational at the conclusion of the test effort. The W-8 LEP replaces warhead components to extend its service life. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is responsible for most of the refurbishment costs associated with the W-8 warhead. The Air Force is responsible for funding ALCM W-8 integration. Integration includes evaluation of interface control changes as part of the Initial Concept Design (ICD), missile testing, and logistics requirements necessary to support a First Production Unit (FPU) delivery of 28. These programs are in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development, due to efforts supporting a fielded, post Milestone III operational weapon system. B. Accomplishments/Planned Program ($ in Millions) - Accomplishments/Planned Program - Continue CATIK payload door Interface Design/Development; pre-planning for integration testing - Continue update of CATIK Interface Control Documents and purchase hardware - Begin INE Software Emulation Development, Testing and Integration - Conduct flight test planning for integration testing - Continue update of CATIK Interface Control Documents and assemble hardware CATIK Test and Evaluation/Government costs Continue CATIK Test & Evaluation/Government costs Begin INE Software Subterminal Map Development, Testing and Integration Continue INE Software Subterminal Map Development, Testing and Integration R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-5 of 119-11 1222 23 15.635 1.69 2.75 24 25.18.32 4.5.937 2.146.5 Exhibit R-2a (PE 11122F)
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification Begin Cruise Missile Functional Ground Test (FGT) software design & development Begin Cruise Missile FGT hardware design/development Begin FGT System/Missile Integration & Test Continue FGT System/Missile Integratin & Test ALCM interface change evaluations and contractor Interface Control Document support for W-8 LEP Continue ALCM interface change evaluations and contractor Interface Control Document support for W-8 LEP ALCM/W-8 integration data development ALCM/W-8 integration ground test and flight test support Continue ALCM/W-8 integration ground test and flight test support Begin ALCM/W-8 Service System Test and repair (Service STAR) re-design/modification Begin Big Crow Alternative hardware and software devolpement Continue Big Crow Alternative hardware and softare development Total Cost C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) 23 24 Actual MPAF, Missile Modifications 1.961 1.981 (BA 3, PE 11122F, P-13) MPAF, Missile Modifications Initial Spares (BA 4 PE 1.6 1.661 11122F, P-16 ) MPAF, Replenishment Spares 4.143 3.785 (BA 4, PE 11122F, P-17) OPAF, Electronics and Telecommunications Equipment 1.312 1.35 (BP83) (BA 3, PE 11122F, P-18) 7.128 7.128 1.244 4.3 1. 1.36.125.595.84 1. 5.1 19.4 2.9 25 26 27 28 29 Cost to Total Cost Complete 21.154 24.44 9.519 9.753 9.92 Continuing.375.178.182.185.189 Continuing 4.234 4.249.282.286.293 Continuing 1.328 1.374 1.47 1.438 1.466 Continuing D. Acquisition Strategy Begun in, CATIK payload door development efforts are performed by Boeing utilizing a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract. A CATIK Low Rate Initial Production contract will be awarded in the 3rd quarter 4 to ensure CATIK production assets are available in late 6/early 7 to continue ALCM flight testing beyond 6 and support W-8 LEP (current interface). R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-6 of 119-11 1223 Exhibit R-2a (PE 11122F)
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification The Cruise Missile FGT development will be performed by the prime contractor, utilizing a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract. The ALCM/W-8 LEP integration will be performed by the prime contractor utilizing a Time and Materials (T&M) engineering assignment on an existing sustainment contract. The Big Crow Alternative development will be performed by SAIC using a CPFF contract. R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-7 of 119-11 1224 Exhibit R-2a (PE 11122F)
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis Cost Categories (Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Requirements) ($ in Millions) Product Development Development: CATIK TRW- INE Boeing-INE Functional Ground Test ( FGT) W8 LEP Support W8 LEP Support, Service STAR INE Software Subterminal Map Development Big Crow Alternative Hardware and Software Developement Subtotal Product Development Remarks: Support OC-ALC/PSM W8 Support/PSM Subtotal Support Remarks: Test & Evaluation Utah Test Range 49th Test Wing Responsible Test Org Eglin AFB Contract Method Performing Activity & Total & Type Location Prior to 23 Cost 23 23 Cost Award Date 24 24 Cost Award Date Cost to 25 25 Complete Cost Award Date Total Target Cost Value of Contract Eng Asgn/ CPAF Eng Asgn/T&M Eng Asgn/ CPAF FFP Eng Asgn/T&M FFP Boeing, Seattle, WA. 8.191 17.68.5 1.441 1.2 1.2 1.72 SAIC, San Diego 1.832 19.4 4.3 1.36 7.668 7.668 19.8 1.6 6.715 1. 1..5.5 1. 3.874 1.127 5.1 22.49 8.337 9.318 7.296.652 1.436 2.88.753 1.436 2.189 2.875 2.475.612.5 1.4 1..26.475.45.25 4.75 3.925.897.5 15.5 2.35.11.11 MIPR MIPR MIPR.5 26.471 1.441 Raytheon, Tuscon AZ Boeing, Seattle, WA. E-Spectrums, San Antonio TX. Eng Asgn/T&M Boeing, Seattle, WA. CPFF.5 R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-8 of 119-11 1225 Exhibit R-3 (PE 11122F)
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis 49th Test Wing (W-8 LEP) None Subtotal Test & Evaluation Remarks: Management Subtotal Management Remarks: Total Cost MIPR 7.57 3.5 9.435 8.95 19.57 1.933 19.4 R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-9 of 119-11 1226.595.84 8. 2.356 91.992 Exhibit R-3 (PE 11122F)
Exhibit R-4, RDT&E Schedule Profile R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-1 of 119-11 1227 Exhibit R-4 (PE 11122F)
Exhibit R-4a, RDT&E Schedule Detail Schedule Profile -- Contract Award - CATIK (2Q) CATIK Development Milestones -- Critical Design Review (CDR) Integration/Qual Testing CATIK Production Contract Award Functional/Physical Config Audit 5 Prototype CATIKs delivered Flight Testing Funtional Ground Test (FGT) Contract Award FGT PDR FGT CDR ALCM/W-8 Contract Award ALCM/W-8 Ground Test Support ALCM/W-8 Flight Test Support INE Softwware Subterminal Map Development Contract Award Big Crow Alternative Hardware and Software Development 23 2Q 24 25 4Q 2Q 2Q 2Q 4Q R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 119-11 of 119-11 1228 Exhibit R-4a (PE 11122F)