Closing the Revolving Door: Community. National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 2, 2011

Similar documents
DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

Biennial State Plan July 1, 2017 June 30, 2019

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Justice Reinvestment in Arkansas

A Strategic Planning Framework for Prisoner Reentry TARGETS FOR POLICY CHANGE THAT GUIDE IMPLEMENTATION

Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014

Factors Impacting Recidivism in Vermont. Report to House and Senate Committees April 21, 2011

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2013 to FISCAL YEAR 2022

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia

Department of Corrections Presentation for House Appropriation Committee January 27, 2016

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Act

OFFENDER REENTRY PROGRAM

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY REENTRY COURT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL)

Responding to Racial Disparities in Multnomah County s Probation Revocation Outcomes

Oregon Criminal Justice Commission Joint Ways and Means Public Safety Committee Agency Presentation

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 to FISCAL YEAR 2021

Justice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework

*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

Performance Incentive Funding

INMATE PROGRAMS. Partially-Sentenced Inmate: An inmate serving one or more sentences with adjudicated charges or holds.

Chairman Wolf, Ranking Member Fattah and Members of the Subcommittee,

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

TJJD the Big Picture OBJECTIVES

SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board of Pardons and Paroles Correctional Managed Health Care Committee

Office of Criminal Justice Services

AVENAL STATE PRISON. The Kings County Grand Jury conducted a tour of the Avenal State Prison facility and interviewed several employees on-site.

Oregon Criminal Justice Commission Joint Ways and Means Public Safety Committee Agency Presentation

Assessment of Disciplinary and Administrative Segregation Proposal

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

IN JUNE 2012, GOVERNOR SAM BROWNBACK,

Outcomes Analyses: Prepared 2/04/04 by Lois A. Ventura, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Justice College of Health and Human Services University of Toledo

DISABILITY-RELATED INQUIRIES CONCERNING INDIVIDUALS INCARCERATED IN PRISON. Prepared by the Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania

HUDSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY REENTRY UNIT

Justice Reinvestment in Massachusetts

Community Transition Center: A Collaborative Approach to Offender Reentry

6,182 fewer prisoners

Arizona Department of Corrections

San Francisco Adult Probation Department. Fiscal Year Annual Report

Sheriff Koutoujian, Middlesex County

State of North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Prisons

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing

INMATE CLASSIFICATION

The Primacy of Drug Intervention in Public Safety Realignment Success. CSAC Healthcare Conference June 12, 2013

Consensus Report of the Arkansas Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections

Pamela K. Lattimore, Debbie Dawes and Stephen Tueller RTI International

Texas Department of Criminal Justice Biennial Report of the Reentry and Integration Division

Circuit Court of Cook County Performance Metrics Department Adult Probation

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

5/25/2010 REENTRY COURT PROGRAM

The Florida Legislature

Veteran Court Conference Marriott Wardman Park Hotel December 2, 2013

New Directions --- A blueprint for reforming California s prison system to protect the public, reduce costs and rehabilitate inmates

COMMUNITY PARTNERS BREAKFAST. Overview of CRJ

Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department

Reducing Recidivism in Vermont

annual REPORT Introduction July 1st, 2011

DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION:

Deputy Probation Officer I/II

Defining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program

Chapter 7 MANAGING PRISONS AND PRISONERS. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

Specialized Training: Investigating Sexual Abuse in Correctional Settings Notification of Curriculum Utilization December 2013

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PROGRAM MONTHLY STATUS REPORT

Marion County Reentry Council

The Final Report of the Evaluation of the Court Support Services Division s Probation Transition Program

Department of Public Safety Division of Juvenile Justice March 20, 2013

Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 to FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015

PRE-RELEASE TERMINATION AND POST-RELEASE RECIDIVISM RATES OF COLORADO S PROBATIONERS: FY2014 RELEASES

After years of steady decline, Rhode Island s

Justice Reinvestment in Kansas (House Bill 2170) Kansas BIDS Conference October 8 & 9, 2015

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

Prisoner Reentry and Adult Education. With our time together, we propose

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

IC Chapter 2. State Grants to Counties for Community Corrections and Charges to Participating Counties for Confined Offenders

Court-Involved Mental Health Clients - an Overview of Services

Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

Justice Reinvestment Fact Sheet Baker County

Transforming Safety 2018 Cycle 1: Final Grant Awards

PROGRESSIVE INTERVENTIVE SANCTIONS AND INCENTIVES MODEL IN EL PASO, HUDSPETH AND CULBERSON COUNTIES

[CCP STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX]

AGENDA ITEM FOR ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING ( ) Discussion only ( X ) Action FROM (DEPT/ DIVISION): County Counsel

2016 Bidders Conference for Requests for Proposals (RFPs)

Merced County. Public Safety Realignment & Post Release Community Supervision

2 nd Circuit Court- District Division- Plymouth PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK 5/11/16

St. Louis County Public Safety Innovation Fund Report

PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENTIN ORANGECOUNTY

NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN (August 2005)

Reducing Recidivism for Ex-offenders Returning to Essex County

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

Follow-Up on VFM Section 3.01, 2014 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW

Transcription:

Closing the Revolving Door: Transition from Prison to Community National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 2, 2011

Oregon Department of Corrections Mission To promote public safety by holding offenders accountable for their actions and reducing the risk of future criminal behavior. 2

Focus on Release Preparation Inmates who will be returning to the community should be considered a priority if Oregon is to have fewer victims of crime. 3

Public Safety Implications During 2010, DOC received 5,270 admissions to prison In 2010, 5,100 offenders were released back to their communities across the state from prison Average length of stay: 868 days Percent who will recidivate: 27% Percent who will return to prison: 22.5% 4

Recidivism on Post-Prison Supervision: State Benchmark Recidivism Rate 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 12 mos 24 mos 36 mos 5% 0% 1st 05 2nd 05 1st 06 2nd 06 1st 07 2nd 07 1st 08 Release Cohort Corrections Information System Recidivism = conviction of a new felony 5

State of Recidivism: The Revolving Door of America s Prisons Pew Center for the States Report, 2011 Oregon had the lowest rate of recidivism Measure=return to prison Key indicator of return on correctional investment 6

Comparing Recidivism Rates: Pew Study Oregon Total Oregon New Ci Crimes National Totals 1999 Releases 33% 23% 28% 19% 45% 43% 2004 Releases 7

Why is Oregon s Rate the Lowest? Increasing emphasis on improving transition from prison to community Increasing application of the research on reducing recidivism to corrections practices 8

Why is Oregon s Rate the Lowest? State law and policy Sentencing guidelines Administrative sanctions 1995 revisions to the Community Corrections Act 9

Sentencing Guidelines Prison beds are reserved for more serious crimes Person-to-person Repeat property Very few drug or driving crimes Most revocation sentences limited to 180 days 10

Administrative Sanctions Swift response to violations Use intermediate sanctions prior to revocation Consistency provided by sanctioning grid Reduce cost to the public 11

Administrative Sanctions Funding includes dollars for community sanctions History: statewide policy to reduce technical revocations Present: need to manage local criminal justice system resources 12

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PARTNERSHIP ACT Coordinated local criminal justice response will impact crime better than a short prison stay Community based sanctions are effective against crime 13

Community Corrections Partnership Act Transfer of Responsibility for Short Prison Sentences 12 months or less Construction projects to build local capacity Powers of the supervisory authority 14

Evidence Based Practices Evidence-based practices required by SB 267 (2003) Applies to prevention, treatment or intervention programs which are intended to reduce future criminal behavior in adults and juveniles, or to reduce the need for emergency mental health services 15

DOC and Community Corrections Approach To Reduce Victimization Prioritize limited changeoriented resources by risk to reoffend Focus on criminal risk factors in programming g and interventions Accept greater responsibility for successful community living 16

Automated Criminal Risk Scale Predicts risk to re-offend Predictive factors identified through analysis of Oregon prison releases over a five year period Over 50% of the high risk group will re-offend 17

DOC and Community Corrections Approach to Reduce Victimization Assess for and target criminal risk factors - Antisocial attitudes - Antisocial peers - Alcohol/drug addiction - Personal/emotional factors like impulsivity i it and anger control - Lack of success in work or school 18

Transition Begins At Intake Risk to re-offend assessment completed on all inmates Criminal risk factor assessment completed on all medium and high h risk inmates Medical and mental health screening Educational assessment Custody level el assessment Correctional plan developed 19

General Population Work Education 1 year or Less Re-entry Prep A&D Intake Special lneeds Housing Cognitive Parenting Medical Mental Health Religious Services Work Release Transitional Leave SUMMIT 20

Correctional Caseload Management Counselor time prioritized for higher risk inmates Intake center assesses, counselors do case plans Counselors make referrals to treatment programs based on criminal risk factors, custody level, sentence length, and motivation to change 21

Transition Preparation Work Experience Oregon Corrections Enterprises jobs Work crews Vocational education Institution jobs Processes: Job applications Performance appraisal and job references 22

Transition Preparation Education Programs GED Adult basic education English as a second language Access to college courses Cognitive programs Parenting skills 23

Releasing Institutions Salem Area - OSP - OSCI - SCI Columbia River Coffee Creek Shutter Creek Powder River Snake k River 24

Prioritizing Services for Transition High Risk

Transition and Release Services Addictions treatment programs Provide transition programming Assist with ID and applying for federal/state benefits Coordinate release planning with community corrections Create release packets for Board and PO 26

Community Supervision Assess risk to re-offend Assess criminal risk factors Create a case plan Refer for treatment Monitor conditions of supervision Respond to violations 27

Community Services and Support Transitional Housing Addiction Treatment e Mental Health Treatment Employment Assistance Sex Offender Treatment Domestic Violence Treatment 28

Models for Success Oregon Housing and Community Services: Joint contracting ti process for transitional housing with programs New transitional housing for offenders in Baker, Columbia, Douglas, Klamath, Yamhill, and Multnomah Counties Local partnerships p between community corrections, service providers, and housing providers 29

Models for Success Oregon Department of Human Services: Smart Start packets Oregon Trail Card Prequalification process for federal benefits 30

Models for Success Veteran s Re-Entry Initiative: Outreach into prisons prior to release State-specific reentry guides for incarcerated veterans 31

Transition Requires Collaboration The success of prison to community transition is complex Many ypublic and private agencies have responsibility for parts of it yet no agency has responsibility for all of it. No single agency can accomplish this goal. 32

Re-Entry Council The Governor s Re-Entry Council is envisioned as a state-level, statewide leadership group to work collaboratively on improving the success and safety of prison-to-community it transition 33

What are the Goals of the Re-Entry Council? Identify and address the barriers to successful re-entry that extend beyond the boundaries of the criminal justice system Find cost-effective ways to overcome those barriers. Establish and monitor statelevel performance goals 34

Steering Committee Conduct a thorough review of existing policies and practices that need to be corrected and making specific recommendations for system improvement for consideration by the Council 35

Steering Committee Identify strategies to improve reentry Establish implementation ti groups to work on the operational aspects of system reform, the procedures and practices that will require change in the many agencies involved in the reentry process. 36

First Priorities Housing Employment Continuity of Health and Mental Health Care Reentry Service Sites 37

Work Groups Content experts from the public and private sectors on each topic Over 100 participants, p only 25% from corrections Identify barriers and strategies to address them 38

Implementation Groups Different expertise required for implementation Reentry Wiki Discharge planning process for health/mental health care Work Source Oregon Centers inside prisons 39

40

Six Months Out of Prison: Compliance on Supervision 95% 85% 75% 65% 55% 45% 35% 25% 71% 63% 54% 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 Non-compliance = abscond, revocation, reconviction 41

Oregon s Low Return to Prison Rate Laws reserving prison space for new and more serious crimes Supervision practices: administrative sanctions and risk- based offender management and treatment Release preparation and programming 42