UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing P130: Foreign Comparative Testing

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #208

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #44

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #19

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #71

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #77

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #73

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #169

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element S750: Mission Training and Preparation Systems FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : DIGITAL BATTLEFLD COMM.

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Counter Narcotics Technology Program Office

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: SOF Soldier Protection and Survival Systems

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE BB / SOF Visual Augmentation, Lasers and Sensor Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : OC-135 Open Skies Sensors

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #163

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Soldier Systems - Warrior Dem/Val

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing EF4: Integrated Broadcast System

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Prior Years FY 2013 FY Total Cost FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Multi-Platform Electronics

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #142

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Undersea Warfare Advanced Technology

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Department of Defense Corrosion Policy and Oversight FY 2013 OCO

MEADS DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Army

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Multi-Service Systems Engineering FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment Support. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Integrated Broadcast Service FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED FY Due to the number of efforts in this PE, the programs described herein are representative of the work included in this PE.

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #146

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161

Transcription:

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - - - 30.000-30.000 15.363 15.290 15.449 17.726 Continuing Continuing P313: Foreign Comparative # The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date. - - - 30.000-30.000 15.363 15.290 15.449 17.726 Continuing Continuing Note Rapid Fielding (RF) and Comparative Test is being recast with a focus on operational and developmental prototypes derived from evaluation of foreign equipment and products that will provide the United States Armed Services and Special Operations Command (SOCOM) capabilities to counter emerging threats. The Foreign Comparative (FCT) program will increase its focus on finding and leveraging foreign technology solutions that affordably extend the life of existing military platforms/capabilities, and enhance interoperability with foreign partners and between services. FCT s broad reach across our allies and friendly foreign countries will enable finding and developing innovative, cost effective, and potentially interoperable solutions for the DoD, Multi-Service and Combatant Command (COCOM) priority requirements. In FY 2015, Foreign Comparative (FCT) funding from Program Element (PE) 0605130D8Z is being realigned to PE 0603133D8Z for Budget Activity alignment and emphasis on prototypes. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Foreign Comparative (FCT) program supports the warfighter by leveraging technologies and equipment from allied nations and coalition partners to satisfy U.S. defense requirements, thereby accelerating the United Sates acquisition process and lowering development costs. The FCTs enhance interoperability, facilitate international collaboration, expand opportunities for prototyping to increase competition in innovation and enable more efficient and affordable transition of technologies into acquisition programs of record. Authorized by Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 2350a (g), the FCT program is managed by the Office of Secretary of Defense (Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (DASD) Rapid Fielding), Comparative Technology Office (CTO). The FCT projects are sponsored by the Services and SOCOM. Evaluation processes for project selection include a detailed review to confirm the proposed item addresses valid requirements and DoD priorities, a thorough market survey, and development of a viable acquisition strategy. Total Cost PE 0603133D8Z: Foreign Comparative Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 OCO FY 2015 Total Previous President's Budget - - - - - Current President's Budget - - 30.000-30.000 Total Adjustments - - 30.000-30.000 Congressional General Reductions - - Congressional Directed Reductions - - Congressional Rescissions - - Congressional Adds - - Congressional Directed Transfers - - Reprogrammings - - SBIR/STTR Transfer - - Transfer from PE 0605130D8Z - - 21.285-21.285 DoD Priorities and Requirements - - 8.715-8.715 Change Summary Explanation FY 2015: Increase of $30.000 million reflects the $21.285 million realignment from PE 0605130D8Z and the $8.175 million provided to support DoD priorities and requirements for prototypes designed to counter current and emerging cross-domain (air, space, sea, cyber, etc.) threats that affect Joint and Coalition operations. PE 0603133D8Z: Foreign Comparative Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 2 of 6 R-1 Line #29

COST ($ in Millions) P313: Foreign Comparative Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date. FY 2015 Base P313 / Foreign Comparative FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete - - - 30.000-30.000 15.363 15.290 15.449 17.726 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Foreign Comparative (FCT) program supports the warfighter by leveraging advanced technologies and equipment from allied nations and coalition partners to satisfy U.S. defense requirements, thereby accelerating the U.S. acquisition process and lowering development costs. The FCTs enhance interoperability, facilitate international collaboration, expand opportunities for prototyping and enable more efficient and affordable transition of technologies into acquisition programs of record. Authorized by Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 2350a(g), the FCT program is managed by the Office of Secretary of Defense (OSD), Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (DASD) Rapid Fielding (RF), Comparative Technology Office (CTO). The FCT projects are sponsored by the Services and U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). Evaluation processes for project selection include a detailed review to confirm the proposed item addresses valid requirements and DoD priorities, a thorough market survey, and development of a viable acquisition strategy. Since the program's inception in 1980, OSD has initiated 671 projects; 619 projects have been completed to date. Of the 324 evaluations that met the sponsors' requirements, 252 led to procurements worth approximately $11.000 billion in FY 2013 constant year dollars. With an OSD investment of about $1.170 billion, the FCT Program realized an estimated research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) cost avoidance of $7.800 billion in FY 2013 constant year dollars. The FCT program is a catalyst for teaming and other business relationships between foreign and U.S. industries. Many successful FCT projects result in the licensed production of the qualified foreign item in the United States. Other nations recognize the long-term value of such practices for competing in the United States defense market and the resultant strengthening of the "two-way street" in Defense procurement. The result often means the creation of jobs and contributions to local economies throughout the United States. To date, companies across 33 states benefited from FCT projects. Title: Lightweight M3A1 Recoilless Rifle (Army) Description: The current M3 Carl Gustaf Recoilless Rifle was introduced to US forces in 1991. The original version used a thin steel barrel liner containing the rifling, strengthened by a carbon fiber outer sleeve. External steel parts were eventually replaced with aluminum alloys or plastics thereby reducing the weapon weight from 36 pounds to 21 pounds. At 21 pounds the weapon is extremely heavy, especially when also carrying 84mm ammunition. This M3A1 project will eliminate 6 pounds (28 percent) from the existing system by replacing various components (bolt, trigger, venturi, and ancillary parts) without changing the firing procedures, operations or ammunition. Since the weapons operational characteristics will not be changed, this low risk approach will produce a lighter weight 84mm shoulder fired weapon without going through a costly and time consuming process to test, Total Cost - - 1.700 PE 0603133D8Z: Foreign Comparative Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 3 of 6 R-1 Line #29

P313 / Foreign Comparative qualify, and re-certify an entirely new modernized weapon system. This is continuing project which was previously funded during FY 2014 in PE 0605130D8Z. Continue hardware testing, developmental testing and operational testing. Write an evaluation report, the closeout report, and determine an acquisition decision. Title: Mobile Gunnery Live Fire Monitoring System (MGLFMS) (Navy) Description: The project will test and evaluate a Tank and Infantry Fighting Vehicle gunnery training system that wirelessly transmits live audio and video feeds of weapon systems data to a mobile monitoring station. The MGLFMS enables instructors to evaluate crew functions, make instantaneous corrections, and provides recording capability for detailed after action reviews. Foreign data has shown that training with this system significantly increases probability of gunnery crews placing first round on target. The system also provides an essential tool for instructors to evaluate and make the necessary feedback to ensure the analytical abilities that encompasses all the gunnery skills required for accurate fire. Several North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies currently train with this same equipment. This is continuing project which was previously funded during FY 2014 in PE 0605130D8Z. Receive Phase I test articles during 1Q FY 2015. Initiate Phase I Technical throughout 1Q 3Q FY 2015. Receive Phase II test articles during 3Q FY 2015. Initiate Phase II Performance during 3Q FY 2015. Initiate Phase II Field User Evaluation during 4Q FY 2015. Title: Minor Resource Projects: Description: Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Radio Frequency Amplifier (RFA) (Navy); Energy Absorbing Material for Improved Blunt Impact/Blunt Trauma Protection (Army); Computer Network Defense (CND) Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) Detection (Navy); H-1 Crash-resistant, Ballistic-tolerant, Fuel Cell Qualification (Navy); Rapid Airfield Damage Assessment System (RADAS) (Air Force); Electronic Underwater Navigation (United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM)); and Enhanced Optical and Transceiver Capability. These continuing projects were previously funded during FY 2014 in PE 0605130D8Z. - - 1.000 - - 3.150 The following projects will finalize testing, receive articles, and complete reporting and transition plans: Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Radio Frequency Amplifier (RFA); Energy Absorbing Material for Improved Blunt Impact/Blunt Trauma Protection; Computer Network Defense (CND) Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) Detection PE 0603133D8Z: Foreign Comparative Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 4 of 6 R-1 Line #29

P313 / Foreign Comparative (Navy); H-1 Crash-resistant, Ballistic-tolerant, Fuel Cell Qualification; Rapid Airfield Damage Assessment System (RADAS); Electronic Underwater Navigation; and Enhanced Optical and Transceiver Capability. Title: Foreign Comparative (FCT) FY 2015 Focal Areas: Force Application Description: FCT will invest in cross-domain, innovative Force Application technologies for new and emerging capabilities with international partners, including but not limited to these defense-wide requirements: Anti-Access / Area Denial (A2/AD); Robotics and Autonomous Systems; Interoperability across Platforms and Systems; and Countering Unmanned Systems. - - 9.750 During FY 2015, FCT will focus on selecting projects supporting the below Force Application Areas: -Anti-Access / Area Denial (A2/AD) will provide innovative technologies that enhance position, navigation and timing accuracies, improve targeting/delivery in GPS-denied environments and prevent exploitation of systems lost in denied areas (e.g., anti-tamper capabilities). -Robotics and Autonomous Systems will remotely control assets that reduce troop tasks and exposure for daily operations, including force protection, special operations, and detection. -Interoperability across Platforms and Systems invest into technologies for mission-based on-demand routing, network, and information management, with a focus on command and control interoperability with coalition capabilities through integrated multilevel security enabled networks. Transition of Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) capabilities which are portable, modular, partitioned, scalable, extendable, and secure. -Countering Unmanned Systems (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUVs), and Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs)) will provide technologies that detect, monitor, and counter hostile threats with small signatures, including special operations missions in surface, underwater and onshore environments. Title: Foreign Comparative (FCT) FY 2015 Focal Areas: Force Logistics Description: FCT will invest in cross-domain, innovative Force Logistic technologies for new and emerging capabilities with international partners, including but not limited to these defense-wide requirements: Reducing Soldier Load and Interoperability across Platforms and Systems. - - 7.200 During FY 2015, FCT will focus on selecting projects supporting the below Force Logistics Areas: -Reducing soldier load reduces the weight currently sustained by the individual dismounted soldier, including materials that enable weight reduction to individual weapons, ammunition, or portable missile systems. -Interoperability across Platforms and Systems will invest into technologies for mission-based on-demand routing, network, and information management, with a focus on command and control interoperability with coalition capabilities through integrated multi- PE 0603133D8Z: Foreign Comparative Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 5 of 6 R-1 Line #29

PE 0603133D8Z: Foreign Comparative Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 6 of 6 R-1 Line #29 P313 / Foreign Comparative level security enabled networks. Transition of Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) capabilities which are portable, modular, partitioned, scalable, extendable, and secure. Title: Foreign Comparative (FCT) FY 2015 Focal Areas: Force Support Description: FCT will invest in cross-domain, innovative Force Support evaluation of new and emerging capabilities with international partners, including but not limited to these defense-wide requirements: Increase Human Performance, Energy Solutions, and Training Systems. During FY 2015, FCT will focus on selecting projects supporting the below Force Support Areas: -Increasing human performance involves developing and demonstrating advanced technologies to assess and optimize human cognitive load during combat operations and training. Increasing human performance will also utilize cognitive-load assessment technologies to enhance training of tasks with high cognitive load such as in aviation operations, combined arms engagements, mission command, air and missile defense, or multiple intelligence sensor training. -Energy solutions will include power systems and electronics designed for extreme cold to support Arctic strategy and renewable energy options that can reduce force support and logistics requirements. -Training Systems will demonstrate augmented reality capability that allows representation of fixed objects from a synthetic terrain environment and ability to overlay those objects within the augmented reality display. C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) N/A Remarks D. Acquisition Strategy N/A - - 7.200 Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals - - 30.000 E. Performance Metrics In FY 2015, generic performance metrics applicable to these RDT&E initiatives includes attainment of DoD Strategic Objective 3.5.2D. The title of this objective is "Maintain a strong technical foundation within the Department's Science and Technology (S&T) program" and the metrics for this objective is to transition 40 percent of completing demonstration programs per year. Since the program's inception in 1980, Office of Secretary of Defense has invested about $1.170 billion in FY2013 constant year dollars to initiate 671 projects; 619 projects have been completed to date. Of the 324 evaluations that met the sponsors' requirements, 252 led to procurements worth over $11.000 billion. In FY 2013, efforts in FCT Program Element 0605130D8Z had a transition rate of 84 percent for completed projects, exceeding the objective of 40 percent for demonstration programs.