Secret Recipes Revealed. Demystifying the Title I, Part A Funding Formulas. Raegen T. Miller August

Similar documents
Treating Different Teachers Differently. How State Policy Should Act on Differences in Teacher Performance to Improve Teacher Effectiveness and Equity

Social Sector Innovation Funds

Highway Robbery. How Congress Put Politics Before Need in Federal Highway and Transit Funding. Donna Cooper and John Griffith October 2012

Kansas State Department of Education Information on American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Title I Part A Recovery Funds

Capital Ideas. How to Generate Innovation in the Public Sector. Jitinder Kohli and Geoff Mulgan July

What you need to know about The Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST WEST

Illinois Education Funding Recommendations

Figure 1: 17 States Will No Longer Receive TANF Supplemental Grants Beginning July 1, June 27, 2011

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) Background Information

POLICY BRIEF. 11/2013 Are Conditional Grants Spiralling Out of Control? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY C FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION

Education Appropriations

Director General July 30, 2010 Telecommunications Policy Branch Industry Canada 16th Floor, 300 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C8

budgetadvısory Overview Background April 2009 For schools, the ARRA provides resources in three primary categories:

Funding Application Guide

Distribution of State Aid to Michigan Schools

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Fiscal Requirements. Shelly Babler, Assistant Director Kathy Guralski, Assistant Director March 16, 2017

AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF ARRA. NJ DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION June 2009

Weighted Student Formula

Overview of Federal Funds

The operating framework for. the NHS in England 2009/10. Background

K-12 Categorical Reform

MEMORANDUM. Overview. WIOA Implementation

Re: Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare

CTE Transformation Strategy

Proposition 1: Educational Programs and Operations Levy. Updated

Northern College Business Plan

NCLB FUNDING REFERENCE

A Primer on Activity-Based Funding

Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February

- the proposed development process for Community Health Partnerships. - arrangements to begin to establish a Service Redesign Committee

The Basics of School Funding. Kathryn Summers, Associate Director Senate Fiscal Agency September 2014

Digital Disruption meets Indian Healthcare-the role of IT in the transformation of the Indian healthcare system

The Budget increases propose to fully-funding of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 INTRODUCTION... 3 VISION, MISSION, GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 4 BUSINESS PLAN OUTLINE... 4 OVERVIEW OF STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS...

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

HESS FOUNDATION WILL THIS SECRETIVE FOUNDATION EVOLVE BEYOND CHECKBOOK PHILANTHROPY? JUNE 2015 BY ELIZABETH MYRICK

Summary and Analysis of President Obama's Education Budget Request

Sam Houston State University Academic Policy Statement Distribution of Recovered Indirect Cost Policy Page 1 of 5 Revised March 19, 2012

Access to Evidence. How an Evidence-Based Delivery System Can Improve Legal Aid for Low- and Moderate-Income Americans

Appendix F Federal Stimulus Account Codes

Tourism Funding What s available to support your destinations

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)

State of North Carolina Office of the Governor Bev Perdue

SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC. 5618

Better Align H-1B Visa Fee Revenues to Local Workforce Needs

EMS 3.0: Realizing the Value of EMS in Our Nation s Health Care Transformation

Arts and Foreign Language Assistance

«Vers un système de santé national britannique centré sur le patient»

SPeCiaL RePORt tracking development assistance United StateS

UPDATE ON BUDGET TOPICS:

Comparison of ACP Policy and IOM Report Graduate Medical Education That Meets the Nation's Health Needs

Funding for Housing, Health, and Social Services Block Grants Has Fallen Markedly Over Time

Dual Eligibles: Medicaid s Role in Filling Medicare s Gaps

Fiscal Research Center

2017/ /20 SERVICE PLAN

Graduate Medical Education Payments. Mark Miller, PhD Executive Director February 20, 2015

ECONOMIC & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly The EU blending mechanism: Experiences of KfW development bank

Funding Mechanisms: Retains funding and reimbursement strategies for each entity.

EXAMINING THE LOCAL VALUE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES

Collier County Clerk of the Circuit Court Internal Audit Department. Audit Report Parks and Recreation Audit - Part II Revenues

2018 PRE-BUDGET CONSULTATION

CRS Report for Congress

Virtual Networking Meeting September 29, 2017 Office of ESEA Programs

Medicaid and Block Grant Financing Compared

$75,300, ,000 $36,500,000

TRIUMPH GULF COAST, INC. PRE-APPLICATION FORM

Health. Business Plan to Accountability Statement

City of St. Petersburg Arts and Culture Grant Program Guidelines General Support Grant

Mental Health Care in California

E m e rgency Health S e r v i c e s Syste m M o d e r n i zation

Single Audit Reporting Package

Department of Education Update. Florida School Finance Officers Association November 4, 2009

WHAT IS THE STATE S ROLE?

Next Steps in Libya. Economic and Government Stabilization in the Face of Political and Security Challenges W W W.AMERICANPROGRESS.

BARNSLEY METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL

Vertical integration: who should join up primary and secondary care?

United States Air Force

CONCEPTUAL BASIS FOR PERFORMANCE BASED GRANT SYSTEMS AND SELECTED INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES 1

Taiwan s s Healthcare Industry. Taiwan Institute of Economic Research Dr. Julie C. L. SUN 16 January 2007

CONSOLIDATED PLAN AMENDMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CITY OF LEE S SUMMIT MISSOURI

Primary education (46%); Secondary education (26%); Public administration- Education (16%); Tertiary education (12%) Project ID

Senate Appropriations Committee Bill, FY 2018

Findings Brief. NC Rural Health Research Program

Connecticut s Reliance on Federal Funds

GLOBAL MARKET ACCELERATION FUND (GMAF) Submission Guidelines

Appendix F Federal Stimulus Account Codes

School Finance Basics

Incentive Guidelines Innovation Clusters

TITLE 135 LEGISLATIVE RULE WEST VIRGINIA COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION SERIES 27 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE PROGRAM

REPORT ON COST ESTIMATES FOR SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES FOR 2005

Counting for Dollars: Sedgwick County, Kansas

Newsletter. April In This Issue. Empretec Directors Foster Relations at the Fifteenth Empretec Directors' Meeting in São Paulo

Rural Programme Community grants. Programme guidance. This guidance is for organisations applying to deliver community grants in Wales

In accordance with Section 610(b)(2) of the Millennium Challenge Act of

INDIRECT COST ALLOCATION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2016

BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL SERVICE REVIEWS GREEN PAPER UPDATE: ADULTS SOCIAL CARE INTRODUCTION THE BUDGET NUMBERS

How Approaches to Stuck-in-the-Mud School Funding Hinder Improvement

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUDITOR m STREET N.W., SUITE 900

Federal Economic Stimulus Package

Transcription:

AP Photo/Brian Branch-Price Secret Recipes Revealed Demystifying the Title I, Part A Funding Formulas Raegen T. Miller August 2009 www.americanprogress.org

Secret Recipes Revealed Demystifying the Title I, Part A Funding Formulas Raegen T. Miller August 2009

Contents 1 Executive summary 3 The federal role in elementary and secondary education 5 With increased funding, an enhanced role 6 Where are the poor children? 6 How much money should be sent? 8 The formulas 8 Formula components 10 Basic Grants 11 Concentration Grants 12 Targeted Grants 14 Education Finance Incentive Grants 16 Aftermath 17 Conclusion 18 Endnotes

Executive summary The 1965 passage of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act marked an increased role for the federal government in ensuring equal opportunity in education. Title I, Part A of the act is the centerpiece of this federal role in elementary and secondary education. The law authorizes substantial grants almost $14 billion for the fiscal year that ended in 2008 to augment the education of children living in areas where low-income families are concentrated. Yet the funding formulas that determine the amount of money granted to each school district are not necessarily compatible with the law s intent. 1 Since the Elementary and Secondary Education Act s initial authorization, a number of technical and political decisions have led to a set of four formulas that determine the amounts and destinations of grants under Title I, Part A. Concern for the law s goal of improving equal educational opportunity by targeting children in concentrated poverty has guided the formulas evolution, but the funding formulas are still found wanting in three main ways: The formulas use state average per-pupil expenditures as a proxy for the cost of providing education, causing them to target funds to poor children in wealthy states. This is a different proposition than targeting concentrations of poor children. A combination of clunky eligibility criteria and multiple counting schemes produce some bizarre and unfair results: large districts with low concentrations of poor students are heavily funded, and virtually identical school districts that fall on the cusp of cutoffs can be treated differently. States with small populations and low concentrations of poor children receive radically larger grants on a per-poor-child basis than states with larger populations, including those with substantial rural poverty. Improving the match between the intent of Title I, Part A and the formulas driving its grants is technically feasible, but an aura of mystery around the formulas inhibits informed debate and reform. This paper systematically unpacks the formulas to reveal the specific causes of targeting failure. It also highlights the sensible, progressive notions embraced by the current formulas: Executive summary www.americanprogress.org 1

Honoring states efforts to leverage their revenue capacity for the purpose of funding education. Partly correcting for inequity in education funding within states. Safeguarding districts and states against precipitous drops in funding. Respecting funding challenges peculiar to small states. Children living in concentrated poverty are poorly served by a labyrinthine funding scheme comprising four separate formulas. This paper exposes the technical considerations that should inform a smarter, fairer approach to funding grants under Title I, Part A. An upcoming paper will further detail this approach and chart the political course toward it. 2 Center for American Progress Secret Recipes Revealed

The Center for American Progress is a nonpartisan research and educational institute dedicated to promoting a strong, just and free America that ensures opportunity for all. We believe that Americans are bound together by a common commitment to these values and we aspire to ensure that our national policies reflect these values. We work to find progressive and pragmatic solutions to significant domestic and international problems and develop policy proposals that foster a government that is of the people, by the people, and for the people. Made possible with support from 1333 H Street, NW, 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202-682-1611 Fax: 202-682-1867 www.americanprogress.org